  |
 Sugababes ● General Discussion |
| Track this thread - Email this thread - Print this thread - Download this thread - Subscribe to this forum |
 Apr 7 2012, 11:43 AM
Post
#321
|
|
 Queen of Soon
Joined: 24 May 2007
Posts: 74,074 User: 3,474 
      
|
Oh god I LOVE it when Keisha starts throwing shade and passive aggression about the shop.
 She really is a legend. I am so very excited for this, although I just want official news (When I'm back from Portugal please...  )
|
 |
 
|
|
Apr 19 2012, 12:22 PM
Post
#322
|
|
 BuzzJack Platinum Member
Joined: 7 January 2009
Posts: 7,064 User: 8,073
 
|
Not sure how reliable this Twitter user is:
QUOTE James Merritt @james_merritt Reply Retweet Favorite · Open Just heard what the original Sugababes are calling themselves! And it's ground breaking! (hint: shorten the original name) ... so Suga/Sugar/Sugas then. |
|
|
|
|
Apr 19 2012, 12:56 PM
Post
#323
|
|
 electric butterflies
Pronouns: he/him
Joined: 7 March 2006 Posts: 49,112 User: 70
      
|
I could get on board with "Sugar." It's not AWFUL. I would still be tempted to call them One Touch though.
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 19 2012, 01:29 PM
Post
#324
|
|
|
BuzzJack Platinum Member
Joined: 7 January 2009
Posts: 7,064 User: 8,073
|
Anfunny 'confirmed' @ PopJustice that they are indeed called Suga.
This post has been edited by tommie: Apr 19 2012, 01:29 PM |
|
|
|
|
Apr 19 2012, 01:47 PM
Post
#325
|
|
|
BuzzJack Legend
Joined: 11 June 2011
Posts: 23,993 User: 14,031 
  
|
I think a better name would be "The Original Sugababes" Suga isnt bad though.
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 19 2012, 02:00 PM
Post
#326
|
|
|
BuzzJack Platinum Member
Joined: 7 January 2009
Posts: 7,064 User: 8,073
|
Doubt they could get away with having "Sugababes" in their name - see Original Bucks Fizz.
Suga is a good way to reference the past and have themselves easily searchable on iTunes etc but not risking a lawsuit. |
|
|
|
|
Apr 19 2012, 02:46 PM
Post
#327
|
|
|
Queen of Soon
Joined: 24 May 2007
Posts: 74,074 User: 3,474
|
Suga I can very happily live with. It's nice and close to Sugababes which is what everyone is gonna be calling them anyway.
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 19 2012, 02:56 PM
Post
#328
|
|
|
BuzzJack Legend
Joined: 2 June 2008
Posts: 29,873 User: 6,246
|
I like Suga, but I still would've preferred One Touch.
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 19 2012, 02:56 PM
Post
#329
|
|
|
Is a Moderator :o
Joined: 19 November 2008
Posts: 12,337 User: 7,757
|
When he said it's shortened i was thinking more like, Subes
 Suga is alright i guess.
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 19 2012, 02:58 PM
Post
#330
|
|
|
BuzzJack Enthusiast
Joined: 11 April 2010
Posts: 1,144 User: 10,950
|
I would love the name to be 'Suga'. Very distinctive!
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 20 2012, 08:15 AM
Post
#331
|
|
|
New Entry
Joined: 19 March 2012
Posts: 22 User: 16,563
 
|
Yeah, Suga's not bad. I can live with that
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 20 2012, 10:16 AM
Post
#332
|
|
|
I just had to see your face to feel alive
Joined: 22 February 2010
Posts: 6,910 User: 10,676
  
|
Obviously I STILL wanted ''Sugababes'' to be happening but at least they kept something close to that. I'm just gonna pretend that this is a continuation of the ''Sugababes'' brand and I will give them that name on iTunes accordingly when that day comes the (
This post has been edited by Atonement: Apr 20 2012, 10:17 AM |
|
|
|
|
Apr 20 2012, 09:11 PM
Post
#333
|
|
|
BuzzJack Enthusiast
Joined: 3 December 2006
Posts: 1,286 User: 2,101
 
|
Suga isnt bad, at least it still has half the original name, I think most fans will still refer to them as the Sugababes regardless of what they're now "officially called" anyway.
|
|
|
|
|
Apr 30 2012, 02:39 PM
Post
#334
|
|
|
BuzzJack Enthusiast
Joined: 11 April 2010
Posts: 1,144 User: 10,950
|
Siobhan has been at London Records this morning: https://twitter.com/#!/siobhandonaghy/s...7162368/photo/1
It makes perfect sense, as it is currently managed by Polydor/Universal, and they are supossed to have signed with them. The rights to One Touch and Revolution in Me belong to Warner though. |
|
|
|
|
May 7 2012, 05:38 AM
Post
#335
|
|
|
You don't have to be fabulous to be good
Joined: 10 March 2008
Posts: 9,914 User: 5,591
 
|
Keisha's, Mutya's and Siobhan's accounts are verified on Twitter now.
And just to remind you the amazingness which is Mutya's twitter... 
This post has been edited by Arrs: May 7 2012, 05:51 AM |
|
|
|
|
May 7 2012, 09:29 AM
Post
#336
|
|
|
Queen of Soon
Joined: 24 May 2007
Posts: 74,074 User: 3,474
|
All three verified?
 Mutya's twitter is a genuine moment and a half. |
|
|
|
|
May 7 2012, 11:02 AM
Post
#337
|
|
|
changed the game with that digital drop
Joined: 26 September 2010
Posts: 13,000 User: 11,905
 
|
I want them to be called 'Sugababes'! It doesn't seem right them not being Sugababes. I hope 4.0 have split now, Jade deserves solo success and should never have joined them.
|
|
|
|
|
May 18 2012, 10:35 AM
Post
#338
|
|
|
BuzzJack Enthusiast
Joined: 11 April 2010
Posts: 1,144 User: 10,950
|
They've been working with Katy B:
QUOTE Keisha Buchanan @keisha_buchanan
Great day in the studio with @KatyBmusic !!! The album is coming guys! Whooooooop http://pic.twitter.com/R2rJViRd |
|
|
|
|
May 18 2012, 12:30 PM
Post
#339
|
|
|
BuzzJack Enthusiast
Joined: 7 October 2007
Posts: 1,182 User: 4,477
|
Katy B could easily be Siobhan's substitute
 Come on bitch, tell us if you're working on solo or with the other members. I hate this uncertainty. |
|
|
|
|
May 18 2012, 12:32 PM
Post
#340
|
|
|
Queen of Soon
Joined: 24 May 2007
Posts: 74,074 User: 3,474
|
Oh good lord the wait is KILLING me.
|
|
|
|
|
| Time is now: 19th April 2024 - 11:39 AM |
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 BuzzJack.com
About | Contact | Advertise | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service
