BuzzJack
Entertainment Discussion

Welcome, guest! Log in or register. (click here for help)

Latest Site News
12 Pages V  « < 3 4 5 6 7 > »   
Post reply to this threadCreate a new thread
> Who will win the U.S Presidential election?
Track this thread | Email this thread | Print this thread | Download this thread | Subscribe to this forum
Who will win the U.S Presidential election?
You cannot see the results of the poll until you have voted. Please login and cast your vote to see the results of this poll.
Total votes: 87
Guests cannot vote 
Soy Adrián
post 2nd November 2016, 04:21 PM
Post #81
Group icon
I'm so lonely, I paid a hobo to spoon with me
Joined: 6 February 2010
Posts: 12,908
User: 10,596

Just posted this in the News & Politics forum, but this is a great article if you think that the two candidates are even comparable:

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/th...s-a7384421.html
Go to the top of this page
 
+Quote this post
Brightest Blue
post 2nd November 2016, 04:33 PM
Post #82
Group icon
BuzzJack Legend
Joined: 10 April 2016
Posts: 27,025
User: 23,155

I really hope it is Clinton, but I think it will be Trump.
Go to the top of this page
 
+Quote this post
Qassändra
post 2nd November 2016, 04:46 PM
Post #83
Group icon
DROTTNING!
Joined: 15 April 2006
Posts: 63,953
User: 480

QUOTE(Doctor Blind @ Nov 2 2016, 02:35 PM) *
I expect Hilary Clinton to win (but then I also expected remain to win - I know, not really comparable.. but still)

Bush-Clinton-Bush-Obama-Clinton- Jeb in 2020??

Jeb's totally finished. He didn't want to run either way and any hype he ever had is completely cratered.
Go to the top of this page
 
+Quote this post
Iz 🌟
post 2nd November 2016, 04:52 PM
Post #84
Group icon
I'm a paragon so don't perceive me
Joined: 3 February 2011
Posts: 37,426
User: 12,929

QUOTE(Qassändra @ Nov 2 2016, 01:29 PM) *
Aaaaand this is how rich right-wingers turn poor people against their own interests and the 'snobbish metropolitan liberal elite'.

(granted, guilty on occasion)


Agreed. I really dislike it when I know people have voted without understanding the implications of what they've voted for, but all we can do is encourage them to understand the importance of politics and get them to learn more about the issue for the future so they do vote from a fully informed position, whatever that may be.

I understand the sentiment, when people say things like 'the unintelligent shouldn't vote', it's a reaction to what's perceived to be society doing its utmost to go in the opposite direction to what is believed to be good for the society in the future (and it is often when some right-wing populist, like now, somehow enraptures large swathes of those decidedly not part of the liberal elite, and probably desperate for a change, any change, with plans to take 'backwards' steps that won't benefit the people who are voting for him except perhaps in the very short-term).
Go to the top of this page
 
+Quote this post
JackTheeStallion
post 2nd November 2016, 06:25 PM
Post #85
Group icon
BuzzJack Legend
Joined: 15 March 2006
Posts: 48,139
User: 223

QUOTE(Andrew. @ Nov 2 2016, 04:10 PM) *
So you think we should stop people from voting if it gets your (and mine) favoured result?

No, and maybe uneducated was the wrong word to use as there are a lot of people who don't go through education who are very intelligent. It's just me being angry and I get people's argument that everyone has the right to vote.

It's just to me, I really can't understand how all of a sudden it feels like we're going back in time almost to a place where racism is being more accepted ...it's just upsetting.
Go to the top of this page
 
+Quote this post
Silas
post 2nd November 2016, 06:37 PM
Post #86
Group icon
Queen of Soon
Joined: 24 May 2007
Posts: 74,126
User: 3,474

The main problem here is that the media have been able to get away with peddling outright lies and half truths for decades without penalty. I am supportive of a free press but the press should report the truth and their xenophobic and outright racist lies should come with consequences. Otherwise what the f*** is the point in legislation against hate speech.
Go to the top of this page
 
+Quote this post
Jacob-
post 2nd November 2016, 09:22 PM
Post #87
Group icon
Jacob Alan~
Joined: 12 March 2015
Posts: 4,983
User: 21,664

There is no point in legislating against hate speech, I'd rather know who the racists are and on the whole society shuns them. It just reveals their true character and shows what twats they are rather than have them harbouring and hiding racist views leading to more extreme movements. I'd say this is why the EDL and BNP have faded into obscurity, they had the opportunity to make themselves laughing stocks. That said, newspapers should be fined or something for spreading misinformation absolutely.

As for the candidates neither of them particularly appeal to me but hopefully Hillary will win if only by virtue of not being Trump.
Go to the top of this page
 
+Quote this post
Flatcap
post 2nd November 2016, 09:52 PM
Post #88
Group icon
Nah.
Joined: 7 March 2006
Posts: 15,569
User: 27

Hillary Clinton. The idea of Trump winning is appalling to me.
Go to the top of this page
 
+Quote this post
Harve
post 3rd November 2016, 10:06 AM
Post #89
Group icon
Cœur poids plume
Joined: 3 November 2007
Posts: 18,132
User: 4,718

QUOTE(Jacob Alan @ Nov 2 2016, 09:22 PM) *
There is no point in legislating against hate speech, I'd rather know who the racists are and on the whole society shuns them. It just reveals their true character and shows what twats they are rather than have them harbouring and hiding racist views leading to more extreme movements. I'd say this is why the EDL and BNP have faded into obscurity, they had the opportunity to make themselves laughing stocks. That said, newspapers should be fined or something for spreading misinformation absolutely.

As for the candidates neither of them particularly appeal to me but hopefully Hillary will win if only by virtue of not being Trump.

EDL and BNP faded into obscurity because more mainstream-friendly movements like UKIP supplanted them lol. You see the same thing now with the Tories adopting UKIP's manifesto, eating up their voterbase and making proposals that would be unthinkable from a major party a decade ago. It's given UKIP a bit of an identity crisis.


This post has been edited by Harve: 3rd November 2016, 10:07 AM
Go to the top of this page
 
+Quote this post
Jacob-
post 5th November 2016, 02:24 PM
Post #90
Group icon
Jacob Alan~
Joined: 12 March 2015
Posts: 4,983
User: 21,664

That is sadly true to a degree but as loathsome as UKIP is to me there's no way they could reasonably be construed in a way that is as extreme as the BNP and EDL, likewise with the Tories (even now) in comparison to UKIP. UKIP is falling apart now mostly because they achieved their singular goal and they have no idea what to do with themselves. The Tories have always been awful and fickle and now they're just appealing to their voters, they sway with popular opinion among the right wing voter base. It's not an ideal situation in any way it's just better than the alternative. Imagine how much worse it'd have been if it was the BNP that got 3.8M votes last election.

This post has been edited by Jacob Alan: 5th November 2016, 02:25 PM
Go to the top of this page
 
+Quote this post
LexC
post 5th November 2016, 05:22 PM
Post #91
Group icon
Attack Dog/Sass Queen
Joined: 29 January 2008
Posts: 16,022
User: 5,342

This is as good a thread as any to put it in but a YouTuber who I'm very much a fan of did this video essay on the history of Hilary Clinton in the media. Certainly puts all the associations people have of her into context of the best part of the last 25 years.

Go to the top of this page
 
+Quote this post
Brer
post 6th November 2016, 03:04 AM
Post #92
Group icon
is my brain across your walls?
Joined: 14 February 2009
Posts: 115,112
User: 8,300

Have just rediscovered this site which tests how much you agree with each of the candidates running and decided to take it again lol. I get 97% for Jill Stein (the whole anti-vax thing (as well as her not actually having any chance of winning) is a shame really because she'd be pretty good otherwise), 93% for Hillary, 42% for Gary Johnson and a whopping 13% for Trump. That's slightly higher for Hillary and slightly lower for Trump than I remember from the last time I did this ~

(also allows you to show the dropped out candidates - 95% for Bernie Sanders (R.I.P.), and despite how low that number for Trump is, he's still somehow more agreeable than all of the other Republicans bar Rand Paul who I get 20% for, with John Kasich being the only other one even above 10% :') and it also shows the 2012 candidates, giving me 91% for Obama (surprisingly low) and just 3% for Mitt Romney laugh.gif)
Go to the top of this page
 
+Quote this post
Qassändra
post 6th November 2016, 08:33 AM
Post #93
Group icon
DROTTNING!
Joined: 15 April 2006
Posts: 63,953
User: 480

heard a rumour bré prefers donald trump to mitt romney kink.gif
Go to the top of this page
 
+Quote this post
T83:Y96
post 6th November 2016, 09:23 AM
Post #94
Group icon
My mother said, to get things done, you better not mess with Maj
Joined: 28 October 2014
Posts: 5,765
User: 21,319

My results:

96% Jill Stein
93% Hilary Clinton
42% Gary Johnson
7% Donald Trump
Go to the top of this page
 
+Quote this post
Long Dong Silver
post 6th November 2016, 10:18 AM
Post #95
Group icon
Buffy/Charmed
Joined: 18 April 2013
Posts: 44,128
User: 18,639

Simpatizo con Hillary Clinton an la mayoría de los asuntos de las Elecciones Presidenciales del año 2016.

Los candidatos que apoyas...
Hillary Clinton
88% DEMOCRAT
Hillary Clinton

Jill Stein
87% GREEN

Gary Johnson
68% LIBERTARIAN

Donald Trump
18% REPUBLICAN

And 89% Bernie and 92% for Obama

7% Romney tongue.gif


This post has been edited by ¡Michael Myers!: 6th November 2016, 10:18 AM
Go to the top of this page
 
+Quote this post
danG
post 6th November 2016, 11:45 AM
Post #96
Group icon
🔥🚀🔥
Joined: 30 August 2010
Posts: 74,610
User: 11,746

92% Hillary Clinton (Democrat)
83% Jill Stein (Green)
41% Gary Johnson (Libertarian)
15% Donald Trump (Republican)

95% Barack Obama (Democrat 2012)
21% Mitt Romney (Republican 2012)

79% Bernie Sanders
Go to the top of this page
 
+Quote this post
Silas
post 6th November 2016, 11:46 AM
Post #97
Group icon
Queen of Soon
Joined: 24 May 2007
Posts: 74,126
User: 3,474

98% Jill Stein
97% Hilary Clinton
35% Gary Johnson
23% Donald Trump

95% Obama
12% Ron Paul
6% Romney

97% Sanders
62% O'Malley
22% Bush
12% Rand Paul
6% Huckabee
6% Cruz
5% Christie
5% Rubio
4% Carson
3% Fiorina
3% Graham
1% Santorum


In conclusion, I am so not a republican.
Go to the top of this page
 
+Quote this post
danG
post 6th November 2016, 11:47 AM
Post #98
Group icon
🔥🚀🔥
Joined: 30 August 2010
Posts: 74,610
User: 11,746

what's surprising is that there were so many Republican candidates that are apparently even worse than Trump. Some scored as low as 5% for me.
Go to the top of this page
 
+Quote this post
Klaus
post 6th November 2016, 11:58 AM
Post #99
Group icon
❤️❤️➕🟦
Joined: 3 June 2012
Posts: 22,246
User: 17,160

95% Hilary Clinton
93% Jill Stein
36% Gary Johnson
25% Donald Trump (oops)

98% Obama wub.gif
21% Ron Paul
6% Romney

89% Sanders
74% O'Malley
22% Bush
11% Cruz
Go to the top of this page
 
+Quote this post
lotita
post 6th November 2016, 12:22 PM
Post #100
Group icon
feminist icon
Pronouns: she/her
Joined: 21 April 2015
Posts: 25,354
User: 21,777

97% Hillary
95% Jill Stein
94% Bernie Sanders
40% Rand Paul
36% Gary Johnson
8% Trump
8% Ted Cruz

the shift between left and right between the US/UK is still baffling laugh.gif at least this proves identifying as centre right in the UK does not make me a Trump supporter mellow.gif (as has been legitimately asked before)
Go to the top of this page
 
+Quote this post


12 Pages V  « < 3 4 5 6 7 > » 
Post reply to this threadCreate a new thread

1 user(s) reading this thread
+ 1 guest(s) and 0 anonymous user(s)


 

Time is now: 29th April 2024, 09:56 AM