The Buzzjack Friday Chart Show Thread- 19th October 2018, Women Like Little Mix |
Track this thread - Email this thread - Print this thread - Download this thread - Subscribe to this forum |
19th October 2018, 05:29 PM
Post
#161
|
|
BuzzJack Platinum Member
Joined: 23 June 2018
Posts: 9,511 User: 73,240 |
|
|
|
19th October 2018, 05:39 PM
Post
#162
|
|
you never forget your first time...
Pronouns: he/him
Joined: 19 April 2011 Posts: 121,692 User: 13,530 |
|
|
|
19th October 2018, 06:43 PM
Post
#163
|
|
BuzzJack Platinum Member
Joined: 20 November 2014
Posts: 12,666 User: 21,386 |
|
|
|
19th October 2018, 06:44 PM
Post
#164
|
|
you never forget your first time...
Pronouns: he/him
Joined: 19 April 2011 Posts: 121,692 User: 13,530 |
|
|
|
19th October 2018, 06:47 PM
Post
#165
|
|
BuzzJack Legend
Joined: 10 April 2016
Posts: 27,025 User: 23,155 |
Is happier going to ACR soon?
|
|
|
19th October 2018, 06:51 PM
Post
#166
|
|
BuzzJack Platinum Member
Joined: 20 November 2014
Posts: 12,666 User: 21,386 |
|
|
|
19th October 2018, 09:20 PM
Post
#167
|
|
🔥🚀🔥
Joined: 30 August 2010
Posts: 74,572 User: 11,746 |
Worth noting that two songs from last week's top 40 have left the chart (top 100) entirely due to ACR.
Those being '079ME' (#37) and 'Don't Leave Me Alone' (#40). I know a certain someone here will be very happy about the latter's floppage. |
|
|
19th October 2018, 09:38 PM
Post
#168
|
|
my mind is ready for fun
Joined: 28 August 2017
Posts: 10,709 User: 38,591 |
Promises has avoided ACR: any increase in combined sales resets the 3-week counter, regardless of what the market does. Earlier this year, Paradise avoided ACR with a 0.2% sales increase from 32,016 to 32,080 despite the market increasing 3.85% the same week and Paradise having decreased in sales by more than the market in both the two previous weeks (and being over 9 weeks old at the time). Plus Alan Jones says so.
|
|
|
20th October 2018, 09:47 AM
Post
#169
|
|
you never forget your first time...
Pronouns: he/him
Joined: 19 April 2011 Posts: 121,692 User: 13,530 |
Promises has avoided ACR: any increase in combined sales resets the 3-week counter, regardless of what the market does. Earlier this year, Paradise avoided ACR with a 0.2% sales increase from 32,016 to 32,080 despite the market increasing 3.85% the same week and Paradise having decreased in sales by more than the market in both the two previous weeks (and being over 9 weeks old at the time). Plus Alan Jones says so. From the Official Charts Company rules: QUOTE 7.1 Streaming Ratio New releases will have a streaming to sales ratio of 100:1 (in the case of Premium Streams) or 600:1 (in the case of Ad Funded Streams) applied for the combining of chart eligible transactions. These ratios will be known as the Standard Chart Ratios (SCR) After 3 consecutive weeks of decline a stream to sale ratio of 200:1 (in the case of Premium Streams) or 1200:1 (in the case of Ad Funded Streams) will be applied. These ratios will be known as the Accelerated Chart Ratios (ACR) “Decline" is defined as negative week on week variance of combined sales and streams and which is below the market rate of change week on week. So yes it is measured against the market - I don't know what happened with Paradise that week, it's anomaly in my eyes. I guess the midweeks will tell us the full story on Monday because unfortunately the information I have doesn't give the ACR status. Nevertheless, the market increased by 1.3% so Promises has technically registered a decline. Also: Alan Jones makes mistakes on a near-weekly basis. I wouldn't really call him reliable. |
|
|
20th October 2018, 09:53 AM
Post
#170
|
|
🔥🚀🔥
Joined: 30 August 2010
Posts: 74,572 User: 11,746 |
QUOTE “Decline" is defined as negative week on week variance of combined sales and streams and which is below the market rate of change week on week. Does this not mean the song has to decline in chart sales and for that decline to be more than the market decline. So as 'Promises' hasn't declined in chart sales, it avoids ACR? I'm inclined to believe Alan Jones on this especially given the earlier example of 'Paradise' narrowly avoiding ACR. Has there been an example of a song increasing sales yet going to ACR? |
|
|
20th October 2018, 10:08 AM
Post
#171
|
|
you never forget your first time...
Pronouns: he/him
Joined: 19 April 2011 Posts: 121,692 User: 13,530 |
Perhaps I'm confused, it wouldn't be the first time, I purposely haven't said anything concrete because I have no way of knowing for sure until Monday's midweek update, but it feels very odd for them to implement such a rule and only do it half-arsed like that. There's no point in measuring against the market if they don't consider a gain of 1.1% against the market's gain of 1.3% as a decline too.
|
|
|
20th October 2018, 12:54 PM
Post
#172
|
|
BuzzJack Legend
Joined: 13 April 2007
Posts: 36,673 User: 3,272 |
Does this not mean the song has to decline in chart sales and for that decline to be more than the market decline. So as 'Promises' hasn't declined in chart sales, it avoids ACR? I'm inclined to believe Alan Jones on this especially given the earlier example of 'Paradise' narrowly avoiding ACR. Has there been an example of a song increasing sales yet going to ACR? That's how I would interpret it. It has to satisfy two conditions - 1) A devcline in "sales" AND 2) A decline greater than the market decline. Whoever came up with the phrase "negative week on week variance of combined sales and streams" should be shot for crimes against the English language. |
|
|
20th October 2018, 01:01 PM
Post
#173
|
|
BuzzJack Gold Member
Joined: 21 November 2015
Posts: 4,471 User: 22,687 |
That's how I would interpret it. It has to satisfy two conditions - 1) A devcline in "sales" AND 2) A decline greater than the market decline. Whoever came up with the phrase "negative week on week variance of combined sales and streams" should be shot for crimes against the English language. Its the correct terminology though The way you put it is common folk speak though |
|
|
20th October 2018, 02:45 PM
Post
#174
|
|
BuzzJack Legend
Joined: 13 November 2015
Posts: 33,254 User: 22,665 |
so looks like,
if you drop by 1 sale, and the market increases, it is considered a decline but if you increase by 1 sale, whatever the market does, it's an increase |
|
|
20th October 2018, 09:30 PM
Post
#175
|
|
BuzzJack Enthusiast
Joined: 9 April 2017
Posts: 837 User: 29,031 |
I can't wait for afro bashment to die, such a boring genre. Advice and Ay Caramba sound pretty much exactly what I expected them to sound like before I heard them. Funky Friday is a masterpiece in comparison, at least it doesn't have that flaming beat.
|
|
|
21st October 2018, 07:03 AM
Post
#176
|
|
BuzzJack Legend
Joined: 22 December 2009
Posts: 30,355 User: 10,275 |
|
|
|
21st October 2018, 12:36 PM
Post
#177
|
|
Shakin Stevens
Joined: 29 December 2007
Posts: 46,151 User: 5,138 |
Ridiculous these market decline rules!
If Promises is on ACR it'll be a ridiculous looking fall from the top!! |
|
|
22nd October 2018, 07:15 AM
Post
#178
|
|
my mind is ready for fun
Joined: 28 August 2017
Posts: 10,709 User: 38,591 |
These Days is another previous case: it increased in combined sales by less than the market in its 7th and 8th weeks, then decreased by more than the market in its 9th week, but because of those increases it avoided ACR in its 10th week, which is when it went to #1 (famously replacing the ACR-hit God's Plan). Therefore, unless the OCC have reinterpreted their own rules without acknowledgement, Promises will have avoided ACR for now.
As for their logic behind measuring declines against the market but not increases, I think I understand it but it's tricky to explain - let's see where Promises is in the midweeks first |
|
|
Time is now: 25th April 2024, 05:50 AM |
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 BuzzJack.com
About | Contact | Advertise | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service