BuzzJack
Entertainment Discussion

Welcome, guest! Log in or register. (click here for help)

Latest Site News
> 
4 Pages V   1 2 3 > »   
Post reply to this threadCreate a new thread
> The Official Singles Chart - what should its future be?
Track this thread - Email this thread - Print this thread - Download this thread - Subscribe to this forum
Mark.
post 12th March 2024, 01:59 PM
Post #1
Group icon
BuzzJack Platinum Member
Joined: 27 August 2008
Posts: 7,381
User: 6,928

Article taken from "Record Of The Day" via https://www.facebook.com/groups/40615224454?locale=en_GB

The Official Singles Chart - what should its future be?

01 March 2024 - Editorial

For years now, the Official Singles Chart has been something of an unhappy compromise. Now in 2024, it’s in real danger of finally creaking into oblivion, weighed down by the sheer number of bolt-on changes and rule tweaks that it’s endured since streaming was added almost a decade ago. As we approach that milestone 10-year streaming anniversary this coming June, maybe it’s time to re-assess everything and go back to basics.

Firstly though, how did we get here?

It was on Sunday evening 6 July in 2014 that ‘Problem’ by Ariana Grande featuring Iggy Azalea became the first no.1 single that had both download sales and streams combined for its overall tally. Six weeks later, a former Record of the Day called ‘Am I Wrong’ by Nico & Vinz became the first song in history to appear on the Top 75 without selling a single copy, having done so on streams alone. But we were still in the era when downloads were king, and its release on UK iTunes a week later then propelled it from that lowly starting position of no.52 all the way up to no.1. By December that same year, we saw the first example of a song topping the chart thanks to its dominant streaming figures – that was ‘Thinking Out Loud’ by Ed Sheeran.

Famously, Ed’s the guy who flipped the chart on its head in 2017 when the streaming numbers from his brand-new album ‘Divide’ were so huge on its opening week, nine of the Top 10 songs were by him. An incredulous Greg James had the honour of revealing that historic event on the Radio 1 Top 40 that Friday evening. And it was clear that something had to change. On 26 June that same year, a new rule came into effect which still exists today, meaning only the three most popular songs that week from a lead artist will feature on the singles chart. Around that same time, we first saw and heard the terms SCR (Standard Chart Ratio) plus the dreaded ACR (Accelerated Chart Ratio) halving the streaming tallies for any current song that had essentially been around a bit too long, or even permanent ACR for anything that was more than three years old. This was the last time that 100 streams were regarded as being the equivalent of one sale, with an alteration meaning that was now 150:1, and those songs that had been around for more than ten weeks and seen their sales decline for three consecutive weeks would see that cut to 300:1. Looking back, those 150 and 300 numbers seem to have been plucked out of thin air at the time, and with video streams now featuring (you need to be a boffin to understand just how they weigh up against audio streams), it’s quite frankly an unholy mess of formulas and algorithms that render the entire chart process incomprehensible to the public at large. Which could be one of the reasons why interest appears to have waned so much.

That brief history lesson brings us to where to we are today, and your head is probably already spinning. We feel it’s time to relook at all this, particularly considering the enormous change in consumption habits that we’ve seen in recent times. Audio streaming leads the way, and one daily glance at the Spotify Top 50 gives you a much truer picture of what the nation is really consuming. How can we fix the Official Singles Chart? Let’s throw some ideas out there for discussion.

First, it’s surely time to scrap ACR completely, is it not? You could be overly brutal and ask: if a new release isn’t good enough to compete against any catalogue title, does the whole current A&R process needs addressing from top to bottom? But that’s another story, and we’ll try not to be flippant here. What is inescapable though is that songs are blowing up from every genre and every possible era on a week-by-week basis, often without any sort of label control, and their true immediate popularity often isn’t being reflected by the existing chart rules. There can be an annoying lag before they sometimes show up properly on the chart, which seems a bit silly really. We saw this first in 2022 when ‘Running Up That Hill’ by Kate Bush surged back to life after its inclusion in ‘Stranger Things’ and was the most-streamed song, yet only ranked at no.2 on the Official Chart behind Harry Styles with ‘As It Was’. It was only a media uproar that forced the hand of the chart bosses to dump Kate’s ACR status, give a song a reset, and then see its true popularity shine through. It’s happened again just recently when ‘Murder On The Dancefloor’ by Sophie Ellis-Bextor has outgunned every other UK-signed act, even though the song is 23 years old. ‘Unwritten’ by Natasha Bedingfield also returned and had a bit of a reset, while the perennial favourites ‘Mr. Brightside’ by The Killers and ‘Riptide’ by Vance Joy were also among the 20 most-streamed songs that week, but were inexplicably downgraded, so didn’t show up inside the Official Top 40. If ACR went, the chart would feel much more natural and reflective of what people are really listening to and loving, even if that does mean oldies. Certain songs might hang around for months on end, of course, but if that’s what people are consuming, the chart really does need to better reflect that to maintain its relevance as a true barometer of the nation’s music tastes. If that prospect alarms you, fear not as the arrival of big new music will always push those tracks out of the way if they have genuine mass appeal.

Next, how about this for a simple tweak – labels must decide going forward which song from an album bundle they want to be the so-called ‘focus single’, and that would then be the only one that shows up on the singles chart. Everything else would then be regarded simply as an album track. Beyond that, you could now introduce a four-week eligibility gap between each ‘focus single’, which would help enormously with radio airplay, and the artist builds up a string of multiple ‘focus singles’ on the chart from that album, now without being restricted to just three titles, should they choose to keep releasing a new ‘focus single’ every four weeks. If their streaming levels remain strong for months on end, you’d see that properly reflected on the weekly singles chart.

We’ve recently seen a few of the majors (with one notable exception) trying to ‘game’ the chart by dropping physical product at appropriate moments in the release cycle, and it has worked very well for some big-name acts, particularly when the streaming numbers may not have been as impressive as hoped, but a high chart position was needed to sort-of save face. This needs a radical overhaul. One solution could be that a £1.99 maximum retail price limit is placed upon the physical CD single. And no physical will count toward the chart if it comes after the steaming debut. Anything that does arrive on time must be only one track (no remixes or bonus songs if it’s truly going to represent a streaming equivalent). And if a label chooses to put physical stock out there, the song then gets removed from the Top 100 once your physical stock dries up, even if you continue to be streamed in huge numbers. Think of it as being like the days when tracks were routinely deleted. And all this might finally deter labels from doing down that desperate physical route. We should also look at the sales of physical product through artist’s own websites. How and why has this somehow become acceptable? Back in the days of old, this would be considered as pure hype, and any such sales would be excluded from the chart. Of course, a big international star like Taylor Swift, Adele, or Ed Sheeran is going to shift bigger numbers of physical than a new artist, by sheer virtue of the fact that they each can motivate a fan base of millions rather than a small core. Our recommendation would be that any sales could only count if it was generally available to the public through at least one mainstream outlet such as Amazon etc. Oh, and we’d scrap cassette sales from the chart completely. Nobody plays them, after all. They’re probably one of the worst pieces of landfill with all their mixed component parts, and it’s about as relevant as counting a plant pot with an artist’s face on as a legitimate sale, claiming it’s somehow as worthy as 150 streams. Just get rid.

You could go even more radical though, and simply dump all physical sales from the chart, full stop. That’d certainly keep it pure again, just like the old days when the Top 40 was an essential guide to the most-bought singles that week, nothing more, nothing less. One copy sold equalled one unit, and everyone knew exactly where we stood. Maybe 2024 is the year that the industry finally says the Official Singles Chart is simply the week’s most-streamed songs in its totally unfiltered form, free from any rules concerning the age of a song or its existing chart life to date. Incidentally, does anyone know why we still seem to be unable to differentiate between what is an elected play that’s been sought out on a streaming platform (and therefore arguably of higher significance) versus a ‘lean back’ one from a playlist? Surely that info is out there, but wasn’t it once claimed that between 80-90% of all plays were not coming from specific searches, and that could potentially undermine the perception of just how popular songs are if the public realised many high chart positions were therefore vastly inflated?

While we’ve been pulling ideas together, we’ve heard from any industry contacts who’ve asked us why we care so much about this stuff. Is our interest in the chart not just a throwback to our teenage years, and today’s kids have simply moved on with barely a shoulder shrug for its continued existence? Yes, that’s possibly so, which then makes us wonder if there is indeed any hope for the future survival of the Official Singles Chart. Some say it’s always simply been a tool for the music industry and has been ‘gamed’ by them since its inception. But we do remain optimistic. Stripping it right back to basics feels like a positive start, and maybe somehow getting it back as an appointment-to-listen/see show on both radio and primetime TV each week is another thing that will help to lift mainstream interest in the weekly ups and downs of our favourite stars.

Summing all this up is tough. But here’s how we see it as we head into Q2 2024.

Dump ACR as soon as possible. It’s anachronistic, feels like a flawed and dated concept, and nobody will shed a tear at its disappearance. Ten years was more than enough. Just last week Beyonce took the no.1 title ahead of Noah Kahan, even though ‘Stick Season’ had been streamed many more times than Texas Hold ‘Em’. Incidents like that simply dent the credibility of the Official Singles Chart even further.

Consider excluding all physical product (CDs, vinyl singles, cassettes and possibly even downloads) from the Official Singles Chart to keep it purer and less prone to desperate hype from product teams. However, if the temptation to keep physical in there somehow persists, look at maximum price points that are closer to those of a download sale, not vinyl singles priced at almost a tenner.

If you put into action those points 1 and 2, then simplify the name as the final part of the process – The UK’s Official Singles Chart becomes The Official Singles Streaming Chart in its pure unfiltered form, free from arbitrary restrictions on the age of songs, and everyone then knows exactly where they stand from now on.

Thanks to everyone we’ve spoken to when we’ve been canvassing opinions on all this. What’s clear is that nobody seems entirely happy with the Official Singles Chart in its current form, from both inside and outside the industry, and better transparency about how it’s complied and the stats behind each chart placing would certainly be a very useful start. We’re keen to keep the dialogue going, with some people who’ve been in contact also bemoaning the day the chart is released, the relative failure of New Music Friday to generate much impact anymore, and even a desire from some for a quicker turnover of big hits again. It’s impossible to please everyone, and we can’t turn back the clock either. Instead, let’s all work together for the best possible solutions and on-going chats to push forward what’s still one of the world’s most trusted, keenly fought and referenced list of our nation’s most popular songs.
Go to the top of this page
 
+Quote this post
Hassaan
post 12th March 2024, 02:28 PM
Post #2
Group icon
BuzzJack Enthusiast
Joined: 17 July 2015
Posts: 582
User: 22,168

I don't know what you do exactly, but my observation is that it's too overcomplicated. They can surely strip it back.
Go to the top of this page
 
+Quote this post
JulianT
post 12th March 2024, 02:30 PM
Post #3
Group icon
BuzzJack Platinum Member
Joined: 20 April 2009
Posts: 8,558
User: 8,705

Excluding sales from the official chart is one of the odder suggestions I’ve seen. Why on Earth would buying a song not be a method of consumption worth reflecting?

As for scrapping ACR, whenever that debate comes up you have one camp saying it should be scrapped but just as many saying it doesn’t go far enough and old songs should be on double or treble ACR or excluded from the chart entirely. The existing system is at least a compromise between those viewpoints.

The article also says the chart is too weighed down by rules before itself proposing a complicated rule around “focus singles”. laugh.gif
Go to the top of this page
 
+Quote this post
JosephBoone
post 12th March 2024, 02:38 PM
Post #4
Group icon
you never forget your first time...
Pronouns: he/him
Joined: 19 April 2011
Posts: 121,804
User: 13,530

I don't think anything will make the chart feel more "relevant" to the general public at this stage - the #1 is sometimes of note, and something Murder on the Dancefloor's resurgence got some articles, but that's about it. The chart show is popular on Radio 1 but I can imagine it's got a pretty consistent slot regardless which definitely helps its case. I firmly believe removing ACR and scrapping pure sales (?!) would actually reduce the public's interest more, because it's these things that can help increase the #1 turnover, therefore more interest! Nobody's making an appointment to hear 39 of the 40 songs they heard last week once again.

I also don't think your average listener really cares about ACR, or whether TEXAS HOLD 'EM is the "genuine" #1, that's obviously only us chart geeks. And sure, the chart has a purpose to display the most popular songs of the week. Yet, also, the OCC must be aware of how vital the Radio 1 chart show is to the brand, and if they're playing the "old rules" chart without ACR, and then without pure sales too, you're going to get people switching off. A slightly higher turnover will keep people listening, and it's more to write about in the OCC articles which they post on social media for the casuals to read as well.

I think at the end of the day, something like ACR is a compromise between an accurate chart, and an entertaining show. It's not perfect in its execution and it's clearly polarising among chart fans, but I think it does its job well to create a more interesting chart and bumping older songs downwards, but the big, persistent hits are still just that and they still get that recognition - see Stick Season still riding high in the top 10 despite ACR. It's not any less of a hit, and it's not had any less recognition really.

And if artists want to mobilise their fanbase to buy physicals or downloads to help achieve a top 10 or a #1 hit, so what? I see no problems with that - if people part with their money, it should be included.

final thing - I agree with Julian re how complicated "focus singles" would get. 3 track rule is objective, if messy when a song just vanishes one week and returns the next, but there's no misunderstanding that.
Go to the top of this page
 
+Quote this post
Dobbo
post 12th March 2024, 03:02 PM
Post #5
Group icon
BuzzJack Legend
Joined: 4 November 2013
Posts: 30,552
User: 20,053

Agree that ACR must be scrapped. And I don't think it would have any bearing on chart show listeners. I don't think there are many that religiously listen to every show, most of the audience are casuals who will stick it on if they happen to be driving/working between 4 & 6 on a Friday and WILL want to hear the same songs as usual as people crave familiarity.
Go to the top of this page
 
+Quote this post
Bjork
post 12th March 2024, 03:07 PM
Post #6
Group icon
BuzzJack Legend
Joined: 13 November 2015
Posts: 33,293
User: 22,665

Did he really suggest scrapping physicals? Its the most ridiculous suggestion like ever
Go to the top of this page
 
+Quote this post
Dircadirca
post 12th March 2024, 04:32 PM
Post #7
Group icon
BuzzJack Platinum Member
Pronouns: He/Him
Joined: 28 July 2013
Posts: 5,076
User: 19,614

Thanks for posting that article, appreciate it as a measured observation rather than a thinly veiled whinge that a lot of these articles can be.

QUOTE(Mark. @ Mar 12 2024, 09:59 PM) *
it’s quite frankly an unholy mess of formulas and algorithms that render the entire chart process incomprehensible to the public at large. Which could be one of the reasons why interest appears to have waned so much.

I'm not sure I could necessarily agree on this point. I think if anything it's increased internet visibility of opinions, which is increasingly aged & jaded. People who don't like things complain on Facebook and/or Reddit. People who like things avoid those negativity zones and just enjoy it to themselves. Furthermore, if anything's happened, it's that the new dominance of streaming has shifted the dominant demographic so rapidly that a lot of folk have found their interests pushed aside, almost like a whole generation was skipped. Streaming and such makes for an easy scapegoat as well. You can bet that the moment the Bryan Adams (or Frankie Laine ~) record is beaten, there'll be debate on the merits of it that'll largely be fuelled by people not willing to accept the changing of the guard. Everyone loves to quote the records & milestones that serve their interests until they don't. laugh.gif

The merits of physical product is worthwhile to discuss without an easy solution. A while back I was watching a talk between label heads about the industry and one of them admitted that utilising pre-orders/formats was their only way to get a strong first week chart position, but that it felt like cheating to them. I always get a bit suspicious of them on the UK Charts as well, like last year when for a while, about half of the songs that hit #1, did so with conveniently timed physical boosts. Not only that, but often conveniently stacked, like Lewis Capaldi pulling out two narrow victories, and pulling more CD sales for a brand new single than a new Metallica album one week. It just feels like a carefully planned design that always seems to work out. I can't say for sure if it's all above board but in any case, it takes away the illusion that the public at large is choosing what's going to #1. There's an argument to be made that a streaming only chart would make for something more historically relevant, but admittedly I've never been a fan of gate-keeping music consumption. Maybe the ratios could use some tweaking, but I don't want to just assume that someone is buying a single to never spin it, nor that someone passively hearing a song on a playlist necessarily enjoys it less than someone who typed it into the search bar.
Go to the top of this page
 
+Quote this post
GTH
post 12th March 2024, 05:16 PM
Post #8
Group icon
Gareth T H
Joined: 6 February 2010
Posts: 2,501
User: 10,597

I don’t get the comments suggesting waning interest in the charts. How is this measured or evidenced? We may not have as many people listening to the radio now, but in part comes from how accessible music has come from streaming services, including finding new music. You don’t need to listen to a chart show or radio to find new music like you used to.

Whilst I agree the charts aren’t perfect, I don’t think anything we do would get people outside chart fans more engaged. I also don’t get comments saying the chart risks ‘creaking into oblivion’ or what that would even look like. Clear from forums like this that even with regular chart grumblers about staleness/acr/etc, the same people are still checking the charts regularly so it can’t be THAT bad.
Go to the top of this page
 
+Quote this post
My Random Music
post 16th March 2024, 11:47 AM
Post #9
Group icon
BuzzJack Climber
Joined: 24 February 2021
Posts: 78
User: 124,622

I remember being sat in a school assembly in 1993. The headmaster was trying to think of something us students could relate to when making his point so he asked one of the younger teachers who was currently number one in the charts. The younger teacher said The Bluebells which sparked a big reaction from us students because we all knew that Queen had just knocked The Bluebells off the top of the charts.

Now we're all in our 40s if you were to ask use all who is currently number one I would expect 99% of us wouldn't have a clue. I know it's Beyonce because I have my own chart spreadsheet that I update each week, but I've never knowingly heard the song and I'm happy with that fact given how dreadful Beyonce is.

The point is that most of us 40 somethings were going to lose interest anyway given that in the good old days of 1993 our 50 something headmaster had no clue and the maybe 30 year old teacher had a vague idea.

I also think the question of whether the charts reflect what's currently popular has always been questionable. Again going back to school in 1993, most of the boys were into Nirvana and some of the girls were too. The rest of the girls were divided between Take That and East 17 with a couple who liked Bad Boys Inc instead. On that basis you would expect Nirvana to be dominating the charts but they weren't. Their final single "Rape Me/All Apologies" only made number 32 that year.

I do however thing something does need to change and I think a good starting point is only making singles eligible given it's supposed to be a singles chart. Also whilst it was tedious having Bryan Adams at number one for 16 weeks, the fact the rules mean there's little chance of that record being beaten makes it less interesting.

Even from discussion I've read on here where people almost know how a records going to do in the charts before it's even released almost makes the chart seem pointless. For example there was an Ed Sheeran single recently that didn't chart very high at all, people on here predicted it wouldn't and I personally have no idea why because I would have thought the fact it was by Ed Sheeran would make it a contender for number one. Then there's artists from yesteryear who don't seem to have a hope in hell of making the Top 40 with their new record. In the 90s we still had the likes of Cliff Richard having hits, not my cup of tea but it made the charts more interesting.
Go to the top of this page
 
+Quote this post
JulianT
post 16th March 2024, 01:58 PM
Post #10
Group icon
BuzzJack Platinum Member
Joined: 20 April 2009
Posts: 8,558
User: 8,705

^ The Beatles have recently had a #1 single and Kylie a Top 10 so it isn’t totally impossible for legacy acts to have hits.

I don’t like the idea of only official singles counting to the chart - anything that takes power away from the public and gives it to record companies I’d oppose.

A lot of this just makes me think the current rules aren’t so bad really - the majority of the suggestions in the article and the discussion threads here and on Haven would make things worse in my view.
Go to the top of this page
 
+Quote this post
My Random Music
post 16th March 2024, 09:50 PM
Post #11
Group icon
BuzzJack Climber
Joined: 24 February 2021
Posts: 78
User: 124,622

QUOTE(JulianT @ Mar 16 2024, 01:58 PM) *
^ The Beatles have recently had a #1 single and Kylie a Top 10 so it isn’t totally impossible for legacy acts to have hits.

I don’t like the idea of only official singles counting to the chart - anything that takes power away from the public and gives it to record companies I’d oppose.

A lot of this just makes me think the current rules aren’t so bad really - the majority of the suggestions in the article and the discussion threads here and on Haven would make things worse in my view.


You're right that we do have the odd legacy act have chart success. I didn't think we'd see The Beatles and Rolling Stones in the Top 40 again let alone both have Top 40 hits in the same year but it happened last year. I thought neither were at their best but were better than the rest of the rubbish that was in the Top 40 last year.

I would say the fact that Beyonce is at number one proves that record labels still have the power. She's the wife of a record label boss after all. By the time I was at university me and my friends had different music tastes but we could all agree on how much we hated Destiny's Child. I find it baffling how successful Beyonce has been as a solo artist but maybe the answer is starring at me right in my face.

I know I'm too old to speak for the youth of today but the music in the charts these days doesn't strike me as the type of music teenage boys would listen to. I had a conversation with a work colleague in his early 20s about music recently and his music taste was in his own words "angry rappers". He named a few rappers he liked and I hadn't heard of any of them. I asked whether he liked Drake (I'm well aware of his chart success) and he was offended I even considered that a possibility. We had Eminem in my day, but he thought that Eminem was too old.

I've known for many years that it's the lowest common denominator worm fodder that comes out on top. Maybe todays youngsters realise that earlier than I did.
Go to the top of this page
 
+Quote this post
Smint
post 17th March 2024, 12:55 AM
Post #12
Group icon
BuzzJack Gold Member
Joined: 21 February 2021
Posts: 3,574
User: 124,514

No-one will share a tear at ACR's disappearance?

Bit of a sweeping statement and certainly doesn't reflect many on the forums. Charts will be much duller without it especially around Christmas.

Go to the top of this page
 
+Quote this post
kimberley88
post 17th March 2024, 01:19 AM
Post #13
Group icon
BuzzJack Regular
Joined: 14 December 2009
Posts: 251
User: 10,194

Call me old fashioned but I still don't think streaming shouldn't count in the main charts and if they want to do a chart based on steaming it should be a different chart for that. Official physical/downloads only. Being able to listen to what you want and paying monthly still feels like a cop out.
Go to the top of this page
 
+Quote this post
Bjork
post 17th March 2024, 08:02 AM
Post #14
Group icon
BuzzJack Legend
Joined: 13 November 2015
Posts: 33,293
User: 22,665

Oh my yes don't count streams, only itunes so with 1 sale you can make the top 100, that's very representative of the charts, number 67 to 100 all would be tied with 1 sale lol biggrin.gif
Go to the top of this page
 
+Quote this post
Jessie Where
post 17th March 2024, 08:57 AM
Post #15
Group icon
Break the tension
Joined: 7 March 2006
Posts: 89,016
User: 51

There is a separate sales chart available if you want to look at that, but yeah given actual sales have been all but obsolete for quite some time now it's not really a feasible argument. I'd say probably hasn't been for around 8 years even.
Go to the top of this page
 
+Quote this post
Eric_Blob
post 17th March 2024, 09:09 AM
Post #16
Group icon
BuzzJack Legend
Joined: 18 February 2010
Posts: 25,010
User: 10,665

QUOTE(My Random Music @ Mar 16 2024, 09:50 PM) *
I would say the fact that Beyonce is at number one proves that record labels still have the power. She's the wife of a record label boss after all. By the time I was at university me and my friends had different music tastes but we could all agree on how much we hated Destiny's Child. I find it baffling how successful Beyonce has been as a solo artist but maybe the answer is starring at me right in my face.


There's a LOT of "theories" out there about Beyonce if you go looking. I can't go into it all because it'll take forever but the gist of it is that some people think she was chosen as a young child to be a future pop star. There are blogs, websites, forums full of details people have found about Beyonce's early life, and her parents and other ancestors and their connections, places they've been, groups they've been a part of, the earliest media coverage of her, etc.

I don't know how true it all is, but it's an interesting rabbit hole to go into at least.
Go to the top of this page
 
+Quote this post
DJ Cheeky Magpie
post 17th March 2024, 09:54 AM
Post #17
Group icon
Pineapple 🍍
Joined: 9 June 2017
Posts: 6,531
User: 33,062

Get rid acr got big problem in December top 100 Christmas songs.

I give up chart this year stop listen end January as old song like cruel summer prada not gone acr. Get rid acr make chart worst very more boring who went blood mr brightside top 20 every week


This post has been edited by DJ Cheeky Magpie: 17th March 2024, 09:59 AM
Go to the top of this page
 
+Quote this post
JulianT
post 17th March 2024, 09:58 AM
Post #18
Group icon
BuzzJack Platinum Member
Joined: 20 April 2009
Posts: 8,558
User: 8,705

I do think people forget what the chart was like in 2016 and early 2017 and why these rules were introduced. Of course there are arguments for and against the rules as they stand, and possible alternatives to ACR and the 3 track rule, but it is curious to see statements like “everyone agrees we should get rid of ACR”.
Go to the top of this page
 
+Quote this post
T Boy
post 17th March 2024, 10:05 AM
Post #19
Group icon
Radical Pink Troll
Joined: 11 March 2006
Posts: 26,606
User: 177

Again, people will dismiss whatever I say regardless but I question the need these days for an ‘official’ chart. Obviously you can’t just have a sales only chart these days, times have changed. But with streaming being such a radically different way of measuring consumption to straight sales, they should have held off trying to combine them like for like. The chart has been a boring mess for almost a decade and having removed every ‘rule’ in 2007, they’ve had to bring more in to try in vain to keep the chart the way they think it needs to be.

What is an ‘official’ combined chart needed for? No one outside of online forums takes notice of it anyway. We have charts for everything separately anyway so why can’t we just have them instead? The only reason we ever had an official chart was because sales were the only thing that could measure consumption and that is no longer true. Why don’t we have Radio 1 air an official streaming chart and Radio 2 air an official sales chart? I just don’t get the need to combine things that are so different. You could still reference what no.1 is but just throw the words ‘sales’ and ‘streaming’ in front of them. People get all the other no.1s mixed up anyway so I don’t see why it matters.

This way you could get rid of ACR too. The streaming chart would be slower but the sales one would be faster but this way all sorts of artists would get some exposure. Separate the charts for albums too so that we don’t see new albums nosedive after a week.
Go to the top of this page
 
+Quote this post
DJ Cheeky Magpie
post 17th March 2024, 10:11 AM
Post #20
Group icon
Pineapple 🍍
Joined: 9 June 2017
Posts: 6,531
User: 33,062

Compilation chart that turn in more soundtrack album chart this days
Go to the top of this page
 
+Quote this post


4 Pages V   1 2 3 > » 
Post reply to this threadCreate a new thread

1 user(s) reading this thread
+ 1 guest(s) and 0 anonymous user(s)


 

Time is now: 27th April 2024, 06:36 AM