1980s Top 40 Rate - Part 3, Number 5s - The Results! |
Track this thread - Email this thread - Print this thread - Download this thread - Subscribe to this forum |
May 28 2015, 07:38 PM
Post
#21
|
|
BuzzJack Regular
Joined: 1 April 2014
Posts: 277 User: 20,769 |
Can we not have a one song per artist rule when all the results are in? For example second place song for the relevant number. I'm sure a lot of classic bands like the Smiths just got the most points because it was the Smiths and there wasn't a lot of choice for that number.
|
|
|
May 28 2015, 07:41 PM
Post
#22
|
|
Yes, it's me.
Joined: 4 November 2009
Posts: 19,810 User: 9,885 |
Good point. How do we decide which Smiths song gets precedence?
Do we do a re-shuffle at the end once all the positions are done? |
|
|
May 28 2015, 08:30 PM
Post
#23
|
|
BuzzJack Legend
Joined: 18 July 2012
Posts: 22,812 User: 17,376 |
Difficult to do that - when it gets to number ones there's going to be multiple entries for many acts, so they may disadvantaged with the votes getting split and none of them winning. There's a core fan group of Kate, Smiths, New Order etc who are voting (often including me), but I expect the bigger hits might be more open to more voters. I would have preferred Little Lies to win, obv, as Kate has much better tracks still to come, but then again one of her best records didn't win (This Woman's Work) and one of her lesser tracks did (Big Sky). Bushzarre!
If it is limited to one per artist, though, the highest-placed should take precedence as it will be harder to win higher up the chart (I would guess)? |
|
|
May 28 2015, 09:42 PM
Post
#24
|
|
BuzzJack Platinum Member
Joined: 16 May 2007
Posts: 8,261 User: 3,410 |
Can we not have a one song per artist rule when all the results are in? For example second place song for the relevant number. I'm sure a lot of classic bands like the Smiths just got the most points because it was the Smiths and there wasn't a lot of choice for that number. tbh, I wasn't expecting Smiths, Kate & New Order to win multiple rates, but they got the votes. Once we go higher up the chart, their votes will be more split I imagine. There'll be a wildcard round once all the 40 are done (the second place tracks), so it's not a given all Smiths tracks (for example) will end up in the Final Top 40 |
|
|
May 28 2015, 09:43 PM
Post
#25
|
|
BuzzJack Platinum Member
Joined: 16 May 2007
Posts: 8,261 User: 3,410 |
|
|
|
May 28 2015, 09:50 PM
Post
#26
|
|
BuzzJack Platinum Member
Joined: 16 May 2007
Posts: 8,261 User: 3,410 |
Difficult to do that - when it gets to number ones there's going to be multiple entries for many acts, so they may disadvantaged with the votes getting split and none of them winning. There's a core fan group of Kate, Smiths, New Order etc who are voting (often including me), but I expect the bigger hits might be more open to more voters. I would have preferred Little Lies to win, obv, as Kate has much better tracks still to come, but then again one of her best records didn't win (This Woman's Work) and one of her lesser tracks did (Big Sky). Bushzarre! John's put it much better than I could, and I agree with everything here. I was hoping for a Little Lies shock win myself, and truth be told, there's quite a few of my faves across the peak position rates that appear to be loved only by me. For example, in the No.24 rate, why isn't Scarlet Fantastic winning by a landslide? The great thing about doing this is the overall unpredictability of where people's votes will go (obvs Kate, Smiths and New Order aside ) and it's fascinating. But like John says, the higher up the chart we go, the more voters we'll probably get and the less chance of a core fan base winner (possibly) |
|
|
Time is now: 19th April 2024 - 01:07 PM |
Copyright © 2006 - 2024 BuzzJack.com
About | Contact | Advertise | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service