BuzzJack
Entertainment Discussion

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register | Help )

Latest Site News
9 Pages V   1 2 3 > »   
Post reply to this threadCreate a new thread
> Now 90
Track this thread - Email this thread - Print this thread - Download this thread - Subscribe to this forum
slowdown73
post Feb 9 2015, 12:26 PM
Post #1
Group icon
BuzzJack Platinum Member
Joined: 3 August 2006
Posts: 8,209
User: 1,031
Anybody know when this is being released? Not heard anything and Now 89 was out in November and thought they were usually every 3-4 months.
Go to the top of this page
 
+Quote this post
gooddelta
post Feb 9 2015, 12:33 PM
Post #2
Group icon
Hello?
Joined: 8 March 2006
Posts: 83,011
User: 116
The first one of the year is released around Easter so presumably the last Monday in March, give or take a week.
Go to the top of this page
 
+Quote this post
T Boy
post Feb 9 2015, 05:58 PM
Post #3
Group icon
Radical Pink Troll
Joined: 11 March 2006
Posts: 26,599
User: 177
Surely they're waiting for actual hits to happen since a couple of the current top 40 featured on Now 88 drama.gif
Go to the top of this page
 
+Quote this post
Spiral
post Feb 9 2015, 07:10 PM
Post #4
Group icon
BuzzJack Platinum Member
Joined: 28 January 2009
Posts: 7,193
User: 8,208
The artwork will be revealed on Friday! I hope it's not more smiley faced things and an actual pattern (similar to US' NOW 53 cover). Also i wonder what songs will actually appear, especially the Rihanna/Kanye/McCartney song.
Go to the top of this page
 
+Quote this post
Hadji
post Feb 9 2015, 07:29 PM
Post #5
Group icon
BuzzJack Platinum Member
Joined: 20 November 2014
Posts: 12,630
User: 21,386
QUOTE(Spiral @ Feb 9 2015, 07:10 PM) *
The artwork will be revealed on Friday! I hope it's not more smiley faced things and an actual pattern (similar to US' NOW 53 cover). Also i wonder what songs will actually appear, especially the Rihanna/Kanye/McCartney song.

I reckon it will be the same as the U.S. NOW 53 cover but with 90 instead of 53. I really hope Rihanna does make an appearance. If Ashley Abram was still compiling the albums, she would definitely be on there
Go to the top of this page
 
+Quote this post
Dobbo
post Feb 9 2015, 07:49 PM
Post #6
Group icon
BuzzJack Legend
Joined: 4 November 2013
Posts: 30,510
User: 20,053
QUOTE(T Boy @ Feb 10 2015, 05:58 AM) *
Surely they're waiting for actual hits to happen since a couple of the current top 40 featured on Now 88 drama.gif


Very true! I imagine all of this week's new entries will feature, they're probably gasping for fillers at this stage so to have a few top tens come in should see them all make the cut.
Go to the top of this page
 
+Quote this post
Hadji
post Feb 9 2015, 07:57 PM
Post #7
Group icon
BuzzJack Platinum Member
Joined: 20 November 2014
Posts: 12,630
User: 21,386
QUOTE(Dobbo @ Feb 9 2015, 07:49 PM) *
Very true! I imagine all of this week's new entries will feature, they're probably gasping for fillers at this stage so to have a few top tens come in should see them all make the cut.

This has gotta be one of the slowest charts since 2008. Which in this case, they'll have more top 20 songs than top 10 songs or maybe a few top 30
Go to the top of this page
 
+Quote this post
Spiral
post Feb 9 2015, 08:01 PM
Post #8
Group icon
BuzzJack Platinum Member
Joined: 28 January 2009
Posts: 7,193
User: 8,208
The only worrying thing though is licensing! I know we go on about Taylor Swift, but that's two songs already out, making it even harder to group together 40 hits between NOW 89 and NOW 90. Ed Sheeran, Take That, Fergie, Mark Ronson/Bruno Mars, Ellie Goulding, DJ Fresh/Ella Eyre, Charli XCX/Rita Ora and (possibly) Madonna will make it an interesting NOW though.
Go to the top of this page
 
+Quote this post
Hadji
post Feb 9 2015, 08:11 PM
Post #9
Group icon
BuzzJack Platinum Member
Joined: 20 November 2014
Posts: 12,630
User: 21,386
QUOTE(Spiral @ Feb 9 2015, 08:01 PM) *
The only worrying thing though is licensing! I know we go on about Taylor Swift, but that's two songs already out, making it even harder to group together 40 hits between NOW 89 and NOW 90. Ed Sheeran, Take That, Fergie, Mark Ronson/Bruno Mars, Ellie Goulding, DJ Fresh/Ella Eyre, Charli XCX/Rita Ora and (possibly) Madonna will make it an interesting NOW though.

I have a feeling that Taylor Swift won't be making an appearance because of licensing. Same reason Macklemore & Ryan Lewis and Eminem never make appearances
Go to the top of this page
 
+Quote this post
JosephBoone
post Feb 9 2015, 09:18 PM
Post #10
Group icon
you never forget your first time...
Pronouns: he/him
Joined: 19 April 2011
Posts: 121,537
User: 13,530
Hopefully Cheryl will appear on it with I Don't Care seeing as it got missed off the last one!
Go to the top of this page
 
+Quote this post
gavindeejay
post Feb 10 2015, 10:34 AM
Post #11
Group icon
Why do today, what you can do tomorrow?
Joined: 7 November 2008
Posts: 10,466
User: 7,645
There'll be plenty of tracks to include on there. It's still not out for about 6 weeks yet...plus they've got a few tracks from last year to catch up on. wink.gif
Go to the top of this page
 
+Quote this post
slowdown73
post Feb 10 2015, 01:10 PM
Post #12
Group icon
BuzzJack Platinum Member
Joined: 3 August 2006
Posts: 8,209
User: 1,031
I hope Cheryl's last single is included.
Go to the top of this page
 
+Quote this post
Hadji
post Feb 10 2015, 03:45 PM
Post #13
Group icon
BuzzJack Platinum Member
Joined: 20 November 2014
Posts: 12,630
User: 21,386
QUOTE(slowdown73 @ Feb 10 2015, 01:10 PM) *
I hope Cheryl's last single is included.

And Ed Sheeran's as "Thinking Out Loud" should have been on NOW 89 instead of "Don't"
Go to the top of this page
 
+Quote this post
Mangų
post Feb 10 2015, 03:49 PM
Post #14
Group icon
BuzzJack Platinum Member
Joined: 10 March 2006
Posts: 19,145
User: 151
QUOTE(Hadji @ Feb 10 2015, 03:45 PM) *
And Ed Sheeran's as "Thinking Out Loud" should have been on NOW 89 instead of "Don't"

By what logic?? wacko.gif 'Don't' was the single at the time Now 89 was out so it made perfect sense for it to be included, and 'Thinking Out Loud' will undoubtedly be on Now 90.
Go to the top of this page
 
+Quote this post
Hadji
post Feb 10 2015, 04:29 PM
Post #15
Group icon
BuzzJack Platinum Member
Joined: 20 November 2014
Posts: 12,630
User: 21,386
QUOTE(Mango @ Feb 10 2015, 03:49 PM) *
By what logic?? wacko.gif 'Don't' was the single at the time Now 89 was out so it made perfect sense for it to be included, and 'Thinking Out Loud' will undoubtedly be on Now 90.

Because they usually put the #1 single on there. I did think it was a bit odd to include his previous #8 single instead of his recent #1 single. Instead, they should have put both his songs


This post has been edited by Hadji: Feb 10 2015, 04:30 PM
Go to the top of this page
 
+Quote this post
gavindeejay
post Feb 10 2015, 04:54 PM
Post #16
Group icon
Why do today, what you can do tomorrow?
Joined: 7 November 2008
Posts: 10,466
User: 7,645
QUOTE(Hadji @ Feb 10 2015, 04:29 PM) *
Because they usually put the #1 single on there. I did think it was a bit odd to include his previous #8 single instead of his recent #1 single. Instead, they should have put both his songs


Good job they didn't as Now 90 would be Sheeran-less. tongue.gif
Go to the top of this page
 
+Quote this post
Hadji
post Feb 10 2015, 05:10 PM
Post #17
Group icon
BuzzJack Platinum Member
Joined: 20 November 2014
Posts: 12,630
User: 21,386
QUOTE(gavindeejay @ Feb 10 2015, 04:54 PM) *
Good job they didn't as Now 90 would be Sheeran-less. tongue.gif

If they did include both Sheeran songs on NOW 89 and "Bloodstream" became a hit just before NOW 90 is announced, then NOW 90 wouldn't have been Sheeran-less
Go to the top of this page
 
+Quote this post
Spiral
post Feb 10 2015, 06:57 PM
Post #18
Group icon
BuzzJack Platinum Member
Joined: 28 January 2009
Posts: 7,193
User: 8,208
QUOTE(Hadji @ Feb 10 2015, 05:10 PM) *
If they did include both Sheeran songs on NOW 89 and "Bloodstream" became a hit just before NOW 90 is announced, then NOW 90 wouldn't have been Sheeran-less

NOW do like to have continuity though the NOWs, so perhaps they wanted all of the "X" singles on them and Warner only let them have one during the release of NOW 89.
Go to the top of this page
 
+Quote this post
Hadji
post Feb 10 2015, 07:03 PM
Post #19
Group icon
BuzzJack Platinum Member
Joined: 20 November 2014
Posts: 12,630
User: 21,386
QUOTE(Spiral @ Feb 10 2015, 06:57 PM) *
Warner only let them have one during the release of NOW 89.

Warner did this with NOW 87. They only allowed one of their songs ("Riptide") to appear on the album


This post has been edited by Hadji: Feb 10 2015, 07:05 PM
Go to the top of this page
 
+Quote this post
Spiral
post Feb 10 2015, 08:20 PM
Post #20
Group icon
BuzzJack Platinum Member
Joined: 28 January 2009
Posts: 7,193
User: 8,208
QUOTE(Hadji @ Feb 10 2015, 07:03 PM) *
Warner did this with NOW 87. They only allowed one of their songs ("Riptide") to appear on the album

I meant one song from Ed, not the label. NOW 89 had a few Warner inclusions. happy.gif
Go to the top of this page
 
+Quote this post


9 Pages V   1 2 3 > » 
Post reply to this threadCreate a new thread

1 users are reading this thread (1 guests and 0 anonymous users)
0 members:


 

Time is now: 18th April 2024 - 08:04 PM