BuzzJack
Entertainment Discussion

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register | Help )

Latest Site News
 
Post reply to this threadCreate a new thread
> Prison sentences
Track this thread - Email this thread - Print this thread - Download this thread - Subscribe to this forum
Prison sentences
You cannot see the results of the poll until you have voted. Please login and cast your vote to see the results of this poll.
Total votes: 8
Guests cannot vote 
vidcapper
post Feb 6 2018, 12:06 PM
Post #1
Group icon
Paul Hyett
Joined: 4 April 2006
Posts: 25,346
User: 364
... and criminal punishments in general.

I realise that they are very much circumstance-dependant, but in general, do you think they are too soft, too hard, or about right?
Go to the top of this page
 
+Quote this post
Suedehead2
post Feb 6 2018, 02:06 PM
Post #2
Group icon
BuzzJack Legend
Joined: 13 April 2007
Posts: 36,653
User: 3,272
Per head of population, we lock up more people than any other western democracy apart from the USA. As the crime rate is comparable to the rest of Europe, that would suggest that sentences are too severe.
Go to the top of this page
 
+Quote this post
Dexton
post Feb 6 2018, 02:09 PM
Post #3
Group icon
rip in peace Dickston
Joined: 29 January 2017
Posts: 9,529
User: 25,045
You do you crime you do the time, but if the crime is drug dealing and the time is longer than that of a murderers - some serious recalibration of the prison system needs to take place
Go to the top of this page
 
+Quote this post
vidcapper
post Feb 6 2018, 02:49 PM
Post #4
Group icon
Paul Hyett
Joined: 4 April 2006
Posts: 25,346
User: 364
QUOTE(Suedehead2 @ Feb 6 2018, 02:06 PM) *
Per head of population, we lock up more people than any other western democracy apart from the USA. As the crime rate is comparable to the rest of Europe, that would suggest that sentences are too severe.


But you seem to be talking about the *numbers* of people being convicted, rather than the level of punishment they receive, which is a separate issue.
Go to the top of this page
 
+Quote this post
Suedehead2
post Feb 6 2018, 05:11 PM
Post #5
Group icon
BuzzJack Legend
Joined: 13 April 2007
Posts: 36,653
User: 3,272
QUOTE(vidcapper @ Feb 6 2018, 02:49 PM) *
But you seem to be talking about the *numbers* of people being convicted, rather than the level of punishment they receive, which is a separate issue.

Prison numbers have been increasing steadily for well over 20 years. For most of that time crime has been falling.

Just look at reports of trials elsewhere in Europe which result in someone getting what would be considered lenient here. Yet there is no indication that the sentences handed out are anything unusual.
Go to the top of this page
 
+Quote this post
vidcapper
post Feb 7 2018, 06:41 AM
Post #6
Group icon
Paul Hyett
Joined: 4 April 2006
Posts: 25,346
User: 364
But as I see it, if prison numbers are rising, then current sentences cannot be acting as a sufficient deterrent - so a rethink is needed on how to dissuade re-offending.
Go to the top of this page
 
+Quote this post
Suedehead2
post Feb 7 2018, 08:46 AM
Post #7
Group icon
BuzzJack Legend
Joined: 13 April 2007
Posts: 36,653
User: 3,272
There a several non-custodial sentences which have e a much better record of reducing reoffending. Of course, the Daily Mail doesn't want you to know that.
Go to the top of this page
 
+Quote this post
Doctor Blind
post Feb 7 2018, 09:56 AM
Post #8
Group icon
#38BBE0 otherwise known as 'sky blue'
Joined: 27 October 2008
Posts: 16,170
User: 7,561
Oh Vid, the Ed Miliband and Geoff Lloyd podcast just did an episode on prison - episode 19 on the linked page. I heartily recommend that you listen to it! They even discuss with Lord Falconer (former Justice Secretary under Tony Blair) and he makes some very interesting points about how politicised this whole argument is, even to the point where the editor of the Sun in the 2000s Rebekah Brooks was encouraging him to develop prison ships!

QUOTE(vidcapper @ Feb 7 2018, 06:41 AM) *
But as I see it, if prison numbers are rising, then current sentences cannot be acting as a sufficient deterrent - so a rethink is needed on how to dissuade re-offending.


Oh I agree that a rethink is needed but as for current sentences not acting as a sufficient deterrent.. is that necessarily the case though? In Sweden where the sentences tend not to be as long their prison population has been falling over the past decade and the re-offending rates are also in decline, whereas in the UK where sentences tend to be much longer the re-offending rates remain stable and the prison population continues to grow:



Some of that growth is because convicted criminals are spending much more time in prison, not because more crime is being committed - indeed violent crime has seen a steady decline since 1995.



As for whether sentences are too long, just about right, too short - I don't think the answer is that straightforward unfortunately but I have answered too long as I think that is certainly the case for persistent offenders of non-violent crimes.


This post has been edited by Doctor Blind: Feb 7 2018, 09:59 AM
Go to the top of this page
 
+Quote this post
vidcapper
post Feb 7 2018, 10:52 AM
Post #9
Group icon
Paul Hyett
Joined: 4 April 2006
Posts: 25,346
User: 364
QUOTE(Suedehead2 @ Feb 7 2018, 08:46 AM) *
There a several non-custodial sentences which have e a much better record of reducing reoffending. Of course, the Daily Mail doesn't want you to know that.


I didn't even *mention* the Mail!

Of course, flogging would technically count as a non-custodial sentence... whistle.gif

[As people here delight in misinterpreting me at the slightest opportunity : just to be 100% clear, I'm not advocating it, just playing devils advocate again]


This post has been edited by vidcapper: Feb 7 2018, 10:58 AM
Go to the top of this page
 
+Quote this post


Post reply to this threadCreate a new thread

1 users are reading this thread (1 guests and 0 anonymous users)
0 members:


 

Time is now: 19th April 2024 - 10:53 AM