Vigilante justice |
Track this thread - Email this thread - Print this thread - Download this thread - Subscribe to this forum |
28th May 2018, 01:43 PM
Post
#21
|
|
BuzzJack Legend
Joined: 18 July 2012
Posts: 22,829 User: 17,376 |
No problem - you just have to persuade 17,399,999 other people to also send you 0.005p. ...and you have to persuade everyone who gets burgled to not put a claim in, and instead try and murder them instead (because that's pre-meditation if you decide to do it in advance) |
|
|
28th May 2018, 01:52 PM
Post
#22
|
|
Paul Hyett
Joined: 4 April 2006
Posts: 25,346 User: 364 |
...and you have to persuade everyone who gets burgled to not put a claim in, and instead try and murder them instead (because that's pre-meditation if you decide to do it in advance) But there's usually not much time for meditation when you are being burgled. Seriously though - getting back towards the point : I've never suggested that everyone should react violently to a crime in progress, only that the law might be modified to expand the definition of self-defence a bit, so that the victims of crime don't get dragged unnecessarily to court for just suffering a rush of blood. |
|
|
28th May 2018, 02:46 PM
Post
#23
|
|
Queen of Soon
Joined: 24 May 2007
Posts: 74,082 User: 3,474 |
If you ever get burgled I’m sending a link to this thread to the CPS. Enjoy prison for pre-meditated murder x
|
|
|
28th May 2018, 03:04 PM
Post
#24
|
|
Paul Hyett
Joined: 4 April 2006
Posts: 25,346 User: 364 |
|
|
|
28th May 2018, 03:07 PM
Post
#25
|
|
Buffy/Charmed
Joined: 18 April 2013
Posts: 44,083 User: 18,639 |
Weird, surely?? Spelt like Weirwood
|
|
|
28th May 2018, 06:50 PM
Post
#26
|
|
BuzzJack Platinum Member
Joined: 3 September 2009
Posts: 7,814 User: 9,543 |
And the burglar mumbled “I’m sorry”
Well why the hell are you stealing from some one then? A little sorry doesn’t make up for it He’s a criminal, through and through |
|
|
28th May 2018, 07:05 PM
Post
#27
|
|
I'm a paragon so don't perceive me
Joined: 3 February 2011
Posts: 37,420 User: 12,929 |
...and therefore subhuman and should be deprived of his right to life in lieu of a proper trial?
|
|
|
28th May 2018, 09:20 PM
Post
#28
|
|
Queen of Soon
Joined: 24 May 2007
Posts: 74,082 User: 3,474 |
Resounding victory there for the concepts of "innocent until proven guilty" and "rehabilitation" so well done for that ronald mcdonald.
|
|
|
2nd June 2018, 04:49 PM
Post
#29
|
|
BuzzJack Platinum Member
Joined: 3 September 2009
Posts: 7,814 User: 9,543 |
|
|
|
2nd June 2018, 08:06 PM
Post
#30
|
|
BuzzJack Legend
Joined: 18 July 2012
Posts: 22,829 User: 17,376 |
So is the President Of The United States, only he does it BIG TIME, no small bits & pieces for him, only shitloads of 500million dollars sums. Until he is brought to justice I don't think anyone has any moral right to demand anything other than abiding by the letter of the law. That means prison or fines.
Now if anyone wants go and sort the biggest crooks in the world first, and then work your way down the small fry then I could accept that argument. In the meantime get some house insurance or insure your mobiles for free via your bank account freebies and no-one need die (on either side of the crime). If you can't afford it, then I presume you have very little that needs to be replaced... |
|
|
3rd June 2018, 06:14 AM
Post
#31
|
|
Paul Hyett
Joined: 4 April 2006
Posts: 25,346 User: 364 |
|
|
|
6th June 2018, 09:43 AM
Post
#32
|
|
Paul Hyett
Joined: 4 April 2006
Posts: 25,346 User: 364 |
...and therefore subhuman and should be deprived of his right to life in lieu of a proper trial? I'm all in favour of suspects being put on trial, but that isn't what this thread is about. OK, if someone nicks your TV or games console, those can be easily replaced via insurance - but what if it were some priceless family heirloom? It's far easier to imagine someone losing their rag over *that*. |
|
|
6th June 2018, 03:42 PM
Post
#33
|
|
I'm a paragon so don't perceive me
Joined: 3 February 2011
Posts: 37,420 User: 12,929 |
I'm all in favour of suspects being put on trial, but that isn't what this thread is about. OK, if someone nicks your TV or games console, those can be easily replaced via insurance - but what if it were some priceless family heirloom? It's far easier to imagine someone losing their rag over *that*. A thread about vigilante justice is definitely about the proper process that should be being exercised in our justice system, no matter what is stolen or otherwise wrong done. You seem to be saying that it's okay for someone to take the law into their own hands if they were dealt enough emotional damage through losing an item of high sentimental value. Are you actually an anarchist? |
|
|
6th June 2018, 07:13 PM
Post
#34
|
|
Queen of Soon
Joined: 24 May 2007
Posts: 74,082 User: 3,474 |
|
|
|
7th June 2018, 05:57 AM
Post
#35
|
|
Paul Hyett
Joined: 4 April 2006
Posts: 25,346 User: 364 |
A thread about vigilante justice is definitely about the proper process that should be being exercised in our justice system, no matter what is stolen or otherwise wrong done. You seem to be saying that it's okay for someone to take the law into their own hands if they were dealt enough emotional damage through losing an item of high sentimental value. Are you actually an anarchist? Not exactly - I was merely saying I could understand why someone would lose their rag under those circumstances. That's why there is a 'diminished responsibility' defence available : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diminished_responsibility e.g. if you came home and caught some guy raping your wife, then you beat him with a baseball bat, many people would have sympathy with that impulsive act. |
|
|
Time is now: 25th April 2024, 06:39 AM |
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 BuzzJack.com
About | Contact | Advertise | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service