BuzzJack
Entertainment Discussion

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register | Help )

Latest Site News
62 Pages V  « < 13 14 15 16 17 > »   
Post reply to this threadCreate a new thread
> Sugababes ● General Discussion
Track this thread - Email this thread - Print this thread - Download this thread - Subscribe to this forum
DoggySwami
post Mar 25 2012, 06:53 PM
Post #281
Group icon
BuzzJack Enthusiast
Joined: 11 April 2010
Posts: 1,144
User: 10,950
QUOTE(tommie @ Mar 25 2012, 07:21 PM) *
A bidding war? 4.0 could never...

I'm surprised that they haven't signed with a label yet though


Well, they seem to have a quite definitive release schedule (first single in May, album in September according to Siobhan) so I would say they must be either in the very final stages of the negotiation or it doesn't really affect to the campaign. Sounds like they've got full control over the production of the album and won't use any of the resources the label could get them in terms of producers.
Go to the top of this page
 
+Quote this post
Silas
post Mar 25 2012, 08:59 PM
Post #282
Group icon
Queen of Soon
Joined: 24 May 2007
Posts: 74,053
User: 3,474
Bidding war does back up what we've heard before that they were recording the album then shopping it as a finished product to labels. Giving the girls mass control over it which is more along the lines of what Siobhan had for Ghosts, what Mutya would have probably desired after being burned by Crown/Island throughout the Real Girl era and what Keisha would have liked after having no control during Sweet7 (and we all know that K is someone who likes control.)


They better go to a good label. Complete with solo deals.
Go to the top of this page
 
+Quote this post
DoggySwami
post Mar 26 2012, 12:21 PM
Post #283
Group icon
BuzzJack Enthusiast
Joined: 11 April 2010
Posts: 1,144
User: 10,950
QUOTE
They better go to a good label. Complete with solo deals.


My guess is that the label willing to make additional solo deals is the one that already owns some back catalogue of them. So they would take the risk with those deals, but they would also benefit from the new sales of One Touch and Revolution In Me (Warner) or Sugababes 2.0/3.0, Ghosts and Real Girl (Island/Universal).
Go to the top of this page
 
+Quote this post
Vee
post Mar 26 2012, 01:06 PM
Post #284
Group icon
New Entry
Joined: 19 March 2012
Posts: 22
User: 16,563
I don't mean to sound bitchy but it's so ironic that there's a bidding war over v 1.0. I'm glad Heidi and Amelle can't get a record deal as a band. I really really hope now Heidi realizes the mistake she made by choosing the trouble-maker and being naive enough to think people would still support them. They got what they deserved (except Jade, I feel bad for her cause she seems so nice) but Heidi and Amelle totally deserve to be in the position they are now.

Back on topic - I really hope they consider One Touch as a possibility.
Go to the top of this page
 
+Quote this post
Slick
post Mar 26 2012, 01:36 PM
Post #285
Group icon
electric butterflies
Pronouns: he/him
Joined: 7 March 2006
Posts: 49,112
User: 70
I think 'One Touch' would be a superb name!
Go to the top of this page
 
+Quote this post
Silas
post Mar 26 2012, 05:13 PM
Post #286
Group icon
Queen of Soon
Joined: 24 May 2007
Posts: 74,053
User: 3,474
It would be brilliant. Something 1.0 related is a must though as they'll benefit HUGELY from the strength of the 1.0/2.0 material.
Go to the top of this page
 
+Quote this post
BOOBA GRANDE
post Mar 26 2012, 05:22 PM
Post #287
Group icon
You don't have to be fabulous to be good
Joined: 10 March 2008
Posts: 9,914
User: 5,591
To be fair, the only name I properly accept for 1.0 is Sugababes. And I _still_ hope for some miracle...
Go to the top of this page
 
+Quote this post
Atonement
post Mar 26 2012, 05:49 PM
Post #288
Group icon
I just had to see your face to feel alive
Joined: 22 February 2010
Posts: 6,910
User: 10,676
Me too. I don't like One Touch as a name even though it's a reference to their album. I really don't know what would fit them.. If they can't have the Sugababes I want a spin-off name.

This post has been edited by Atonement: Mar 26 2012, 05:49 PM
Go to the top of this page
 
+Quote this post
AaronTM
post Mar 26 2012, 11:42 PM
Post #289
Group icon
salty foods parch the human
Pronouns: he/him
Joined: 24 October 2007
Posts: 26,020
User: 4,631
Other than 'Sugababes' (which doesn't appear to be happening for obvious reasons), 'One Touch' is the only name for them I think I'd be pleased with. I don't want a spin-off or different take on the Sugababe name - something like Origibabes would be awful, tacky and potentially credibility damaging - it just has to be One Touch.
Go to the top of this page
 
+Quote this post
Martyn
post Mar 27 2012, 12:51 AM
Post #290
Group icon
BuzzJack Platinum Member
Joined: 7 March 2006
Posts: 13,207
User: 66
They could just call them selves Sugafree
Go to the top of this page
 
+Quote this post
gooddelta
post Mar 27 2012, 10:45 AM
Post #291
Group icon
Hello?
Joined: 8 March 2006
Posts: 83,006
User: 116
I like the One Touch idea but could they not just call themselves Sugababes* or Suga_babes or something, i.e. a slightly different spelling/presenation but the same pronunciation? Or just Suga?
Go to the top of this page
 
+Quote this post
Pepi
post Mar 28 2012, 01:19 PM
Post #292
Group icon
BuzzJack Regular
Joined: 4 September 2009
Posts: 391
User: 9,550
SugaRbabes laugh.gif
Go to the top of this page
 
+Quote this post
Silas
post Mar 28 2012, 05:39 PM
Post #293
Group icon
Queen of Soon
Joined: 24 May 2007
Posts: 74,053
User: 3,474
Ha! Everyone seems to spell it with a bloody R anyway.
Go to the top of this page
 
+Quote this post
tommie
post Mar 29 2012, 01:20 PM
Post #294
Group icon
BuzzJack Platinum Member
Joined: 7 January 2009
Posts: 7,064
User: 8,073
You know, hearing Mel Blatt's comments re: the All Saints reunion makes me happy that Keisha, Siobhan and Mutya seems to be taking things at their own pace instead of trying to force something. While there's of course always money as motivation behind these type of reunions, I really do think All Saints did it for all the wrong reasons which is part of why it all fell apart so quickly.

Hell, even if it worked out it seems like they were doomed to repeat the same mistakes as Shaz once again seemed to be the main contributor for Studio One and that was seemingly a big issue back in the day. I'm rambling a bit, but at least 1.0 seem determined NOT to repeat history, otherwise they would've just taken the deals that were offered back in 2009.
Go to the top of this page
 
+Quote this post
Silas
post Mar 29 2012, 04:17 PM
Post #295
Group icon
Queen of Soon
Joined: 24 May 2007
Posts: 74,053
User: 3,474
OMG WHAT A LEGEND SHE IS!



I too am far happier that they put their past behind them first, then agreed they felt they had unfinished business, slowly starting to work together in a studio together for the first time in over a decade to see if they had that same spark they had first time around and if they had something to give before even beginning to think about an album never mind a label.
Go to the top of this page
 
+Quote this post
tommie
post Apr 1 2012, 06:01 AM
Post #296
Group icon
BuzzJack Platinum Member
Joined: 7 January 2009
Posts: 7,064
User: 8,073
4.0 could neva: http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/showb...ecord-deal.html
Go to the top of this page
 
+Quote this post
Atonement
post Apr 1 2012, 08:07 AM
Post #297
Group icon
I just had to see your face to feel alive
Joined: 22 February 2010
Posts: 6,910
User: 10,676
I think new music is coming soon!

(The deal better not be an April Fool's joke)


This post has been edited by Atonement: Apr 1 2012, 08:20 AM
Go to the top of this page
 
+Quote this post
Silas
post Apr 1 2012, 09:19 AM
Post #298
Group icon
Queen of Soon
Joined: 24 May 2007
Posts: 74,053
User: 3,474
It's from the scum so I'm going to take it with a pinch of salt for now, but still be excited that the music industries worst kept secret is still on the go.


I personally think it's a good sign that they are still being written about, it shows that the press is still interested/on their side which will help when it comes to new material.
Go to the top of this page
 
+Quote this post
tommie
post Apr 1 2012, 04:02 PM
Post #299
Group icon
BuzzJack Platinum Member
Joined: 7 January 2009
Posts: 7,064
User: 8,073
Mutya is looking great:

https://twitter.com/#!/LovePorscha/stat...1/photo/1/large

Getting back into pop star mode already!
Go to the top of this page
 
+Quote this post
Liаm
post Apr 1 2012, 04:03 PM
Post #300
Group icon
Brown cow, stunning!
Joined: 7 December 2009
Posts: 67,160
User: 10,139
Wow she does look great ohmy.gif
Go to the top of this page
 
+Quote this post


62 Pages V  « < 13 14 15 16 17 > » 
Post reply to this threadCreate a new thread

1 user(s) are reading this thread (1 guests and 0 anonymous users)
0 members:


 

Time is now: 16th April 2024 - 02:08 PM