BuzzJack
Entertainment Discussion

Welcome, guest! Log in or register. (click here for help)

Latest Site News
> 
 
Post reply to this threadCreate a new thread
> Was just thinking..., Help!
Track this thread | Email this thread | Print this thread | Download this thread | Subscribe to this forum
89.
post 30th January 2008, 11:20 AM
Post #1
Group icon
BuzzJack Platinum Member
Joined: 18 August 2006
Posts: 9,730
User: 1,142

If physicals only make up about 5% of total sales when combined, why is it that...when artists say they're releasing a song as download only it doesn't do great but if it's released both ways- physical and downloads... it does a lot better? unsure.gif Using 5% as a rough figure, surely that shouldn't make a big difference in the total sales?...

I was thinking about it and think the figure is a bit low wink.gif What you think?


This post has been edited by Johnny: 30th January 2008, 11:55 AM
Go to the top of this page
 
+Quote this post
RabbitFurCoat
post 30th January 2008, 12:38 PM
Post #2
Group icon
IncredibleSquirrel
Joined: 8 March 2006
Posts: 25,845
User: 118

I think it's 5% of the total market. Which is slightly misleading as all the catalogue tracks (from 'Rehab' and 'Chasing Cars' to 'Don't Stop Me Now' and 'In The Air Tonight') sell ENTIRELY on downloads. The % is much higher the further up the chart you go.
Go to the top of this page
 
+Quote this post
*Ben*
post 30th January 2008, 12:44 PM
Post #3
Group icon
Chart Chat Slave
Joined: 19 March 2006
Posts: 64,345
User: 275

I think it's because of the fact that physical releases have still lots of promo and airplay while download only tracks not much as of yet. But there are some exception: Nelly Furtado - Say It Right, Oasis - Lord... etc. With the decrease of physical sales I think this will change.

I think the 5% could be right. I remember that in the first singles chart of the year the sales were: 96% downloads, 4 % physicals of total sales according to MW.
Go to the top of this page
 
+Quote this post
-SCOTT-
post 30th January 2008, 04:01 PM
Post #4
Group icon
BuzzJack Gold Member
Joined: 12 March 2006
Posts: 2,145
User: 194

^Because there are millions of songs that are available to download from the last 50 years. Only the latest physical releases are available.

Anyway, physical releases aren't making that much difference to chart peaks anymore. In 2006, getting top 10 on downloads alone was an almost definate sign that it would #1 when physically released. Yet now, even getting to #2 on downloads won't confirm a #1 (as proved by Adele)
Go to the top of this page
 
+Quote this post


Post reply to this threadCreate a new thread

2 user(s) reading this thread
+ 2 guest(s) and 0 anonymous user(s)


 

Time is now: 29th April 2024, 04:50 AM