BuzzJack
Entertainment Discussion

Welcome, guest! Log in or register. (click here for help)

Latest Site News
 
Post reply to this threadCreate a new thread
> More goals in the knockout stages
Track this thread - Email this thread - Print this thread - Download this thread - Subscribe to this forum
PeteFromLeeds
post 2nd July 2018, 09:40 AM
Post #1
Group icon
Buy yourself a car, and a house in Devon
Joined: 6 May 2016
Posts: 23,892
User: 23,247

There's been quite a bit of discussion on here about how, erm, dull the last two knockout matches were, both resulting in a 1-1 draw where not much else happened. I thought we could share our ideas of how to maybe improve it here.

I was thinking about this last night and had the idea that instead of the winner of Match A playing the winner of Match B etc., the winning teams could be ranked in a similar way to how teams on the same points are ranked (i.e. goal difference, then goals scored). The team at the top of that rank would then play the team at the bottom of the rank in the next round, the second highest team playing the second lowest and so on. It could give teams an incentive to score more goals because they would be less likely to end up playing one of the big names in the next round. (But then again, that could all go horribly wrong and we end up with a massively one-sided tournament)

Any other ideas?
Go to the top of this page
 
+Quote this post
Suedehead2
post 2nd July 2018, 07:06 PM
Post #2
Group icon
BuzzJack Legend
Joined: 13 April 2007
Posts: 36,674
User: 3,272

The two periods of extra-time have both been very poor.

If they had the penalty shoot-out before extra-time then at least one side would always have an incentive to score. Whoever lost the shoot-out would know that winning ink extra-time was their only chance of going through.

Of course, that wouldn't have helped make the last 86 minutes of normal time in Croatia v Denmark any better.

Pete's idea is an interesting one. If (as I assume is the intention) it is only used to determine the fixtures from the quarter-final onwards (i.e. the last-16 matches are still decided by group positions) it shouldn't be too lop-sided.
Go to the top of this page
 
+Quote this post
TheSnake
post 2nd July 2018, 09:10 PM
Post #3
Group icon
Say that hiss with your chest, and...
Joined: 24 May 2016
Posts: 18,467
User: 23,308

Sweden vs Switzerland on paper certainly looks like it will be the next match to go to extra time tomorrow!

This post has been edited by The Snake: 2nd July 2018, 09:11 PM
Go to the top of this page
 
+Quote this post
PeteFromLeeds
post 4th July 2018, 08:44 AM
Post #4
Group icon
Buy yourself a car, and a house in Devon
Joined: 6 May 2016
Posts: 23,892
User: 23,247

So using my idea, the ranking after the Round of 16 would give us:

1. Brazil (GD: 2)
2. France (GD: 1, GS: 4)
3. Belgium (GD: 1, GS: 3)
4. Uruguay (GD: 1, GS: 2)
5. Sweden (GD: 1, GS: 1)
6. Croatia (GD: 0, GS: 1, FP: 0)
7. England (GD: 0, GS: 1, FP: -2) (Resort to Group Stage performance in which England were better)
8. Russia (GD: 0, GS: 1, FP: -2) (Resort to Group Stage performance in which Russia were worse)

Which would give us:

Brazil vs Russia
France vs England
Belgium vs Croatia
Uruguay vs Sweden

Evens the teams out nicely, and sticks the teams which relied on penalties to get them through against the big teams.
Go to the top of this page
 
+Quote this post


Post reply to this threadCreate a new thread

1 user(s) reading this thread
+ 1 guest(s) and 0 anonymous user(s)


 

Time is now: 25th April 2024, 05:44 PM