Proposed football law changes, 30 minute halves anyone? |
Track this thread - Email this thread - Print this thread - Download this thread - Subscribe to this forum |
Jun 19 2017, 04:13 PM
Post
#1
|
|
BuzzJack Legend
Joined: 13 April 2007
Posts: 36,652 User: 3,272 |
The International Football Association Board is considering some fairly radical changes to the laws of the game. Perhaps the lost radical is the idea that each half should be 30 minutes long but that the clock should stop every time the ball goes out of play.
Among other suggestions are Penalties should be taken in the same way as in a shoot-out. If the penalty is not scored, play would restart with a goal kick. The logic behind the change is to eliminate the problem of encroachment. Back passes to the goalkeeper should result in a penalty. I don't see the logic here as the current law has more or less eliminated the back pass. If a goal is prevented by handball on the line, the referee should be able to award the goal anyway. http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/40311889 |
|
|
Jun 19 2017, 04:17 PM
Post
#2
|
|
BuzzJack Legend
Joined: 4 November 2013
Posts: 30,510 User: 20,053 |
Absolutely farcical the lot of them. Ok except the last one you've posted I agree there.
|
|
|
Jun 19 2017, 10:43 PM
Post
#3
|
|
WINTER IS COMING
Joined: 7 March 2006
Posts: 45,595 User: 88 |
I actually think a lot of them make sense (some less so). Perhaps the 30 minute halves is a big change, but I think it would combat a lot of the time wasting elements that are deployed by teams.
That said, I'm not sure a lot of them will get passed. |
|
|
Jun 19 2017, 10:53 PM
Post
#4
|
|
Queen of Soon
Joined: 24 May 2007
Posts: 74,069 User: 3,474 |
I like the idea's of stopping the clock for penalties, faux injuries et al. Will really discourage time wasting I think.
|
|
|
Jun 19 2017, 10:56 PM
Post
#5
|
|
I'm a paragon so don't perceive me
Joined: 3 February 2011
Posts: 37,409 User: 12,929 |
30 minute halves I could get on board with. It seems an earth-shattering change but most of the reason I do get bored watching football is the length of the matches.
|
|
|
Jun 20 2017, 07:42 AM
Post
#6
|
|
I'm so lonely, I paid a hobo to spoon with me
Joined: 6 February 2010
Posts: 12,908 User: 10,596 |
30 minute halves I could get on board with. It seems an earth-shattering change but most of the reason I do get bored watching football is the length of the matches. You might be out of luck in that case, as it's likely that 30 minute halves with the clock stopped for injuries, throw ins etc. would probably lead to the game taking about the same amount of time it does now. I read somewhere that the average half currently has about 28 minutes of action. |
|
|
Jun 20 2017, 08:49 AM
Post
#7
|
|
I'm a paragon so don't perceive me
Joined: 3 February 2011
Posts: 37,409 User: 12,929 |
Rats, back to watching the first few matches of major internationals closely then barely paying attention for the next few years it is then.
|
|
|
Jun 20 2017, 09:16 AM
Post
#8
|
|
BuzzJack Legend
Joined: 13 April 2007
Posts: 36,652 User: 3,272 |
You might be out of luck in that case, as it's likely that 30 minute halves with the clock stopped for injuries, throw ins etc. would probably lead to the game taking about the same amount of time it does now. I read somewhere that the average half currently has about 28 minutes of action. If that idea is adopted how long will it be before broadcasters insist that at least one break in play in each half should be extended to allow for a commercial break? |
|
|
Jun 20 2017, 09:22 AM
Post
#9
|
|
Queen of Soon
Joined: 24 May 2007
Posts: 74,069 User: 3,474 |
I dunno. Sky broadcast the entire Grand Prix with out an ad break. Probably find they ask for an extended half time to 20mins rather than show horning an ad break into the middle of a half
|
|
|
Jun 20 2017, 10:12 AM
Post
#10
|
|
I'm so lonely, I paid a hobo to spoon with me
Joined: 6 February 2010
Posts: 12,908 User: 10,596 |
I dunno. Sky broadcast the entire Grand Prix with out an ad break. Probably find they ask for an extended half time to 20mins rather than show horning an ad break into the middle of a half I could far more easily live with that. It's bad enough that they're asking for kick offs at weird times every new season to try and capture international audiences. |
|
|
Jun 20 2017, 10:14 AM
Post
#11
|
|
BuzzJack Legend
Joined: 13 April 2007
Posts: 36,652 User: 3,272 |
I dunno. Sky broadcast the entire Grand Prix with out an ad break. Probably find they ask for an extended half time to 20mins rather than show horning an ad break into the middle of a half When I started watching football the half-time break was just ten minutes. There must come a time when the length of the break is a problem for players' fitness. |
|
|
Jun 20 2017, 11:45 AM
Post
#12
|
|
It's still will be the return of the Mack 4eva
Joined: 1 February 2011
Posts: 53,603 User: 12,915 |
I'll be quite happy with the 30 minute plus the clock stopped for injuries, throw ins etc. 30 minutes would at least make the game where the game is fought to the very end.
QUOTE If a goal is prevented by handball on the line, the referee should be able to award the goal anyway. This should have happened for Ghana at the 2010 World Cup quarter-final, they were robbed thanks to Suarez. Definitely should happen. Originally I thought the changes sounded ridiculous. But now all for them make perfect sense. The traditionalists may not agree. |
|
|
Jun 20 2017, 03:53 PM
Post
#13
|
|
I'm so lonely, I paid a hobo to spoon with me
Joined: 6 February 2010
Posts: 12,908 User: 10,596 |
As much sense as it makes in terms of preventing time wasting and faked injuries, I'd find it a bit of a shame if the 30 minute half rule was introduced. The current system lends a bit of anarchy to the end of games, particularly compared to something like rugby.
|
|
|
Time is now: 19th April 2024 - 12:00 AM |
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 BuzzJack.com
About | Contact | Advertise | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service