Printable version of thread

Click here to view this topic in its original format

BuzzJack Music Forum _ News and Politics _ OPINION POLLS 2018-2022

Posted by: Doctor Blind Sep 4 2018, 12:05 PM

I couldn't post in the other thread, so I though I'd start a new thread if that is ok with everyone?

Interesting YouGov survey which looked at polling for 18-24 year-olds only.

https://twitter.com/ElectionMapsUK/status/1036900674573934592

QUOTE
How the next general election would look if only 18-24s were allowed to vote (Data from @YouGov, 28-29th August). I'm expecting some great GIFs, everyone...

LAB: 66%, 600 Seats
LDM: 13%, 21 Seats
CON: 12%, 0 Seats
GRN: 4%, 1 Seat
SNP: 3%, 9 Seats
PLC: 0.4%, 1 Seat


ZERO seats for the Tories!!

Posted by: YOUSHALLNOTPEEN! Sep 4 2018, 12:11 PM

I SAW THAT!!

The young don't watch the BBTory or read the Murdoch press. Disgusting we have this government and Beexit when thr young despise both.

Posted by: Popchartfreak Sep 4 2018, 12:15 PM

QUOTE(YOUSHALLNOTPEEN! @ Sep 4 2018, 01:11 PM) *
I SAW THAT!!

The young don't watch the BBTory or read the Murdoch press. Disgusting we have this government and Beexit when thr young despise both.


Have a word with Jezza then, cos he has the power to do something about it......

Posted by: 5 Silas Frøkner Sep 4 2018, 01:48 PM

The PC and SNP numbers look a little lower than I would expect based on what has actually happened at elections. I’d also expect a higher green vote.

Probably a by-product of a small sample.

The number for the Tories isn’t a shock at all. You could expand that to 35 and they’d still struggle to gain a seat

Posted by: Suedehead2 Sep 4 2018, 02:27 PM

The projection if only over-65s were allowed to vote, of course, showed the Tories winning well over 500 seats.

Posted by: YOUSHALLNOTPEEN! Sep 4 2018, 02:32 PM

QUOTE(Suedehead2 @ Sep 4 2018, 03:27 PM) *
The projection if only over-65s were allowed to vote, of course, showed the Tories winning well over 500 seats.


And yet the Tories cut pensions and fuel allowances. Beggars belief! Guess that's what happens when you watch the BBC and read newspapers.

Posted by: Doctor Blind Sep 4 2018, 02:49 PM

QUOTE(Suedehead2 @ Sep 4 2018, 03:27 PM) *
The projection if only over-65s were allowed to vote, of course, showed the Tories winning well over 500 seats.


Indeed. What a great shame it is that many won't be alive in 20 or so years time though..

Posted by: Popchartfreak Sep 4 2018, 04:03 PM

QUOTE(YOUSHALLNOTPEEN! @ Sep 4 2018, 03:32 PM) *
And yet the Tories cut pensions and fuel allowances. Beggars belief! Guess that's what happens when you watch the BBC and read newspapers.


Pensions havent been cut, they keep up with inflation, and as far as I know the fuel allowance, free TV licence and all the rest are still in operation.

They have completely effed up the NHS though so their core base dies earlier than otherwise they would, so it's kind of a braindead policy really thinking people dont notice they have to wait 5 months for an interview to have an operation to remove a sun-carcinoma (NB this is me) forcing you to go private or take a chance it hasnt gone deep and dark because it's not as urgent as someone who breaks an arm while pissed on a night out.

So let's get the criticism right about how evil they are, and then spread that message because that one is REALLY going to cost them votes.....

Posted by: danG Sep 4 2018, 04:03 PM

Instead we'll most likely just have a new generation of over 65s who vote Tory, there's a clear trend the older you are the more likely to vote conservative.


Posted by: Doctor Blind Sep 4 2018, 04:14 PM

QUOTE(danG @ Sep 4 2018, 05:03 PM) *
Instead we'll most likely just have a new generation of over 65s who vote Tory, there's a clear trend the older you are the more likely to vote conservative.


Whilst it is true to say that as you grow older your political view changes - in the 2017 election the average age at which you are more likely to vote Conservative in just two years surged from 32 to 47!

In other news - in Germany, the far-right AfD have now overtaken the SPD to take 2nd biggest party in polling...


Posted by: YOUSHALLNOTPEEN! Sep 9 2018, 07:28 PM

QUOTE(danG @ Sep 4 2018, 05:03 PM) *
Instead we'll most likely just have a new generation of over 65s who vote Tory, there's a clear trend the older you are the more likely to vote conservative.



Nope.

My generation won't change. We despise the bast*rd Tories and all they've done. No forgiveness. Losing our EU citizenship and rights is their fault.

Posted by: vidcapper Sep 12 2018, 06:08 AM

QUOTE(Doctor Blind @ Sep 4 2018, 03:49 PM) *
Indeed. What a great shame it is that many won't be alive in 20 or so years time though..


But by then there will be more Tory converts to replace them...

Posted by: vidcapper Sep 12 2018, 06:11 AM

QUOTE(Popchartfreak @ Sep 4 2018, 05:03 PM) *
Pensions havent been cut, they keep up with inflation, and as far as I know the fuel allowance, free TV licence and all the rest are still in operation.

They have completely effed up the NHS though


It still seems in reasonable shape to me, judging by recent experience.

Posted by: YOUSHALLNOTPEEN! Sep 12 2018, 08:45 AM

Wrong to both viscapprr.

Posted by: 5 Silas Frøkner Sep 12 2018, 09:43 AM

QUOTE(vidcapper @ Sep 12 2018, 08:11 AM) *
It still seems in reasonable shape to me, judging by recent experience.

It’s good that your experience with the NHS was a positive one, as was ours last year when my father was similarly ill.

That doesn’t take away from the factual reality that our health service is missing targets UK wide, is tens of thousands of staff short of safe and effective operation, the staff are hideously overworked and underpaid and is just chronically underfunded. Even Scotland is struggling and the NHS north of the border has been better protected from the austerity of the Tory government.

The staff that work in or NHS are amazing and do incredible work in very tough conditions.

You just have to look at every official measure, including the operating deficits of the trusts, to see how bad things actually are country wide

Posted by: Doctor Blind Sep 12 2018, 03:27 PM

Any thoughts on the rise of the AfD, Silas?

Posted by: 5 Silas Frøkner Sep 12 2018, 07:58 PM

Concerning but their numbers seem to fluctuate quite heavily as they’re down to 4th in the most recent poll with the Greens ahead of them and the SPD having lost 3% between polls.

Chemnitz was a bit scary and I think the weekend before in Berlin there was an AfD/NeoNazi March and multiple people were charged with making the Nazi salute (which is a crime in Germany)

It will be interesting to see how Merkel responds going forward to such blatant marching of Nazis on the streets. Immigration itself seems to be a lesser issue than it was their support might start to fall away in the west but the East remains their best breeding ground for support. I don’t think they’ll be going away any time soon. Almost 30 years post reunification the East still lags behind the West in living standards and GDP

Posted by: YOUSHALLNOTPEEN! Sep 12 2018, 08:02 PM

QUOTE(5 Silas Frøkner @ Sep 12 2018, 08:58 PM) *
Concerning but their numbers seem to fluctuate quite heavily as they’re down to 4th in the most recent poll with the Greens ahead of them and the SPD having lost 3% between polls.

Chemnitz was a bit scary and I think the weekend before in Berlin there was an AfD/NeoNazi March and multiple people were charged with making the Nazi salute (which is a crime in Germany)

It will be interesting to see how Merkel responds going forward to such blatant marching of Nazis on the streets. Immigration itself seems to be a lesser issue than it was their support might start to fall away in the west but the East remains their best breeding ground for support. I don’t think they’ll be going away any time soon. Almost 30 years post reunification the East still lags behind the West in living standards and GDP


Is that their north south divide? It might last generations then like here or Spain.

Posted by: Suedehead2 Sep 12 2018, 08:29 PM

QUOTE(YOUSHALLNOTPEEN! @ Sep 12 2018, 09:02 PM) *
Is that their north south divide? It might last generations then like here or Spain.

The East-West gap 30 years ago was far greater than the UK's north-south divide has ever been. The East was a completely basket case. It says a lot for the strength of the West German economy that they could absorb the East without the economy collapsing.

Posted by: 5 Silas Frøkner Sep 12 2018, 08:47 PM

I'm not really sure that the North/South divide is really comparable to the East/West split in Germany because of the circumstances that lead to the variation in Standards and Economic performance. Three states, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Bayern and Baden-Württemberg each on their own have a higher GDP that the entirety of east Germany combined. I think if you include West Berlin then it's a tight battle for 3rd sport with BW and still over €200bn behind NRW.

30 years ago these states were still under communist rule and life was very tough. It's remarkable what has been achieved to date in reintegrating them with West Germany but there's still a long way to go until the inequality between DDR and BDR is reduced to negligible levels.

Posted by: Brett-Butler Sep 19 2018, 05:19 PM

Tweet from https://twitter.com/ElectionMapsUK/status/1042119111797616640 -

QUOTE
My current polling average puts:

LAB at a 15 month low, w/ 36.7%
LDM at a 16 month high, w/ 9.7%
CON at a post-chequers high, w/ 39.3%

Don't like to read TOO much into opinion polls, but suggests that LAB are losing supporters from both sides of the Brexit divide.

Posted by: Suedehead2 Sep 20 2018, 04:30 PM

Latest from Ipsos/Mori

Con - 39
Lab - 37
LibD - 13

Usual caveats (only one poll, blah, blah, blah) apply.

Posted by: Suedehead2 Sep 20 2018, 05:15 PM

Slightly more details on that poll...

CON: 39% (+1)
LAB: 37% (-1)
LDEM: 13% (+3)
GRN: 5% (+2)
UKIP: 2% (-4)

via @IpsosMORI, 14 - 18 Sep
Chgs. w/ 24 Jul

Note that the polling started before the Lib Dem conference, not that it was exactly prominent in the news bulletins.

Posted by: vidcapper Sep 21 2018, 05:20 AM

QUOTE(Suedehead2 @ Sep 20 2018, 06:15 PM) *
Slightly more details on that poll...

CON: 39% (+1)
LAB: 37% (-1)
LDEM: 13% (+3)
GRN: 5% (+2)
UKIP: 2% (-4)

via @IpsosMORI, 14 - 18 Sep
Chgs. w/ 24 Jul

Note that the polling started before the Lib Dem conference, not that it was exactly prominent in the news bulletins.


it's always interesting to see how the party conferences affect them.

Posted by: Doctor Blind Sep 26 2018, 03:19 PM

Westminster voting intention:

LAB: 39% (+1)
CON: 37% (-2)
LDEM: 9% (+2)
UKIP: 8% (+1)
GRN: 2% (-1)

via @OpiniumResearch, 18 - 20 Sep
https://www.opinium.co.uk/political-polling-18th-september-2018-2/

Over half (56%) of the public think that there should be another general election if the UK does not secure a deal with the EU by 29th March 2019

Posted by: vidcapper Sep 27 2018, 05:14 AM

QUOTE(Doctor Blind @ Sep 26 2018, 04:19 PM) *
Westminster voting intention:

LAB: 39% (+1)
CON: 37% (-2)
LDEM: 9% (+2)
UKIP: 8% (+1)
GRN: 2% (-1)

via @OpiniumResearch, 18 - 20 Sep
https://www.opinium.co.uk/political-polling-18th-september-2018-2/

Over half (56%) of the public think that there should be another general election if the UK does not secure a deal with the EU by 29th March 2019


Their level of indicated UKIP support is far higher than the others. huh.gif

Posted by: vidcapper Sep 30 2018, 05:31 AM

See how quiet/boring this forum gets when I hardly post. tongue.gif

YOuGov poll

https://yougov.co.uk/news/2018/09/28/voting-intention-conservatives-42-labour-36-24-25-/

Posted by: Doctor Blind Oct 3 2018, 11:13 AM

Some more polling from BMG (28/29 September)

Westminster voting intention:

LAB: 40% (+2)
CON: 35% (-3)
LDEM: 12% (+2)
UKIP: 5% (-)

via @BMGResearch, 28 - 29 Sep: https://www.bmgresearch.co.uk/huffpost-bmg-voting-intention-polling-results/
Chgs. w/ 22 Sep

and on that EU question:

REMAIN: 47%
LEAVE: 43%
PLEASE STOP ASKING ME THIS QUESTION/DON'T KNOW: 10%

Posted by: vidcapper Oct 4 2018, 05:21 AM

THere does seem to be more variation between polls now...

Posted by: vidcapper Oct 8 2018, 05:32 AM

Update :

http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/

Posted by: ¡Michael Myers! Oct 9 2018, 11:17 AM

Tories must be BRICKING IT

Even their biased polls aren't doing much for them. They are over.

Posted by: vidcapper Oct 15 2018, 05:21 AM

QUOTE(¡Michael Myers! @ Oct 9 2018, 12:17 PM) *
Tories must be BRICKING IT

Even their biased polls aren't doing much for them. They are over.


Or not, according to the latest : http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/

Posted by: vidcapper Oct 29 2018, 06:26 AM

QUOTE(vidcapper @ Oct 15 2018, 05:21 AM) *
Or not, according to the latest : http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/


Update

Posted by: Doctor Blind Nov 10 2018, 01:54 PM

The latest poll from Survation (9 November) shows the two largest parties still neck-and-neck. The splits for 18-24, 25-34 and 35-44 are v interesting though which shows that the Conservatives have a big problem with the under 45s!

https://www.survation.com/labour-narrowly-lead-conservatives-in-new-voting-intention-poll/




Posted by: vidcapper Dec 3 2018, 06:38 AM

Snap election now could see Corbyn as Prime Minister propped up by Nicola Sturgeon's SNP, poll finds

Theresa May fighting to salvage her Brexit deal ahead of crunch Commons vote
Fears rising of a snap election as Parliament looks to be in deadlock over options
Poll of polls shows as of now Tories could be largest party but out of government

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6451939/Snap-election-Corbyn-PM-propped-SNP.html

Posted by: Steve201 Dec 3 2018, 09:53 AM

Hopes!!

Yippee!!

Posted by: vidsanta Dec 3 2018, 11:11 AM

QUOTE(Steve201 @ Dec 3 2018, 09:53 AM) *
Hopes!!

Yippee!!


I'm not sure where they get 43 SNP MP's from, though? They currently have 35, and they'd probably lose as many to Lab as they might gain from Tories.

Posted by: Doctor Blind Dec 3 2018, 11:15 AM

Thanks to the Fixed Term Parliament Act (cheers Nick Clegg...) there won't be a snap general election. I cannot see the appetite for it from 2/3 of the HoC -

Secondly, even IF there were to be a snap election, the result would likely be the same hung parliament we have currently (going on recent Opinion Polls) with no party nor coalition able to command a majority.

Posted by: vidsanta Dec 3 2018, 03:38 PM

QUOTE(Doctor Blind @ Dec 3 2018, 11:15 AM) *
Thanks to the Fixed Term Parliament Act (cheers Nick Clegg...) there won't be a snap general election. I cannot see the appetite for it from 2/3 of the HoC -

Secondly, even IF there were to be a snap election, the result would likely be the same hung parliament we have currently (going on recent Opinion Polls) with no party nor coalition able to command a majority.


I cannot see the opposition winning a no-confidence vote anyway - whatever the issues within the Tory party over Brexit, and others, they will surely be united in wanting to prevent an early election!

Posted by: December's Dong Dec 3 2018, 03:51 PM

So you admit the Tories know they are done?

Posted by: Suedehead2 Dec 3 2018, 05:57 PM

QUOTE(Doctor Blind @ Dec 3 2018, 11:15 AM) *
Thanks to the Fixed Term Parliament Act (cheers Nick Clegg...) there won't be a snap general election. I cannot see the appetite for it from 2/3 of the HoC -

Secondly, even IF there were to be a snap election, the result would likely be the same hung parliament we have currently (going on recent Opinion Polls) with no party nor coalition able to command a majority.

There will be a general election if the government loses a confidence vote, assuming Corbyn cannot form a government. The 2/3rds majority is only required if the government wants to call an early election. The FTP Act reducesd the powers of the PM. Without it, Cameron could have called an election at any time in the coalition years.

Posted by: Christmasteve201 Dec 3 2018, 07:53 PM

It May loses the vote next Tuesday what will happen? Will she not have the confidence of parliament meaning JC will be asked to form a minority gov or will the bill be amended and passed?

Posted by: December's Dong Dec 3 2018, 07:59 PM

It is a deal, so cannot be amended.

Posted by: Suedehead2 Dec 3 2018, 08:01 PM

There would have to be a separate vote of confidence if the government loses the vote on the deal. It seems almost certain that Labour would table one if the government does lose on the 11th. If that is passed (basically, if the DUP abandon the confidence and supply arrangement), Corbyn (or someone else) would have 14 days to form a government. If he can't, there will be a general election.

Posted by: Christmasteve201 Dec 3 2018, 11:43 PM

Omg!

There's a European council meeting that May will try and get an amendment!

Posted by: 5 Silas Frøkner Dec 4 2018, 06:12 AM

QUOTE(vidsanta @ Dec 3 2018, 01:11 PM) *
I'm not sure where they get 43 SNP MP's from, though? They currently have 35, and they'd probably lose as many to Lab as they might gain from Tories.

They did have 53 a couple of years ago. You overestimate the appeal of Corbyn in Scotland when his manifesto is a watered down version of the SNPs “our record in government” page off their website and he’s not pro-EU. Something that matters in a country that’s more than 63% in favour of remain

Posted by: vidsanta Dec 4 2018, 06:23 AM

QUOTE(Suedehead2 @ Dec 3 2018, 08:01 PM) *
There would have to be a separate vote of confidence if the government loses the vote on the deal. It seems almost certain that Labour would table one if the government does lose on the 11th. If that is passed (basically, if the DUP abandon the confidence and supply arrangement), Corbyn (or someone else) would have 14 days to form a government. If he can't, there will be a general election.


Just because the DUP have abandoned their support, doesn't mean they'd vote *against* the Tories in a no-confidence vote since they'd get nothing from a Labour gov't. More likely they'd abstain, and in that case, the opposition would not have enough votes to win.

Posted by: vidsanta Dec 4 2018, 06:26 AM

QUOTE(5 Silas Frøkner @ Dec 4 2018, 06:12 AM) *
They did have 53 a couple of years ago. You overestimate the appeal of Corbyn in Scotland when his manifesto is a watered down version of the SNPs “our record in government” page off their website and he’s not pro-EU. Something that matters in a country that’s more than 63% in favour of remain


But that 53 was an historic high, which I can't imagine being repeated, especially as it was due to Labour's weakness there at the time.

Posted by: 5 Silas Frøkner Dec 4 2018, 06:38 AM

Labour are still weak north of the border though. Scottish polling numbers look exceptionally different to that for the rest of the UK. The SNP are in the 40’s and then Tory and Labour are hanging out around the low 20’s. Labour lost a lot of votes in Scotland for good and many think Corbyns full of shite (plus the Scottish party are crap and more interested in trying to score a cheap political goal than doing anything of use). Additionally they propped up a lot of Tory council administrations, even when the SNP were the largest party and when they are supposed to be similar in political outlook. That really hurt them

Posted by: vidsanta Dec 4 2018, 06:56 AM

QUOTE(5 Silas Frøkner @ Dec 4 2018, 06:38 AM) *
Labour are still weak north of the border though. Scottish polling numbers look exceptionally different to that for the rest of the UK. The SNP are in the 40’s and then Tory and Labour are hanging out around the low 20’s. Labour lost a lot of votes in Scotland for good and many think Corbyns full of shite (plus the Scottish party are crap and more interested in trying to score a cheap political goal than doing anything of use). Additionally they propped up a lot of Tory council administrations, even when the SNP were the largest party and when they are supposed to be similar in political outlook. That really hurt them


IN which case, would the SNP really want to risk propping up a Labour minority gov't?

It proved disastrous for the LD's...

Posted by: 5 Silas Frøkner Dec 4 2018, 07:20 AM

They have long ruled out formally being part of a coalition government, but would enter a confidence and supply arrangement and have always been open about their willingness to do that in return for more devolution. That and a chance to be part of ending austerity would be a big motivator for them to join forces. They’re judged on Holyrood so more money and more power for Holyrood puts them in a good place for 2021

Posted by: vidsanta Dec 4 2018, 07:27 AM

QUOTE(5 Silas Frøkner @ Dec 4 2018, 07:20 AM) *
They have long ruled out formally being part of a coalition government, but would enter a confidence and supply arrangement and have always been open about their willingness to do that in return for more devolution. That and a chance to be part of ending austerity would be a big motivator for them to join forces. They’re judged on Holyrood so more money and more power for Holyrood puts them in a good place for 2021


Who'd trust them in a 'confidence & supply' arrangement after what the DUP did... rolleyes.gif

Posted by: 5 Silas Frøkner Dec 4 2018, 08:30 AM

They’re two very different parties with very different leadership for a start

Posted by: vidsanta Dec 4 2018, 09:25 AM

QUOTE(5 Silas Frøkner @ Dec 4 2018, 08:30 AM) *
They’re two very different parties with very different leadership for a start


From my pov, the SNP & Labour are very similar, both left-wing, with Scottish Independence being the only major difference.

Posted by: Glühbotchia Dec 4 2018, 10:28 AM

QUOTE(5 Silas Frøkner @ Dec 4 2018, 07:20 AM) *
They have long ruled out formally being part of a coalition government, but would enter a confidence and supply arrangement and have always been open about their willingness to do that in return for more devolution. That and a chance to be part of ending austerity would be a big motivator for them to join forces. They’re judged on Holyrood so more money and more power for Holyrood puts them in a good place for 2021


You'd think the SNP would rather swallow their pride and enter into a coalition with Labour than allowing the Tories longer in power?

Posted by: Christmasteve201 Dec 4 2018, 12:06 PM

QUOTE(5 Silas Frøkner @ Dec 4 2018, 06:38 AM) *
Labour are still weak north of the border though. Scottish polling numbers look exceptionally different to that for the rest of the UK. The SNP are in the 40’s and then Tory and Labour are hanging out around the low 20’s. Labour lost a lot of votes in Scotland for good and many think Corbyns full of shite (plus the Scottish party are crap and more interested in trying to score a cheap political goal than doing anything of use). Additionally they propped up a lot of Tory council administrations, even when the SNP were the largest party and when they are supposed to be similar in political outlook. That really hurt them


This, the snp are basically taking all the left of centre support from labour!

Posted by: Christmasteve201 Dec 4 2018, 12:08 PM

QUOTE(vidsanta @ Dec 4 2018, 09:25 AM) *
From my pov, the SNP & Labour are very similar, both left-wing, with Scottish Independence being the only major difference.


More or less a bit like SF in Ireland they are populist social democrat parties only in England populist means having to be anti eu to attract small town voters who live in areas annihilated by the eu!

Posted by: vidsanta Dec 4 2018, 02:58 PM

QUOTE(Christmasteve201 @ Dec 4 2018, 12:08 PM) *
More or less a bit like SF in Ireland they are populist social democrat parties only in England populist means having to be anti eu to attract small town voters who live in areas annihilated by the eu!


But if/when the SNP achieve Scottish independence, their reason to exist will be gone, and they'll fade away like UKIP...

Posted by: Harve Dec 4 2018, 05:28 PM

QUOTE(vidsanta @ Dec 4 2018, 03:58 PM) *
But if/when the SNP achieve Scottish independence, their reason to exist will be gone, and they'll fade away like UKIP...

The SNP aren't like UKIP though. They're not a single-issue party and they've been in power for over 11 years, whereas UKIP have fairly minimal influence across all levels of government.

There's not necessarily anyone to replace them either, yet, whereas the Tories easily gobbled up UKIP votes in 2017.

Posted by: December's Dong Dec 4 2018, 10:40 PM

DUP announced it wants an election. Tories are over. Great use of 1billion eh Mad May!

Posted by: Doctor Blind Dec 4 2018, 11:52 PM

But what would that election resolve? Probably we'd end up with what we've got now- and even less time to resolve Brexit.

A new poll from ComRes makes even more troubling viewing...

On "asking the EU to renegotiate the current deal if the House of Commons votes against it on 11th December":
Support: 45%
Oppose: 25%

~~

On "extending the date when the UK leaves the EU beyond 29th March 2019":

Support: 34%
Oppose: 46%

~~

On "the UK remaining a full member of the EU":

Support: 44%
Oppose: 45%

~~

On "holding a second referendum on whether to Remain or Leave":

Support: 40%
Oppose: 50%

~~

On "implementing in full the deal negotiated by Theresa May and agreed by the EU":

Support:: 26%
Oppose: 42%

On "having a 'no deal' or 'clean break' Brexit":

Support: 34%
Oppose: 41%

via @ComRes, 30 Nov - 02 Dec

And finally...

LAB: 39% (-1)
CON: 37% (+1)
LDEM: 9% (-)
UKIP: 6% (-1)
GRN: 3% (-)


So no majority support for the current deal, none for extending A50, massively split on whether to stay in the EU, and no majority support for a 2nd referendum, nor for having a 'no deal' Brexit.

In chess they'd call that zugzwang !

Posted by: Suedehead2 Dec 5 2018, 02:25 PM

Most recent polls have shown a majority in favour of a referendum on the deal. I suspect the language used may make a difference. "Second referendum" makes it sound like people are being told "You got it wrong, try again" (as Mayhem may be saying to MPs next week). "A referendum on the deal" is a more accurate description of what people ar calling for.

Posted by: vidsanta Dec 6 2018, 06:33 AM

QUOTE(Suedehead2 @ Dec 5 2018, 02:25 PM) *
Most recent polls have shown a majority in favour of a referendum on the deal. I suspect the language used may make a difference. "Second referendum" makes it sound like people are being told "You got it wrong, try again" (as Mayhem may be saying to MPs next week). "A referendum on the deal" is a more accurate description of what people ar calling for.


The name of the referendum matters little, only the wording of the question.

Posted by: Suedehead2 Dec 6 2018, 08:17 AM

QUOTE(vidsanta @ Dec 6 2018, 06:33 AM) *
The name of the referendum matters little, only the wording of the question.

You’ve missed the point. The point is that it would not be a re-run of the 2016 referendum. It remains the case that polls generally show public support for a vote on the deal.

Posted by: vidsanta Dec 6 2018, 08:50 AM

QUOTE(Suedehead2 @ Dec 6 2018, 08:17 AM) *
You’ve missed the point. The point is that it would not be a re-run of the 2016 referendum. It remains the case that polls generally show public support for a vote on the deal.


UNfortunately the HoC is far more divided...

Posted by: Doctor Blind Dec 23 2018, 07:53 PM

Westminster voting intention:

CON: 39% (+1)
LAB: 39% (-)
LDEM: 6% (-2)
UKIP: 6% (-)
GRN: 4% (-)

via @OpiniumResearch, 18 - 20 Dec
Chgs. w/ 14 Dec

Posted by: vidsanta Dec 24 2018, 06:11 AM

QUOTE(Doctor Blind @ Dec 23 2018, 07:53 PM) *
Westminster voting intention:

CON: 39% (+1)
LAB: 39% (-)
LDEM: 6% (-2)
UKIP: 6% (-)
GRN: 4% (-)

via @OpiniumResearch, 18 - 20 Dec
Chgs. w/ 14 Dec


It can't be that encouraging for Labour that, no matter how much the Tories f*ck-up, they can't consistently break the 40% barrier.

Posted by: Christmasteve201 Dec 24 2018, 04:27 PM

It's a result of the polarised nature of British politics at present - democratic socialism for labour will only attract so many voters so the others turn to the tories (people who hate corbynism and won't vote LDs due to their history this decade under clegg) so the two big parties are stuck at a plateau at present. Is it not worrying for tories that JC labour reached 15 points higher than anyone from the right believed they would pre June 2017?

UKIP steady on 6% after I thought they'd disappeared must be the result of the threat to Brexit at present?

Posted by: Michaelmas! Dec 24 2018, 06:15 PM

QUOTE(Christmasteve201 @ Dec 24 2018, 04:27 PM) *
It's a result of the polarised nature of British politics at present - democratic socialism for labour will only attract so many voters so the others turn to the tories (people who hate corbynism and won't vote LDs due to their history this decade under clegg) so the two big parties are stuck at a plateau at present. Is it not worrying for tories that JC labour reached 15 points higher than anyone from the right believed they would pre June 2017?

UKIP steady on 6% after I thought they'd disappeared must be the result of the threat to Brexit at present?


THIS

The Tories are BRICKING it as even their fake establishment polls have Labour higher than them! Dictatorships don't like that.

Posted by: vidsanta Dec 25 2018, 06:16 AM

QUOTE(Christmasteve201 @ Dec 24 2018, 04:27 PM) *
UKIP steady on 6% after I thought they'd disappeared must be the result of the threat to Brexit at present?


Whatever their poll ratings, as long as Brexit goes through they'll put up few candidates, so their supports will have to make another choice.


QUOTE(Michaelmas! @ Dec 24 2018, 06:15 PM) *
THIS

The Tories are BRICKING it as even their fake establishment polls have Labour higher than them! Dictatorships don't like that.


Is a GE a 'fake establishment poll' too? thinking.gif

Posted by: Brett-Butler Jan 5 2019, 11:45 PM

via https://twitter.com/britainelects/status/1081678914123124741:

Westminster voting intention:

CON: 40% (-1)
LAB: 34% (-5)
LDEM: 10% (+3)
GRN: 4% (-)
UKIP: 4% (+1)

via @YouGov, 21 Dec - 04 Jan
Chgs. w/ 17 Dec

Brett-Butler's usual caveats about reading too much into one opinion poll applies, but if this isn't an errant poll, then the Lib Dems must be rather proud with themselves, and Labour less so. I'm also choosing to believe that a few % of the "other" not featured in this poll is going to the SDP...

Posted by: Auld Lang Peen Jan 6 2019, 12:13 AM

Pfft. YouGov is an old people's Tory poll. I don't belive Miss 400 Seat Tory Majority YouGov for one second

Posted by: Brett-Butler Jan 6 2019, 12:17 AM

YouGov was the poll that was https://yougov.co.uk/topics/politics/articles-reports/2017/06/09/how-yougovs-election-model-compares-final-result, but whatever makes you feel good.

Posted by: Auld Lang Peen Jan 6 2019, 12:36 AM

It said Tories would have 400 seat majorities. It loves the Tories.

Posted by: vidcapper Jan 6 2019, 06:31 AM

QUOTE(Brett-Butler @ Jan 6 2019, 12:17 AM) *
YouGov was the poll that was https://yougov.co.uk/topics/politics/articles-reports/2017/06/09/how-yougovs-election-model-compares-final-result, but whatever makes you feel good.


It even predicted a worse result for the Tories than they actually achieved...

QUOTE(Auld Lang Peen @ Jan 6 2019, 12:36 AM) *
It said Tories would have 400 seat majorities. It loves the Tories.


Not the ones close to polling date.

Besides, just because a poll suggests something, doesn't make it true.



Posted by: Suedehead2 Jan 6 2019, 03:20 PM

QUOTE(Brett-Butler @ Jan 5 2019, 11:45 PM) *
via https://twitter.com/britainelects/status/1081678914123124741:

Westminster voting intention:

CON: 40% (-1)
LAB: 34% (-5)
LDEM: 10% (+3)
GRN: 4% (-)
UKIP: 4% (+1)

via @YouGov, 21 Dec - 04 Jan
Chgs. w/ 17 Dec

Brett-Butler's usual caveats about reading too much into one opinion poll applies, but if this isn't an errant poll, then the Lib Dems must be rather proud with themselves, and Labour less so. I'm also choosing to believe that a few % of the "other" not featured in this poll is going to the SDP...

I suspect you are over-estimanting the number of people aware that the SDP is still a thing.

Posted by: vidcapper Jan 6 2019, 03:38 PM

QUOTE(Suedehead2 @ Jan 6 2019, 03:20 PM) *
I suspect you are over-estimanting the number of people aware that the SDP is still a thing.


ARe you sure he didn't mean SNP?

The SDP 'died' nearly 30 years ago.

As for UKIP, now they seem to be flirting ever more closely with racists, I think that 4% is too high.

Posted by: Suedehead2 Jan 6 2019, 04:15 PM

QUOTE(vidcapper @ Jan 6 2019, 03:38 PM) *
ARe you sure he didn't mean SNP?

The SDP 'died' nearly 30 years ago.

As for UKIP, now they seem to be flirting ever more closely with racists, I think that 4% is too high.

The SDP never fully died. It has continued since most of the membership merged with the Liberal Party. Similarly, the Liberal Party has never officially disbanded.

Posted by: Brett-Butler Jan 6 2019, 04:26 PM

QUOTE(Suedehead2 @ Jan 6 2019, 04:20 PM) *
I suspect you are over-estimanting the number of people aware that the SDP is still a thing.



QUOTE(vidcapper @ Jan 6 2019, 04:38 PM) *
ARe you sure he didn't mean SNP?


I *did* mean the SDP (Social Democratic Party), albeit somewhat tongue-in-cheekly. Their membership has increased quite a bit in the past few months (albeit from a very small base), mainly from disgruntled Brexiteers of all different stripes, and they've even gained an MEP (Patrick O'Flynn defected from Ukip to them). I do think that they are going to start picking up a bit more support and press coverage over the next 12 months, albeit not to the extent that they are become a default option on opinion polls, or that they seriously challenge for any seats, either at a local or national level.

Posted by: Crazy Chris Jan 7 2019, 05:20 PM

QUOTE(Auld Lang Peen @ Jan 6 2019, 12:13 AM) *
Pfft. YouGov is an old people's Tory poll. I don't belive Miss 400 Seat Tory Majority YouGov for one second



Neither do I. All I can see at the next election, whenever that may be, is another hung parliament. Labour won't get a majority until they ditch Corbyn and I'd bet my house on that.

Posted by: Botchia Jan 7 2019, 11:14 PM

QUOTE(Auld Lang Peen @ Jan 6 2019, 12:13 AM) *
Pfft. YouGov is an old people's Tory poll. I don't belive Miss 400 Seat Tory Majority YouGov for one second


YouGov was literally the only polling company which correctly predicted a Hung Parliament before the last election? IIRC the media was ridiculing the poll and calling it very "brave".

Posted by: Doctor Blind Jan 7 2019, 11:24 PM

No that was Survation: https://www.survation.com/survation-most-accurate-pollster/ (the last survey of which had figures of- LAB 42 (-2) CON 41 (NC) LD 10 (NC) GRE (-1) UKIP 5 (+2) AP 2 (NC))

YouGov underrepresented Labour by around 6pc in the 2017 GE but somehow got the seat share reasonably well despite this.

Personally I have seen the polls shift very little over the past 12 months, this looks like it is likely to be an outlier - used exclusively to provoke debate/discussion - but ultimately meaningless.

Posted by: Doctor Blind Jan 12 2019, 08:48 AM

and speaking of which... here is the latest Survation poll.


Posted by: vidcapper Jan 12 2019, 09:16 AM

[quote name='Doctor Blind' post='6161199' date='Jan 12 2019, 08:48 AM']and speaking of which... here is the latest Survation poll.



So, basically the same as it's been for quite a while, allowing for margin of error.

Posted by: Doctor Blind Jan 12 2019, 09:32 AM

QUOTE(vidcapper @ Jan 12 2019, 09:16 AM) *
So, basically the same as it's been for quite a while, allowing for margin of error.


Around 40/40 for Labour and Conservatives - and 50/50 for Remain and Leave. Yes - nothing has changed!

There is a lot of confirmation bias going around though... especially on Twitter (see: Poll on last page being shared widely as an example of 'Labour losing support due to their current policy on Brexit')

Posted by: Doctor Blind Feb 2 2019, 08:44 PM

Westminster voting intention:

CON: 41% (+4)
LAB: 34% (-6)
LDEM: 8% (+1)
UKIP: 7% (-)
GRN: 4% (-)

via @OpiniumResearch, 30 Jan - 01 Feb
Chgs. w/ 18 Jan

Quite a shift here, could be an outlier - could be a sign of things finally changing .. ?

Posted by: vidcapper Feb 10 2019, 02:58 PM

Different site than usual - still a summary of recent polls though.

https://www.markpack.org.uk/155623/voting-intention-opinion-poll-scorecard/

Posted by: Brett-Butler Feb 19 2019, 08:20 PM

Time to both a) look at the first post-Independent Group opinion poll, and b) check out the new Twitter embed function -



Glad they clarified what IG stands for.

I wouldn't read too much into one opinion poll only a day after the grouping came to being, but interesting nonetheless. It would suggest that they will eat up support mainly from Labour, but also a sizeable amount from the Conservatives as well, and hardly any from the Lib Dems, strangely.

Posted by: BotchLikeThis Feb 19 2019, 08:40 PM

The Lib Dems should just disband and form a new centrist party with IG. Lib Dems are far too tainted and any new centrist party will push them further into irrelevance.

However, I'm not surprised that Lib Dems have barely lost any support to IG. I think switchers would most likely be the centrist Tories / Labour voters who are unhappy with the current extremities of these parties. Lib Dems continue to plod along and please their core voters but it's difficult to see them making any real headway in future if they couldn't do it with the current weakness of the Tories and Labour.

Posted by: Doctor Blind Feb 19 2019, 08:44 PM

The IG don't really have any real policies or platform at the moment (except 'stop Brexit') so difficult to see this initial bounce go much higher at this stage, but interesting nonetheless to see such a strong start. I still get the impression it will struggle, especially if and when Brexit is resolved and the other issues facing society became more prevalent.

Posted by: 5 Silas Frøkner Feb 19 2019, 10:25 PM

Those numbers don’t add up at all. Even counting the SNP and PC and NI you’re still a good 7% short of 100%

Posted by: Envoirment Feb 19 2019, 10:32 PM

Interesting to see the IG with such a large share right off the bat. With an 8th Labour MP joining and the potential for more (perhaps even some Tory MPs joining) it could be a nice way of eating into Con/Lab and give us a more spread out vote/seat share amongst parties, in which a colatition government is the only option. There's still a long way until 2022 though (unless there's a GE before then) and it's early days for the IG. They may fizzle out once the "hype" dies down. Hopefully they'll register as a political party and start fleshing out their policies and such. I honestly hope they do well and can cement themselves similarly to how the Lib Dems have. It'd be nice for Lab/Con to have less power and influence.

Posted by: Brett-Butler Feb 19 2019, 10:36 PM

QUOTE(5 Silas Frøkner @ Feb 19 2019, 11:25 PM) *
Those numbers don’t add up at all. Even counting the SNP and PC and NI you’re still a good 7% short of 100%


https://interactive.news.sky.com/IG_TABS_190219.pdf. It would appear that the 7% short comes from people who voted "Other" - the first table also includes "I would not vote", which from some rough calculations I did appears to have been removed from the headline polling (ie divide the party %s by 74 to get the headline percentage).

Posted by: Brett-Butler Feb 19 2019, 10:39 PM

Added hilarity in the more detailed breakdown - the 1% of people in Scotland who said they'd vote for Plaid Cymru. A party that is quite well known for not standing candidates in Scotland.

Posted by: vidcapper Feb 20 2019, 09:04 AM

QUOTE(Brett-Butler @ Feb 19 2019, 08:20 PM) *
Time to both a) look at the first post-Independent Group opinion poll, and b) check out the new Twitter embed function -



Glad they clarified what IG stands for.

I wouldn't read too much into one opinion poll only a day after the grouping came to being, but interesting nonetheless. It would suggest that they will eat up support mainly from Labour, but also a sizeable amount from the Conservatives as well, and hardly any from the Lib Dems, strangely.


What about the 13% not accounted for, though?

Posted by: Brett-Butler Feb 20 2019, 09:12 AM

Please see my post from 10 hours ago with full polling data.

Posted by: vidcapper Feb 20 2019, 09:12 AM

QUOTE(Envoirment @ Feb 19 2019, 10:32 PM) *
Interesting to see the IG with such a large share right off the bat. With an 8th Labour MP joining and the potential for more (perhaps even some Tory MPs joining) it could be a nice way of eating into Con/Lab and give us a more spread out vote/seat share amongst parties, in which a colatition government is the only option. There's still a long way until 2022 though (unless there's a GE before then) and it's early days for the IG. They may fizzle out once the "hype" dies down. Hopefully they'll register as a political party and start fleshing out their policies and such. I honestly hope they do well and can cement themselves similarly to how the Lib Dems have. It'd be nice for Lab/Con to have less power and influence.


IMO they & the LD's are trying to occupy basically the same ground, so unless they agree not to stand against one another, one will fall heavily.

Posted by: 5 Silas Frøkner Feb 20 2019, 09:36 AM

QUOTE(Brett-Butler @ Feb 19 2019, 10:36 PM) *
https://interactive.news.sky.com/IG_TABS_190219.pdf. It would appear that the 7% short comes from people who voted "Other" - the first table also includes "I would not vote", which from some rough calculations I did appears to have been removed from the headline polling (ie divide the party %s by 74 to get the headline percentage).

Cheers for the link to the data. That makes more sense although that’s quite a high “other” number given NI is about 2.5% on these polls.

Posted by: BotchLikeThis Feb 20 2019, 12:55 PM

QUOTE(vidcapper @ Feb 20 2019, 09:12 AM) *
IMO they & the LD's are trying to occupy basically the same ground, so unless they agree not to stand against one another, one will fall heavily.


This presupposes the country is as divise as the big two parties, which it is not

Posted by: vidcapper Feb 20 2019, 02:45 PM

QUOTE(BotchLikeThis @ Feb 20 2019, 12:55 PM) *
This presupposes the country is as divise as the big two parties, which it is not


Did you mean 'diverse' or divisive' there? unsure.gif

Posted by: vidcapper Feb 23 2019, 06:25 AM

It'll be interesting to see how the TIG rate in the polls for the next month or two - especially as they appear to have only one policy, and no really big names... rolleyes.gif

Posted by: Steve201 Feb 23 2019, 04:21 PM

At ethe independent group standing in elections? They certainly don't seem to want to stand in a by election anyway!

Posted by: Brett-Butler Feb 23 2019, 04:33 PM

QUOTE(Steve201 @ Feb 23 2019, 05:21 PM) *
At ethe independent group standing in elections? They certainly don't seem to want to stand in a by election anyway!


At the moment it seems to be a "To Be Confirmed" situation. There is a parliamentary by-election that's likely to take place in Wales in the next few months, but I don't think they'll have a candidate ready in time for that - in order for them to make an impact, it'll have to be a marquee name, but I'm not sure if there's any big names that aren't already in parliament that would support the aims of the Tiggers.

As for the local election, I don't think they've got enough of a run-in time to have a whole swathe of new candidates to run in most of the places up for re-election. If they are running, it'll likely be local defectors rather than brand new names. Which would be a shame for them, as building themselves up from the grassroots will be very important for them - it worked wonders for the Lib Dems building themselves up on a council level, which then helped when they were standing on a national level. At the moment, TIG is very much a top-down party, given they've only got MPs at the moment.

Posted by: Suedehead2 Feb 23 2019, 05:34 PM

There are no local elections in Newport, so I suspect the by-election may be in April. The only reason for leaving it until May ould be if Labour think there is a chance they could lose the seat.

Fielding a large number of candidates in the May elections would be a huge rusk for the Tiggers. With no party organisation at the moment, they could end up getting very bad results indeed. That could kill them off before they've even started.

Posted by: vidcapper Feb 24 2019, 06:36 AM

QUOTE(Suedehead2 @ Feb 23 2019, 05:34 PM) *
There are no local elections in Newport, so I suspect the by-election may be in April. The only reason for leaving it until May ould be if Labour think there is a chance they could lose the seat.


Very little chance of that - the Tories could only barely scrape it, even in the Thatcherite landslide of 1983.

Posted by: vidcapper Feb 24 2019, 06:49 AM

Conservatives would win a 34-seat majority if a General Election were held tomorrow - but LOSE if Jeremy Corbyn stepped down as Labour leader, poll suggests

Theresa May would would win a 34-seat majority in a General Election, poll says
The Mail on Sunday poll puts the Conservatives on 39% and Labour on 31%
Without Corbyn as leader, Labour would win 40% over the Tories 37%, poll says

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6738541/Conservatives-win-34-seat-majority-General-Election-held-tomorrow-poll-suggests.html

******************************************

OK, the numbers themselves are not that important, but the notion that there would be a considerable swing to Labour without Corbyn as leader, should provide food for thought...

Posted by: Suedehead2 Feb 24 2019, 08:57 AM

QUOTE(vidcapper @ Feb 24 2019, 06:36 AM) *
Very little chance of that - the Tories could only barely scrape it, even in the Thatcherite landslide of 1983.

In the last election Labour and the Tories both won seats they didn’t win in landslide years.

Posted by: vidcapper Feb 24 2019, 09:20 AM

QUOTE(Suedehead2 @ Feb 24 2019, 08:57 AM) *
In the last election Labour and the Tories both won seats they didn’t win in landslide years.


True - demographic changes can cause that.

Posted by: Brett-Butler Feb 25 2019, 10:54 PM

For anyone in any doubt as to why Labour are now suddenly in favour of a 2nd referendum -



Obviously you shouldn't read too much into one poll, but golly gosh, look at that Labour %.

Posted by: BotchLikeThis Feb 25 2019, 11:19 PM

Oh dear at Labour!

Posted by: vidcapper Feb 26 2019, 06:22 AM

QUOTE(Brett-Butler @ Feb 25 2019, 10:54 PM) *
For anyone in any doubt as to why Labour are now suddenly in favour of a 2nd referendum -



Obviously you shouldn't read too much into one poll, but golly gosh, look at that Labour %.


It's the mid 80's over again!

With the loss of some moderate MP's, that presumably makes the core even less appealing. But will Corbyn get the clear message without an election defeat to ram it home?

Posted by: Doctor Blind Mar 3 2019, 11:19 PM

Latest Opinium

Definitely a slump for Labour and a surge for the Conservatives! That's the Conservatives, who just had to pay out £33 million to EuroTunnel to settle a lawsuit over extra ferry services in the event of a no-deal Brexit.: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-47414699

Westminster voting intention:

CON: 40% (+3)
LAB: 34% (-3)
LDEM: 9% (+1)
UKIP: 7% (-)
GRN: 3% (-)

via @OpiniumResearch, 26 Feb - 01 Mar
Chgs. w/ 15 Feb


TIG down to 5%... laugh.gif

Posted by: Doctor Blind Mar 17 2019, 11:45 AM

Latest from Survation:


Posted by: vidcapper Mar 17 2019, 02:47 PM

QUOTE(Doctor Blind @ Mar 17 2019, 11:45 AM) *
Latest from Survation:


You looked in The Mail - I thought that was a forbidden publication for Remainers/progressives... teresa.gif

Posted by: Steve201 Mar 17 2019, 05:30 PM

That's a poll to frighten the torys with this weeks vote for me because labour were well behind over the past two months now all of a sudden they have a decent lead!?

Posted by: Envoirment Mar 17 2019, 05:40 PM

QUOTE(Steve201 @ Mar 17 2019, 05:30 PM) *
That's a poll to frighten the torys with this weeks vote for me because labour were well behind over the past two months now all of a sudden they have a decent lead!?


Not surprising given that May is pushing so hard for a deal that pretty much no one wants.

Posted by: Brett-Butler Mar 17 2019, 05:53 PM

I don't think that poll's going to spook the Tories, unless there's a couple more polls that come out showing a Labour lead, demonstrating this is a consistent pattern, rather than one rogue poll.

Posted by: vidcapper Mar 18 2019, 06:26 AM

QUOTE(Brett-Butler @ Mar 17 2019, 05:53 PM) *
I don't think that poll's going to spook the Tories, unless there's a couple more polls that come out showing a Labour lead, demonstrating this is a consistent pattern, rather than one rogue poll.


And even then, they are hardly likely to call a GE while trailing in the polls!

Posted by: Doctor Blind Mar 31 2019, 12:00 AM

QUOTE(Brett-Butler @ Mar 17 2019, 05:53 PM) *
I don't think that poll's going to spook the Tories, unless there's a couple more polls that come out showing a Labour lead, demonstrating this is a consistent pattern, rather than one rogue poll.


Westminster voting intention:

LAB: 41% (+5)
CON: 36% (-7)
LDEM: 7% (+1)
UKIP: 7% (+2)

via @DeltaPollUK
Chgs. w/ 23 Feb


Posted by: vidcapper Apr 1 2019, 05:07 AM

I think the odds of the PM calling a GE have just lengthened greatly... tongue.gif

Posted by: Brett-Butler Apr 13 2019, 09:41 AM

Voting intention for both Westminster & EU polls. As it stands, Labour ahead in EU polls, with Brexit Party & Ukip eating into the Tories at the same level:


Posted by: vidcapper Apr 13 2019, 02:16 PM

[quote name='Brett-Butler' post='6217043' date='Apr 13 2019, 10:41 AM']Voting intention for both Westminster & EU polls. As it stands, Labour ahead in EU polls, with Brexit Party & Ukip eating into the Tories at the same level:


Very fragmented, especially for the Euro's!

Posted by: Iz~ Apr 13 2019, 02:24 PM

Pretty bad for the Conservatives, but also bad for Labour, it's far away from the very polarised 2017 GE result. But on the other hand, it looks like trending to be more polarised on Brexit, that's a great result for the Brexit party at this early stage, less so for CUK.

Of course, no campaigning on EU elections yet but that may just hurt the Tories further, could they perhaps be coming to top EU Parliament 2014 as their worst ever election result?

Posted by: vidcapper Apr 14 2019, 10:14 AM

QUOTE(Iz~ @ Apr 13 2019, 03:24 PM) *
Pretty bad for the Conservatives, but also bad for Labour, it's far away from the very polarised 2017 GE result. But on the other hand, it looks like trending to be more polarised on Brexit, that's a great result for the Brexit party at this early stage, less so for CUK.

Of course, no campaigning on EU elections yet but that may just hurt the Tories further, could they perhaps be coming to top EU Parliament 2014 as their worst ever election result?


I've a funny feeling they won't be calling a GE anytime soon... w00t.gif

Posted by: Doctor Blind Apr 14 2019, 01:27 PM

Yes but they WILL have to call one in 2022, and it's only going to get worse for them. Recent Onward report:

QUOTE
The tipping point age – the average age at which the probability of voting Conservative exceeds the probability of voting Labour – has risen from
47 years old in 2017 to 51 years old today. This means that in the 18 months between the 2017 election and our fieldwork, the point at which people were more likely to vote Conservative increased by 4 years.

Posted by: vidcapper Apr 14 2019, 01:43 PM

QUOTE(Doctor Blind @ Apr 14 2019, 02:27 PM) *
Yes but they WILL have to call one in 2022, and it's only going to get worse for them. Recent Onward report:


That's assuming the upward trend will continue, of course.

Posted by: Doctor Blind Apr 14 2019, 01:47 PM

QUOTE(vidcapper @ Apr 14 2019, 02:43 PM) *
That's assuming the upward trend will continue, of course.


Indeed.

I guess implementing a Brexit that the young resolutely don't want will really reverse that trend won't it ?

Posted by: Suedehead2 Apr 14 2019, 02:58 PM

QUOTE(Doctor Blind @ Apr 14 2019, 02:47 PM) *
Indeed.

I guess implementing a Brexit that the young resolutely don't want will really reverse that trend won't it ?

Indeed. There was an article in the i on Friday written by someone from Conservative Home. He failed to mention that rather large elephant in the room as a potential cause of the shift.

Posted by: vidcapper Apr 15 2019, 05:25 AM

QUOTE(Doctor Blind @ Apr 14 2019, 02:47 PM) *
Indeed.

I guess implementing a Brexit that the young resolutely don't want will really reverse that trend won't it ?


They were just the ones handed the poisoned chalice - if they were in power, they'd be the ones taking the hit.

Posted by: Suedehead2 Apr 15 2019, 07:42 AM

QUOTE(vidcapper @ Apr 15 2019, 06:25 AM) *
They were just the ones handed the poisoned chalice - if they were in power, they'd be the ones taking the hit.

Eh? They were handed it by themselves. They called the referendum. They chose to make it advisory with, as a result, no threshold. They chose to plough on regardless of the closeness of the result. They chose to ignore all the breaches of electoral law. This is a mess entirely of their own making.

Posted by: vidcapper Apr 15 2019, 10:48 AM

QUOTE(Suedehead2 @ Apr 15 2019, 08:42 AM) *
Eh? They were handed it by themselves. They called the referendum. They chose to make it advisory with, as a result, no threshold. They chose to plough on regardless of the closeness of the result. They chose to ignore all the breaches of electoral law. This is a mess entirely of their own making.


Excuse me? there was a GE in 2017 - if voters were that unhappy with the Tories, they should have taken the chance to remove them then.

Posted by: Suedehead2 Apr 15 2019, 11:48 AM

QUOTE(vidcapper @ Apr 15 2019, 11:48 AM) *
Excuse me? there was a GE in 2017 - if voters were that unhappy with the Tories, they should have taken the chance to remove them then.

They still sought to keep hold of the poisoned chalice.

Posted by: Bré Apr 15 2019, 07:30 PM

What I'm getting from that one EU election poll is that Change UK is already looking like a totally pointless failed experiment.

Posted by: vidcapper Apr 16 2019, 05:05 AM

QUOTE(Suedehead2 @ Apr 15 2019, 12:48 PM) *
They still sought to keep hold of the poisoned chalice.


What were they *going* to say - vote Labour and let them deal with it instead? wacko.gif rolleyes.gif

Posted by: Brett-Butler Apr 16 2019, 06:27 AM

QUOTE(Bré @ Apr 15 2019, 08:30 PM) *
What I'm getting from that one EU election poll is that Change UK is already looking like a totally pointless failed experiment.



Indeed, their branding & persuasion game has been woeful since their stronger TIG opening. I found this short Tweet-discussion from the weekend very interesting, explaining that whilst CHUK's branding has been completely off base, the Brexit Party have hit all the right notes:


Posted by: Popchartfreak Apr 16 2019, 06:59 AM

QUOTE(vidcapper @ Apr 15 2019, 11:48 AM) *
Excuse me? there was a GE in 2017 - if voters were that unhappy with the Tories, they should have taken the chance to remove them then.


The electorate removed their majority and gave a hung parliament. The Tories carried on as if buying some DUP votes could solve the whole issue instead of modifying their approach and sorting themselves out first. There was no unified approach to Brexit taken from the GE result, which is what the people voted for quite clearly when the Tories got a shock hammering.

Posted by: Popchartfreak Apr 16 2019, 07:02 AM

QUOTE(Bré @ Apr 15 2019, 08:30 PM) *
What I'm getting from that one EU election poll is that Change UK is already looking like a totally pointless failed experiment.


Except that it gave both obstinate parties a kick in the ass forcing their leadership to realise that they risk falling apart if they both continued to pursue their own self-interested stances. Falling on your sword for the greater good can often work better than moaning from within and being ignored.

Posted by: Popchartfreak Apr 16 2019, 07:10 AM

QUOTE(Brett-Butler @ Apr 16 2019, 07:27 AM) *
Indeed, their branding & persuasion game has been woeful since their stronger TIG opening. I found this short Tweet-discussion from the weekend very interesting, explaining that whilst CHUK's branding has been completely off base, the Brexit Party have hit all the right notes:



The Brexit Party IS UKIP with a name-change. UKIP was all about Farage, self-evidently as it imploded as all the nutters hadnt a clue once he ran off to get rich and stick his nose in foreign right-wing affairs. Farage acolytes were always going to switch, so it's not really a new party, it's the Farage Party.

Change UK was a bunch of rebels just pissed off with the leadership of their parties, and in that respect they represent most of us, but it's not a new party in the sense that it has organised, financed, worked out policies and so on. It's been forced to have been created. The SDP was much easier because it was one party, by and large, pissed off with the far-left. Circumstances in 2019 are much more messed-up and complex.

Posted by: Iz~ Apr 16 2019, 01:13 PM

QUOTE(Brett-Butler @ Apr 16 2019, 06:27 AM) *
Indeed, their branding & persuasion game has been woeful since their stronger TIG opening. I found this short Tweet-discussion from the weekend very interesting, explaining that whilst CHUK's branding has been completely off base, the Brexit Party have hit all the right notes:



Very interesting and I completely agree, particularly that last bit about the colours. Colour wheel wise, going with turquoise doesn't line up with the Brexit Party's aims, but it's such a good calming colour it's a surprise no one has taken it before.

Imagine if Change UK had branded themselves The Remain Party. It's not the sole reason why they exist, sure, but they weren't going to cut out a unique place in British politics any other way.

Posted by: Brett-Butler Apr 16 2019, 05:08 PM

QUOTE(Iz~ @ Apr 16 2019, 02:13 PM) *
Very interesting and I completely agree, particularly that last bit about the colours. Colour wheel wise, going with turquoise doesn't line up with the Brexit Party's aims, but it's such a good calming colour it's a surprise no one has taken it before.

Imagine if Change UK had branded themselves The Remain Party. It's not the sole reason why they exist, sure, but they weren't going to cut out a unique place in British politics any other way.


The problem with naming themselves the "Remain" Party is that it is far too negative - it gives the impression of a party that is merely going to uphold the status quo, which would damage its chances psychologically. They could have gone for something along the likes of the "European Party", which tells everyone what they are without as many negative connotations (except among those who don't consider themselves as having a European identity, a population that also includes many Remainers), or possibly the Cosmopolitan Party (a bit more of a long shot, but definitely stands out). Change UK is perhaps the dullest possible name they could go for, plus it gives their enemies lots of pre-built ammunition - "you want to stop us changing from being in the EU etc..."

Posted by: vidcapper Apr 17 2019, 05:26 AM

QUOTE(Popchartfreak @ Apr 16 2019, 07:59 AM) *
The electorate removed their majority and gave a hung parliament. The Tories carried on as if buying some DUP votes could solve the whole issue instead of modifying their approach and sorting themselves out first.


What was the alternative then - Labour could not have formed a gov't without the DUP either, and they would also have needed *every* other opposition party too, and if you think the Tory coalition was unstable... rolleyes.gif

Posted by: Iz~ Apr 17 2019, 08:07 AM

And that’s what selling the LDs short in their coalition got them. No one but the DUP would consider the Tories, they killed compromise for themselves dead.

The issue is that they continued to treat a hung parliament like they were still a majority government, rather than opening themselves up to cross-party talks, until now, when the deadline has already passed.

Posted by: Popchartfreak Apr 17 2019, 11:26 AM

QUOTE(vidcapper @ Apr 17 2019, 06:26 AM) *
What was the alternative then - Labour could not have formed a gov't without the DUP either, and they would also have needed *every* other opposition party too, and if you think the Tory coalition was unstable... rolleyes.gif


Which is what the electorate voted for - a situation where no-one had total control, where co=operation was called for and getting agreement should have been planned for. Split, just like the country, so everyone has to compromise and accept they can't have exactly what they want.

Put the deal to the electorate, that'll soon sort out whether people actually want it, or whether they would rather stay as they are. But of course, those who would rather go for the will of 1.5m dead people rather than 1.5m potential new voters keep moaning about democracy being a bad thing when you get an actual concrete deal rather than an airy fairy bunch of pink elephant lies....

It's funny cos it's true. tongue.gif

Posted by: Brett-Butler Apr 17 2019, 05:11 PM

So let's see how the Brexit Party is doing now that they've officially launched and are...oh f***:



I imagine that this is a temporary boost as the party were likely fresh in people's mind following their high-profile launch, and their numbers may settle down in a few weeks time. Interesting to not that gains have almost exclusively been at the expense of UKIP, which we can take as some relief, in the same way that being kicked in the shins is preferable to being kicked in the bolling-brooks.

Poor, poor Change UK...

Posted by: Iz~ Apr 17 2019, 05:35 PM

Brexit are acting as the figurehead for hard Leavers. Which is good for Farage's party, they can continue to propose the same sort of generic catch-all Brexit under a populist banner and gain votes and keep the Brexit conversations alive, no matter how unworkable any of the solutions are. That doesn't matter. They don't officially support any kind of Brexit, they don't have to, though accepting the """truth""" (big fat lie) that everyone has always supported hard Brexit won't hurt them. They're now mainstream.

The data shows Remain is still completely split, with the largest proportion still going to a party (Labour) that isn't operating under a Remain policy. Additionally, several Remain voters don't yet know who they'd support. Still a lot of room for the polls to normalise, and for campaigns to make sure that pro-Europeans don't stay home on the voting day.

Posted by: blacksquare Apr 18 2019, 09:09 AM



Oh

Posted by: Popchartfreak Apr 18 2019, 04:36 PM

QUOTE(blacksquare @ Apr 18 2019, 10:09 AM) *


Oh


Corbyn must be pissing himself with delight - under a third of voter support and still 10 points clear. Labour could have a Chimp as party leader and still appear a better alternative to the Tories. Mind you, if they want someone who enjoys flinging faeces about they need look no further than bff Assange....

Posted by: Suedehead2 Apr 18 2019, 04:54 PM

QUOTE(Brett-Butler @ Apr 17 2019, 06:11 PM) *
So let's see how the Brexit Party is doing now that they've officially launched and are...oh f***:



I imagine that this is a temporary boost as the party were likely fresh in people's mind following their high-profile launch, and their numbers may settle down in a few weeks time. Interesting to not that gains have almost exclusively been at the expense of UKIP, which we can take as some relief, in the same way that being kicked in the shins is preferable to being kicked in the bolling-brooks.

Poor, poor Change UK...

How's this for confusing? Another poll carried out roughly at the same time as the above gives the following...

Lab 33%
Con 18%
Farage 17%
LibD 9%
ChUK 9%
UKIP 5%
Green 5%

It is unclear how the two polling organisations have adjusted their figures, particularly for the Chukas and Farage's fanclub.

Posted by: Iz~ Apr 18 2019, 04:56 PM

Two new parties with built-in support appearing at the same time AND this election being incomparable to the last EU election in terms of voter awareness and EU interest in the country must be making it exceptionally hard to weight voting intentions properly.

Posted by: Suedehead2 Apr 18 2019, 05:04 PM

QUOTE(Iz~ @ Apr 18 2019, 05:56 PM) *
Two new parties with built-in support appearing at the same time AND this election being incomparable to the last EU election in terms of voter awareness and EU interest in the country must be making it exceptionally hard to weight voting intentions properly.

I wonder if a newspaper will decide to pay for an old-fashioned poll, i.e. one that asks a representative sample. That would reduce the amount of adjustment required.

Posted by: Klaus Apr 18 2019, 05:23 PM

QUOTE(Suedehead2 @ Apr 18 2019, 05:54 PM) *
It is unclear how the two polling organisations have adjusted their figures, particularly for the Chukas and Farage's fanclub.

Ohhh.... it’s interesting that Change UK can be shortened to ChUK....a Umunna. It’s probably been noticed thousands I’ve times already but that’s the first I clicked mellow.gif

Posted by: Iz~ Apr 19 2019, 03:25 AM

Meanwhile for the actual Remain-Leave voting intention, ComRes has this:



That's... a pretty sizeable advantage. God polls are interesting right now.

Posted by: Doctor Blind Apr 20 2019, 08:14 AM



Poll of Polls over the last 2 years.. some significant shifts taking place at the moment. That being the crumbling of Conservative support (at last!)

Posted by: Harve Apr 20 2019, 09:45 AM

Re: poll volatility of new, but prominent, parties. TIG/ChangeUK* have fluctuated between 18% and 1% of the vote I believe. Most polls have been in the reasonably consistent 5-8% zone, but that's intriguing indeed.

*god I cringe just typing that name out

Posted by: Harve Apr 20 2019, 10:21 AM

Meanwhile my hometown's Tory party, Derbyshire Conservatives (representing 1 million people), have refused to campaign for the EU elections. Many local associations will be tacitly on strike, but Derbyshire are wanting to make a song and a dance of it.

Being deep into Brexitland, Derbyshire is one of the few places that https://i.redd.it/ik63jcfab03z.png in 2017's election. It's an interesting area politically, with an equal split currently between the two main parties, but was overwhelmingly Labour during the Blair years. Just one Westminster seat is a safe (Tory) seat, although the ex-coal mining areas have been Labour for a century, albeit with increasingly small majorities.

They of course won't really care if 23 May is a disaster for their own party. But they surely plan to continue campaigning hard for the local elections 3 weeks before, and I can't help but feel that the EU elections will cast a shadow over these. Frustratingly we don't really get any polls for local elections, but here's hoping!

https://www.derbyshireconservatives.com/news/derbyshire-conservatives-make-views-clear-european-elections-we-will-take-no-part-them Quite telling that this rather gammony bunch are 75-80% men and all but 3 are over the age of 50. It's horribly insensitive and crass but I'd also be interested in any article that studies the correlation between a boomer's political leanings and their BMI. unsure.gif unsure.gif unsure.gif

Posted by: Doctor Blind Apr 20 2019, 11:05 AM

Not strictly related to Opinion Polls but the research that Onward (right leaning thinktank) did recently shows how big the problem is for the Conservatives in terms of the polarising of the electorate generationally:



Looking at just Labour and Conservative voters you can see that demographically the votes are evenly spread for Labour but are hugely skewed towards the 'Baby Boomer' generation for the Conservatives (e.g. those born after 1945 and before 1960) - this tends to be the generation that benefitted from free higher education, relatively inexpensive housing etc. - as we start to see them die off in the next 20 to 30 years it will be the millennial generation (born 1981-2000) that sways more influence and as you can see at the moment, they ain't voting Conservative.

Full report here: https://www.ukonward.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/Onward-Generation-Why-online-PDF.pdf

Posted by: Brett-Butler Apr 20 2019, 11:17 AM

QUOTE(Doctor Blind @ Apr 20 2019, 12:05 PM) *
N

Looking at just Labour and Conservative voters you can see that demographically the votes are evenly spread for Labour but are hugely skewed towards the 'Baby Boomer' generation for the Conservatives (e.g. those born after 1945 and before 1960) - this tends to be the generation that benefitted from free higher education, relatively inexpensive housing etc. - as we start to see them die off in the next 20 to 30 years it will be the millennial generation (born 1981-2000) that sways more influence and as you can see at the moment, they ain't voting Conservative.


To paraphrase a common call I've heard in recent years, you can't expect the youth to get excited about capitalism when they've got no capital to begin with. People writing the obituary of the current Conservative Party will undoubtedly say that their biggest failure (even more so than Brexit and other possible symptoms) will be their failure to build more houses to allow more young people onto the property ladder. Although I doubt demographic differences will see the Conservatives no longer being a force in politics - there're been stories going well back to the 1960s saying that the demographic changes will mean that the Conservatives will die out within the next few years, and in that time they've been in power longer than Labour.

Posted by: Brett-Butler Apr 27 2019, 08:17 PM

New Westminster opinion poll showing a party that doesn't even have any policies in 3rd in the rankings. Definitely feels like a honeymoon boost, but even so, rather interesting:


Posted by: 5 Silas Frøkner Apr 27 2019, 09:46 PM

And on the other side of the border...



we be riding this wave all the way to freedom and our EU passports

Posted by: Steve201 Apr 28 2019, 12:25 AM

Good luck to yous!

Posted by: vidcapper Apr 28 2019, 05:18 AM

QUOTE(5 Silas Frøkner @ Apr 27 2019, 10:46 PM) *
And on the other side of the border...

we be riding this wave all the way to freedom and our EU passports


Except that you won't be *in* the EU if you achieve independence - you'll have to apply as a separate country, and satisfy all the criteria that new members have to.

I'm not saying that wouldn't happen, but it's likely to be a long drawn-out process.

Posted by: 5 Silas Frøkner Apr 28 2019, 08:48 AM

We already satisfy all the criteria by virtue of the fact that we currently are an EU member. Duh.

A growing number within the EU have been confirming that Scotland wouldn’t need to wait long at all. Mainly because of the sentence above.


We also don’t magically achieve freedom from what’s left of the English empire overnight. There will be a negotiation period where we sort out split of the assets and debts with Westminster that we can use to speak with the EU and arrange our way in.

Posted by: Suedehead2 Apr 28 2019, 08:49 AM

QUOTE(vidcapper @ Apr 28 2019, 06:18 AM) *
Except that you won't be *in* the EU if you achieve independence - you'll have to apply as a separate country, and satisfy all the criteria that new members have to.

I'm not saying that wouldn't happen, but it's likely to be a long drawn-out process.

Scotland will already have met most of the membership requirements. Unless another member obstructs their application for other reasons, it needn’t take as long as most recent ones.

Posted by: vidcapper Apr 28 2019, 09:31 AM

QUOTE(5 Silas Frøkner @ Apr 28 2019, 09:48 AM) *
We already satisfy all the criteria by virtue of the fact that we currently are an EU member. Duh.

A growing number within the EU have been confirming that Scotland wouldn’t need to wait long at all. Mainly because of the sentence above.
We also don’t magically achieve freedom from what’s left of the English empire overnight. There will be a negotiation period where we sort out split of the assets and debts with Westminster that we can use to speak with the EU and arrange our way in.


The think I find bizarre is that after gaining 'their freedom from the English', they immediately want to give it away to the EU. laugh.gif

Posted by: Suedehead2 Apr 28 2019, 10:04 AM

QUOTE(vidcapper @ Apr 28 2019, 10:31 AM) *
The think I find bizarre is that after gaining 'their freedom from the English', they immediately want to give it away to the EU. laugh.gif

Don't you think that the fact that former parts of the Soviet Union and their satellite states have willingly joined the EU means that rather a lot of people don't see it that way?

Posted by: 5 Silas Frøkner Apr 28 2019, 10:12 AM

Every EU member state is a fully independent country capable of making its own decisions and you don't surrender sovereignty when you pool it. The UK is not pooled sovereignty. It is a colonial power dictating over what's left of its former Empire.

The UK and USSR and not in anyway equivalent to the EU.

Posted by: vidcapper Apr 28 2019, 01:29 PM

QUOTE(5 Silas Frøkner @ Apr 28 2019, 11:12 AM) *
Every EU member state is a fully independent country capable of making its own decisions and you don't surrender sovereignty when you pool it. The UK is not pooled sovereignty. It is a colonial power dictating over what's left of its former Empire.


You make it sound like England conquered Scotland, whereas it was actually a mutual arrangement to form a union.

Posted by: Iz~ Apr 28 2019, 01:41 PM

And you make it sound like the EU conquered Europe, when it was a mutual agreement to join and together direct its future formed by and aided with the cooperation of 28 of the most peaceful governments on the planet.

and the Scottish riots against the Act of Union in 1707 were far from insignificant.

Posted by: Popchartfreak Apr 28 2019, 05:29 PM

microphone dropped...!

Posted by: 5 Silas Frøkner Apr 28 2019, 06:50 PM

QUOTE(vidcapper @ Apr 28 2019, 02:29 PM) *
You make it sound like England conquered Scotland, whereas it was actually a mutual arrangement to form a union.

They did.

When they couldn't win by force, they did so by economics. Killing off Scotland's attempt at Empire and then swooping in with the offer to reimburse the wealthy for their loses if they just signed the Act of Union. The rich sold Scotland to the English without the consent of the people of Scotland and as Iz said, the riots were hefty. So hefty the act was signed in secret.

Posted by: vidcapper Apr 29 2019, 05:25 AM

QUOTE(5 Silas Frøkner @ Apr 28 2019, 07:50 PM) *
They did.


When they couldn't win by force, they did so by economics. Killing off Scotland's attempt at Empire and then swooping in with the offer to reimburse the wealthy for their loses if they just signed the Act of Union. The rich sold Scotland to the English without the consent of the people of Scotland and as Iz said, the riots were hefty. So hefty the act was signed in secret.


You are Nicola Sturgeon, AICMFP. wink.gif

I didn't exactly see Scotland complaining when they shared in the economic opportunities of the Victorian era...

Posted by: Popchartfreak Apr 29 2019, 07:27 AM

QUOTE(vidcapper @ Apr 29 2019, 06:25 AM) *
You are Nicola Sturgeon, AICMFP. wink.gif

I didn't exactly see Scotland complaining when they shared in the economic opportunities of the Victorian era...


You weren't born.

I didn't exactly see England complaining when they sent small children up chimneys, stuck countless people in factories with no holidays, no sick pay, no health service, no power while they ransacked far-flung countries and neighbouring countries plundering natural resources for their own benefit while assisting in genocide of the local population.

People who write the history books, by and large, are the rich ones benefitting from the system. The underclass depend on rich people with social consciences trying to do something about it. The poor ones that tried tended to get sent to the colonies as rabble-rousers, at best.

As I say over and over life isn't black & white it is, and always will be, shades of grey, there are always consequences to everything, both good and bad, and whether they are good or bad depends entirely on your viewpoint and how you perceive you are doing out of it.

Posted by: vidcapper Apr 29 2019, 07:35 AM

QUOTE(Popchartfreak @ Apr 29 2019, 08:27 AM) *
You weren't born.


Well, duh! I didn't mean it in the literal sense. rolleyes.gif

Posted by: Suedehead2 Apr 29 2019, 07:54 AM

QUOTE(vidcapper @ Apr 29 2019, 08:35 AM) *
Well, duh! I didn't mean it in the literal sense. rolleyes.gif

How about reading the whole post?

Posted by: vidcapper Apr 29 2019, 08:38 AM

QUOTE(Suedehead2 @ Apr 29 2019, 08:54 AM) *
How about reading the whole post?


I *did* read the whole post - I simply chose not to reply to it, as is my prerogative.

Posted by: Doctor Blind Apr 30 2019, 12:22 PM

Can we keep discussion in here to the topic of Opinion Polls please?

In keeping with the theme of recent weeks.. this poll from YouGov shows that the Brexit Party have in the public's opinion a clear stance, but that the recently formed Change UK has a way to go yet with as many as 44% not sure. This is clearly a massive missed opportunity and probably an own-goal with respect to killing off a potential 2nd referendum when/if The Brexit Party establish a clear lead in the EU elections.


Posted by: Brett-Butler Apr 30 2019, 12:57 PM

Who are the 3% that think the Brexit Party is anti-Brexit? It’s like that opinion poll a few years ago where 4% of people said they had been decapitated.

Posted by: 5 Silas Frøkner Apr 30 2019, 02:05 PM

On the same measure. What rock are people living under if they think the SNP or the LD or Greens or PC are pro-Brexit?

Posted by: vidcapper Apr 30 2019, 03:32 PM

QUOTE(5 Silas Frøkner @ Apr 30 2019, 03:05 PM) *
On the same measure. What rock are people living under if they think the SNP or the LD or Greens or PC are pro-Brexit?


Alas, not everyone is as well-informed as we are. mellow.gif

Posted by: Iz~ Apr 30 2019, 03:57 PM

The interesting takeaway from that poll is that far more people seem to view Labour as an anti-Brexit party... when they're not. They're struggling to agree on whether a second referendum is necessary (meanwhile the complete Conservative split is mildly funny)

The other thing is that Lib Dems being only at 53% is far worse than they should be hoping for, even disregarding that UKIP and Brexit stances should be fairly self-explanatory, the idea would be to be level with about where the SNP currently are.

Posted by: Bré Apr 30 2019, 04:41 PM

I'm more confused at 5% of people thinking UKIP is anti-Brexit. And less people knowing about UKIP's stance in general than the Brexit Party.

Posted by: Popchartfreak Apr 30 2019, 07:41 PM

I think what we can take away from that poll is that unless the clue is in the name a large proportion of the population havent a clue, and even when the clue is IN the name 25% of people STILL haven't a clue.

Which all goes to show that about half the population is ripe for any old piece of tat, you could tell them Martians are invading and they'd ring up in panic. Sounds unlikely? Errr it happened, see Orson Welles radio broadcast of War Of The Worlds....

Posted by: Brett-Butler Apr 30 2019, 08:32 PM

QUOTE(Popchartfreak @ Apr 30 2019, 08:41 PM) *
Which all goes to show that about half the population is ripe for any old piece of tat, you could tell them Martians are invading and they'd ring up in panic. Sounds unlikely? Errr it happened, see Orson Welles radio broadcast of War Of The Worlds....


The actually panic over the radio broadcast of War of The Worlds https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/war-of-the-worlds/ (including by Orson Welles himself in his experimental documentary "F For Fake") - the isolated, and largely unverified stories surrounding the panic was the old-timey version of modern days stories like "Chris Pratt wore a French hat, and people are FURIOUS", where the "people" are two people of Twitter with 7 followers between them. Ironically, the fact that people believe that there was mass panic surrounding this broadcast just goes to show how people are likely to believe something just because it confirms their cognitive biases.

Posted by: Doctor Blind Apr 30 2019, 09:01 PM

'Ever since I first learned about confirmation bias I've been seeing it everywhere'... basil.gif

Posted by: Suedehead2 Apr 30 2019, 09:04 PM

QUOTE(Doctor Blind @ Apr 30 2019, 10:01 PM) *
'Ever since I first learned about confirmation bias I've been seeing it everywhere'... basil.gif

We need a Like button.

Posted by: Brett-Butler Apr 30 2019, 09:06 PM

QUOTE(Doctor Blind @ Apr 30 2019, 10:01 PM) *
'Ever since I first learned about confirmation bias I've been seeing it everywhere'... basil.gif


biggrin.gif

Posted by: vidcapper May 1 2019, 04:55 AM

QUOTE(Brett-Butler @ Apr 30 2019, 09:32 PM) *
The actually panic over the radio broadcast of War of The Worlds https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/war-of-the-worlds/ (including by Orson Welles himself in his experimental documentary "F For Fake") - the isolated, and largely unverified stories surrounding the panic was the old-timey version of modern days stories like "Chris Pratt wore a French hat,


Plus there was no instant confirmation/refutation then, so true facts were harder to establish - although there are still far too many people who believe in UFO conspiracy theories. sad.gif

Posted by: Popchartfreak May 1 2019, 06:54 AM

errrr the principle applies, there were a few hundreds of concerned calls to the radio stations. People widely believe the moon landings were faked. the flat earth society is very much a thing, the numbers of people claiming to have been kidnapped by aliens is a virtual army (as mentioned by Vidcapper), many millions of people believe Donald Trump is not a liar despite video evidence to the contrary....

People, and I'm sorry to say it, can be persuaded to believe any old piece of fake crap even when it clearly challenges reality and science. The evidence is everywhere - or else I've fallen victim to the same confirmation bias. I haven't. I didn't say they ran screaming into the streets....

Posted by: vidcapper May 1 2019, 09:05 AM

QUOTE(Popchartfreak @ May 1 2019, 07:54 AM) *
errrr the principle applies, there were a few hundreds of concerned calls to the radio stations. People widely believe the moon landings were faked. the flat earth society is very much a thing, the numbers of people claiming to have been kidnapped by aliens is a virtual army (as mentioned by Vidcapper),

many millions of people believe Donald Trump is not a liar despite video evidence to the contrary....


He's in politics, so he's a liar, period. tongue.gif

AS for the others, I just laugh at them.

Posted by: Tawdry Hepburn May 1 2019, 10:04 AM

Who remembers the spaghetti tree hoax? laugh.gif

Posted by: Brett-Butler May 1 2019, 10:17 AM

QUOTE(Tawdry Hepburn @ May 1 2019, 11:04 AM) *
Who remembers the spaghetti tree hoax? laugh.gif


Not me, although that’s largely because it happened 30 years before I was born. tongue.gif

Posted by: Suedehead2 May 1 2019, 10:22 AM

QUOTE(vidcapper @ May 1 2019, 10:05 AM) *
He's in politics, so he's a liar, period. tongue.gif

AS for the others, I just laugh at them.

Until recently, very few politicians were blatant liars. They may have bent the truth a little or been selective with facts, but they didn’t tell outright lies. The likes of Trump and Cameron have changed that. Their attitude seems to have been “People expect politicians to lie; why disappoint them?” That is potentially very dangerous.

Posted by: Doctor Blind May 11 2019, 05:22 PM

Huge lead for Nigel Farage's Brexit Party in the latest poll from OpiniumResearch.

European Parliament voting intention:

BREX: 34% (+6)
LAB: 21% (-7)
LDEM: 12% (+5)
CON: 11% (-3)
GRN: 8% (+2)
UKIP: 4% (+1)
CHUK: 3% (-4)

via @OpiniumResearch, 08 May
Chgs. w/ 23 Apr

Posted by: vidcapper May 12 2019, 04:59 AM

QUOTE(Suedehead2 @ May 1 2019, 11:22 AM) *
Until recently, very few politicians were blatant liars. They may have bent the truth a little or been selective with facts, but they didn’t tell outright lies. The likes of Trump and Cameron have changed that. Their attitude seems to have been “People expect politicians to lie; why disappoint them?” That is potentially very dangerous.


More dangerous if they believe them despite the lies, though?

Posted by: Suedehead2 May 12 2019, 08:54 AM

QUOTE(vidcapper @ May 12 2019, 05:59 AM) *
More dangerous if they believe them despite the lies, though?

That's one of the reasons why it's so dangerous. It's a sorry state of affairs when so many people look at the PM's record and decide they cannot believe a word she says. It's dangerous when a significant number of people believe the lies told by the likes of Trump, Johnson and Farage despite the irrefutable evidence that they are serial liars.

Posted by: Botchia May 12 2019, 09:40 AM



!!!!!

Posted by: Iz~ May 12 2019, 09:59 AM

SURGE

I mean it's totally wishful thinking as an election would never occur under those conditions but that is a beautiful map.

Posted by: Harve May 12 2019, 10:18 AM

I wouldn't pay much attention to Westminster polling until a fair time after the Euros have ended. And FPBE seat projections are always going to be very tricky and incredibly interesting under unprecedented circumstances. A party on 15-20% of the vote could get hundreds of seats or barely any at all.

Posted by: Harve May 12 2019, 10:21 AM

But of course while the exact numbers are fickle, we can't deny the broad trends of the Tories being in dire straits and Labour not much better.

Posted by: Harve May 12 2019, 05:30 PM

QUOTE(Doctor Blind @ May 11 2019, 06:22 PM) *
Huge lead for Nigel Farage's Brexit Party in the latest poll from OpiniumResearch.

European Parliament voting intention:

BREX: 34% (+6)
LAB: 21% (-7)
LDEM: 12% (+5)
CON: 11% (-3)
GRN: 8% (+2)
UKIP: 4% (+1)
CHUK: 3% (-4)

via @OpiniumResearch, 08 May
Chgs. w/ 23 Apr

Also 38% is already a few percent above the ceiling that I thought UKIP+BREX would be limited to, even in light of ~40% of voters believing that WTO rules are a good idea. I hope it's wrong. Ack.

Posted by: Doctor Blind May 12 2019, 05:48 PM

Unfortunately I can see the Brexit Party winning this by quite a clear margin.

The anti-Politics feeling is also being fuelled and stoked up by Change UK but they still seem to be languishing in the doldrums.

Posted by: Rooney May 12 2019, 05:57 PM

But the Brexit Party just plays on the emotions associated - you know what you're getting despite the fact it's going to be like your worst nightmare.

I feel the Remain vote is way too split.

Posted by: Doctor Blind May 12 2019, 09:37 PM

COMRES poll (with European seat projections):

BXP 27% (+27)
Lab 25% (-)
LD 14% (+7)
Con 13% (-11)
Grn 8% (-)
ChUK 6% (+6)
SNP 4% (+2)
UKIP 3% (-25)

My seat estimate
BXP 24 (+24)
Lab 21 (+1)
LD 10 (+9)
Con 8 (-11)
Grn 2 (-1)
SNP 2 (-)
UKIP 2 (-22)
PC 1 (-)
ChUK 0 (-)

A Grn/LD/ChUK and SNP coalition would be around 2 pt ahead of BXP/UKIP.

Posted by: Doctor Blind May 18 2019, 05:14 PM

Westminster voting intention (via @HanburyStrategy,):

Lab 30% (-11)
Con 21% (-23)
BXP 19% (+19)
LD 13% (+5)
ChUK 6% (+6)
Grn 5% (+3)
SNP 4% (+1)
UKIP 2% (-)

Projected Seat estimate
Lab 314 (+52)
Con 224 (-93)
SNP 53 (+18)
LD 35 (+23)
BXP 0 (-)
ChUK 0 (-)
Oth 24 (-)


*.*

Posted by: vidcapper May 19 2019, 05:12 AM

QUOTE(Doctor Blind @ May 18 2019, 06:14 PM) *
Westminster voting intention (via @HanburyStrategy,):

Lab 30% (-11)
Con 21% (-23)
BXP 19% (+19)
LD 13% (+5)
ChUK 6% (+6)
Grn 5% (+3)
SNP 4% (+1)
UKIP 2% (-)

Projected Seat estimate
Lab 314 (+52)
Con 224 (-93)
SNP 53 (+18)
LD 35 (+23)
BXP 0 (-)
ChUK 0 (-)
Oth 24 (-)
*.*


Two things -

No majority for Lab even with a 9% lead.
No seats for BXP even with 19% of the vote. ohmy.gif

Posted by: Suedehead2 May 19 2019, 08:27 AM

QUOTE(vidcapper @ May 19 2019, 06:12 AM) *
Two things -

No majority for Lab even with a 9% lead.
No seats for BXP even with 19% of the vote. ohmy.gif

Electoral Calculus gives the Farage Fanclub some seats based on those figures. My guess is that it is the difference between giving them a starting point of zero or building on the UKIP vote.

Posted by: Steve201 May 19 2019, 10:55 AM

Mental that 19% of the vote can still give you 0-5 seats max. Shows how the vote spread is important!!

Posted by: Doctor Blind May 19 2019, 12:21 PM

QUOTE(Steve201 @ May 19 2019, 11:55 AM) *
Mental that 19% of the vote can still give you 0-5 seats max. Shows how the vote spread is important!!


That's the absurdity of the FPTP system - the SNP vote is obviously concentrated in Scotland so appears low at 4% but gives them almost all Scottish seats (53 out of 59).

I think the Brexit Party would on that vote share finish second in up to 100 seats - and as Suedey says the Electoral Calculus site actually gives the Brexit Party one seat- https://www.electoralcalculus.co.uk/homepage.html

I assume that would be Boston & Skegness??

Posted by: Harve May 19 2019, 12:49 PM

QUOTE(Doctor Blind @ May 19 2019, 01:21 PM) *
That's the absurdity of the FPTP system - the SNP vote is obviously concentrated in Scotland so appears low at 4% but gives them almost all Scottish seats (53 out of 59).

I think the Brexit Party would on that vote share finish second in up to 100 seats - and as Suedey says the Electoral Calculus site actually gives the Brexit Party one seat- https://www.electoralcalculus.co.uk/homepage.html

I assume that would be Boston & Skegness??

Thurrock. It's not about the overall Leave vote, but rather where the Tory and Labour votes are both relatively low. Like many high Leave-voting seats, Boston & Skegness is safe Tory whereas Thurrock has been a marginal for decades.

Posted by: Steve201 May 19 2019, 12:53 PM

Is the increase back to 2015 levels for the SNP due to the Brexit situation. I got the general feeling that their support was on the wane(or plateux at least) maybe at devolved level at least.

Posted by: Doctor Blind May 19 2019, 01:06 PM

QUOTE(Steve201 @ May 19 2019, 01:53 PM) *
Is the increase back to 2015 levels for the SNP due to the Brexit situation. I got the general feeling that their support was on the wane(or plateux at least) maybe at devolved level at least.


Same reason for the increase in support for Lib Dems and Green Party, a strong pro-Remain message, yes.

Posted by: 5 Silas Frøkner May 19 2019, 06:20 PM

Ruthie had a very successful catch phrase in “no indyref2” (no actual policies of course) which did what it was designed to do an get unionists to vote tactically. The SNP actually got more votes in 2016 than in 2011. Their council vote is higher than ever as well. They’ve got on with the day job while being a clear and consistent voice against Brexit. Their support isn’t going anywhere.

Davidson like to mouth off that she will be the next FM but they’re not even on half the level of support of the SNP on a bad poll for the SNP. On a good day, Ruth has about 45% of the level of support that Nicola has.

Posted by: Suedehead2 May 19 2019, 08:33 PM

Given how long they have been in power in Scotland (including the period when they were propped up by the Tories), the SNP are doing very well at the moment. They have made themselves the leading pro-Remain party in Scotland, well ahead of the Lib Dems and Greens. Whether that translates into a majority for independence remains to be seen.

Posted by: Botchia May 30 2019, 08:11 PM

Leaked poll due to come out shortly has Lib Dems now in the lead on 24%!! Followed by Brexit and then Labour and Tories on 19% each.

Lib Dems *.*

Posted by: Suedehead2 May 30 2019, 08:40 PM

If the rumoured figures are confirmed, electoral calculus shows the Lib Dems first in the popular vote but fourth un seats. Labour, joint third in the popular vote would have the most seats. Welcome to First Past The Post.

Posted by: Brett-Butler May 30 2019, 09:41 PM

Confirmation:



We are truly living in the banter era.

Posted by: Botchia May 30 2019, 09:58 PM

This feels like such a moment for the Lib Dems!

Posted by: Botchia May 30 2019, 10:05 PM

So it's the first time Lib Dems have led in a Westminster poll since YouGov's own back in April 2010(!)

And just like that the coalition years are a distant memory *.*

Posted by: Bré May 30 2019, 10:49 PM

The next election is going to be seriously spicy.

Posted by: Envoirment May 30 2019, 11:57 PM

Come on Lib Dems!! *_* The Greens on 8% as well... Now if only that could translate into enough seats for a Green/SNP/Lib Dem coalition of sorts. I'm hoping the Conseratives and Labour will continue to fall. I think people are finally realising they have the power to completely change the stagnant Con-Labour governments. A lot of people think you're wasting a vote by not voting for Lab or Con, so glad to see that changing significantly.

Hopefully the next leader of the Lib Dems will be able to carry this momentum forward.

Posted by: Iz~ May 31 2019, 12:38 AM

I couldn't even begin to imagine how an election would look under that poll. Of course it does mean that the new PM won't even think about having one unless forced to by a VoNC, I've seen reports that suggest the Conservatives would get obliterated down to under 100 seats, which I'm very sceptical would ever happen but, not a good time to be a new Tory PM.

Posted by: vidcapper May 31 2019, 05:12 AM

I suspect a lot of people will revert to their traditional allegiences by the time the next GE comes around.

Posted by: Popchartfreak May 31 2019, 07:02 AM

you're assuming there wont be a GE in the next few months and that Brexit will be sorted one way or the other. With a NO Deal PM they may not have a choice - Parliament wont allow it, so that means either a referendum or a GE. Either way whatever the result half the country is going to be pissed off and vote against the Tory Party for what they've done. Boris Johnson is not the Messiah and Saviour if half the country still believes ending No Deal Brexit is the answer to all our current woes, such as mass closures of Doctors surgeries - the CBI has just said it will harm small businesses, which means we all get poorer and die sooner.

So, Corbyn, hard-brexit new Tory PM, and suddenly Jo Swinson looks fresh and trustworthy in comparison if she wins the Libdem election.


Posted by: Botchia May 31 2019, 12:48 PM

Jo Swinson is the candidate to keep building the momentum. I have nothing against Ed Davey but I can see the Lib Dems having a greater risk of plateauing under his leadership!

Posted by: Steve201 May 31 2019, 06:38 PM

Yeh Swinson would be a much better leader amongst the general public.

Remember JC was 23% at the start of the last GE campaign so things change a lot and if Brexit is done before any election it'll change dramatically too.


Posted by: 5 Silas Frøkner Jun 1 2019, 03:14 PM

This bounce back is very much an English narrative which is particularly risky for Jo as she stands in a Scottish seat that she's already lost once before to the SNP.

Posted by: Popchartfreak Jun 1 2019, 04:59 PM

QUOTE(5 Silas Frøkner @ Jun 1 2019, 04:14 PM) *
This bounce back is very much an English narrative which is particularly risky for Jo as she stands in a Scottish seat that she's already lost once before to the SNP.


Party leaders get a higher profile. Even after the Tory-LibDem era she still gained 1000 votes. That she lost was due in large part to Labour support collapsing after the banking crisis. The SNP quickly lost over 6000 votes in 2 years and despite Tories getting 3000 extra votes, Labour 1000, and Libdems losing 1000. I don't see Labour bouncing back, I don't see Tories bouncing back, so yes they could switch back to SNP - but Libdems were arguably much less popular in 2015 and 2017 and at their lowest point. Or "wiped out forever" as both Labour & Tory supporters predicted with glee at the time. Karma is a bitch....

Her area presumably then is in the lucky position of having 2 serious No Brexit candidates to choose from, which means they can entirely judge on other issues that are important to them, such as staying/remaining in the UK and it's not a case of just staying/remaining in the EU.

Posted by: 5 Silas Frøkner Jun 1 2019, 07:30 PM

The EU election vote in her constituency had her nearly 10% behind the SNP. And westminster polling has the SNP on track to win way back up into the 50s seat wise and that makes her seat vulnerable. They did nothing in the Locals here, the fightback is to a much lower level in Scotland as well. If you're a remainer there is really only one party worth backing in Scotland and it sure ain't the LibDems.


She's already high-profile. Being the LibDem leader won't change the profile she has in her constituency. Just because little englanders don't know who she is doesn't mean that on the good side of hadrians wall she's just as anonymous.

Posted by: Brett-Butler Jun 1 2019, 08:00 PM

The latest Banter Era opinion poll:


Posted by: Doctor Blind Jun 3 2019, 08:53 PM

The Electoral Calculus site is a sobering read today... !

QUOTE
This month's poll-of-polls shows the Brexit party ahead of the Conservatives. This is because the three most recent polls (YouGov, Opinium and Delta Poll) all have the Brexit party ahead by between 3pc and 9pc. As our graph posted on 28 May shows (see "Euro elections analysis below"), there is a switch-over effect in seats won if the Brexit party overtakes the Conservatives. According to these polls, this has now happened so the Brexit party is predicted to win a substantial number of seats, with the Conservatives reduced to third equal place with the Liberal Democrats. On average, the Brexit party is slightly ahead of the Labour party and is predicted to be the largest party in parliament.

On these figures, a three-way Brexit/Conservative/DUP coalition would only have 313 seats, which is short of a majority. An alternative three-way coalition of Labour/SNP/Lib Dem would have 323 seats, so would need additional support from the five Welsh nationalists to make a wafer-thin majority of six seats.

Some points of caution need to be made. The polls are quite volatile and do not show a consistent picture. They disagree on which party is in the lead: YouGov says the Lib Dems, Opinium says Brexit, and Delta Poll says Labour. And the Labour and Lib Dem vote shares vary quite widely between the pollsters. Small differences in voter support can translate into a large difference in seats. For example, a 1pc swing from the Brexit party to the Conservatives would move around 50 seats. So the uncertainty in the prediction is higher than usual. And these polls were taken just after the European elections. This may be a temporary effect and the old status quo may return before too long. Or this could be the new landscape.

It is a truth that if either Leave voters or Remain voters could unite behind a single party, and the other group did not, then they could easily get a majority at Westminster. The Leavers are still split, but more of them are favouring the Brexit party than the Conservatives. The Remainers are even more split between Labour, the Liberal Democrats and the Greens. If voters move to unite their forces, or the major parties change their policy stance, then there could be dramatic changes.

Posted by: Brett-Butler Jun 3 2019, 09:19 PM

If it does indeed become apparent that the Labour/Conservative duopoly is under threat by the two being cut off by Brexit Party/Lib Dems on both sides thanks to that whole EU thing, then we could see Hades becoming glacial and the LabCon MPs suddenly becoming warmer to the idea of PR, as it could save their bottoms from losing their seats. Well, one can hope.

Posted by: Doctor Blind Jun 16 2019, 03:19 PM

Latest YouGov- would be interesting to see this tested in a GE, but I think things will have changed quite a bit by 2022 IMO.

Westminster voting intention:

BREX: 24% (-2)
CON: 21% (+4)
LAB: 21% (+2)
LDEM: 19% (-3)

via @YouGov
Chgs. w/ 10 Jun

Posted by: Brett-Butler Jun 16 2019, 04:04 PM

We're still in the banter era then, I see.

Whether the Brexit Party are still in that position come the end of the year/likely General Election remains to be seen - it depends on what happens in regards to Brexit in the next few months - if it looks like there will be a managed exit, then they will collapse a la UKIP following the initiation of Article 50. If there's no progress, or there's another delay, or Brexit is cancelled (could still happen!), then they will continue to grow in support. I do think their support will fall in opinion polls over the next few months whilst parliament is in recess and Brexit doesn't feature as much on the agenda, but come September it could creep up again as the October deadline nears again.

Posted by: vidcapper Jul 4 2019, 05:00 AM

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7211387/Labour-support-time-low-18-cent-according-poll-bad-Gordon-Brown-2008-crash.html

Corbyn takes Labour to ALL-TIME polling low: Just 18% would vote for the party in a general election as they slump to fourth place
Labour dropped 2 points since last week behind Tories 24% and Brexit Party 23%
Corbyn's ratings are so low they have dropped behind the Lib Dems on 20%
Growing discontent on Brexit position and leader's stance on anti-Semitism

************

The polls are so ridiculously volatile at the moment, that I wonder why anyone bothers taking them... laugh.gif

Posted by: Suedehead2 Jul 4 2019, 06:12 AM

They are a bit all over the place, but the general trend suggests a four-way tie. Under FPTP, that males things very unpredictable.

Posted by: Envoirment Jul 4 2019, 10:59 PM

QUOTE(Suedehead2 @ Jul 4 2019, 07:12 AM) *
They are a bit all over the place, but the general trend suggests a four-way tie. Under FPTP, that males things very unpredictable.


I wouldn't necessarily say that. They've generally been about the same over the last month or so once you take into account margin of error, with a bit of movement between the parties here and there.



SNP on 4% and Plaid on 1%.

I'm hoping either a people's vote occurs at some point or Boris tries to push through a no deal as prime minister, only to be met with a vote of no confidence loss and a snap general election. Under the current percentages, we could feasibly have a Lib Dem/Green/SNP coalition government.

Labour have quite a high number of remain voters still voting for them based on that survey. 20% of those who surveyed who voted remain in the EU referendum would vote labour, the second highest behind the Lib Dems with 29%. I feel that with the right marketing strategy in a general election and a continuation of Labour's lackluster and vague stance, the Greens and Lib Dems could eat into Labour's votes even more than they have already.

I guess the biggest issue as well is that there are 16% of voters who don't know who they would vote for in the raw survey. That will likely have a big impact on a general election in the current political climate.

Posted by: vidcapper Jul 5 2019, 04:56 AM

QUOTE(Envoirment @ Jul 4 2019, 11:59 PM) *
I'm hoping either a people's vote occurs at some point or Boris tries to push through a no deal as prime minister, only to be met with a vote of no confidence loss and a snap general election. Under the current percentages, we could feasibly have a Lib Dem/Green/SNP coalition government.


How exactly?

The Greens could only contribute 1 or 2 MP's, the SNP maybe 50, so no way could the LD's muster 270-ish from just 20% of the popular vote... huh.gif

Posted by: Harve Jul 5 2019, 05:15 AM

QUOTE(vidcapper @ Jul 5 2019, 05:56 AM) *
How exactly?

The Greens could only contribute 1 or 2 MP's, the SNP maybe 50, so no way could the LD's muster 270-ish from just 20% of the popular vote... huh.gif

Actually, they could.

Our voting system has always been bad, but it's particularly ridiculous in situations like these. A party really could get hundreds of seats off 20% of the vote. They could also get 0 off 20% of the vote. If there are four parties getting 15-20% of the vote, then someone could get a huge majority off just 30% of the vote.

Posted by: vidcapper Jul 5 2019, 05:46 AM

QUOTE(Harve @ Jul 5 2019, 06:15 AM) *
Actually, they could.

Our voting system has always been bad, but it's particularly ridiculous in situations like these. A party really could get hundreds of seats off 20% of the vote. They could also get 0 off 20% of the vote. If there are four parties getting 15-20% of the vote, then someone could get a huge majority off just 30% of the vote.


But that also depends on the distribution of that national vote share - Con & Lab tend to have high shares in specific locations, and low votes in their opponents heartlands, whereas LD support tends to be more evenly spread. so they end up 'wasting' lots of votes in 2nd places.

Posted by: Iz~ Jul 5 2019, 07:26 AM

That is the ‘traditional’ way of thinking, sure, but with LDs and Brexit gaining support, who’s to say what are safe seats? Labour and Conservative tribalists will have you believe that to ensure they keep their holds but a balance upset by too many supporters from the other two COULD make seats go to very unexpected places.

Posted by: Doctor Blind Jul 12 2019, 09:02 PM

Survation latest poll:


LAB 29% (+3), CON 23% (-1), BXP 20% (nc), LD 19% (nc), SNP 4% (+1), GRN 3% (-2), OTH 2% (-1)

(changes w/ 19th - 20th June 2019)

Posted by: Brett-Butler Jul 27 2019, 08:15 PM

The first post-Boris opinion poll is out. As expected, a big bump to the Conservatives at the expense of the Brexit Party, although I imagine that the polls will calm down post-summer recess.


Posted by: Bré Jul 28 2019, 02:31 AM

Another poll has come out that has CON +10 and BXP -10. Really worried that we're going to get an early election that results in a huge Tory majority. But then that's what we thought would happen the last time there was an early election so...

Posted by: vidcapper Jul 28 2019, 05:13 AM

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7293197/Boris-Johnson-gets-bounce-Poll-finds-10-rise-support-Tories-PM.html

Boris Johnson gets his bounce: Poll finds 10% rise in support for Tories with him as PM - but delaying an election boosts Labour if party ditches Jeremy Corbyn

The surge in support has given the Conservatives a five-point lead over Labour
But if Labour ditched Corbyn, the Tories would trail them by six points
The rise corresponds to a ten-point fall for Nigel Farage's Brexit Party
Some 55 per cent think there will be an Election by the end of the year
The poll came as Mr Johnson's majority could be wiped out by next week

Posted by: Steve201 Jul 28 2019, 07:44 AM

I don't really know how anyone could predict a lead for labour if JC wasn't leader without knowing who the leader would be lol??

Posted by: vidcapper Jul 28 2019, 08:27 AM

QUOTE(Steve201 @ Jul 28 2019, 08:44 AM) *
I don't really know how anyone could predict a lead for labour if JC wasn't leader without knowing who the leader would be lol??


How about on the 'ANYTHING'S better than Corbyn' basis... rolleyes.gif

I'd certainly be more likely to vote Labour without Corbyn in charge.

Posted by: Rooney Jul 28 2019, 11:36 AM

QUOTE(vidcapper @ Jul 28 2019, 09:27 AM) *
How about on the 'ANYTHING'S better than Corbyn' basis... rolleyes.gif

I'd certainly be more likely to vote Labour without Corbyn in charge.


If Corbyn leaves, it could just so easily be someone who is very left who takes the mantle. The problem Corbyn is going to have is Johnson will absolutely nail him in PMQs of that I have doubt.

You can't really read a lot in the Polls - Johnson is riding on the optimism and good PR so it's no surprise he's seemingly gaining a lot of the Brexit votes. I think come an General Election right now, the Tories will gain a lot of extra votes, but not extra seats. Let's be honest if the rumours are right they are very soon to be facing a 'No Confidence' motion as it looks like they are going to lose their majority. I do wonder if Cummings and Johnson working together they have devised a strategy to target the millions of people who don't vote and tap in to their emotions. The Tories have little chance of crawling back the swing middle class voters.

Posted by: Steve201 Jul 28 2019, 01:40 PM

I think JC has proven that he can put forward a manifesto for change in 2017, it's about building on that. So the ideology doesn't look to be the issue.

Posted by: vidcapper Jul 28 2019, 01:59 PM

QUOTE(Steve201 @ Jul 28 2019, 02:40 PM) *
I think JC has proven that he can put forward a manifesto for change in 2017, it's about building on that. So the ideology doesn't look to be the issue.


Proposing a manifesto for change is one thing - convincing people to vote for the enormous cost of it, is quite another...

Posted by: Rooney Jul 28 2019, 02:20 PM

QUOTE(Steve201 @ Jul 28 2019, 02:40 PM) *
I think JC has proven that he can put forward a manifesto for change in 2017, it's about building on that. So the ideology doesn't look to be the issue.


This was 2.5 years ago and in the UK at least it was Labour vs Tories with Lib Dems still recovering from the last election. Suspect a lot of those voters that went Labour will now go to the Lib Dems. So much has changed since then. Problem is we have a hard-left and a hard-right party right now and there are so many liberal/middle ground voters.

Then you've got think the Tories will likely lose the Scottish seats to the SNP as well.

Posted by: Suedehead2 Jul 28 2019, 02:30 PM

QUOTE(vidcapper @ Jul 28 2019, 02:59 PM) *
Proposing a manifesto for change is one thing - convincing people to vote for the enormous cost of it, is quite another...

If only the Tory leadership contenders had faced questions about how they planned to finance their multi-billion pound plans.

Posted by: Trump2020 Jul 28 2019, 02:48 PM

QUOTE(Suedehead2 @ Jul 28 2019, 03:30 PM) *
If only the Tory leadership contenders had faced questions about how they planned to finance their multi-billion pound plans.



That's easy. From all the money we won't pay the robbing EU.


Go Boris!! Tory landslide at the next election. We have a new dynamic PM and a new energised Cabinet. Who'd want to vote for geriatric commie Corbyn, his ex dimwit Abbott, McDonald and Lady Nugent. Simply no contest at all.

Posted by: Suedehead2 Jul 28 2019, 05:56 PM

QUOTE(Trump2020 @ Jul 28 2019, 03:48 PM) *
That's easy. From all the money we won't pay the robbing EU.
Go Boris!! Tory landslide at the next election. We have a new dynamic PM and a new energised Cabinet. Who'd want to vote for geriatric commie Corbyn, his ex dimwit Abbott, McDonald and Lady Nugent. Simply no contest at all.

Grow up.

Posted by: 5 Silas Frøkner Jul 29 2019, 07:56 AM



Plaid on the march. Brexit is how the United Kingdom ends

Posted by: Steve201 Jul 29 2019, 08:40 AM

QUOTE(5 Silas Frøkner @ Jul 29 2019, 08:56 AM) *


Plaid on the march. Brexit is how the United Kingdom ends


Let's hope it's a lot more democratic than the UK was!

Posted by: Steve201 Jul 29 2019, 08:41 AM

QUOTE(Rooney @ Jul 28 2019, 03:20 PM) *
This was 2.5 years ago and in the UK at least it was Labour vs Tories with Lib Dems still recovering from the last election. Suspect a lot of those voters that went Labour will now go to the Lib Dems. So much has changed since then. Problem is we have a hard-left and a hard-right party right now and there are so many liberal/middle ground voters.

Then you've got think the Tories will likely lose the Scottish seats to the SNP as well.


You call them hard left and right by the standards of 1990-2008 political thought. Perhaps they are now the centre?

Posted by: Harve Jul 30 2019, 03:05 PM

BJ's poll bounce is smaller than May's so far, but it has scope to go higher as something like 70-80% of the remaining BXP voters, 15% of likely voters, have a favourable opinion of BJ.

The overall Tory + BXP + UKIP total is at a maximum of around 45%, which is smaller than the 55% Tory + UKIP total that May inherited in 2016.

Posted by: Trump2020 Jul 31 2019, 08:29 PM

Boris opens up 10 point lead.

Source: Daily Mail. YouGov

Tories 32%
Labour 22%
Lib Dems 19%

Down to rise in male support apparently.

Posted by: Doctor Blind Jul 31 2019, 08:53 PM

Well there will be an electoral test of that lead tomorrow in Wales where he was on Tuesday being 'welcomed' by the locals, in the Brecon and Radnorshire By-election


Posted by: vidcapper Aug 1 2019, 04:53 AM

QUOTE(Doctor Blind @ Jul 31 2019, 09:53 PM) *


It would have been far more surprising if he had been cheered... rolleyes.gif

Posted by: Trump2020 Aug 1 2019, 06:40 AM

QUOTE(vidcapper @ Aug 1 2019, 05:53 AM) *
It would have been far more surprising if he had been cheered... rolleyes.gif



Disgusting behaviour. mad.gif Show our new PM some respect.

Posted by: 5 Silas Frøkner Aug 1 2019, 07:00 AM

Why? What has he done to earn that respect?

Posted by: Popchartfreak Aug 1 2019, 12:26 PM

QUOTE(Steve201 @ Jul 29 2019, 09:41 AM) *
You call them hard left and right by the standards of 1990-2008 political thought. Perhaps they are now the centre?


pretty much on the extremes both end historically over the last 70 years. Labour have been almost this left before (and gave us Thatcher, who was about as right as I thought it was possible to get in the electoral real world. How wrong I was.....!). They seem to make each other more extreme in response to each other....

Posted by: Trump2020 Aug 1 2019, 03:27 PM

QUOTE(5 Silas Frøkner @ Aug 1 2019, 08:00 AM) *
Why? What has he done to earn that respect?



Well give the guy a chance. He's only been in the job 8 days...

Posted by: Suedehead2 Aug 1 2019, 05:09 PM

QUOTE(Trump2020 @ Aug 1 2019, 04:27 PM) *
Well give the guy a chance. He's only been in the job 8 days...


He has been in the public eye for years and has done precious little to earn respect. Why should I respect someone who lies as much as he does?

Posted by: vidcapper Aug 2 2019, 04:37 AM

QUOTE(Suedehead2 @ Aug 1 2019, 06:09 PM) *
He has been in the public eye for years and has done precious little to earn respect. Why should I respect someone who lies as much as he does?


On that basis, NO politician deserves respect. huh.gif

Posted by: Suedehead2 Aug 2 2019, 01:18 PM

QUOTE(vidcapper @ Aug 2 2019, 05:37 AM) *
On that basis, NO politician deserves respect. huh.gif

I can only think of one politician who lies as much as Johnson.

Posted by: Algernon Monqueef Aug 2 2019, 09:01 PM

What a load! Survation still has Labour leading. It's absolutely SHOCKING that so many would vote for Bojo and his shower of shite far right government! I just could not imagine supporting the Tories. All of their lies have been exposed. There is no excuse. They want to privatise the NHS, don't care about the poor, and are devious, spiteful and hateful. Get them OUT. NO respect for Bojo. This right wing talking point of show him respect that I keep seeing is LAUGHABLE. We have had this government for ten years. We know what they're like. We know what that buffoon is like. OUT!!!

Also, Labour is NOT extreme left. Labour is moderate European left of centre. Renationalising the NHS, our vital infrastructure, our services such as police and fire and rescue, and readdressing the rise of plutocracy, should not be seen as extreme. Ever. The only reason people think these moderate, very typical, policies are, is due to successive right wing governments and an extremely right wing media moving the Overton window.

Posted by: vidcapper Aug 3 2019, 04:40 AM

QUOTE(Suedehead2 @ Aug 2 2019, 02:18 PM) *
I can only think of one politician who lies as much as Johnson.


The Leader of the Opposition? rolleyes.gif

Posted by: Trump2020 Aug 3 2019, 07:30 AM

QUOTE(Suedehead2 @ Aug 2 2019, 02:18 PM) *
I can only think of one politician who lies as much as Johnson.



Hmmm. thinking.gif

Posted by: Suedehead2 Aug 3 2019, 08:14 AM

QUOTE(vidcapper @ Aug 3 2019, 05:40 AM) *
The Leader of the Opposition? rolleyes.gif

Perhaps you could give some examples. Corbyn is useless in all sorts of ways, but he is the epitome of honesty compared to the big fat liar in Downing Street.

Posted by: Steve201 Aug 3 2019, 09:41 AM

JC has pretty much had the same views his whole career which is a strength and weakness!

Posted by: Algernon Monqueef Aug 3 2019, 10:43 AM

QUOTE(vidcapper @ Aug 3 2019, 05:40 AM) *
The Leader of the Opposition? rolleyes.gif


Show me the receipts.

Posted by: Algernon Monqueef Aug 3 2019, 12:44 PM

Westminster voting intention:

LAB: 30% (+3)
CON: 29% (+1)
LDEM: 16% (-3)
BREX: 15% (-1)
GRN: 5% (+1)

via @ComRes, 26 - 28 Jul
Chgs. w/ 25 Jul

Oh, well look at that! It makes me rotf.gif to see y'all quoting ToryGov as a respectable source on hur! Survation and ComRes have Labour clearly ahead. Landed Gentry Etonian aristocrat pocket politician blustering buffoon Bojo is going to get SMASHED.

Posted by: Doctor Blind Aug 14 2019, 12:09 PM

Public opinion appears to be moving towards remain - and certainly AWAY from leaving without a deal.


Posted by: Algernon Monqueef Aug 14 2019, 12:26 PM

The Torygraph have tried, with Cumming's permission and strategy of course, to create a counter narrative saying people want no deal xD They didn't mention the fact that Bojo has had secret talks asking the eu how long to start a deal after no deal, and that no deal with an entire continent we've aleays needed is ridiculous. It won't just disappear because the brexshitters want it to.

Posted by: Suedehead2 Aug 14 2019, 01:12 PM

QUOTE(Algernon Monqueef @ Aug 14 2019, 01:26 PM) *
The Torygraph have tried, with Cumming's permission and strategy of course, to create a counter narrative saying people want no deal xD They didn't mention the fact that Bojo has had secret talks asking the eu how long to start a deal after no deal, and that no deal with an entire continent we've aleays needed is ridiculous. It won't just disappear because the brexshitters want it to.

I think you should do him the courtesy of using his full title - unelected bureaucrat Dominic Cummings.

Posted by: Algernon Monqueef Aug 14 2019, 01:55 PM

QUOTE(Suedehead2 @ Aug 14 2019, 02:12 PM) *
I think you should do him the courtesy of using his full title - unelected bureaucrat Dominic Cummings.


Agreed tbh! The unelected shadow pm. Last time it was Mad May's hudband who had that title.

Posted by: Rooney Aug 14 2019, 06:32 PM

QUOTE(Doctor Blind @ Aug 14 2019, 01:09 PM) *
Public opinion appears to be moving towards remain - and certainly AWAY from leaving without a deal.



I suspect it will only increase as we get closer to October 31st and it is more heavily scruitinised in the media. May was never going to do it, so there was less made about it. Now businesess know there is a real possibility, I think we will see more lobbying. Of course the counter narrative I suspect will be 'fearmongering'.

Tellingly no-one can really name one good aspect of No Deal expect we can now have our own fish and can negotiate trade deals with other countries (which of course in itself is a fantasy pipeline as Silas pointed out in a different thread).

Posted by: vidcapper Aug 20 2019, 05:16 AM

New blow for Labour as poll shows voters would prefer a No Deal Brexit than for Jeremy Corbyn to become prime minister

https://yougov.co.uk/topics/politics/articles-reports/2019/08/17/48-35-britons-would-rather-have-no-deal-and-no-cor

Posted by: Algernon Monqueef Aug 20 2019, 10:23 AM

Lol yeah no.

Posted by: Iz O'Malley Aug 20 2019, 12:40 PM

To add a more nuanced perspective, that's a terrible poll question comparing two different categories of outcome, and excluding several possibilities, Corbyn isn't even necessarily popular among all Remainers.

Posted by: Brett-Butler Aug 21 2019, 05:04 PM

Oh my (note that this opinion poll doesn't offer Brexit Party or Green Party as a prompt):



As I expected, there's a big Boris Bounce. Let's see if any future polls show if this is an outlier, or a sign of things to come.

Posted by: Algernon Monqueef Aug 21 2019, 05:11 PM

Survation actually only put Bojo the Clown on 28% and Lab 24%. Beggars BELIEF some people just believe whatever propaganda they're given. With how far right his government is, there is literally no reason for the brexshit party. Rhat means Labour shouls go full remain and make an electoral pact with all remain parties.

Posted by: blacksquare Aug 21 2019, 05:32 PM

QUOTE(Brett-Butler @ Aug 21 2019, 06:04 PM) *
Oh my (note that this opinion poll doesn't offer Brexit Party or Green Party as a prompt):



As I expected, there's a big Boris Bounce. Let's see if any future polls show if this is an outlier, or a sign of things to come.


This is beyond appalling.

Posted by: Algernon Monqueef Aug 21 2019, 06:01 PM

The far right have mobilised brexshit as an issue to get widespread support, even though brexshit only benefits the 1%

Posted by: Iz O'Malley Aug 21 2019, 07:39 PM

!

So, many things to say, it could be aimed at politicians, prompting safer ground for Boris for an election (with echoes of 2017), it could be a really weird outlier, it could be the current labour/lib dem spat which is entirely pointless and counterproductive, it could be due to the Conservatives temporarily in the good books of hardline Brexiteers with an angling towards no deal (as clearly more of those numbers are from lost Brexit Party votes), I don't know what exactly to make of that quite honestly.

Posted by: 5 Silas Frøkner Aug 21 2019, 07:43 PM

That’s also 3 months from the last poll by that company. So I’d be asking similar questions about that last one. Like how reliable are they, WBA’s their methodology, do the use non-standard questions.

Irregular polls can show big swings vs a more frequent one so I’ll take this with a container ship load of salt until comres/yougov et al publish their latest poll

Posted by: vidcapper Aug 22 2019, 05:11 AM

QUOTE(5 Silas Frøkner @ Aug 21 2019, 08:43 PM) *
That’s also 3 months from the last poll by that company. So I’d be asking similar questions about that last one. Like how reliable are they, WBA’s their methodology, do the use non-standard questions.

Irregular polls can show big swings vs a more frequent one so I’ll take this with a container ship load of salt until comres/yougov et al publish their latest poll


Some people even take elections/referenda with a pinch of salt... teresa.gif

Posted by: Iz O'Malley Aug 22 2019, 08:03 AM

I've had a further look at that poll from Kantar, and the same research that gave that Conservative 42% poll shows this:

https://uk.kantar.com/public-opinion/politics/2019/brexit-barometer-more-than-half-of-britons-are-in-favour-of-any-final-deal-or-agreement-reached-by-the-government-being-put-to-a-public-referendum/

(one can find information about their methodology at the bottom of that page)

QUOTE
52% of Britons are in favour of any final Brexit deal or agreement reached by the government being put to a public referendum (+5 vs May 2019).29% say it shouldn’t (+1 vs May) and 19% say they ‘don’t know’ (-6)

Remaining in the EU/Revoking Article 50 continues to be the most popular outcome for the public, with one in three saying this is their most favourable scenario (33%, -3 vs May 2019).

Leaving the European Union with ‘No Deal’ is the preferred outcome for more than two in ten Britons(23%, +1 vs May). Almost one in ten (9%, -1 vs May) want to Leave the EU with Theresa May’s deal, and 13% want Britain to leave the EU but remain in the Single Market / Customs Union (nc). More than one in five say they ‘don’t know’ (22%, +3 vs May 2019).

37% (+8 vs May 2019) of Leave voters and seven in ten of Remain voters (71%, +3 vs May 2019) say they want any agreement to be put to a public vote.

Almost half of Britons think it is ‘likely’ that the UK will leave the EU by the 31st October 2019 (46%), with 35% think it is ‘unlikely’. One in five people ‘don’t know’ (19%).

“One in three (32%) Britons think that a No Deal Brexit would affect them negatively this year, with a further third (33%) thinking it will be neither positive or negative, and 22% believe it would affect them positively.

More than one in three of Leave voters (36%) believe the impact on them personally would be positive by the end of this year if the UK left without a deal on October 31st. Conversely, 52% of Remain voters believe the impact would be negative.

If a new referendum was held on the UK’s membership of the European Union, 36% of Britons say they would vote to Remain (-6 vs May 2019),35% say they would vote to Leave (+2 vs May 2019). One in five say they wouldn’t vote (19%, +3 vs May 2019) and one in ten ‘don’t know’ (10%, +1).


So who knows. Most interesting are those first two though, 52-29 for a new referendum and full revocation in both May and August being the most popular final outcome.

Posted by: Algernon Monqueef Aug 22 2019, 10:09 AM

QUOTE(vidcapper @ Aug 22 2019, 06:11 AM) *
Some people even take elections/referenda with a pinch of salt... teresa.gif



A non binding referendum in a parliamentary democracy that somehow becomes werrl errf perperrrl and ignores two nations and the youth is just lol. Tories didn't win the last election and the whole system is corrupt, based around returning lanfed gentry majorities, soooo

And omg at 22% being so brainwashed that they think a no deal would benefit them! Wow! Talk about wishful ignorance.

Posted by: mald487 Aug 22 2019, 11:36 AM

Like I said before, let them have their rude awakening. I will sit back and laugh from a distance.


Posted by: Algernon Monqueef Aug 22 2019, 12:09 PM

QUOTE(mald487 @ Aug 22 2019, 12:36 PM) *
Like I said before, let them have their rude awakening. I will sit back and laugh from a distance.



This tbh

There's no empire anymore sad.gif Ironic they keeo banging on about the evil econtrolling empire, but complain the eu influences a few of our trade and human rights laws lol

Posted by: vidcapper Aug 22 2019, 01:33 PM

QUOTE(Algernon Monqueef @ Aug 22 2019, 11:09 AM) *
A non binding referendum in a parliamentary democracy that somehow becomes werrl errf perperrrl and ignores two nations and the youth is just lol.


FFS, Scotland & Northern Ireland and young voters all had the chance to vote!

Posted by: 5 Silas Frøkner Aug 22 2019, 05:50 PM

And they did. And their votes were completely ignored.

It is an undeniable fact that the older you are the more likely you were to vote for it and the youth, with the most to lose, votes to remain by a considerable amount.

Anything that impacts the long-term future of a country should be weighted in favour of those who have to bare the majority of the consequences. A massive chunk of the Brexit vote is already f***ing dead and another big chunk will be dead before the day we eventually leave

Posted by: Algernon Monqueef Aug 22 2019, 06:00 PM

Vould under 18s vote? No? Do Scotland and NI or even Wales COMBINED have a population total equivalent to England's? Whaat no??? Oh. Was Scotland told the only way it could remain in the EU was to stay a part of the landed gentry, Etonian-run UK? It was you say? Oh.

Posted by: Algernon Monqueef Aug 22 2019, 06:02 PM

Also please explain how a teeny tiny majority on a SECOND referendum, and a non-binding one at that, in a parliamentary democracy where sovereignty resides in the crown in parliament, is enough? Surely it should be enough - at an absolute PUSH - for a softer than soft single market brexshit at best? That's without even mentioning AGAIN that leave campaigned on a single market, Norway style platform. They didn't mention that Norway would not accept them into that agreement, but oops. They didn't mention a lot of things.

Posted by: vidcapper Aug 23 2019, 05:40 AM

QUOTE(5 Silas Frøkner @ Aug 22 2019, 06:50 PM) *
And they did. And their votes were completely ignored.

It is an undeniable fact that the older you are the more likely you were to vote for it and the youth, with the most to lose, votes to remain by a considerable amount.

Anything that impacts the long-term future of a country should be weighted in favour of those who have to bare the majority of the consequences. A massive chunk of the Brexit vote is already f***ing dead and another big chunk will be dead before the day we eventually leave


Nonsense - their votes were counted, just the same as everyone else's.

Hold the front page - youths vote differently from their elders... rolleyes.gif

The factor you're ignoring is that the older generation also have bear the majority of the *consequences* of political decisions, so it's hard to argue that their influence should count less than that of the young.

Posted by: Algernon Monqueef Aug 23 2019, 11:08 AM

Except this is a LONG TERM major decision. The youth should take point. And they said no to brexshit. Sorry sad.gif Otherwise, we get a situation like ww do now - the oldies are dying off and the polls have already swung away from the original result! Not that 51% or 27% of the population is a major rrsult that has to be carried out anyway.

Yes and their votes are completely trampled by Lil England, treating them like colonies, overpowrring them through size, rather than treating them as they are: countries that need to be respected.


Posted by: TheJüpreme Aug 23 2019, 11:15 AM

Out of interest, watching from the outside I'm fascinated to have watched the English/UK media manage to shift the view of Mr Corbyn - who seems to me literalky the stereotype of an inoffensive older English man who likes gardening and is generally friendly & well-meaning - into this bizarre fearmongering image that I don't recognise in the guy at all.

What's up with that? Does anyone here who's not rabidly rightwing have an opinion on that? Like I genuinely am confused at his unpopularity with so many in the UK when he seems to be basically the nice British person stereotype that the UK has over the years tried to sell to the rest of the world. (While Boris and a lot of his Cabinet also appear like stereotypical English villain characters in the style of e.g. a Bond film) It seems from the outside like a really strange distortion of reality.

Posted by: Algernon Monqueef Aug 23 2019, 11:20 AM

That is bescause we have a mainstream one party state media. The papers and Murdoch set the agenda with the Tories - and the tv, especially BBtory, usually just follows. Once the Tories are in, they do not easily get out. They control the media and create stupid, ministry of truth narratives. Corbyn has been everything from a communist spy to a russian-hat-wearing russia lover to a pet hamster hunter rotf.gif And people like Chris and vidcapper eat it all up!

Posted by: vidcapper Aug 23 2019, 11:27 AM

QUOTE(Algernon Monqueef @ Aug 23 2019, 12:08 PM) *
Except this is a LONG TERM major decision. The youth should take point. And they said no to brexshit. Sorry sad.gif Otherwise, we get a situation like ww do now - the oldies are dying off and the polls have already swung away from the original result! Not that 51% or 27% of the population is a major rrsult that has to be carried out anyway.


Has it occurred to you that the generation that voted for Brexit in 2016, were quite likely the same people who voted to endorse our Common Market membership in 1975, but in the intervening years discovered that we had been hoodwinked into joining a political union that they had *not* voted for?

Posted by: vidcapper Aug 23 2019, 11:29 AM

QUOTE(Algernon Monqueef @ Aug 23 2019, 12:20 PM) *
That is bescause we have a mainstream one party state media. The papers and Murdoch set the agenda with the Tories - and the tv, especially BBtory, usually just follows. Once the Tories are in, they do not easily get out. They control the media and create stupid, ministry of truth narratives. Corbyn has been everything from a communist spy to a russian-hat-wearing russia lover to a pet hamster hunter rotf.gif And people like Chris and vidcapper eat it all up!


Actions however speak louder than words, and Corbyn has done more than enough on record to show he'd make a terrible PM.

Posted by: Algernon Monqueef Aug 23 2019, 11:38 AM

QUOTE(vidcapper @ Aug 23 2019, 12:27 PM) *
Has it occurred to you that the generation that voted for Brexit in 2016, were quite likely the same people who voted to endorse our Common Market membership in 1975, but in the intervening years discovered that we had been hoodwinked into joining a political union that they had *not* voted for?



Seeing as no one cared about the eu one way or the other,except for the yourh, pre 2015, your hypothesis is completely and DEMONSTRANLY wrong. Look at the stats. People only statted to care once the referendum kicked off and the Tories banged on aboot it. They were hoodwinked alright ... by the one party state media, Bojo's lies and the Frog.

Posted by: Algernon Monqueef Aug 23 2019, 11:39 AM

QUOTE(vidcapper @ Aug 23 2019, 12:29 PM) *
Actions however speak louder than words, and Corbyn has done more than enough on record to show he'd make a terrible PM.


Like what - bring peace? Respect everyone? Not be an Etonian rich priviliged born into power aristocrat intent on punishing everyone who's not rich? I see.

Posted by: Steve201 Aug 23 2019, 12:03 PM

QUOTE(vidcapper @ Aug 23 2019, 12:29 PM) *
Actions however speak louder than words, and Corbyn has done more than enough on record to show he'd make a terrible PM.

Please give examples?

Posted by: Algernon Monqueef Aug 23 2019, 12:15 PM

QUOTE(Steve201 @ Aug 23 2019, 01:03 PM) *
Please give examples?


He is a Tory. He sews propaganda seeds and then flees once they've been challenged. They just want to sow doubt snd then let the latest propaganda story do the rest.

Posted by: Iz O'Malley Aug 23 2019, 12:59 PM

Re: Jupiter, that is an accurate perception of what Corbyn should be, my main issue with him is given the cartoonish villainy of the Tories he hasn’t quite been the hero we hoped for, which is nothing compared to the bizarre painting the media have of his incompetence (quite obviously because they’d have a lot to lose under a Corbyn premiership and they get to control the narrative).

Posted by: vidcapper Aug 23 2019, 01:45 PM

QUOTE(Steve201 @ Aug 23 2019, 01:03 PM) *
Please give examples?


https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/aug/13/jeremy-corbyn-labour-leadership-foreign-policy-antisemitism

https://foreignpolicy.com/2017/06/07/voting-for-jeremy-corbyn-isnt-just-dumb-its-dangerous/

Posted by: Steve201 Aug 23 2019, 02:52 PM

The whole Anti-Sem issues is of grave concern but there is an element of right wing media hyping it up a lot. Most of the left who spout out A-S nonsense are the idiot fringes and JC has continually opposed rascism in all its forms. He cannot do something about every on line troll who spouts it out in Labours name.

With regards to the second article - give me strength - how dare JC have a different economic and foreign policy point of view to the last 2 generations in the UK. I mean NATO itself nearly got us into a war with Putin over their expansion in Ukraine so I think its too influenced by the USA and CIA!

The same people said these things about SF in Ireland only 25 years ago but hey look the British were talking to the IRA at the same time and look what happens when you talk to marginalised groups - they join the democratic process and Ireland is a much better country for it.

Posted by: Algernon Monqueef Aug 23 2019, 02:53 PM

QUOTE(Steve201 @ Aug 23 2019, 03:52 PM) *
The whole Anti-Sem issues is of grave concern but there is an element of right wing media hyping it up a lot. Most of the left who spout out A-S nonsense are the idiot fringes and JC has continually opposed rascism in all its forms. He cannot do something about every on line troll who spouts it out in Labours name.

With regards to the second article - give me strength - how dare JC have a different economic and foreign policy point of view to the last 2 generations in the UK. I mean NATO itself nearly got us into a war with Putin over their expansion in Ukraine so I think its too influenced by the USA and CIA!


100% THIS

Posted by: vidcapper Aug 24 2019, 04:58 AM

QUOTE(Algernon Monqueef @ Aug 23 2019, 03:53 PM) *
100% THIS


But in order to win a GE, Corbyn will have to gain the support of the same sort of people that Blair won over in 1997, and I just can't see that happening.

Blair won by ditching a lot of the left-wing baggage e.g. Clause 4, and keeping control over the unions - AFAICS, Corbyn is threatening to reverse a lot of that - and that scares middle-ground voters away!

Posted by: Rooney Aug 24 2019, 08:47 AM

QUOTE(TheJüpreme @ Aug 23 2019, 12:15 PM) *
Out of interest, watching from the outside I'm fascinated to have watched the English/UK media manage to shift the view of Mr Corbyn - who seems to me literalky the stereotype of an inoffensive older English man who likes gardening and is generally friendly & well-meaning - into this bizarre fearmongering image that I don't recognise in the guy at all.

What's up with that? Does anyone here who's not rabidly rightwing have an opinion on that? Like I genuinely am confused at his unpopularity with so many in the UK when he seems to be basically the nice British person stereotype that the UK has over the years tried to sell to the rest of the world. (While Boris and a lot of his Cabinet also appear like stereotypical English villain characters in the style of e.g. a Bond film) It seems from the outside like a really strange distortion of reality.



Plenty of reasons- firstly there is a reason he has been a backbencher for the most of his political career. You have to be media savvy these days unfortunately, this is something Corbyn is not.

I also feel that a lot of his key policies are just unachiveable in the day and age when business rules. Nationalising a load of businesses is a waste of public money and there is little guarantee they will actually work. Most voters have been exposed to capitalism and lots of peoplethink they're richer than they actually are. True grassroot politics just does not have the sway these days. You need at least a majority of the media on your side, which Corbyn has little.

Posted by: Steve201 Aug 24 2019, 09:32 AM

But he doesn't want to nationalise a load of businesses he wants to nationalise monopolies that are in the public interest to nationalise such as water/electric/public transport and there has been seen to be genuine public support for this. People aren't being given a fair turn by privatised utilities which everyone needs and has s right to for a fair price. He's not looking to nationalise Ryanair or Boots chemist like.

You also act like capitalisms in place so it can't be reversed - the same was true 70 and 100 years ago but people see the inequalities it brings and are disgusted by this.

I believe people want a free society but also a FAIR one and regulations are needed to ensure the minority of racketeers in society play a fair game.

As for Vids point - JC one a decent coalition of 40% on a fair democratic socialist platform in 2017 so it is possible. The electoral coalition won by Blair in 1997 has moved on and we live in a different time now.

Posted by: Algernon Monqueef Aug 24 2019, 09:56 AM

QUOTE(Rooney @ Aug 24 2019, 09:47 AM) *
Plenty of reasons- firstly there is a reason he has been a backbencher for the most of his political career. You have to be media savvy these days unfortunately, this is something Corbyn is not.

I also feel that a lot of his key policies are just unachiveable in the day and age when business rules. Nationalising a load of businesses is a waste of public money and there is little guarantee they will actually work. Most voters have been exposed to capitalism and lots of peoplethink they're richer than they actually are. True grassroot politics just does not have the sway these days. You need at least a majority of the media on your side, which Corbyn has little.


Nationalising vital services is necessary. It is also free for the railways oops. The others will recoupd the losses. Those assets should neeever have been stolen.

The only reason why business rules is because we now live in oligarchies with the rich ruling - Tories. The UN held up its policies as an example of governments of the future. Worldwide, economists have said it works. It worked in Iceland and Portugal. It worked in America under FDR. Soo yeaaa.

Posted by: Trump2020 Aug 25 2019, 03:33 PM

QUOTE(Algernon Monqueef @ Aug 23 2019, 12:08 PM) *
Except this is a LONG TERM major decision. The youth should take point. And they said no to brexshit. Sorry sad.gif Otherwise, we get a situation like ww do now - the oldies are dying off and the polls have already swung away from the original result! Not that 51% or 27% of the population is a major rrsult that has to be carried out anyway.

Yes and their votes are completely trampled by Lil England, treating them like colonies, overpowrring them through size, rather than treating them as they are: countries that need to be respected.



I'm sick to the back teeth of all this youth v the elderly. mad.gif The result was OUT. Doesn't go on who voted which way. It's a result of all votes. You remainers are just clutching at increasingly desperate straws to keep us in. rolleyes.gif Well not long now until Oct. 31st. You lost, get over it. We're leaving. Boris is taking legal advice about proroguing parliament and intends to do it from Sept 9th for 5 or 6 weeks, until it's too late to rescind A50 or cancel Brexit. He has balls. Should have been PM instead of May in 2016.

Posted by: Algernon Monqueef Aug 25 2019, 03:39 PM

THE RESULT WAS NOT OUT. THE RESULT WAS ... WHO KNOWS?! It was a 50 50 split in numbers and countries and the youth, the DECISIND FSCTOR, decided to stay. Sorry. The end.

You lost get over it. NEVER USE THAT RIDICULOUS BRAINDEAD ARGUMENT AGAINST ME EEEVER AGAIN. HOW DARE YIU INSULT OUR INTELLIGENCE USING IT?!

The last person who shut down parliament caused a civil war and was soon out of power. So please. If you shut down parliament, you guess what? LOSE CONTROL. Parliament is sovereign. If Bojo shuts it down, then guess what? He comes a FAR RIGHT DICTATOR. Not that you'd care. You'd still doff your cap and look up with big puppy dog eyes at a right wing authoritarian male figure.

Posted by: Trump2020 Aug 25 2019, 03:40 PM

QUOTE(Algernon Monqueef @ Aug 25 2019, 04:39 PM) *
THE RESULT WAS NOT OUT. THE RESULT WAS ... WHO KNOWS?! It was a 50 50 split in numbers and countries and the youth, the DECISIND FSCTOR, decided to stay. Sorry. The end.



Sorry but last time I checked the UK voted to leave the EU. END OF. smile.gif

Posted by: Algernon Monqueef Aug 25 2019, 03:44 PM

QUOTE(Trump2020 @ Aug 25 2019, 04:40 PM) *
Sorry but last time I checked the UK voted to leave the EU. END OF. smile.gif


Last I checked, this was a democracy, not a football match. The end. Sorry sad.gif And last I checked, it was a 50 50 inconclusive decision with one side lying and saying it wanted to stay in the single market. Sorry sad.gif You got brainwashed by the rich wanting to avoid the new tax directive and you are too ignorant to just admit it.

Posted by: Izzy Aug 25 2019, 03:55 PM

It does take a special kind of effort to sound madder than Chris when he unleashes Uneducated Brexit Bravado (August 2019 edition) but you managed it.

Keep the quality up and knock this awful discourse off please. Though welcome for mods to delete as this has got quite off-topic.

Posted by: TheJüpreme Aug 25 2019, 04:26 PM

Its not just the youth vs the elderly, its educated vs un too.

Wonder which ones will be able to leave when it all goes tits up. At this point its kind of hilarious to see who is supporting it being exactly who have not a lot of strings to the bow if things go bad. Those who rely on state support cheering to impoverish the state...interesting flex tbh

Posted by: mald487 Aug 25 2019, 07:25 PM

QUOTE(Algernon Monqueef @ Aug 25 2019, 03:39 PM) *
THE RESULT WAS NOT OUT. THE RESULT WAS ... WHO KNOWS?! It was a 50 50 split in numbers and countries and the youth, the DECISIND FSCTOR, decided to stay. Sorry. The end.

You lost get over it. NEVER USE THAT RIDICULOUS BRAINDEAD ARGUMENT AGAINST ME EEEVER AGAIN. HOW DARE YIU INSULT OUR INTELLIGENCE USING IT?!

The last person who shut down parliament caused a civil war and was soon out of power. So please. If you shut down parliament, you guess what? LOSE CONTROL. Parliament is sovereign. If Bojo shuts it down, then guess what? He comes a FAR RIGHT DICTATOR. Not that you'd care. You'd still doff your cap and look up with big puppy dog eyes at a right wing authoritarian male figure.


Don't waste this much energy on a naive troll like Chris. People like this genuinely don't understand that this isn't a game to us and the whole "you lost nah nah nah nah..." thing isn't going to work when we are talking about the welfare of our families.

Don't worry he'll soon see that his good friend Boris doesn't give a sh't about him and his situation, and we'll be there to scream 'told ya so!' with precisely 0% sympathy.

Posted by: Algernon Monqueef Aug 25 2019, 07:28 PM

I actually think the hardcore extremist Brexshitters will start to claim that whatever shortages, etc, happen is exactly what they voted for. They'll neeever admit they were wrong. Far right dictator shutting down parlisment? Wahey finally in full control! Food shortages? That's alright - they wanted to show some "blitz spirit" and now they get the chance! No feesh fruit? They wanted to grow some anyway. And on and on and on.

Posted by: mald487 Aug 26 2019, 03:54 PM

QUOTE(Algernon Monqueef @ Aug 25 2019, 07:28 PM) *
I actually think the hardcore extremist Brexshitters will start to claim that whatever shortages, etc, happen is exactly what they voted for. They'll neeever admit they were wrong. Far right dictator shutting down parlisment? Wahey finally in full control! Food shortages? That's alright - they wanted to show some "blitz spirit" and now they get the chance! No feesh fruit? They wanted to grow some anyway. And on and on and on.



Oh totally. There will be many of them that will claim that they knew all of this was going to happen and it's fine. We already know from observation(see Vidcappers comments) that they are planning to blame Remainers for "talking down Britain" when(YES...WHEN....NOT IF) the s£ht hits the fan. They've already got their excuses lined up.

You really couldn't make any of it up. It's nuts and to be honest on a world stage.....it's very embarrassing. Yet somehow all of these countries around the world are desperate to do brand spanking new trades deals with us. Oh I'm sure...what with all of the things that we manufacture( laugh.gif laugh.gif laugh.gif ). After all it's not like we've just left a major trading bloc of 28 countries.... It's not like we will be the ones in the negotiation that will need it more than any country that we negotiate with, hence we will be the ones at an immediate disadvantage....OH WAIT. laugh.gif laugh.gif laugh.gif

Posted by: Algernon Monqueef Aug 26 2019, 04:15 PM

QUOTE(mald487 @ Aug 26 2019, 04:54 PM) *
Oh totally. There will be many of them that will claim that they knew all of this was going to happen and it's fine. We already know from observation(see Vidcappers comments) that they are planning to blame Remainers for "talking down Britain" when(YES...WHEN....NOT IF) the s£ht hits the fan. They've already got their excuses lined up.

You really couldn't make any of it up. It's nuts and to be honest on a world stage.....it's very embarrassing. Yet somehow all of these countries around the world are desperate to do brand spanking new trades deals with us. Oh I'm sure...what with all of the things that we manufacture( laugh.gif laugh.gif laugh.gif ). After all it's not like we've just left a major trading bloc of 28 countries.... It's not like we will be the ones in the negotiation that will need it more than any country that we negotiate with, hence we will be the ones at an immediate disadvantage....OH WAIT. laugh.gif laugh.gif laugh.gif


100% THIS

Popchart said years ago that vidcapper would start blaming remainers for brexshit failures. Right on schedule, there he was doing just that!! It's maddening.

Posted by: Trump2020 Aug 26 2019, 04:22 PM

QUOTE(Algernon Monqueef @ Aug 25 2019, 08:28 PM) *
I actually think the hardcore extremist Brexshitters will start to claim that whatever shortages, etc, happen is exactly what they voted for. They'll neeever admit they were wrong. Far right dictator shutting down parlisment? Wahey finally in full control! Food shortages? That's alright - they wanted to show some "blitz spirit" and now they get the chance! No feesh fruit? They wanted to grow some anyway. And on and on and on.



I mainly eat tinned veg. like mushy peas, carrots, butter beans, green beans and baked beans so will stock up on those.

Posted by: Algernon Monqueef Aug 26 2019, 04:31 PM

Oh my GOD

Can't you brexshitter extremists just go live out a dystopian fantasy on one of the unoccupied islands? We'll continur living to a 21st century european standard x You can tske the landed gentry party with you as you go x

Posted by: mald487 Aug 26 2019, 04:54 PM

QUOTE(Trump2020 @ Aug 26 2019, 04:22 PM) *
I mainly eat tinned veg. like mushy peas, carrots, butter beans, green beans and baked beans so will stock up on those.




What about when Boris forces you back into work?

Posted by: Rooney Aug 26 2019, 05:09 PM

QUOTE(Trump2020 @ Aug 26 2019, 05:22 PM) *
I mainly eat tinned veg. like mushy peas, carrots, butter beans, green beans and baked beans so will stock up on those.


The fact that in 2019 we should even have to be considering stocking up on tinned food just shows you what madness this is we are talking about. I mean I'm sure the world is all for Brexit if we can send Pork Pies to the USA, I can't wait to see Lindsey Lohan stuffing her face in a Pork Pie in Beverley Hills.

Cummings is obviously dictating a strategy that is going to blamr the EU if we do leave with a Deal. And he's severely limiting Boris' media to only the big news bulletins. Be interesting to see if certain quarters of the media start turning on him going forward.

Posted by: vidcapper Aug 27 2019, 05:10 AM

QUOTE(mald487 @ Aug 26 2019, 05:54 PM) *
What about when Boris forces you back into work?


You mean 'the jobs that won't exist because of Brexit reducing our economy to 3rd world levels' rolleyes.gif

Posted by: mald487 Aug 27 2019, 09:56 AM

QUOTE(vidcapper @ Aug 27 2019, 05:10 AM) *
You mean 'the jobs that won't exist because of Brexit reducing our economy to 3rd world levels' rolleyes.gif



No, I didn't say that did I? I also never said that the economy would be reduced to 3rd world levels. Simply that it would do significant damage to the economy.

Sticking an eyeroll emoji at the end of everything and twisting someones words doesn't suddenly mean that they said something they didn't. Don't put words in my mouth

If anything there will probably be jobs that NEED doing due to lack of EU workers available to fill them.

Posted by: Algernon Monqueef Aug 27 2019, 10:30 AM

QUOTE(mald487 @ Aug 27 2019, 10:56 AM) *
No, I didn't say that did I? I also never said that the economy would be reduced to 3rd world levels. Simply that it would do significant damage to the economy.

Sticking an eyeroll emoji at the end of everything and twisting someones words doesn't suddenly mean that they said something they didn't. Don't put words in my mouth

If anything there will probably be jobs that NEED doing due to lack of EU workers available to fill them.


Such as all the fruit ones. And who will they recruit? People like Chris, and this government is FAR RIGHT. They won't be able to refuse. They'll force them to.

Posted by: Trump2020 Aug 27 2019, 11:22 PM

QUOTE(mald487 @ Aug 26 2019, 05:54 PM) *
What about when Boris forces you back into work?


He won't though. Only have 6 years to retirement age and no more DWP checks and am more deoressed than ever after my daughter's untimely death. My new lovely lady GP says she'll fully support me when my next assessment comes up and at any subsequent appeal. smile.gif

Posted by: Trump2020 Aug 27 2019, 11:27 PM

QUOTE(Algernon Monqueef @ Aug 27 2019, 11:30 AM) *
Such as all the fruit ones. And who will they recruit? People like Chris, and this government is FAR RIGHT. They won't be able to refuse. They'll force them to.



Even if they're far too clinically depressed to work?

Posted by: mald487 Aug 27 2019, 11:39 PM

QUOTE(Trump2020 @ Aug 27 2019, 11:27 PM) *
Even if they're far too clinically depressed to work?


We've been through this. Boris won't give a sh£t about that.

Posted by: Algernon Monqueef Aug 28 2019, 01:02 AM

QUOTE(Trump2020 @ Aug 28 2019, 12:27 AM) *
Even if they're far too clinically depressed to work?


Why would a far right government give a shit? It won't. They are the lanfed gentry. You are the serf.

Posted by: vidcapper Aug 28 2019, 04:50 AM

QUOTE(Algernon Monqueef @ Aug 28 2019, 02:02 AM) *
Why would a far right government give a shit? It won't. They are the lanfed gentry. You are the serf.


Newsflash - feudalism *ended* in the mid-14th century!

Posted by: Izzy Aug 28 2019, 08:31 AM

QUOTE(vidcapper @ Aug 28 2019, 04:50 AM) *
Newsflash - feudalism *ended* in the mid-14th century!


Medieval feudalism ended in the 1600s or thereabouts, there was no defined end... and as it was never defined it certainly could be argued that extreme forms of capitalism share some traits...


Posted by: Algernon Monqueef Aug 28 2019, 08:32 AM

Newsflash: capitalism just rebranded it. Newsflash: the Tory landed gentry are the same families. They have clung on to power and people still keep doffin their caps.

Posted by: 5 Silas Frøkner Aug 28 2019, 09:08 AM

QUOTE(Trump2020 @ Aug 28 2019, 12:27 AM) *
Even if they're far too clinically depressed to work?

You assume that they believe depression exists. Their attitude towards MH care suggests they don’t

They have one mission, to kill off the benefits system and those who rely on it

Posted by: Algernon Monqueef Aug 28 2019, 09:10 AM

QUOTE(Izzy @ Aug 28 2019, 09:31 AM) *
Medieval feudalism ended in the 1600s or thereabouts, there was no defined end... and as it was never defined it certainly could be argued that extreme forms of capitalism share some traits...


100% THIS

Posted by: Esmerelda Sep 14 2019, 08:44 PM

Westminster voting intention:

CON: 37% (+2)
LAB: 25% (-)
LDEM: 16% (-1)
BREX: 13% (-)
GRN: 2% (-1)

via
@OpiniumResearch
Chgs. w/ 06 Sep

Good grief! Seems the worse Boris is the more he is liked...

Posted by: Steve201 Sep 14 2019, 11:41 PM

Showing himself off as being a strong leader who wants to push through Brexit at any cost goes down well with voters who are Brexit at any cost and those more moderate who just want it decided upon!

Posted by: Algernon Monqueef Sep 14 2019, 11:48 PM

Why are you quoting the outlier?

All others have Labour way in front, including internal no.10 polls rotf.gif

Posted by: Izzy Sep 15 2019, 02:10 AM

Oh yes, I do like the ComRes one where Labour has a lead of -1.

Posted by: vidcapper Sep 15 2019, 04:43 AM

QUOTE(Algernon Monqueef @ Sep 15 2019, 12:48 AM) *
Why are you quoting the outlier?

All others have Labour way in front, including internal no.10 polls rotf.gif


Oh right, I forgot - all polls that don't show Labour running the Tories close are 'invalid/biased'... rolleyes.gif

Posted by: Suedehead2 Sep 15 2019, 09:37 AM

QUOTE(Algernon Monqueef @ Sep 15 2019, 12:48 AM) *
Why are you quoting the outlier?

All others have Labour way in front, including internal no.10 polls rotf.gif

Would you like to provide a link to these mysterious polls.

If, as has been reported, No 10 are commissioning polls, perhaps somebody would like to question whether it is a legal use of state funds.

Posted by: Brett-Butler Sep 15 2019, 10:20 AM

QUOTE(Steve201 @ Sep 15 2019, 12:41 AM) *
Showing himself off as being a strong leader who wants to push through Brexit at any cost goes down well with voters who are Brexit at any cost and those more moderate who just want it decided upon!


A https://www.hansardsociety.org.uk/publications/reports/audit-of-political-engagement-16 showed that a majority of people from the UK, on all sides of the political spectrum, would favour a "strong, rule breaking leader" over a democratic one (54% agreed, only 23% disagreed), so in that regard I do not see this poll (if it is not an outlier) as particularly surprising. I'm starting to think that we're in the beginning of a post-democratic world, where people are willing to accept a strongman, rule breaking, authoritarian tough leader, as long as that leader agrees with everything that you want to take place.

Posted by: mald487 Sep 15 2019, 02:34 PM

The polls aren´t surprising at all(unfortunately IMO). Most people accept that Brexit is happening and just want it over with now regardless of how they voted and see Boris as far more likely to carry it through than Corbyn. What most people aren´t thinking about however, is the aftermath sad.gif

Posted by: Algernon Monqueef Sep 15 2019, 03:13 PM

Again, ONE outlier vs the rest of the polling data that shows the end of the Tory party x

Posted by: vidcapper Sep 15 2019, 03:31 PM

QUOTE(Algernon Monqueef @ Sep 15 2019, 04:13 PM) *
Again, ONE outlier vs the rest of the polling data that shows the end of the Tory party x


The power of wishful thinking... rotf.gif

Posted by: Suedehead2 Sep 15 2019, 04:52 PM

QUOTE(mald487 @ Sep 15 2019, 03:34 PM) *
The polls aren´t surprising at all(unfortunately IMO). Most people accept that Brexit is happening and just want it over with now regardless of how they voted and see Boris as far more likely to carry it through than Corbyn. What most people aren´t thinking about however, is the aftermath sad.gif

The sad thing is that a lot of those people believe that it really will be "over" if we leave next month. The truth is that the issue will continue to dominate politics for years to come as we try to negotiate deals (not just trade deals) with the rest of the world.

Posted by: Algernon Monqueef Sep 15 2019, 05:05 PM

QUOTE(vidcapper @ Sep 15 2019, 04:31 PM) *
The power of wishful thinking... rotf.gif


You are suuuch a Tory.

And nope. Btw, how is that 400 seat Mad May majority workin out?

Posted by: vidcapper Sep 16 2019, 04:57 AM

QUOTE(Algernon Monqueef @ Sep 15 2019, 06:05 PM) *
You are suuuch a Tory.


There's no need to insult me. huh.gif

QUOTE
And nope. Btw, how is that 400 seat Mad May majority workin out?


For that matter how is that 2017 Corbyn 'win' working out... laugh.gif

Posted by: Algernon Monqueef Sep 16 2019, 08:43 AM

Quite well thanks. The opposition has a lot more mps than the weak and wobbly chaotic disco citizens party x

Posted by: vidcapper Sep 16 2019, 08:57 AM

QUOTE(Algernon Monqueef @ Sep 16 2019, 09:43 AM) *
Quite well thanks. The opposition has a lot more mps than the weak and wobbly chaotic disco citizens party x


'disco citizens'? laugh.gif

Posted by: Izzy Sep 19 2019, 04:04 AM



REVOKE SURGE

Posted by: vidcapper Sep 19 2019, 04:33 AM

QUOTE(Izzy @ Sep 19 2019, 05:04 AM) *


REVOKE SURGE


Does anyone remember there's more to politics than Brexit, though... smile.gif

Posted by: Izzy Sep 19 2019, 04:56 AM

If you want to go back to that halcyon period where the B-word didn't dominate all political discussion, vote Lib Dem to get out of it magic.gif

(estimated time only 1 year, other parties all offer 10 years or more)

Posted by: Algernon Monqueef Sep 19 2019, 10:45 AM

ComRes

28% Evil rich party
27% Labour for the people
20% Yellow Tories

After Oct 1st the Tories will collapse, plus the impartiality laws in an election to stop the massive anti Labour bias, Corbyn's campaigning, and it's a done deal. Fiiinally a Labour government! We've been waiting so many years for a party that isn't neoliberal!!

Posted by: Doctor Blind Sep 26 2019, 09:42 AM

Latest Survation:

CON: 27% (-2)
LAB: 24% (-)
LDEM: 22% (+4)
BREX: 16% (-1)
SNP 4%
Grn 3%

Highest Lib Dem poll for a decade.

Would put the Conservatives on around 280-290 seats, so about where there are now and well short of a majority, Lib Dems up to 45 and Labour down to 240-ish. Just 1 seat for the Brexit Party.

At the moment a GE would change little in the HoC (Con gains quite limited but massive losses in Scotland to SNP and S England to the Lib Dems) except perhaps a Lab/Lib/SNP coalition which would likely have a mandate to govern for a short period..

Posted by: Algernon Monqueef Sep 26 2019, 10:21 AM

That will do to bring in non-bias laws, get the Tories out, and force reform of the BBTory. Then opinion polls will really start to change.

Posted by: Brett-Butler Sep 26 2019, 05:06 PM

QUOTE(Doctor Blind @ Sep 26 2019, 10:42 AM) *
Latest Survation:

CON: 27% (-2)
LAB: 24% (-)
LDEM: 22% (+4)
BREX: 16% (-1)
SNP 4%
Grn 3%

Highest Lib Dem poll for a decade.

Would put the Conservatives on around 280-290 seats, so about where there are now and well short of a majority, Lib Dems up to 45 and Labour down to 240-ish. Just 1 seat for the Brexit Party.


Although this is still very much fan-fiction territory (terrible fan-fiction, but fiction nonetheless), I would be interested to know what constituency that the Brexit Party would win in that scenario. Clacton or South Thanet probably.

Posted by: Algernon Monqueef Sep 26 2019, 05:14 PM

And this is before the Labour campaign begins or the impartiality laws come into play to control our one party state media.

Posted by: Envoirment Sep 26 2019, 11:40 PM

Hopefully the Lib Dem surge continues. At the start of the year they were polling ~10%. Now they're consistently polling ~20%. I hope they can move up into 25-30% territory and continue their strong remain stance. Perhaps even surprise during a GE. I'm hoping the Brexit Party will eat into the Con vote and allow surprise wins by the Lib Dems in multiple constituencies come the next GE.

Posted by: Steve201 Sep 27 2019, 12:01 AM

In that scenario you'd think the LDs and laabour could work something out.

Posted by: vidcapper Sep 27 2019, 04:20 AM

QUOTE(Algernon Monqueef @ Sep 26 2019, 06:14 PM) *
And this is before the Labour campaign begins or the impartiality laws come into play to control our one party state media.


Impartiality laws don't affect newspapers though, and they still have a very strong influence.

Posted by: Doctor Blind Sep 27 2019, 08:33 AM

QUOTE(Brett-Butler @ Sep 26 2019, 06:06 PM) *
Although this is still very much fan-fiction territory (terrible fan-fiction, but fiction nonetheless), I would be interested to know what constituency that the Brexit Party would win in that scenario. Clacton or South Thanet probably.


Thurrock apparently, where UKIP were <1000 away from taking in 2015.

Posted by: Algernon Monqueef Sep 27 2019, 10:56 AM

QUOTE(vidcapper @ Sep 27 2019, 05:20 AM) *
Impartiality laws don't affect newspapers though, and they still have a very strong influence.


Affects BBTory! And as we saw in tbe last electiom, 27% - 40%, that's enough x

Posted by: Botchia Sep 29 2019, 06:32 PM

QUOTE(Steve201 @ Sep 27 2019, 01:01 AM) *
In that scenario you'd think the LDs and laabour could work something out.


Not now Labour is firmly remaining on the fence. If they had moved to back Remain, I think it would have been more likely a deal would have been done to stop the Tories.

Posted by: Steve201 Sep 29 2019, 07:11 PM

Labour are trying to keep voters in different seats happy which is the right thing to do imo!

Posted by: Rooney Sep 29 2019, 08:02 PM

QUOTE(Steve201 @ Sep 29 2019, 08:11 PM) *
Labour are trying to keep voters in different seats happy which is the right thing to do imo!


It's a daft strategy, they should either come out and say they are all for a Brexit with Customs Union or are pro-Remain. The problem Labour are going to have when it comes to campaigning is they are neither here nor there. Labour's option of leaving the EU with stong ties to the EU is the strategy we should have gone down long ago, but imo the country is too fractured now. The fantastists are all for No Deal and a large percentage of people don't want to leave the EU at all and plausibly see a way out of this whole mess.

The election is going to be based on Brexit (unfortunately) and in any campaigning both the Tories and Lib Dems will play off against Labour's stragegy. Of course they don't want to lose a lot of their heartlands, but imo it's probably too late for a lot of these seats, they're Brexit/Tory now.

Posted by: Algernon Monqueef Sep 29 2019, 08:51 PM

They are saying they are neutral and will give the country a choice between a soft brexshit or remain.

Posted by: Common Sense Sep 29 2019, 09:41 PM

QUOTE(Algernon Monqueef @ Sep 29 2019, 09:51 PM) *
They are saying they are neutral and will give the country a choice between a soft brexshit or remain.



They're trying to please everyone and not come down for either side or they'll lose votes.

Posted by: 5 Silas Frøkner Sep 29 2019, 10:42 PM

Problem is by fence sitting they’re haemorrhaging votes left and right and centre. They can broadly afford to lose the right but the centre and left is something they can’t afford if Comrade wants to be PM

Posted by: Rooney Sep 29 2019, 11:08 PM

QUOTE(Algernon Monqueef @ Sep 29 2019, 09:51 PM) *
They are saying they are neutral and will give the country a choice between a soft brexshit or remain.


But a neutral stance does absolutely nothing as both Silas and Common Sense point out. By not leaning to one side they're losing votes to the Lib Dems who are Revoke and to the Brexiteers who will vote Tory or Brexit. I understand their logic, but strategically it's a complete mess as there is no emotion in their campaign. I think if they came out as Remain the Lib Dems might prop them up in to government but only if Corbyn stood down. Lib Dems are doing so well in the polls as they are picking up the Centre swing voter ground.

Kate Hoey is actually at the Convervative Party conference rotf.gif Why has she not been expelled from the party yet? No idea how she still has the whip.

Posted by: Steve201 Sep 30 2019, 07:02 AM

Is she? Disgraceful!!

Not sure the northern seats will vote Tory which is a good thing but they might vote BP!

Anyone else just noticed Nigel Farage initials are NF 😂 for National Front!

Posted by: Suedehead2 Sep 30 2019, 08:17 AM

It's fairly common for MPs of one party to attend events at another party's conference. Actually addressing the conference (not just a fringe meeting) would be a different matter.

Posted by: vidcapper Sep 30 2019, 09:33 AM

QUOTE(Steve201 @ Sep 30 2019, 08:02 AM) *
Is she? Disgraceful!!

Not sure the northern seats will vote Tory which is a good thing but they might vote BP!

Anyone else just noticed Nigel Farage initials are NF 😂 for National Front!


[Waits to see AQ's comment on that one] laugh.gif

Posted by: Algernon Monqueef Sep 30 2019, 10:29 AM

QUOTE(Steve201 @ Sep 30 2019, 08:02 AM) *
Is she? Disgraceful!!

Not sure the northern seats will vote Tory which is a good thing but they might vote BP!

Anyone else just noticed Nigel Farage initials are NF 😂 for National Front!


According to some of his boarding school chums, he was WELL aware and bragged about it and would sing Nazi songs.

Posted by: Izzy Sep 30 2019, 10:34 AM

QUOTE(Algernon Monqueef @ Sep 30 2019, 10:29 AM) *
According to some of his boarding school chums, he was WELL aware and bragged about it and would sing Nazi songs.


Why even go that far back? He was, https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-49865706 all too briefly investigated by police for a comment to supporters including the quote 'knife the pen pushers'.

He didn't confirm whether the knives would be long, or whether this imagined assault would take place at night.

Posted by: Algernon Monqueef Sep 30 2019, 10:37 AM

QUOTE(Izzy @ Sep 30 2019, 11:34 AM) *
Why even go that far back? He was, https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-49865706 all too briefly investigated by police for a comment to supporters including the quote 'knife the pen pushers'.

He didn't confirm whether the knives would be long, or whether this imagined assault would take place at night.


!!!

And yet his supporters call remainers, the left wing (lol) and remain mps the fascists!

Posted by: Tawdry Hepburn Sep 30 2019, 10:49 AM

I saw about that, what a dickwad he is.

I'd be really interested to see if those who expressed outrage over the milkshake incident would be willing to call him out on it. I won't hold my breath.

Posted by: Algernon Monqueef Sep 30 2019, 11:07 AM

He is terrified of milkshakes rotf.gif His nice veneer slipped as he went posh boy private school mode and started going off it at his security over it laugh.gif

Posted by: Tawdry Hepburn Sep 30 2019, 11:40 AM

He is! Do you remember when he was held hostage on the top of a bus by a few people outside holding milkshakes?

Posted by: vidcapper Sep 30 2019, 01:25 PM

QUOTE(Algernon Monqueef @ Sep 30 2019, 11:29 AM) *
According to some of his boarding school chums, he was WELL aware and bragged about it and would sing Nazi songs.


Which was, what. forty years ago? When I was a teenager, I was so left-wing that I'd have made you look like Maggie Thatcher in comparison! tongue.gif

The point being, people's political views tend to change with age/experience, so you cannot necessarily judge by words/actions decades ago.

QUOTE(Izzy @ Sep 30 2019, 11:34 AM) *
Why even go that far back? He was, https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-49865706 all too briefly investigated by police for a comment to supporters including the quote 'knife the pen pushers'.


Oh come on, who *hasn't* felt like going postal on petty jobsworths/bureaucrats at some point! laugh.gif

Posted by: Algernon Monqueef Sep 30 2019, 01:39 PM

And yet his politics show no sign of having changed? He is still extremely right wing? Stole Nazi propaganda for Leave? Sooo? His words and actions now echo those of the NF-bragging spoilt brat.

And unless you were um a communist, you weren't more left wing than me. In fact, you probably weren't very left wing at all.

Posted by: vidcapper Sep 30 2019, 01:51 PM

QUOTE(Algernon Monqueef @ Sep 30 2019, 02:39 PM) *
And yet his politics show no sign of having changed? He is still extremely right wing? Stole Nazi propaganda for Leave? Sooo? His words and actions now echo those of the NF-bragging spoilt brat.

And unless you were um a communist, you weren't more left wing than me. In fact, you probably weren't very left wing at all.


He is not as right-wing as the NF - right-wing, but not extreme-right.

As for myself, I voted for Labour in the 1983, Michael Foot and all. blush.gif Read Labour's 1983 manifesto and then try to tell me that it wasn't left-wing...

Posted by: Algernon Monqueef Sep 30 2019, 02:19 PM

Maybe you shouldn't have let yourself be brainwashed bt the dailymail since then.

Andno. He is extremely fsr right. He's probably still fscist

Posted by: vidcapper Sep 30 2019, 03:37 PM

QUOTE(Algernon Monqueef @ Sep 30 2019, 03:19 PM) *
Maybe you shouldn't have let yourself be brainwashed bt the dailymail since then.

Andno. He is extremely fsr right. He's probably still fscist


I have been reading the Mail only for 6-7 years.

Are the terms 'far-right' and 'fascist' too abhorrent to you that you can't even spell them? teresa.gif

Posted by: Steve201 Sep 30 2019, 04:27 PM

QUOTE(vidcapper @ Sep 30 2019, 02:51 PM) *
He is not as right-wing as the NF - right-wing, but not extreme-right.

As for myself, I voted for Labour in the 1983, Michael Foot and all. blush.gif Read Labour's 1983 manifesto and then try to tell me that it wasn't left-wing...


Foots 1983 manifesto was simply supporting the progress that had occurred since 1945 and reinvigorating that. Basically putting two fingers up at control of the economy by the private sector and the financial sector who were licking their lips at a second Thatcher term.

Also, you state that 'with experience' your views changed but that tries to say that left wing people are stupid and don't have a clue which is wholly wrong.

Posted by: vidcapper Oct 1 2019, 04:49 AM

QUOTE(Steve201 @ Sep 30 2019, 05:27 PM) *
Foots 1983 manifesto was simply supporting the progress that had occurred since 1945 and reinvigorating that. Basically putting two fingers up at control of the economy by the private sector and the financial sector who were licking their lips at a second Thatcher term.

Also, you state that 'with experience' your views changed but that tries to say that left wing people are stupid and don't have a clue which is wholly wrong.


Even one of Labour's *own* MP's (Gerald Kaufman) famously described their 1983 manifesto as 'The longest suicide note in history'.

As to the second part - that was not my intent, but merely your own interpretation.

Posted by: Steve201 Oct 1 2019, 06:41 AM

But why use such devisive language then?

Kauffman was from the Labour right who opposed the leadership so no surprise he had that view.

Posted by: vidcapper Oct 1 2019, 07:17 AM

QUOTE(Steve201 @ Oct 1 2019, 07:41 AM) *
Kauffman was from the Labour right who opposed the leadership so no surprise he had that view.


But he was right - the Tories won a 144 seat majority...

Posted by: Steve201 Oct 1 2019, 07:54 AM

Winning a majority doesn't make you right in your arguments though.

Look what Thatcherism has done to your once great country. We can do so much more together than we can ever do alone!

Posted by: vidcapper Oct 1 2019, 10:08 AM

QUOTE(Steve201 @ Oct 1 2019, 08:54 AM) *
Winning a majority doesn't make you right in your arguments though.


It is when the question is 'Who do you want to be the next gov't of this country?' rolleyes.gif

Posted by: Suedehead2 Oct 1 2019, 11:24 AM

QUOTE(vidcapper @ Oct 1 2019, 11:08 AM) *
It is when the question is 'Who do you want to be the next gov't of this country?' rolleyes.gif

That doesn't mean the government is always right, though. If it did, opposition MPs might as well spend all their time on holiday.

Posted by: Steve201 Oct 1 2019, 09:08 PM

Exactly those election victories led to the tories doing some things right and a lot more wrong imo. Britain is a crueler and more survival of the fittest country now due to her.

Posted by: vidcapper Oct 2 2019, 04:42 AM

QUOTE(Suedehead2 @ Oct 1 2019, 12:24 PM) *
That doesn't mean the government is always right, though. If it did, opposition MPs might as well spend all their time on holiday.


Of course not - but it means voters have decided who they want to run the country, for better or worse - and if the polls are any indication unsure.gif currently they seem to believe that Corbyn would tend towards the latter...

Posted by: Steve201 Oct 2 2019, 06:51 AM

So you have slightly changed your original rebuttal of my point to that if the people vote for it then so be but it doesn't mean the people are always right.

Posted by: vidcapper Oct 2 2019, 07:09 AM

QUOTE(Steve201 @ Oct 2 2019, 07:51 AM) *
So you have slightly changed your original rebuttal of my point to that if the people vote for it then so be but it doesn't mean the people are always right.


You're *complaining* that I've made a concession to my original comment? huh.gif

Posted by: Steve201 Oct 2 2019, 11:44 AM

Yes...you have.

Posted by: vidcapper Oct 2 2019, 01:42 PM

QUOTE(Steve201 @ Oct 2 2019, 12:44 PM) *
Yes...you have.


But... why? unsure.gif

Posted by: Steve201 Oct 2 2019, 03:54 PM

You stated that the 1983 labour manifesto was left wing and said that the argument for democratic socialism was lost because the tories won that election.

Obviously that doesn't mean that people who argue for this are wrong overall and are still entitled to argue for that now.

My argument is that the 83 manifesto simply tried to defend the gains made between 1945-79 and that doesn't mean to say it was overly left wing, in fact in the late 1970s this was the consensus view.

Posted by: Suedehead2 Oct 2 2019, 04:08 PM

QUOTE(Steve201 @ Oct 2 2019, 04:54 PM) *
You stated that the 1983 labour manifesto was left wing and said that the argument for democratic socialism was lost because the tories won that election.

Obviously that doesn't mean that people who argue for this are wrong overall and are still entitled to argue for that now.

My argument is that the 83 manifesto simply tried to defend the gains made between 1945-79 and that doesn't mean to say it was overly left wing, in fact in the late 1970s this was the consensus view.

The 1983 manifesto also included a commitment to leave the Common Market so, surely, that issue should have been laid to rest after the result of the election.

Posted by: Steve201 Oct 2 2019, 04:42 PM

Well we all know its the Bennite left like JC who have consistently opposed it. Ironic the Benn Act to prevent a No Deal exit in 2019 was produced by his son Hilary.

Posted by: vidcapper Oct 3 2019, 05:13 AM

QUOTE(Steve201 @ Oct 2 2019, 04:54 PM) *
You stated that the 1983 labour manifesto was left wing and said that the argument for democratic socialism was lost because the tories won that election.

Obviously that doesn't mean that people who argue for this are wrong overall and are still entitled to argue for that now.

My argument is that the 83 manifesto simply tried to defend the gains made between 1945-79 and that doesn't mean to say it was overly left wing, in fact in the late 1970s this was the consensus view.



QUOTE(Suedehead2 @ Oct 2 2019, 05:08 PM) *
The 1983 manifesto also included a commitment to leave the Common Market so, surely, that issue should have been laid to rest after the result of the election.


No lost, but severely undermined, at least - don't forget this was at a time when the industrial unrest of the 70's was still fresh in people's minds.

Of course they can still argue for it, but not from a position of strength - all the Tories need do is point to Venezuela to undermine it. The left can only rely on the generation too young to remember the 70's for their main support.

As for 'that was the consensus view', that's a very weak argument, given that homophobia & racism was far more prevalent then too, and we certainly don't want to turn the clock back on *that*!

As for the Common Market part, you know as well as I do that the rejection of a manifesto is not necessarily a rejection of every policy in it.

Posted by: Steve201 Oct 3 2019, 06:59 AM

I wouldn't say that Britain was anything like Venuzuela tbf but the tories will always use silly arguments that will hit home with middle of the road voters.

The social changes you mention of course were different, thankfully Labour succeeded in many of these even if the economic arguements were being lost.

Most people won't follow as they are forgetful but the best way to counter neoliberal arguements is again looking to the past and debating the 1930s and the Victorian era as this is the type of economy tories want.

Posted by: Algernon Monqueef Oct 3 2019, 08:33 AM

Literally all we have to do is point to the Victorian era or the thousands dying from extreme poverty right now plus rhe doubling of the national debt to toepedo any Tory eeconomic argument. Oop. Sorry. The UK and Keynesian efonomics have nothing to do with Venezuela, tour personal voogeyman. Sorry sad.gif Mwaa. You are such a Tory laugh.gif

Posted by: Steve201 Oct 3 2019, 07:51 PM

It's simply highlights the advances we have made because mainly due to the left! Tories were dragged kicking and screaming at each turn!


Posted by: vidcapper Oct 4 2019, 04:59 AM

QUOTE(Steve201 @ Oct 3 2019, 08:51 PM) *
It's simply highlights the advances we have made because mainly due to the left! Tories were dragged kicking and screaming at each turn!


Well, I can't really argue with that, but what I do disagree with is that there's any real possibility of the Tories reversing the major reforms (AQ's biggest fear). They can do no more than tinker around the edges, as anything more will cost them General Elections.

Posted by: Steve201 Oct 4 2019, 08:02 AM

Exactly, successes which can't be undone!!

Posted by: Algernon Monqueef Oct 4 2019, 08:12 AM

You're wrong. They are desperate to get us oot the EU to do away with human rights. We have a modern day poor house, foodbanks. We have a modern day workhouse, 0 hour contracts, so please.

Posted by: vidcapper Oct 4 2019, 09:02 AM

QUOTE(Algernon Monqueef @ Oct 4 2019, 09:12 AM) *
You're wrong. They are desperate to get us oot the EU to do away with human rights. We have a modern day poor house, foodbanks. We have a modern day workhouse, 0 hour contracts, so please.


Sigh. rolleyes.gif

Posted by: Algernon Monqueef Oct 4 2019, 09:10 AM

It is true. Sorry you are too much of a right wing Tory to see it.

Posted by: vidcapper Oct 4 2019, 02:02 PM

QUOTE(Algernon Monqueef @ Oct 4 2019, 10:10 AM) *
It is true. Sorry you are too much of a right wing Tory to see it.


Yeah, the kind that has never voted Tory in their lives... rolleyes.gif

Posted by: Common Sense Oct 5 2019, 08:11 PM

Opinium poll for Observer, Cons back to 15-pt lead:
Con 38% +2
Lab 23% -1
Lib Dem 15% -5
Brexit 12% +1
Green 4% +2
2,006 UK adults 3-4 Oct, change since last week

Posted by: Steve201 Oct 6 2019, 01:56 AM

If there's another extension beyond 31st October that'll change a lot!

Posted by: vidcapper Oct 14 2019, 05:48 AM

Polls update :

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opinion_polling_for_the_next_United_Kingdom_general_election

Posted by: Trick Or Queef! Oct 15 2019, 10:07 AM

Latest polls have a 3% gap, and we all knoe these polls are propaganda exercises for Tories, rather than fact. They're done. They're finished.

Posted by: vidcapper Oct 15 2019, 01:52 PM

QUOTE(Trick Or Queef! @ Oct 15 2019, 11:07 AM) *
Latest polls have a 3% gap, and we all knoe these polls are propaganda exercises for Tories, rather than fact. They're done. They're finished.


I hate to tell you this, but wishful thinking doesn't work... rolleyes.gif

Posted by: Tones and Iz Oct 15 2019, 01:59 PM

I think we're still in a honeymoon period for the PM (even Brown's lasted 3 months) and the Tories could easily fall away in any election scenario. Corbyn's shown his expertise in a campaign scenario, Johnson from his public appearances decidedly... hasn't. And the gap was far bigger in 2017. This isn't an ideal situation for the Conservatives.

Posted by: Trick Or Queef! Oct 15 2019, 02:06 PM

Rememebr: polling companies are propaganda tools. The bandwagon effect is a real thing. They were completely wrong last time, all fvaouring 400 seat Tory majorities etc! We saw the same with Michihan, with them pretending Hillary was 23 points ahead vs Bernie.

The Tories are finished.

Posted by: vidcapper Oct 16 2019, 04:32 AM

QUOTE(Trick Or Queef! @ Oct 15 2019, 03:06 PM) *
Rememebr: polling companies are propaganda tools. The bandwagon effect is a real thing. They were completely wrong last time, all fvaouring 400 seat Tory majorities etc! We saw the same with Michihan, with them pretending Hillary was 23 points ahead vs Bernie.

The Tories are finished.


Is *everything* a conspiracy for you? rolleyes.gif

Posted by: vidcapper Oct 16 2019, 04:36 AM

QUOTE(Tones and Iz @ Oct 15 2019, 02:59 PM) *
I think we're still in a honeymoon period for the PM (even Brown's lasted 3 months) and the Tories could easily fall away in any election scenario. Corbyn's shown his expertise in a campaign scenario, Johnson from his public appearances decidedly... hasn't. And the gap was far bigger in 2017. This isn't an ideal situation for the Conservatives.


The gap *was* bigger in 2017, but polling companies tend to adjust their methodology when they get things that wrong, so I think it would be unwise of Labour to rely on a similar campaign surge, or that the Tories will run such a lacklustre/complacent campaign.

Posted by: Trick Or Queef! Oct 16 2019, 09:52 AM

You do rralisr impartiality rules come in to play too, so thr one party state media has to dial back its government propaganda too? The polls in thr US are still reporting error-riddled polls and freely ADMIT Bernie will probably outperform them. Oops. It's the same here. Sorry.

Posted by: vidcapper Oct 17 2019, 05:18 AM

Another one of these 'fake' polls? rolleyes.gif

https://yougov.co.uk/topics/politics/articles-reports/2019/10/16/political-trackers-14-15-oct-update

Posted by: Trick Or Queef! Oct 17 2019, 09:02 AM

Yes. It is ToryGov, literally the worst one.

Posted by: Doctor Blind Oct 17 2019, 09:06 AM

The recent increase in the Conservative vote share has been taken from the Brexit Party, that may change if there is an extension beyond 31st October...

Average (1-10 Oct) over 4 polls:

Con 34%
Lab 24½%
Lib Dem 18%
Brexit Party 12%
Green 5%

Posted by: vidcapper Oct 18 2019, 05:10 AM

QUOTE(Trick Or Queef! @ Oct 17 2019, 10:02 AM) *
Yes. It is ToryGov, literally the worst one.


Why can you not grasp that it is not in *anyone's* interest to 'rig' polls - as the last election proved, real votes always trump polls. In any case, poor predictions hurt polling companies commercially!

The 'bandwagon' effect was notably absent last time, so don't bother citing it...

Posted by: Trick Or Queef! Oct 18 2019, 01:47 PM

Except it buoyed the Tories, as did Brexshit? Given REAL UNBALANCED polling feom the start, Mad May would have lost far more seats.

Posted by: Trick Or Queef! Oct 18 2019, 01:47 PM

If it weren't in the corporate neoliberal interest, polls would be far more accurate. It is a whole thing in political theory. Sorry.

Posted by: vidcapper Oct 18 2019, 02:10 PM

QUOTE(Trick Or Queef! @ Oct 18 2019, 02:47 PM) *
Except it buoyed the Tories, as did Brexshit? Given REAL UNBALANCED polling feom the start, Mad May would have lost far more seats.


Lets get this straight - you'd rather have polls with an inbuilt bias towards Labour? How is that any better than vice versa? wacko.gif

The polls may have given the Tories an over-optimistic view of their position, but even after the real position was clarified, Labour *still* did not win nearly enough seats to prevail.

Posted by: Trick Or Queef! Oct 18 2019, 02:12 PM

And yet wa sonly 2k votes away from an overall majority based on narrow seats after being written off THANKD TO BIASED POLLS. Soo yeaah.

Posted by: vidcapper Oct 18 2019, 02:56 PM

QUOTE(Trick Or Queef! @ Oct 18 2019, 03:12 PM) *
And yet wa sonly 2k votes away from an overall majority based on narrow seats after being written off THANKD TO BIASED POLLS. Soo yeaah.


You're getting really desperate if you're resorting to fantasy politics now! laugh.gif

Posted by: Trick Or Queef! Oct 18 2019, 03:40 PM

Not fanrasy, but facts. That was the difference. Sorry.

Posted by: vidcapper Oct 18 2019, 04:04 PM

QUOTE(Trick Or Queef! @ Oct 18 2019, 04:40 PM) *
Not fanrasy, but facts. That was the difference. Sorry.


No, the facts are what the result *actually was*! rolleyes.gif

Posted by: Freddie Kruger Oct 18 2019, 04:06 PM

Michael doesn't like facts. He still says REMAIN won and Hillary's sat in the Oval office. ohmy.gif ohmy.gif

Posted by: Trick Or Queef! Oct 18 2019, 04:12 PM

QUOTE(vidcapper @ Oct 18 2019, 05:04 PM) *
No, the facts are what the result *actually was*! rolleyes.gif


And the fact is 2k votes total across select constituencies would have won it.

Posted by: Freddie Kruger Oct 18 2019, 04:14 PM

QUOTE(Trick Or Queef! @ Oct 18 2019, 05:12 PM) *
And the fact is 2k votes total across select constituencies would have won it.



Would have, could have. All irrelevant. Those voters couldn't stomach Corbyn as PM though and won't next time. He's a failure.

Posted by: vidcapper Oct 19 2019, 04:37 AM

QUOTE(Trick Or Queef! @ Oct 18 2019, 05:12 PM) *
And the fact is 2k votes total across select constituencies would have won it.


But they *didn't* - end of story!

Posted by: Tones and Iz Oct 19 2019, 04:45 AM

I think Michael is merely describing a minor psychological effect, that of perceived winner’s advantage, that possibly caused enough floating votes, a small but not insignificant number, to vote for the candidate they perceived as more electable. Which is an outcome that doesn’t seem entirely fair but it happens. In combination with the right media bias, this results in a conservative government more often than it should given how generally equal the splits otherwise are. This is worse because our system is a harmful winner takes all construct.

Such is the advantage to the leading party unless it is completely neck and neck.

Posted by: vidcapper Oct 19 2019, 07:25 AM

QUOTE(Tones and Iz @ Oct 19 2019, 05:45 AM) *
I think Michael is merely describing a minor psychological effect, that of perceived winner’s advantage, that possibly caused enough floating votes, a small but not insignificant number, to vote for the candidate they perceived as more electable. Which is an outcome that doesn’t seem entirely fair but it happens. In combination with the right media bias, this results in a conservative government more often than it should given how generally equal the splits otherwise are. This is worse because our system is a harmful winner takes all construct.

Such is the advantage to the leading party unless it is completely neck and neck.


Possibly, but that is counterbalanced somewhat by the benefit Labour gain through their constituencies being smaller than average in size - and the longer we go between boundary changes, the more of an advantage it becomes.

Of course, whenever there *is* a boundary review, Labour kick & scream like toddlers having a tantrum about 'Tory bias'... rolleyes.gif

Posted by: Trick Or Queef! Oct 19 2019, 08:38 AM

QUOTE(vidcapper @ Oct 19 2019, 08:25 AM) *
Possibly, but that is counterbalanced somewhat by the benefit Labour gain through their constituencies being smaller than average in size - and the longer we go between boundary changes, the more of an advantage it becomes.

Of course, whenever there *is* a boundary review, Labour kick & scream like toddlers having a tantrum about 'Tory bias'... rolleyes.gif


God's sake. Tories are GERRYMANDERING. They eant to change constituencies to how they have never been before because guess what? TORIES BENEFIT and it would create an eternal Tory state. That is why. Would their votes change? NO! They cheat to win.

And Iz is 100% correct. Ans aeeing as Corbyn was 2k shy of an overall majority vs bandwagon effect, media bias, constant attacks, well! His policies must be popular.

Posted by: vidcapper Oct 19 2019, 09:05 AM

QUOTE(Trick Or Queef! @ Oct 19 2019, 09:38 AM) *
God's sake. Tories are GERRYMANDERING. They eant to change constituencies to how they have never been before because guess what? TORIES BENEFIT and it would create an eternal Tory state. That is why. Would their votes change? NO! They cheat to win.


Do you not realize that the Boundaries Commission is an *Independent* body, whose mandate is to equalise the size of constituencies as much as possible?

https://boundarycommissionforengland.independent.gov.uk/

There are less paranoid people than you confined in Broadmoor... w00t.gif

Posted by: Trick Or Queef! Oct 19 2019, 09:08 AM

You do realise that thr TORIES suggest HOW the changes are made and the commission responds to that, right? The Tories have decided to change how constituencies are based. You realise that, yes? You realise it is not fair. Like, at all, yes, to guarantee a one party state with no change in vote volume? Idiot.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/politics/2015/dec/14/conservative-power-grab-stay-in-power-permanent

Cheer and clap for your right wing aristocrat masters. They're never wrong and never corrupt! cheer.gif

Also the boundary commission's role is to follow the electoral rules to make it as fair as possible. That's it.

Posted by: Suedehead2 Oct 19 2019, 10:20 AM

QUOTE(vidcapper @ Oct 19 2019, 08:25 AM) *
Possibly, but that is counterbalanced somewhat by the benefit Labour gain through their constituencies being smaller than average in size - and the longer we go between boundary changes, the more of an advantage it becomes.

Of course, whenever there *is* a boundary review, Labour kick & scream like toddlers having a tantrum about 'Tory bias'... rolleyes.gif

Not that rubbish again. If you apply a uniform swing from Tory to Labour to give the two the same share of the vote and leave the other parties unchanged, the Tories win more seats than Labour. Any perceived bias in the past was down to a combination of various factors including lower turnout in safe Labour seats and Labour targeting seats more effectively than the Tories.

Incidentally, under the proposed new boundaries, the gap in seats under the above scenario is even greater despite there being 50 fewer seats.

Posted by: vidcapper Oct 19 2019, 02:55 PM

QUOTE(Suedehead2 @ Oct 19 2019, 11:20 AM) *
Not that rubbish again. If you apply a uniform swing from Tory to Labour to give the two the same share of the vote and leave the other parties unchanged, the Tories win more seats than Labour. Any perceived bias in the past was down to a combination of various factors including lower turnout in safe Labour seats and Labour targeting seats more effectively than the Tories.

Incidentally, under the proposed new boundaries, the gap in seats under the above scenario is even greater despite there being 50 fewer seats.


So what solution do you propose? We certainly can't leave the unequal electorate situation for ever. Bearing in mind that PR is alas not gonna happen in the foreseeable...


Posted by: Trick Or Queef! Oct 19 2019, 03:15 PM

PR or leave as is. The end. The Tories are trying to make a one party state and you are just guffawing like the village idiot and nodding as they do it.

Posted by: vidcapper Oct 20 2019, 05:54 AM

QUOTE(Trick Or Queef! @ Oct 19 2019, 04:15 PM) *
PR or leave as is. The end. The Tories are trying to make a one party state and you are just guffawing like the village idiot and nodding as they do it.


The only thing I am guffawing at is the repetition of your tired old claims about the Tories!

Posted by: Suedehead2 Oct 20 2019, 08:31 AM

QUOTE(vidcapper @ Oct 19 2019, 03:55 PM) *
So what solution do you propose? We certainly can't leave the unequal electorate situation for ever. Bearing in mind that PR is alas not gonna happen in the foreseeable...

You know as well as I do that the problems are an inherent part of FPTP.

Posted by: vidcapper Oct 20 2019, 08:44 AM

QUOTE(Suedehead2 @ Oct 20 2019, 09:31 AM) *
You know as well as I do that the problems are an inherent part of FPTP.


But a succession of gov'ts without overall majorities thro FPTP will undermine the case against PR, or so we can hope...

Posted by: Doctor Sleep Oct 24 2019, 04:28 PM

Westminster voting intention...

if "the deadline for the UK to leave the EU has been extended beyond the 31st of October 2019":

LAB: 27%
CON: 26%
BREX: 20%
LDEM: 18%
GRN: 4%

via @ComRes, 16 - 17 Oct


OOOOOOOOFFFFFFFTTT.

Posted by: Michael Myers Oct 24 2019, 05:06 PM

EVIL TORIES OUT!

Posted by: Freddie Kruger Oct 24 2019, 05:07 PM

QUOTE(Doctor Sleep @ Oct 24 2019, 05:28 PM) *
Westminster voting intention...

if "the deadline for the UK to leave the EU has been extended beyond the 31st of October 2019":

LAB: 27%
CON: 26%
BREX: 20%
LDEM: 18%
GRN: 4%

via @ComRes, 16 - 17 Oct
OOOOOOOOFFFFFFFTTT.



Another well hung parliament then.

Posted by: Freddie Kruger Oct 24 2019, 05:18 PM

Many Labour MP's and the SNP saying they won't back an election as they suspect some kind of clever trap by Boris to then somehow refuse the extension and crash us out with no deal still on 31st.

Posted by: Suedehead2 Oct 24 2019, 05:33 PM

QUOTE(Freddie Kruger @ Oct 24 2019, 06:18 PM) *
Many Labour MP's and the SNP saying they won't back an election as they suspect some kind of clever trap by Boris to then somehow refuse the extension and crash us out with no deal still on 31st.

This is what happens when a serial liar becomes PM. He simply cannot be trusted.

Posted by: Envoirment Oct 24 2019, 07:16 PM

Not surprised by that given what's happened the last few weeks and with public opinion shifting against Boris. Now the important thing is how does it translate into seats? I expect the Brexit Party won't get too many seats, but come 2nd/3rd in a lot of constituencies. That would lead the way for a potential Labour/Lib Dem/SNP/Green colatition of sorts. I find it hard to believe the Conservatives will be in power in some form again after another GE. Another May-like scenario but worse.

Posted by: Michael Myers Oct 24 2019, 07:32 PM

But we are living in a one party media state, which does buoy the evil party. Brainwashing is a thing.

Posted by: vidcapper Oct 25 2019, 04:47 AM

QUOTE(Suedehead2 @ Oct 24 2019, 06:33 PM) *
This is what happens when a serial liar becomes PM. He simply cannot be trusted.


And that's different from *every other* PM, how? w00t.gif

QUOTE(Envoirment @ Oct 24 2019, 08:16 PM) *
I find it hard to believe the Conservatives will be in power in some form again after another GE. Another May-like scenario but worse.


Hard to believe, despite the polls?

QUOTE(Michael Myers @ Oct 24 2019, 08:32 PM) *
But we are living in a one party media state, which does buoy the evil party. Brainwashing is a thing.


Ever wonder *how* you became so convinced there's a 'secret Tory plot to create a one party state' in the first place? teresa.gif

The irony is - you accuse me of being brainwashed by the Daily Mail, yet are oblivious to to your own 100% reliance of leftist sources to form your own opinions...

Posted by: Suedehead2 Oct 25 2019, 08:56 AM

QUOTE(vidcapper @ Oct 25 2019, 05:47 AM) *
And that's different from *every other* PM, how? w00t.gif

Grow up. Johnson easily outdoes all his predecessors (in my lifetime at least) when it comes to lies. I disagreed with Thatcher on almost everything, but at least I could assume that she was generally telling the truth (or something close to it) when it came to facts. With Johnson, the opposite is the case.

Posted by: vidcapper Oct 25 2019, 09:12 AM

QUOTE(Suedehead2 @ Oct 25 2019, 09:56 AM) *
Grow up.


Excuse me?!

QUOTE
Johnson easily outdoes all his predecessors (in my lifetime at least) when it comes to lies. I disagreed with Thatcher on almost everything, but at least I could assume that she was generally telling the truth (or something close to it) when it came to facts. With Johnson, the opposite is the case.


I am very sceptical about anything *any* politician says - Boris Johnson no more or less than any other.

Posted by: blacksquare Oct 25 2019, 09:26 AM

QUOTE(vidcapper @ Oct 25 2019, 10:12 AM) *
Excuse me?!
I am very sceptical about anything *any* politician says - Boris Johnson no more or less than any other.


Well then, you're the perfect fool for Boris.

Skepticism towards politicians is understandable but those unable to see the difference just enable his lies further.

Posted by: vidcapper Oct 25 2019, 10:01 AM

QUOTE(blacksquare @ Oct 25 2019, 10:26 AM) *
Well then, you're the perfect fool for Boris.


Did you mean 'tool'? unsure.gif

QUOTE
Skepticism towards politicians is understandable but those unable to see the difference just enable his lies further.


It's not a question of being 'unable' - I would do the same for anyone who appears to be making a good attempt to get through what we voted for, namely leaving the EU.

Posted by: Peentergeist Oct 25 2019, 10:10 AM

QUOTE(vidcapper @ Oct 25 2019, 05:47 AM) *
And that's different from *every other* PM, how? w00t.gif
Hard to believe, despite the polls?
Ever wonder *how* you became so convinced there's a 'secret Tory plot to create a one party state' in the first place? teresa.gif

The irony is - you accuse me of being brainwashed by the Daily Mail, yet are oblivious to to your own 100% reliance of leftist sources to form your own opinions...


Even Ofcom is demanding changes from the BBTory rotf.gif Peter Owen has smashed the one party media state with his analysis. The BBTory even tried some small changes on the fly on response. It is a fact. Once the Tories get in, they sneak and conive to never get out anf the media is supporting them.

Posted by: Peentergeist Oct 25 2019, 10:13 AM

Grow up. Bojo is a serial liar and a crook. There is a world of difference. Only Cameron and Mad May even come close to his levels of skullduggery and lies.

Also, 51% is a non binding referendum where you expressed an ooinion, a vague one, rather than voted. It's not enough for major constitutional change. Sorry. Aaand no one voted for a hard tory brexshit. Sorry. It is totally undemocratic.

Posted by: vidcapper Oct 25 2019, 10:17 AM

QUOTE(Peentergeist @ Oct 25 2019, 11:13 AM) *
Also, 51% is a non binding referendum where you expressed an ooinion, a vague one, rather than voted. It's not enough for major constitutional change. Sorry. Aaand no one voted for a hard tory brexshit. Sorry. It is totally undemocratic.


If I had a penny for every time you repeated *that*, I could retire tomorrow. laugh.gif

Posted by: Peentergeist Oct 25 2019, 10:19 AM

And maybe one time it will finally sink in instead of you repeating the lies of the hard right press and Tories you've obviously been brainwashed and conditioned by x

Posted by: vidcapper Oct 25 2019, 10:44 AM

QUOTE(Peentergeist @ Oct 25 2019, 11:19 AM) *
And maybe one time it will finally sink in instead of you repeating the lies of the hard right press and Tories you've obviously been brainwashed and conditioned by x


Another penny for me. rolleyes.gif

Posted by: Freddie Kruger Oct 25 2019, 10:57 AM

QUOTE(vidcapper @ Oct 25 2019, 11:17 AM) *
If I had a penny for every time you repeated *that*, I could retire tomorrow. laugh.gif


Me too. smile.gif


Maybe he just copies and pastes his posts. biggrin.gif

Posted by: Suedehead2 Oct 25 2019, 10:59 AM

QUOTE(vidcapper @ Oct 25 2019, 10:12 AM) *
Excuse me?!
I am very sceptical about anything *any* politician says - Boris Johnson no more or less than any other.

The attitude that "all politicians lie all the time" has helped to get us where we are. We now have Cabinet ministers whose attitude seems to be "If people think we always lie, I might as well lie". Tories know that they can lie more than politicians of other parties because they have a largely compliant press on their side.

Posted by: mald487 Oct 25 2019, 12:13 PM

QUOTE(vidcapper @ Oct 25 2019, 10:01 AM) *
Did you mean 'tool'? unsure.gif
It's not a question of being 'unable' - I would do the same for anyone who appears to be making a good attempt to get through what we voted for, namely leaving the EU.


A very slim majority voted for.

You don't speak for a significant number of people.

Posted by: mald487 Oct 25 2019, 12:21 PM

QUOTE(Suedehead2 @ Oct 25 2019, 10:59 AM) *
The attitude that "all politicians lie all the time" has helped to get us where we are. We now have Cabinet ministers whose attitude seems to be "If people think we always lie, I might as well lie". Tories know that they can lie more than politicians of other parties because they have a largely compliant press on their side.



Exactly. Letting Boris off the hook with "oh well *shrugs/rolls eyes* they are all the same as each other" is ridiculous and leading down a dangerous path.

Yes many politicians do lie, yes many Prime Ministers lie, terribly, but this is a man who has a track record for colossal lies, telling multiple different versions of events to different people, and has no issue with taking the UK out of the EU in the most reckless, chaotic way possible all for personal gain.

He deserves to be called out, he deserves to have his motives scrutinized, questions and then questioned again.

Posted by: Suedehead2 Oct 25 2019, 12:52 PM

QUOTE(mald487 @ Oct 25 2019, 01:21 PM) *
Exactly. Letting Boris off the hook with "oh well *shrugs/rolls eyes* they are all the same as each other" is ridiculous and leading down a dangerous path.

Yes many politicians do lie, yes many Prime Ministers lie, terribly, but this is a man who has a track record for colossal lies, telling multiple different versions of events to different people, and has no issue with taking the UK out of the EU in the most reckless, chaotic way possible all for personal gain.

He deserves to be called out, he deserves to have his motives scrutinized, questions and then questioned again.

One of the bodies tasked with questioning him is the House of Commons liaison committee. The PM (in a process introduced by Tony Blair) is supposed to appear before that committee each year. This year's session was supposed to be in September but Johnson avoided that with his unlawful prorogation of parliament. It was rearranged for yesterday but Johnson dodged that date as well. So, in three months as PM Johnson has manged to attend PMQs twice and the liaison committee not at all.

Posted by: mald487 Oct 25 2019, 01:35 PM

QUOTE(Suedehead2 @ Oct 25 2019, 12:52 PM) *
One of the bodies tasked with questioning him is the House of Commons liaison committee. The PM (in a process introduced by Tony Blair) is supposed to appear before that committee each year. This year's session was supposed to be in September but Johnson avoided that with his unlawful prorogation of parliament. It was rearranged for yesterday but Johnson dodged that date as well. So, in three months as PM Johnson has manged to attend PMQs twice and the liaison committee not at all.



Oh...well...they´re all the same. Nevermind.. wink.gif wink.gif

Posted by: vidcapper Oct 25 2019, 01:46 PM

I think we're drifting off-topic for this thread, perhaps it should be continued elsewhere?

Posted by: Freddie Kruger Oct 26 2019, 07:56 PM

Westminster Voting Intention:

CON: 36% (-1)
LAB: 23% (+1)
LDM: 18% (-1)
BXP: 12% (+1)
GRN: 6% (-1)

Via @YouGov - 24-25 Oct,
Changes w/ 20-21 Oct.

Posted by: Freddie Kruger Oct 26 2019, 07:57 PM

Opinium poll for the Observer, 23-25 Oct

Con 40% +3
Lab 24% ±0
Lib Dem 15% -1
Brexit 10% -2

Change since 15-17 Oct

Posted by: Freddie Kruger Oct 26 2019, 07:58 PM

Two great polls there for Boris to ponder. Would give him a nice overall majority.

Posted by: vidcapper Oct 27 2019, 05:52 AM

QUOTE(Freddie Kruger @ Oct 26 2019, 08:58 PM) *
Two great polls there for Boris to ponder. Would give him a nice overall majority.


Corbyn not wanting a GE to block 'No Deal'? Yeah, right... rolleyes.gif

Posted by: vidcapper Oct 27 2019, 03:44 PM

Age, rather than class, has come to determine how Britain votes

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2019/oct/27/age-rather-than-class-now-determines-how-britain-votes

By 2017 a 30-year-old was twice as likely to back Labour over the Tories, while a 70-year-old was twice as likely to do the opposite

[article continues]

Posted by: Peentergeist Oct 27 2019, 05:00 PM

Evil brainwashing Tories OUT!!

They brainwash old people who aren't as net savvy and fall prey to the evil BBTory, corporate news and right wing rags.

Posted by: vidcapper Oct 27 2019, 05:22 PM

QUOTE(Peentergeist @ Oct 27 2019, 05:00 PM) *
Evil brainwashing Tories OUT!!

They brainwash old people who aren't as net savvy and fall prey to the evil BBTory, corporate news and right wing rags.


I can see you won't be convinced that voters prefer the Tories to a Corbyn-led Labour party no matter how badly Lab do in the next election...

Posted by: Peentergeist Oct 27 2019, 05:32 PM

40% agaimst rhe most hostile media v a politician EEEVER x Sorry.

Posted by: Freddie Kruger Oct 27 2019, 08:41 PM

Opinium (Con +16), Deltapoll (Con +13) and YouGov (Con +15) all showing Conservative leads in excess of 10pts.


Are they all wrong?

Posted by: Freddie Kruger Oct 27 2019, 08:43 PM

QUOTE(vidcapper @ Oct 27 2019, 05:22 PM) *
I can see you won't be convinced that voters prefer the Tories to a Corbyn-led Labour party no matter how badly Lab do in the next election...



Michael would still say they'd won if Boris got a 100 seat majority or the election was corrupt or influenced by Trump or Putin or Mickey Mouse. biggrin.gif

Posted by: 5 Silas Frøkner Oct 30 2019, 10:17 AM

https://www.heraldscotland.com/news/18002245.new-poll-reveals-support-snp-scottish-independence/

Unionist newspaper the Herald has published its readers poll showing a 57.5% backing for the SNP, 80% (!!!) backing for remain (admittedly not overly surprising given it’s broadsheet) and finally 60% backing for independence.

Tides be turning in Scotland

Posted by: Suedehead2 Oct 30 2019, 11:05 AM

Polls of a self-selected sample of readers of one paper are completely meaningless. Pretending such polls mean anything should be left to the Daily Express.

Posted by: 5 Silas Frøkner Oct 30 2019, 11:52 AM

Usually id agree, but the unionist/nationalist divide in Scotland provides a different frame to look through. When a unionist paper is returning such a heavy volume of nationalist support there is something relevant there and worth thinking about

Posted by: vidcapper Oct 31 2019, 05:07 AM

I eagerly await the first during-campaign polls - that's when the action was last time! smile.gif

Posted by: Harve Oct 31 2019, 12:13 PM

Vote by education level, YouGov:

Degree holders

28% LAB
28% LD
24% CON
8% GRN
5% BXP
4% SNP
2% Other

GCSEs highest qualification obtained

45% CON
19% BXP
18% LAB
10% LD
3% SNP
3% GRN
2% Other

The Tory/BXP voter demographics are becoming like the US Republican Party's.

Posted by: blacksquare Oct 31 2019, 12:23 PM

QUOTE(Harve @ Oct 31 2019, 12:13 PM) *
Vote by education level, YouGov:

Degree holders

28% LAB
28% LD
24% CON
8% GRN
5% BXP
4% SNP
2% Other

GCSEs highest qualification obtained

45% CON
19% BXP
18% LAB
10% LD
3% SNP
3% GRN
2% Other

The Tory/BXP voter demographics are becoming like the US Republican Party's.




Similar with age as well, although not surprising

Posted by: 5 Silas Frøkner Oct 31 2019, 01:37 PM

7% of 18-24 backing SNP is something like 80-85% of all under 25s in Scotland if that held out over a full sample size for scotland

Posted by: vidcapper Oct 31 2019, 02:45 PM

QUOTE(Harve @ Oct 31 2019, 12:13 PM) *
Vote by education level, YouGov:

Degree holders

28% LAB
28% LD
24% CON
8% GRN
5% BXP
4% SNP
2% Other

GCSEs highest qualification obtained

45% CON
19% BXP
18% LAB
10% LD
3% SNP
3% GRN
2% Other

The Tory/BXP voter demographics are becoming like the US Republican Party's.


So what are you suggesting - that older people shouldn't be allowed to vote?

It not, what else?

Posted by: Tones and Iz Oct 31 2019, 03:47 PM

Doesn’t look like suggesting anything, merely that if you are less educated, you are more likely to vote the Conservative Party. What that says about the value of the parties can be left up to the reader.

Posted by: vidcapper Oct 31 2019, 04:19 PM

QUOTE(Tones and Iz @ Oct 31 2019, 03:47 PM) *
Doesn’t look like suggesting anything, merely that if you are less educated, you are more likely to vote the Conservative Party. What that says about the value of the parties can be left up to the reader.


Then why is it whenever *I* post, I'm always accused of having a hidden agenda?

Posted by: Harve Oct 31 2019, 04:48 PM

QUOTE(vidcapper @ Oct 31 2019, 03:45 PM) *
So what are you suggesting - that older people shouldn't be allowed to vote?

It not, what else?

I have absolutely no idea how you have inferred that I'm suggesting taking away people's right to vote. Indeed, I'm talking about education, not age.

Poll of the 16,000 strong Facebook group of UK migrants in France:

64.5% Lib Dem
24% Lab
7% SNP
2.1% Green
0.8% Plaid
0.7% Conservative
0.1% Communist
0.8% Independent/other

Clearly meaningless for anything other than for displaying how well the Tories are hoovering up the migrant vote, whose everyday lives are being affected by this.

Posted by: vidcapper Oct 31 2019, 05:07 PM

QUOTE(Harve @ Oct 31 2019, 04:48 PM) *
I have absolutely no idea how you have inferred that I'm suggesting taking away people's right to vote. Indeed, I'm talking about education, not age.


And *I* have no idea how people infer things about me, so if they don't like it done to them, don't do it to me. mellow.gif

If people *are* going to make claims about me, at least be 100% honest about what you are implying, so I have a chance to defend myself.

Posted by: blacksquare Oct 31 2019, 06:05 PM

QUOTE(vidcapper @ Oct 31 2019, 05:07 PM) *
And *I* have no idea how people infer things about me, so if they don't like it done to them, don't do it to me. mellow.gif

If people *are* going to make claims about me, at least be 100% honest about what you are implying, so I have a chance to defend myself.


Posting YouGov polls showing demographics for different parties isn’t suggesting that the elderly should have their vote taken away, nor are those statistics somehow about you.

What a bizarre leap.

Posted by: vidcapper Nov 1 2019, 03:53 PM

Guardian Polltracker : https://www.theguardian.com/politics/ng-interactive/2019/oct/31/uk-general-election-2019-poll-tracker

As it's the Guardian, maybe it'll even be an acceptable source for Michael Moaner? heehee.gif


Powered by Invision Power Board
© Invision Power Services