Straw poll : Scottish Independence |
Track this thread - Email this thread - Print this thread - Download this thread - Subscribe to this forum |
28th January 2019, 07:27 AM
Post
#1
|
|
Paul Hyett
Joined: 4 April 2006
Posts: 25,346 User: 364 |
Should Scotland become an independent country Y/N?
I'd be interested in your thoughts, too. |
|
|
28th January 2019, 07:32 AM
Post
#2
|
|
Queen of Soon
Joined: 24 May 2007
Posts: 74,090 User: 3,474 |
Absolutely!
|
|
|
28th January 2019, 08:02 AM
Post
#3
|
|
Paul Hyett
Joined: 4 April 2006
Posts: 25,346 User: 364 |
Absolutely! One cynical reason against it, would be that it would leave the rest of the UK with a virtually permanent Tory majority - at least under FPTP. Even if they did gain independence, would it really stop them blaming the English for all their problem, though? |
|
|
28th January 2019, 09:37 AM
Post
#4
|
|
Say that hiss with your chest, and...
Joined: 24 May 2016
Posts: 18,472 User: 23,308 |
Absolutely! I voted Yes too on this straw poll. The case for independence is far more convincing now than in the first Scottish referendum now there is the added staying in the EU factor. I would say if IndyRef2 was held tomorrow Yes would win. This post has been edited by The Snake: 28th January 2019, 09:41 AM |
|
|
28th January 2019, 09:58 AM
Post
#5
|
|
BuzzJack Legend
Joined: 18 July 2012
Posts: 22,851 User: 17,376 |
I have completely reversed my stance due to Brexit. I see no reason for Scotland to be forced down with the rest of us if it chooses to rejoin the EU, and any consequence on England's politics is self-inflicted and tough luck.
Anyone is free to blame the English for anything they historically did, and that applies to all countries of the world, including Scotland as part of the UK where they went along with dubious political acts..... England: Nice country you have there. I'll take it! Great Britain: Nice country you have there. I'll take it! Just saying. |
|
|
28th January 2019, 10:02 AM
Post
#6
|
|
Paul Hyett
Joined: 4 April 2006
Posts: 25,346 User: 364 |
I voted Yes too on this straw poll. The case for independence is far more convincing now than in the first Scottish referendum now there is the added staying in the EU factor. I would say if IndyRef2 was held tomorrow Yes would win. You realise it wouldn't be a case of *staying in* the EU, rather, applying as a new country? I have completely reversed my stance due to Brexit. I see no reason for Scotland to be forced down with the rest of us if it chooses to rejoin the EU, and any consequence on England's politics is self-inflicted and tough luck. Anyone is free to blame the English for anything they historically did, and that applies to all countries of the world, including Scotland as part of the UK where they went along with dubious political acts..... England: Nice country you have there. I'll take it! That hasn't Scotland's case for over 300 years |
|
|
28th January 2019, 10:06 AM
Post
#7
|
|
Paul Hyett
Joined: 4 April 2006
Posts: 25,346 User: 364 |
|
|
|
28th January 2019, 10:14 AM
Post
#8
|
|
I'm a paragon so don't perceive me
Joined: 3 February 2011
Posts: 37,420 User: 12,929 |
I was against it at the point of the referendum for selfish electoral reasons mostly, but also because it seemed somewhat foolhardy economically.
Here's the thing though, Scotland was an independent country for approximately a millennium, doing just fine without the English and often against the English. It's only not in the same situation as Ireland (Republic) because of the Acts Of Union and a fiercely independent monarchical, unified tradition (unlike the Irish clans) that ironically, led it down the path towards union with England, along with some unfortunate colonial adventures that left it bankrupt. If we talk historical shoulds and shouldn'ts, then I think it's far more of a 'Scotland shouldn't be in the union'. Having actually visited Scotland for the first time in the intervening years it feels quite different from England, the sort of difference that a French speaker might feel going from France to Wallonia. It might as well be a different country, and in this modern age I'd support what borders we have tending to the lines of traditional culture and ethnic groups. Personally, I enjoy the Union, that we have four countries standing together as one, though I wish they were a bit more equal in size so issues on representation don't come up. But given the current political situation, I think Scotland would do a lot better out of the Union than in it right now. Their Assembly seems from afar quite a marvel and I'm sure it could stand on its own merits independently. |
|
|
28th January 2019, 10:21 AM
Post
#9
|
|
Paul Hyett
Joined: 4 April 2006
Posts: 25,346 User: 364 |
Personally, I enjoy the Union, that we have four countries standing together as one, though I wish they were a bit more equal in size so issues on representation don't come up. But given the current political situation, I think Scotland would do a lot better out of the Union than in it right now. Their Assembly seems from afar quite a marvel and I'm sure it could stand on its own merits independently. At very least, they are sensible enough to adopt a PR system. |
|
|
28th January 2019, 10:24 AM
Post
#10
|
|
Paul Hyett
Joined: 4 April 2006
Posts: 25,346 User: 364 |
|
|
|
28th January 2019, 11:00 AM
Post
#11
|
|
Break the tension
Joined: 7 March 2006
Posts: 89,016 User: 51 |
Yes, definitely. Why do they deserve to be tied to this festering sinkhole of a country?
|
|
|
28th January 2019, 11:21 AM
Post
#12
|
|
Paul Hyett
Joined: 4 April 2006
Posts: 25,346 User: 364 |
|
|
|
28th January 2019, 01:55 PM
Post
#13
|
|
BuzzJack Legend
Joined: 13 April 2007
Posts: 36,676 User: 3,272 |
|
|
|
28th January 2019, 02:51 PM
Post
#14
|
|
Paul Hyett
Joined: 4 April 2006
Posts: 25,346 User: 364 |
|
|
|
28th January 2019, 04:43 PM
Post
#15
|
|
BuzzJack Legend
Joined: 13 April 2007
Posts: 36,676 User: 3,272 |
|
|
|
29th January 2019, 06:29 AM
Post
#16
|
|
Paul Hyett
Joined: 4 April 2006
Posts: 25,346 User: 364 |
The i main reason for having PR for the Scottish parliament (and Welsh assembly) was to avoid accusations that they were setting up legislatures that would have a permanent Labour majority. Pity that logic isn't applied to the 2 party system in the HoC then... |
|
|
29th January 2019, 09:01 AM
Post
#17
|
|
Queen of Soon
Joined: 24 May 2007
Posts: 74,090 User: 3,474 |
One cynical reason against it, would be that it would leave the rest of the UK with a virtually permanent Tory majority - at least under FPTP. Even if they did gain independence, would it really stop them blaming the English for all their problem, though? Having been stuck with Tory governments we didn’t vote for and a Brexit we didn’t vote for, what on earth makes you think Scotland would give one iota of a shit about England reaping what it sowed? Iirc Scotland’s vote was only needed once since WW2 for a labour gov, the rest of the time they managed fine with England & Wales. And shove your xenophobic nonsense. The English aren’t blamed for Jack shit. The movement acknowledges that the two countries want different things and that a lack of local decision making over key policies is holding us back You realise it wouldn't be a case of *staying in* the EU, rather, applying as a new country? That hasn't Scotland's case for over 300 years Scotland is aware of that. Scotland is also aware that even the Spanish are rolling out the red carpet to welcome us - as Brexit makes it a model that Catalonia cannot follow. The Act of Union was shoddy and in a number of ways Scotland never stopped being an independent country. It retained its, superior, legal system, it’s education system, it’s healthcare system and a unique cultural identity Polls are misleading at the moment because of Brexit. The material change of circumstances changes the polling quite significantly. Our future of no deal changes things to an independence victory far more decisive than the EU Ref that lead us here The i main reason for having PR for the Scottish parliament (and Welsh assembly) was to avoid accusations that they were setting up legislatures that would have a permanent Labour majority. Well..... It’s more accurate to say that it was designed to present majorities full stop. Although that was secondary to its aim of preventing the nationalists of ever gaining power (very pleasingly, a spectacular failure) |
|
|
29th January 2019, 10:18 AM
Post
#18
|
|
Paul Hyett
Joined: 4 April 2006
Posts: 25,346 User: 364 |
And shove your xenophobic nonsense. The English aren’t blamed for Jack shit. The movement acknowledges that the two countries want different things and that a lack of local decision making over key policies is holding us back how come nationalism is considered xenophobic for England, but perfectly acceptable in Scotland, then? QUOTE Polls are misleading at the moment because of Brexit. Surely every poll since June 2016 will necessarily have had the Brexit factor built in? |
|
|
29th January 2019, 10:43 AM
Post
#19
|
|
Queen of Soon
Joined: 24 May 2007
Posts: 74,090 User: 3,474 |
Because English nationalism is blood and soil nationalism but Scottish nationalism is civic nationalism.
I.e. EngNats hate immigrants but ScotNats are fervently pro-immigrants |
|
|
29th January 2019, 10:59 AM
Post
#20
|
|
Cœur poids plume
Joined: 3 November 2007
Posts: 18,130 User: 4,718 |
Yes.
|
|
|
Time is now: 27th April 2024, 12:56 AM |
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 BuzzJack.com
About | Contact | Advertise | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service