Maroon 5 feat. Kendrick Lamar - "Don't Wanna Know"

BuzzJack - Entertainment Discussion _ Music Genres _ Pop

Latest Site News

Hozier climbs to number one

A chart double for Beyonce

Benson Boone remains at number one

2 Pages

< 1 2

Maroon 5 feat. Kendrick Lamar - "Don't Wanna Know", New single • October 12, 2016

Display modes

Track this thread - Email this thread - Print this thread - Download this thread - Subscribe to this forum

Brightest Blue View member profile	Oct 16 2016, 09:35 AM Post #21
BuzzJack Legend Joined: 10 April 2016 Posts: 27,025 User: 23,155	Lmao what trash


Regina View member profile	Oct 16 2016, 10:32 AM Post #22
Raining Shitter Joined: 9 March 2008 Posts: 63,090 User: 5,572	QUOTE(T Boy @ Oct 16 2016, 09:46 AM) Why are they on this quest to remain relevant? This is so basic it's not even funny. Songs About Jane is crying in a corner somewhere. Because they, GOD FORBID, want to be successful? It's not exactly a bad thing. I don't see why people rave about Songs About Jane so much either tbh, it's largely trash.


T Boy View member profile	Oct 16 2016, 11:07 AM Post #23
Radical Pink Troll Joined: 11 March 2006 Posts: 26,599 User: 177	QUOTE(Regina @ Oct 16 2016, 11:32 AM) Because they, GOD FORBID, want to be successful? It's not exactly a bad thing. I don't see why people rave about Songs About Jane so much either tbh, it's largely trash. I'll have to agree to disagree on that last part, that album is beautiful and had a huge impact on me as a teenager. Wanting to be successful is all well and good but for me they're compromising themselves. I didn't mind their shift towards poppy Max Martin music over the past 2 albums but this is a step too far IMO. It's completely basic and formulaic and not the Maroon 5 I bought into 12 years ago and have strongly supported since. This song pretty much outlines everything I hate about chart music today and it's worse when it's coming from one of my favourite artists. I'll have to hear more music from any up coming album because I'm not here for 12-16 Justin Bieber reject tracks.


Slick View member profile	Oct 16 2016, 11:21 AM Post #24
electric butterflies Pronouns: he/him Joined: 7 March 2006 Posts: 49,112 User: 70	Three facts: 'Songs About Jane' is a wonderful classic album which was very well received at the time (unlike a lot of Maroon 5 stuff since). They haven't met the standard/quality of that album since (unfortunately.) They've been on a rather obvious and desperate quest for success ever since 'Moves Like Jagger' was a shock hit and made them big again. Not a criticism because I've liked a lot of their post-MLJ stuff, but the difference in their output is clear.


Regina View member profile	Oct 16 2016, 12:05 PM Post #25
Raining Shitter Joined: 9 March 2008 Posts: 63,090 User: 5,572	Those are opinions though, not facts. I never took to SAJ and in my opinion their best album is either Hands All Over or It Won't Be Soon Before Long. I don't see anything wrong with changing your sound to want to have some success, it brings a new generation Of fans who might neve Have bothered if they were stuck in the past. Something new is better than being stuck 12 Years in the past.


T Boy View member profile	Oct 16 2016, 12:08 PM Post #26
Radical Pink Troll Joined: 11 March 2006 Posts: 26,599 User: 177	And yet I've enjoyed all of their output since the beginning despite changing sounds until this track so I'd hardly call myself being stuck 12 years in the past.


Slick View member profile	Oct 16 2016, 12:11 PM Post #27
electric butterflies Pronouns: he/him Joined: 7 March 2006 Posts: 49,112 User: 70	QUOTE(Regina @ Oct 16 2016, 01:05 PM) Those are opinions though, not facts. Thanks for that Miss Marple!


Slick View member profile	Oct 16 2016, 12:13 PM Post #28
electric butterflies Pronouns: he/him Joined: 7 March 2006 Posts: 49,112 User: 70	There is a difference between evolving your sound and chasing the current trends. Some people like it when their favourite artist chases current trends, potentially at the expense of the overall quality of the music. For others, it's a bit of a turn-off. It's one of the reasons music is so subjective and varied.


Regina View member profile	Oct 16 2016, 12:20 PM Post #29
Raining Shitter Joined: 9 March 2008 Posts: 63,090 User: 5,572	QUOTE(T Boy @ Oct 16 2016, 01:08 PM) And yet I've enjoyed all of their output since the beginning despite changing sounds until this track so I'd hardly call myself being stuck 12 years in the past. I never said you were though. I don't think the quality has dropped though. It's a better song than Maps and A lot more instant than Payphone was too. If the musics good then chasing trends isn't a bad thing for me.


Red. View member profile	Oct 21 2016, 02:13 AM Post #30
BuzzJack Enthusiast Joined: 18 April 2013 Posts: 526 User: 18,643	The best part of this is Kendrik's rap. Shame it's so short


Jessie Where View member profile	Oct 21 2016, 08:37 AM Post #31
Break the tension Joined: 7 March 2006 Posts: 88,874 User: 51	QUOTE(Regina @ Oct 16 2016, 11:32 AM) Because they, GOD FORBID, want to be successful? It's not exactly a bad thing. I don't see why people rave about Songs About Jane so much either tbh, it's largely trash. You ALWAYS say that about an artist's most successful album!


Jαsє View member profile	Oct 21 2016, 12:17 PM Post #32
BuzzJack Platinum Member Joined: 13 June 2011 Posts: 19,795 User: 14,043	SAJ is trash? lmao wat Anyway this is just alright. It doesn't really go anywhere does it?


Regina View member profile	Oct 21 2016, 12:18 PM Post #33
Raining Shitter Joined: 9 March 2008 Posts: 63,090 User: 5,572	QUOTE(mr_pmt @ Oct 21 2016, 09:37 AM) You ALWAYS say that about an artist's most successful album!


Dobbo View member profile	Oct 22 2016, 09:44 AM Post #34
BuzzJack Legend Joined: 4 November 2013 Posts: 30,510 User: 20,053	This isn't necessarily the worst thing they've done in recent years, but it's definitely the most forgettable IMO.


awardinary View member profile	Nov 3 2016, 04:35 PM Post #35
Here to play, here to stay Pronouns: he/him Joined: 8 February 2015 Posts: 20,178 User: 21,587	Disc 1, Track 15. Sadly Kendrick Lamar's vocals have not been included.