BuzzJack
Entertainment Discussion

Welcome, guest! Log in or register. (click here for help)

Latest Site News
57 Pages V  « < 19 20 21 22 23 > »   
This thread is locked.Create a new thread
> EU Referendum Discussion, Thursday 23rd June
Track this thread - Email this thread - Print this thread - Download this thread - Subscribe to this forum
Rooney
post 18th July 2017, 08:22 PM
Post #401
Group icon
WINTER IS COMING
Joined: 7 March 2006
Posts: 45,604
User: 88

QUOTE(PeaceMob @ Jul 18 2017, 08:14 PM) *
Leaving the single market is considered "Hard Brexit", and yet Remainers will repeatedly say the British people didn't know what they were voting for, but what's this, the former Prime Minister and former Chancellor informing the British people before the referendum that to vote leave is to vote to leave the single market. I guess the British public really did know what they were voting for ohmy.gif biggrin.gif



I don't really see how that is a valid argument. While I have accepted the fact we are leaving, I imagine if you did a survey of every single person who voted Leave, a large majority would not even know what the single market is.

Can't wait until everyone starts kicking off that they can't walk through to Benidorm anymore. That's when the real fun will begin.
Go to the top of this page
 
+Quote this post
Long Dong Silver
post 18th July 2017, 08:25 PM
Post #402
Group icon
Buffy/Charmed
Joined: 18 April 2013
Posts: 44,119
User: 18,639

52 v 48.

I don't think that tiny percentage on one day is enough to pull us all out based on all this uncertainty, along with the fact that 2/4s of the nations AND Gibraltar all voted to stay in. Ia this a UNION or what England says, goes?
Go to the top of this page
 
+Quote this post
J00prstar
post 19th July 2017, 11:23 AM
Post #403
Group icon
there's nothing straight about plump Elvis
Pronouns: they/any
Joined: 21 January 2016
Posts: 13,146
User: 22,895

Quite honestly it makes a mockery of 'The United Kingdom'. The vote was called by an English person and spearheaded by two of the most English English people in existence (BoJo and Farage). Now the whole country is being led by another incredibly English English person (Mrs May).

Where is my United Kingdom? That's how it feels nowadays. Like the rest of us will just be shafted and screw us for thinking we had a right to an opinion, a vote, or any influence in the first place.
Go to the top of this page
 
+Quote this post
Popchartfreak
post 19th July 2017, 01:40 PM
Post #404
Group icon
BuzzJack Legend
Joined: 18 July 2012
Posts: 22,856
User: 17,376

QUOTE(PeaceMob @ Jul 18 2017, 08:14 PM) *
Leaving the single market is considered "Hard Brexit", and yet Remainers will repeatedly say the British people didn't know what they were voting for, but what's this, the former Prime Minister and former Chancellor informing the British people before the referendum that to vote leave is to vote to leave the single market. I guess the British public really did know what they were voting for ohmy.gif biggrin.gif



you can't have it both ways, make up your mind - either the Remainers were telling the truth (clue: they were) about leaving the single market and it wasn't Project fear after all, or else they were lying about it and The Brexiteers were right that it's as easy as piss to stay in the single market and have all of our cake and eat it too. I know plenty of people who believed all the Brexiteer lies, so you can't make assumptions that evryone who voted Leave was in on the mass-delusion just nodding knowing winks at each other....

Otherwise, if nobody cared about Brexit lies, why did they make them? Why not just agree with The Remainers and say people don't care about that, a price worth paying (you know, the sort of arguments that frothing Brexiteers make NOW after the event, but not before)...?

Why not? Because they would have lost the referendum that's why. Pure logic.

Go to the top of this page
 
+Quote this post
vidcapper
post 19th July 2017, 03:35 PM
Post #405
Group icon
Paul Hyett
Joined: 4 April 2006
Posts: 25,346
User: 364

QUOTE(popchartfreak @ Jul 18 2017, 01:00 PM) *
The British Empire offered much: slavery, war, wiping out of indigenous populations, spread of intolerance, decimation of wildlife, homophobia, women knowing their place, ah those were the good ol' days if you were rich. saying "well we weren't the only ones doing it" doesnt make it right: "well everyone else was kicking the baby in the head so that's not my fault" won't wash in court....

These, as I say often, are facts.


My point is - there's no reason to think we made the colonies *worse* off than before we took them over, and how many have proved to be virtually ungovernable since the gained their independence?


QUOTE(Suedehead2 @ Jul 18 2017, 09:16 PM) *
The reason the pound has merely fallen sharply rather than falling off a cliff is that the Bank of England spent billions on making sure that didn't happen.


Which they would have done had the pound fallen for *any* reason - that's their job.


QUOTE(MoistSummerFruit @ Jul 18 2017, 09:25 PM) *
52 v 48.

I don't think that tiny percentage on one day is enough to pull us all out based on all this uncertainty, along with the fact that 2/4s of the nations AND Gibraltar all voted to stay in. Ia this a UNION or what England says, goes?


The 2 out of 4 idea doesn't work unless you have an electoral college - and that's far from ideal too, just look at the US Presidential election...
Go to the top of this page
 
+Quote this post
Suedehead2
post 19th July 2017, 06:24 PM
Post #406
Group icon
BuzzJack Legend
Joined: 13 April 2007
Posts: 36,679
User: 3,272

QUOTE(vidcapper @ Jul 19 2017, 04:35 PM) *
Which they would have done had the pound fallen for *any* reason - that's their job.

It is also the job of government to minimise the chances of such action being necessary.
Go to the top of this page
 
+Quote this post
Popchartfreak
post 19th July 2017, 07:15 PM
Post #407
Group icon
BuzzJack Legend
Joined: 18 July 2012
Posts: 22,856
User: 17,376

QUOTE(vidcapper @ Jul 19 2017, 04:35 PM) *
My point is - there's no reason to think we made the colonies *worse* off than before we took them over, and how many have proved to be virtually ungovernable since the gained their independence?


My point is...ask the Native Americans and aboriginal Australians and New Zealand Maoris if they feel happy about genocide and second citizen status. Ask those Africans cast into slavery if they feel happier about it - or their descendants. The British have a habit of sticking their nose into a situation and making it worse (hello Iraq) and the after-effects get felt for generations. If the British hadnt come over all high and mighty and pompous and treated the actual populations of the world as equals rather than lackies they can rob blind, then they might be held in higher regard than they are today - and that is much higher than they deserve, rather surprisingly (mostly, it must be said, in countries colonised successfully by the British).

So, bit hypocritical to moan about immigrants when the British Empire was the ultimate batch of immigrants - except we didn't adapt to the local culture, we took it over.

Saying genocide is fine because British descendants are happy with history and democracy (which did turn out to be beneficial in many ways in the long run, or none of us would be here to comment on it) is to make excuses. Saying some countries are worse off than they were under British rule (prove that with facts) does not make it a good thing that they were minions or slaves. That just shows how bad politicians are who crave power, not that British power-mad politicians were/are any better...
Go to the top of this page
 
+Quote this post
Long Dong Silver
post 19th July 2017, 08:34 PM
Post #408
Group icon
Buffy/Charmed
Joined: 18 April 2013
Posts: 44,119
User: 18,639

No there are NOT people here arguing FOR British colonial rule!!
I have only ever seen that one time from posh twats from public schools. Disgrace.
Go to the top of this page
 
+Quote this post
Long Dong Silver
post 19th July 2017, 08:38 PM
Post #409
Group icon
Buffy/Charmed
Joined: 18 April 2013
Posts: 44,119
User: 18,639

QUOTE(vidcapper @ Jul 19 2017, 03:35 PM) *
My point is - there's no reason to think we made the colonies *worse* off than before we took them over, and how many have proved to be virtually ungovernable since the gained their independence?
Which they would have done had the pound fallen for *any* reason - that's their job.
The 2 out of 4 idea doesn't work unless you have an electoral college - and that's far from ideal too, just look at the US Presidential election...


It HAS to work, or there is no point in being a Union, 360Jupiter is right.

Otherwise, England, with the FAR greater population, chooses everything and the other nations get dragged along against their will. This is no union. It is colonialism.
Go to the top of this page
 
+Quote this post
Envoirment
post 21st July 2017, 05:30 PM
Post #410
Group icon
BuzzJack Platinum Member
Joined: 21 November 2009
Posts: 8,562
User: 10,030

Some good news is that a transitional deal looks more and more likely. Should mean disruption from leaving the EU will be less and give time for businesses/public services/border control etc to adjust and implement whatever post-brexit deal/infrastructure is done and needed.
Go to the top of this page
 
+Quote this post
Popchartfreak
post 21st July 2017, 08:54 PM
Post #411
Group icon
BuzzJack Legend
Joined: 18 July 2012
Posts: 22,856
User: 17,376

QUOTE(Envoirment @ Jul 21 2017, 06:30 PM) *
Some good news is that a transitional deal looks more and more likely. Should mean disruption from leaving the EU will be less and give time for businesses/public services/border control etc to adjust and implement whatever post-brexit deal/infrastructure is done and needed.


Yes, at last reality bites and another Brexit lie is confirmed. Ruining the country's businesses was never going to be a good way to get yourself elected ever again - especially not when they pay for your own political party...
Go to the top of this page
 
+Quote this post
Envoirment
post 21st July 2017, 09:14 PM
Post #412
Group icon
BuzzJack Platinum Member
Joined: 21 November 2009
Posts: 8,562
User: 10,030

QUOTE(popchartfreak @ Jul 21 2017, 09:54 PM) *
Yes, at last reality bites and another Brexit lie is confirmed. Ruining the country's businesses was never going to be a good way to get yourself elected ever again - especially not when they pay for your own political party...


We're seeing both the UK & EU's posturing coming to an end as things get serious and a pragmatic approach is needed. Still a long way to go in terms of talks, but things don't look as grim as they did not too long ago.
Go to the top of this page
 
+Quote this post
Popchartfreak
post 22nd July 2017, 08:18 AM
Post #413
Group icon
BuzzJack Legend
Joined: 18 July 2012
Posts: 22,856
User: 17,376

QUOTE(Envoirment @ Jul 21 2017, 10:14 PM) *
We're seeing both the UK & EU's posturing coming to an end as things get serious and a pragmatic approach is needed. Still a long way to go in terms of talks, but things don't look as grim as they did not too long ago.


The EU has never postured, they have a unified position amongst 27 nations (which is pretty much impressive, given recent historical problems like Greece) and have always stated openly what the rules are. The Brexit mob are the ones who have been living in fantasy land, and any agreement is down to them accepting reality not the EU changing it's rules or modifying - any trade agreement is welcome as long as rules are stuck to, eg Norway, switzerland, and recently Japan.

Any trade deals we get will never be as generous as those from within the EU, except with those countries with dodgy politics like Saudi Arabia. That is our new future, dealing with undemocratic countries and helping them along as long we turn a blind eye to human rights outrages. Still, at least we wont be getting involved in any more wars, can't afford to piss off customers for our weapons of death - the UK will be even more like a seedy backstreet mobster selling weapons to anyone for whatever reason...
Go to the top of this page
 
+Quote this post
Silas
post 22nd July 2017, 08:52 AM
Post #414
Group icon
Queen of Soon
Joined: 24 May 2007
Posts: 74,093
User: 3,474

The EU has remained steadfast in its position. This is just Tory doners finally kicked their bought and paid for MPs hard enough for them to start understanding that a hard Brexit will be catastrophic for businesses and thus catastrophic for the Tories 2022 election fund.

They're probably also starting to realise that a transition period allows them to enter the next election with everything basically status quo in terms of trading and financial services which gives them a better chance at another term of government
Go to the top of this page
 
+Quote this post
Envoirment
post 22nd July 2017, 04:06 PM
Post #415
Group icon
BuzzJack Platinum Member
Joined: 21 November 2009
Posts: 8,562
User: 10,030

To say the EU haven't been posturing is a bit of a blinded view. Of course they haven't been doing it to the extent of the UK (well the Tory party) and have generally stuck to their guns. However things such as the "divorce" bill being stated at ludicrously high amounts without a cost-checked list being published and the way in which they have come across as wanting to "punish the UK for leaving" are examples of that.

Of course I understand the EU doesn't want to make leaving look good, but they've come to realise that a pragmatic approach is needed (as have our politicians, finally). Not to say we'll "have our cake and eat it", but the tone from both sides has been less harsh now that talks have began. I'm hopeful that common sense will rule and the UK will have a transitional deal which'll prevent the cliff edge and allow both sides time to adjust.

In terms of a transitional deal giving them a better chance at being elected for the next government - I'm not entirely sure it will. In fact it could backfire on them as a lot of people who voted leave may not have liked the Tory approach and how long it's taken to leave the EU - in spite of it being an obvious way to leave without the cliff edge. The next few years will certainly be interesting to say the least.
Go to the top of this page
 
+Quote this post
Suedehead2
post 22nd July 2017, 04:08 PM
Post #416
Group icon
BuzzJack Legend
Joined: 13 April 2007
Posts: 36,679
User: 3,272

QUOTE(Envoirment @ Jul 22 2017, 05:06 PM) *
To say the EU haven't been posturing is a bit of a blinded view. Of course they haven't been doing it to the extent of the UK (well the Tory party) and have generally stuck to their guns. However things such as the "divorce" bill being stated at ludicrously high amounts without a cost-checked list being published and the way in which they have come across as wanting to "punish the UK for leaving" are examples of that.

Of course I understand the EU doesn't want to make leaving look good, but they've come to realise that a pragmatic approach is needed (as have our politicians, finally). Not to say we'll "have our cake and eat it", but the tone from both sides has been less harsh now that talks have began. I'm hopeful that common sense will rule and the UK will have a transitional deal which'll prevent the cliff edge and allow both sides time to adjust.

In terms of a transitional deal giving them a better chance at being elected for the next government - I'm not entirely sure it will. In fact it could backfire on them as a lot of people who voted leave may not have liked the Tory approach and how long it's taken to leave the EU - in spite of it being an obvious way to leave without the cliff edge. The next few years will certainly be interesting to say the least.

They've only come across as "wanting to punish the UK" in the eyes of the Tory press. All they are doing is looking after the interests of the member states which is, after all, what the EU is for.
Go to the top of this page
 
+Quote this post
Popchartfreak
post 22nd July 2017, 06:08 PM
Post #417
Group icon
BuzzJack Legend
Joined: 18 July 2012
Posts: 22,856
User: 17,376

QUOTE(Suedehead2 @ Jul 22 2017, 05:08 PM) *
They've only come across as "wanting to punish the UK" in the eyes of the Tory press. All they are doing is looking after the interests of the member states which is, after all, what the EU is for.

Yes and my understanding of the figures quoted for the divorce bill would that it would based on figures actually on paper for existing and future commitments and was always going to need to be written in black and white. The figure of 100 million was speculation from a couple of countries pounced on with glee by the mail Sun express telegraph as if it were factual proof of a determination to punish us.
Go to the top of this page
 
+Quote this post
vidcapper
post 23rd July 2017, 06:00 AM
Post #418
Group icon
Paul Hyett
Joined: 4 April 2006
Posts: 25,346
User: 364

The EU's problem is that it's never been very good at documenting its own finances, so they'll find it hard to back up any figure they demand in the 'divorce' settlement.
Go to the top of this page
 
+Quote this post
Silas
post 23rd July 2017, 08:41 AM
Post #419
Group icon
Queen of Soon
Joined: 24 May 2007
Posts: 74,093
User: 3,474

That's so much of a lie it's hard to know where to begin. I used to work for a University in Research Finance, the EU grants were audited regularly (unlike research funding from the UK Gov which was never audited) and they were very well controlled by the EU. We had a dedicated team for EU grants as they had a lot of administrative requirements but that meant money was carefully accounted for and always went to the purpose it was granted for. Even switching €100 from your travel budget to buy some more consumables would require justification and pre-approval from the contact at the EU.

It's not just University funds they track closely. The EU has fined member states for misappropriation of EU funds or for poor record keeping.

The EU is more clued up on its financial affairs than the U.K. Government is about its own budget.

You can brainlessly parrot lies from the anti-EU media all you want, but unlike you I've worked with EU funding and experienced first hand how they account for and manage finances.
Go to the top of this page
 
+Quote this post
Popchartfreak
post 23rd July 2017, 06:54 PM
Post #420
Group icon
BuzzJack Legend
Joined: 18 July 2012
Posts: 22,856
User: 17,376

..and happily Nigel Farage has to pay back 80k to the EU for misappropriating it for the Referendum. UK gov investigations into mis-use of funds for elections and referendums always seems to fizzle out....
Go to the top of this page
 
+Quote this post


57 Pages V  « < 19 20 21 22 23 > » 
This thread is locked.Create a new thread

1 user(s) reading this thread
+ 1 guest(s) and 0 anonymous user(s)


 

Time is now: 28th April 2024, 04:28 AM