BuzzJack
Entertainment Discussion

Welcome, guest! Log in or register. (click here for help)

Latest Site News
2 Pages V  < 1 2  
Post reply to this threadCreate a new thread
> Should we start bombing Syria?
Track this thread - Email this thread - Print this thread - Download this thread - Subscribe to this forum
Kath
post 2nd December 2015, 11:16 PM
Post #21
Group icon
BuzzJack Legend
Joined: 24 February 2007
Posts: 20,625
User: 2,980

QUOTE(Christmaseve201 @ Dec 2 2015, 11:08 PM) *
So the Ayes have it with 397 votes - 67 Labour MPs voted with the government and the labour FS Hilary Benn got a hearty round of applause from the Tory benches, hope he's proud of that.


His father would be SO proud of him!
Go to the top of this page
 
+Quote this post
Doctor Blind
post 2nd December 2015, 11:25 PM
Post #22
Group icon
#38BBE0 otherwise known as 'sky blue'
Joined: 27 October 2008
Posts: 16,170
User: 7,561

His speech was very good, even if I don't agree with him. Certainly came across as more statesmanlike than Cameron, and er.. Corbyn.
Go to the top of this page
 
+Quote this post
Steve201
post 2nd December 2015, 11:28 PM
Post #23
Group icon
Shakin Stevens
Joined: 29 December 2007
Posts: 46,151
User: 5,138

Yeh it was statesman like is right to be fair. I'm sure he didn't appreciate the applause.
Go to the top of this page
 
+Quote this post
Doctor Blind
post 2nd December 2015, 11:31 PM
Post #24
Group icon
#38BBE0 otherwise known as 'sky blue'
Joined: 27 October 2008
Posts: 16,170
User: 7,561

Certainly a better argument than Cameron's piss-weak "It will make Britain safer". laugh.gif Oh right, I'm convinced now. Bombs away Dave..
Go to the top of this page
 
+Quote this post
Steve201
post 2nd December 2015, 11:43 PM
Post #25
Group icon
Shakin Stevens
Joined: 29 December 2007
Posts: 46,151
User: 5,138

It's was a good speech but still profoundly wrong morally and politically.
Go to the top of this page
 
+Quote this post
Steve201
post 2nd December 2015, 11:50 PM
Post #26
Group icon
Shakin Stevens
Joined: 29 December 2007
Posts: 46,151
User: 5,138

So here's the break down -

The majority of the shadow cabinet voted against air strikes 16 against, 11 for and 67 MPs for air strikes with 152 against and 10 abstentions.
Go to the top of this page
 
+Quote this post
Rooney
post 2nd December 2015, 11:54 PM
Post #27
Group icon
WINTER IS COMING
Joined: 7 March 2006
Posts: 45,597
User: 88

QUOTE(Doctor Blind @ Dec 2 2015, 11:31 PM) *
Certainly a better argument than Cameron's piss-weak "It will make Britain safer". laugh.gif Oh right, I'm convinced now. Bombs away Dave..


But what's the alternative? I keep hearing strategy, but no-one offers any insight as to what this might be. I don't think negotiating or coming to a peaceful resolution was ever going to be on the agenda, because there is no chance of it happening.
Go to the top of this page
 
+Quote this post
Doctor Blind
post 3rd December 2015, 12:10 AM
Post #28
Group icon
#38BBE0 otherwise known as 'sky blue'
Joined: 27 October 2008
Posts: 16,170
User: 7,561

QUOTE(Rooney @ Dec 2 2015, 11:54 PM) *
But what's the alternative? I keep hearing strategy, but no-one offers any insight as to what this might be. I don't think negotiating or coming to a peaceful resolution was ever going to be on the agenda, because there is no chance of it happening.


Obviously negotiating is utterly pointless.

We should be cutting off the oil and drug money that Turkey allows to cross its pretty pervious border with Syria, as well as donations from Saudi Arabia, Turkey and other equally dodgy neighbours. Turkey is increasingly becoming a rogue state who are using this campaign to simply bomb the PKK, and the shooting down of the Russian military jet only furthers this rather worrying fact.
Go to the top of this page
 
+Quote this post
Kath
post 3rd December 2015, 12:11 AM
Post #29
Group icon
BuzzJack Legend
Joined: 24 February 2007
Posts: 20,625
User: 2,980

QUOTE(Rooney @ Dec 2 2015, 11:54 PM) *
But what's the alternative? I keep hearing strategy, but no-one offers any insight as to what this might be. I don't think negotiating or coming to a peaceful resolution was ever going to be on the agenda, because there is no chance of it happening.

If they're so certain of these ISIS strongholds - why haven't they bombed them before? There's no planned strategy to target ISIS solely - to me - its just going to be a random bombing of innocent people and spreading the cancer at the same time.
Go to the top of this page
 
+Quote this post
Steve201
post 3rd December 2015, 01:13 AM
Post #30
Group icon
Shakin Stevens
Joined: 29 December 2007
Posts: 46,151
User: 5,138

Plus the people who attacked Paris were from Belgium and France!
Go to the top of this page
 
+Quote this post
Botchia
post 3rd December 2015, 04:10 AM
Post #31
Group icon
I Drink Wine
Joined: 12 April 2015
Posts: 10,485
User: 21,753

QUOTE(Rooney @ Dec 3 2015, 12:54 AM) *
But what's the alternative? I keep hearing strategy, but no-one offers any insight as to what this might be. I don't think negotiating or coming to a peaceful resolution was ever going to be on the agenda, because there is no chance of it happening.


This is exactly the problem. My Facebook and Twitter is literally FILLED with posts about Parliament now having blood on their hands, how dare they vote for air strikes etc. But the fact of the matter is, the UK is already carrying out these airstrikes in Iraq and as Hilary Benn pointed out they have allowed the Kurds to regain territory and weaken IS there. Secondly, what's the alternative? We're dealing with a truly evil organisation here. There's no reasoning with these people, there's never going to be a peaceful solution because their sole aim is to destroy everything that stands in their way of enforcing the ideology. If we don't have military action, how do these people propose to deal with the problem of IS? Good luck being diplomatic with them because it's never going to happen.
Go to the top of this page
 
+Quote this post
HelenSpark
post 19th January 2016, 10:00 PM
Post #32
Group icon
New Entry
Joined: 19 January 2016
Posts: 22
User: 22,883

I think UK must attack ISIS
Go to the top of this page
 
+Quote this post


2 Pages V  < 1 2
Post reply to this threadCreate a new thread

1 user(s) reading this thread
+ 1 guest(s) and 0 anonymous user(s)


 

Time is now: 24th April 2024, 08:44 PM