US Election 2016 Poll |
Track this thread - Email this thread - Print this thread - Download this thread - Subscribe to this forum |
8th October 2016, 10:33 PM
Post
#21
|
|
I'm a paragon so don't perceive me
Joined: 3 February 2011
Posts: 37,420 User: 12,929 |
Trump ofc. Let's make America great again, send those immigrants home and put women back in the kitchen!!! totally convinced. Up until the point Hillary has been impressing me more and more each time I see more of her and we get this loon wading in with his big mouth against her... I've been having a fun year of conversations and wall jokes about how awful he is. |
|
|
8th October 2016, 10:45 PM
Post
#22
|
|
is my brain across your walls?
Joined: 14 February 2009
Posts: 115,094 User: 8,300 |
I think Jill Stein is the only candidate who I'd consider voting for if this were the UK tbh but obviously Hillary since she's the only one who has a chance of winning and isn't totally monstrous lol ~
(it's interesting that the only people who seem to be fully behind Hillary on her own merits and not because 'she's not Trump' are people who do not live in the USA) |
|
|
8th October 2016, 11:39 PM
Post
#23
|
|
The horrors persist, but so do I
Joined: 14 July 2013
Posts: 21,965 User: 19,534 |
(it's interesting that the only people who seem to be fully behind Hillary on her own merits and not because 'she's not Trump' are people who do not live in the USA) That's not really the case. There's plenty of people here who'd vote for her no matter what, but I'm sure at least half are just afraid of Trump as you'd expect. I do feel she's more than qualified but I admit it's the threat of Donald Trump that made my decision easy.Giant Meteorite 2016. My friend actually has that sign in his yard!
|
|
|
9th October 2016, 12:32 AM
Post
#24
|
|
is my brain across your walls?
Joined: 14 February 2009
Posts: 115,094 User: 8,300 |
That's not really the case. There's plenty of people here who'd vote for her no matter what, but I'm sure at least half are just afraid of Trump as you'd expect. I do feel she's more than qualified but I admit it's the threat of Donald Trump that made my decision easy. I meant on BuzzJack I guess that wasn't clear from my post though. (and the sample size of actual Americans on BuzzJack is obviously very small) |
|
|
9th October 2016, 01:33 AM
Post
#25
|
|
BuzzJack Legend
Joined: 11 October 2013
Posts: 31,028 User: 19,931 |
It goes to show the impression America has on the world and UK. Trump in power would leave a hugely negative dent on so many countries. It's not like someone like Putin who's equally as vile but just doesn't have a huge amount of power over the UK compared to the US.
|
|
|
9th October 2016, 11:35 AM
Post
#26
|
|
DROTTNING!
Joined: 15 April 2006
Posts: 63,953 User: 480 |
Non-Americans also have the benefit of not being exposed day-in-day-out to a media at a point with Hillary where they'll publish unproven rumours of scandal with the disclaimer "The allegations have yet to be confirmed, but this will only add to the general sense of untrustworthiness around Hillary Clinton", which is about as close as you can get to a get-out-of-jail-free card for libel as possible.
|
|
|
9th October 2016, 02:07 PM
Post
#27
|
|
BuzzJack Legend
Joined: 13 April 2007
Posts: 36,676 User: 3,272 |
I think Jill Stein is the only candidate who I'd consider voting for if this were the UK tbh but obviously Hillary since she's the only one who has a chance of winning and isn't totally monstrous lol ~ (it's interesting that the only people who seem to be fully behind Hillary on her own merits and not because 'she's not Trump' are people who do not live in the USA) If I lived in a state where the outcome was beyond any doubt, I might be tempted to vote for Jill Stein. Otherwise I wouldn't want to risk unintentionally helping Trump. |
|
|
9th October 2016, 02:09 PM
Post
#28
|
|
BuzzJack Legend
Joined: 13 April 2007
Posts: 36,676 User: 3,272 |
Non-Americans also have the benefit of not being exposed day-in-day-out to a media at a point with Hillary where they'll publish unproven rumours of scandal with the disclaimer "The allegations have yet to be confirmed, but this will only add to the general sense of untrustworthiness around Hillary Clinton", which is about as close as you can get to a get-out-of-jail-free card for libel as possible. But according to Trump, the entire media are cheerleaders for Clinton. Are you suggesting he's lying? |
|
|
10th October 2016, 04:39 PM
Post
#29
|
|
BuzzJack Legend
Joined: 7 March 2006
Posts: 22,001 User: 53 |
Don't live in the US but would vote Trump.
|
|
|
10th October 2016, 04:47 PM
Post
#30
|
|
❤️❤️➕🟦
Joined: 3 June 2012
Posts: 22,246 User: 17,160 |
|
|
|
10th October 2016, 05:12 PM
Post
#31
|
|
Queen of Soon
Joined: 24 May 2007
Posts: 74,090 User: 3,474 |
|
|
|
10th October 2016, 06:38 PM
Post
#32
|
|
new hair, new tee, new Levii’s Jeans
Joined: 24 October 2014
Posts: 39,316 User: 21,308 |
I don't understand how Common Sense isn't banned yet
Surely all those times he's pissed off the BJ public has risen his warning level enough? |
|
|
10th October 2016, 08:11 PM
Post
#33
|
|
BuzzJack Legend
Joined: 7 March 2006
Posts: 22,001 User: 53 |
|
|
|
10th October 2016, 08:12 PM
Post
#34
|
|
BuzzJack Legend
Joined: 7 March 2006
Posts: 22,001 User: 53 |
|
|
|
10th October 2016, 08:25 PM
Post
#35
|
|
I'm so lonely, I paid a hobo to spoon with me
Joined: 6 February 2010
Posts: 12,908 User: 10,596 |
If I lived in a state where the outcome was beyond any doubt, I might be tempted to vote for Jill Stein. Otherwise I wouldn't want to risk unintentionally helping Drumpf. There was a brief point in 2012 where it looked like Obama might win with fewer votes, and Trump of all people advocated marching on the White House in protest at this affront to democracy (let's ignore that it's happened multiple times in history and as recently as 2000) - so to anyone tempted to do this I'd warn against it on the basis that winning the popular vote has a tiny chance of making a difference. And that Jill Stein is an anti-vaccination manifestation of everything that's wrong with green politics this side of Natalie "Carpetbagger" Bennett, but that's neither here nor there. |
|
|
10th October 2016, 08:43 PM
Post
#36
|
|
Queen of Soon
Joined: 24 May 2007
Posts: 74,090 User: 3,474 |
Jill Stein is anti-vax? So there is someone worse than Trump running for president after all!
|
|
|
10th October 2016, 08:48 PM
Post
#37
|
|
BuzzJack Legend
Joined: 13 April 2007
Posts: 36,676 User: 3,272 |
There was a brief point in 2012 where it looked like Obama might win with fewer votes, and Trump of all people advocated marching on the White House in protest at this affront to democracy (let's ignore that it's happened multiple times in history and as recently as 2000) - so to anyone tempted to do this I'd warn against it on the basis that winning the popular vote has a tiny chance of making a difference. And that Jill Stein is an anti-vaccination manifestation of everything that's wrong with green politics this side of Natalie "Carpetbagger" Bennett, but that's neither here nor there. I'd just have to write in Bruce Springsteen's name then |
|
|
10th October 2016, 08:53 PM
Post
#38
|
|
is my brain across your walls?
Joined: 14 February 2009
Posts: 115,094 User: 8,300 |
...I might have to retract my previous post, have to admit I was not aware of that re: Jill Stein. Hillary really is the best of a bad bunch. (bring back Bernie)
|
|
|
10th October 2016, 09:05 PM
Post
#39
|
|
Former iconic poster with no consistent posting style
Pronouns: Don't take em seriously tbh
Joined: 20 June 2014 Posts: 20,582 User: 21,005 |
Even if she is anti vax, she's not going to ban vaccines surely
|
|
|
10th October 2016, 09:08 PM
Post
#40
|
|
Queen of Soon
Joined: 24 May 2007
Posts: 74,090 User: 3,474 |
That is the entire cults raison d'être!!! |
|
|
Time is now: 27th April 2024, 03:17 AM |
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 BuzzJack.com
About | Contact | Advertise | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service