Wierd iTunes chart position sort thing, I asked about this on another forum but got nowheres :( |
Track this thread - Email this thread - Print this thread - Download this thread - Subscribe to this forum |
Nov 3 2014, 06:06 PM
Post
#1
|
|
Former iconic poster with no consistent posting style
Pronouns: Don't take em seriously tbh
Joined: 20 June 2014 Posts: 20,582 User: 21,005 |
I'm talking about the iTunes chart you see on the iTunes store in the iTunes window:
It's sorted by chart position as seen by the ^ marker. Let's sort it by Name: Notice the points after song 'positions' in red circles? What do they mean? They aren't the actual top 200 positions, and most of these aren't even in the top 200! The dot positions vary by sort type: WHAT DO THOSE PESKY DOTS MEAN? |
|
|
Nov 3 2014, 06:11 PM
Post
#2
|
|
[Finest Š”asual Dating Authentic Damsels]
Joined: 25 November 2012
Posts: 288 User: 17,886 |
I have no idea, but one thing I do know is that you should click that '£0.99' button next to Only Human!
|
|
|
Nov 3 2014, 06:13 PM
Post
#3
|
|
BuzzJack Enthusiast
Joined: 7 July 2012
Posts: 777 User: 17,325 |
I've noticed this before too, it's pretty annoying. But you do realise you've just given everyone here your email address, right?
|
|
|
Nov 3 2014, 06:13 PM
Post
#4
|
|
(✿◠‿◠)
Pronouns: new york
Joined: 26 September 2013 Posts: 5,353 User: 19,852 |
they mean that the track is entering the Top 200 but the position isn't defined yet!
|
|
|
Nov 3 2014, 06:19 PM
Post
#5
|
|
Former iconic poster with no consistent posting style
Pronouns: Don't take em seriously tbh
Joined: 20 June 2014 Posts: 20,582 User: 21,005 |
|
|
|
Nov 3 2014, 06:19 PM
Post
#6
|
|
Former iconic poster with no consistent posting style
Pronouns: Don't take em seriously tbh
Joined: 20 June 2014 Posts: 20,582 User: 21,005 |
|
|
|
Nov 3 2014, 06:20 PM
Post
#7
|
|
#TeamKrustyKrab
Joined: 6 March 2014
Posts: 4,695 User: 20,675 |
|
|
|
Nov 3 2014, 06:48 PM
Post
#8
|
|
Former iconic poster with no consistent posting style
Pronouns: Don't take em seriously tbh
Joined: 20 June 2014 Posts: 20,582 User: 21,005 |
|
|
|
Nov 3 2014, 06:58 PM
Post
#9
|
|
BuzzJack Gold Member
Joined: 14 July 2008
Posts: 3,807 User: 6,639 |
|
|
|
Nov 3 2014, 09:32 PM
Post
#10
|
|
BuzzJack Legend
Joined: 23 December 2010
Posts: 24,411 User: 12,608 |
Are those numbers (that aren't the chart position) the song's track number? For example is the Pink Floyd song track #11 on its album? And all those X Factor songs are 1-track singles and are therefore track #1 of 1. I haven't checked but I guess this is probably the case.
|
|
|
Nov 3 2014, 09:37 PM
Post
#11
|
|
you never forget your first time...
Pronouns: he/him
Joined: 19 April 2011 Posts: 121,600 User: 13,530 |
Are those numbers (that aren't the chart position) the song's track number? For example is the Pink Floyd song track #11 on its album? And all those X Factor songs are 1-track singles and are therefore track #1 of 1. I haven't checked but I guess this is probably the case. omg you're correct! I remember Carrie Underwood's I Know You Won't showing up at "7." after Kerianne performed it on X Factor, before the top 200 was fully updated - only just clicked now that it's track 7 on the album! |
|
|
Nov 3 2014, 09:38 PM
Post
#12
|
|
Former iconic poster with no consistent posting style
Pronouns: Don't take em seriously tbh
Joined: 20 June 2014 Posts: 20,582 User: 21,005 |
Are those numbers (that aren't the chart position) the song's track number? For example is the Pink Floyd song track #11 on its album? And all those X Factor songs are 1-track singles and are therefore track #1 of 1. I haven't checked but I guess this is probably the case. Very interesting theory there Ryan. Checking now |
|
|
Nov 3 2014, 09:45 PM
Post
#13
|
|
Former iconic poster with no consistent posting style
Pronouns: Don't take em seriously tbh
Joined: 20 June 2014 Posts: 20,582 User: 21,005 |
Your theory seems correct
One of them i checked for Wicked Game didn't work though Anyone welcome to suggest why they only show up when changing the sort! |
|
|
Nov 3 2014, 11:40 PM
Post
#14
|
|
BuzzJack Legend
Joined: 23 December 2010
Posts: 24,411 User: 12,608 |
Ah I just checked and the version that's high on iTunes isn't actually from the album of the same name you linked to, but from a Greatest Hits compilation - and on that compilation 'Wicked Game' is track 3 so the theory works!
|
|
|
Nov 4 2014, 12:38 AM
Post
#15
|
|
Former iconic poster with no consistent posting style
Pronouns: Don't take em seriously tbh
Joined: 20 June 2014 Posts: 20,582 User: 21,005 |
Ah I just checked and the version that's high on iTunes isn't actually from the album of the same name you linked to, but from a Greatest Hits compilation - and on that compilation 'Wicked Game' is track 3 so the theory works! That's great! If you could figure out why they appear that would be über great! |
|
|
Nov 4 2014, 12:52 AM
Post
#16
|
|
BuzzJack Legend
Joined: 23 December 2010
Posts: 24,411 User: 12,608 |
The only thing I can think of, as someone mentioned above, is that clicking one of the other columns (not the chart column), sometimes provides a more up-to-date feed than the chart numbers-sorted chart does. This is possibly for the same reason that LivePopBars sometimes updates before iTunes itself does (which it does sometimes in my case), so therefore iTunes hasn't properly processed the chart numbers-sorted feed yet and therefore just shows the track number.
I suggest that the reason it shows the track number rather than anything else is that iTunes has to "grab" the song preview from the single or album page, and to get that on those pages you would click the track number to listen to the preview. In conclusion I'd suggest that iTunes goes through certain stages when updating its chart: - The most up-to-date feed can be found when sorting by artist (or another non chart number column). - This feed therefore shows the track number of the new top 200 entries so that the song preview is in place. - The feed then updates again and replaces the track number with its chart position - and the preview is already in place from the previous update stage. That's purely based on what I think happened with Carrie Underwood's 'I Know You Won't' a few weeks ago, I don't know if it's possible that it applies to the example you've given above as I haven't examined where they've come from - but in general I imagine that it's just the process iTunes goes through to update its chart and sometimes it updates for us without the update being fully complete. Hope that makes some sort of sense or gives us something to work with! |
|
|
Nov 4 2014, 08:38 AM
Post
#17
|
|
Former iconic poster with no consistent posting style
Pronouns: Don't take em seriously tbh
Joined: 20 June 2014 Posts: 20,582 User: 21,005 |
Ryan, thanks for explaining it all. Looking at the other examples your theories seem correct.
|
|
|
Nov 4 2014, 10:06 AM
Post
#18
|
|
BuzzJack Platinum Member
Joined: 10 March 2006
Posts: 19,163 User: 151 |
It's probably just a bug in the iTunes software?
|
|
|
Nov 4 2014, 11:25 AM
Post
#19
|
|
Former iconic poster with no consistent posting style
Pronouns: Don't take em seriously tbh
Joined: 20 June 2014 Posts: 20,582 User: 21,005 |
|
|
|
Nov 4 2014, 03:06 PM
Post
#20
|
|
Chart Chat Slave
Joined: 19 March 2006
Posts: 64,343 User: 275 |
|
|
|
Time is now: 20th April 2024 - 03:57 AM |
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 BuzzJack.com
About | Contact | Advertise | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service