BuzzJack
Entertainment Discussion

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register | Help )

Latest Site News
 
Post reply to this threadCreate a new thread
> The Big 5: If They'd Had To Qualify...
Track this thread - Email this thread - Print this thread - Download this thread - Subscribe to this forum
Tangela
post May 19 2019, 02:47 AM
Post #1
Group icon
Tangelic
Joined: 30 September 2016
Posts: 6,689
User: 23,643
If there was no 'big 5', since the inception of the semi finals & also no 'if you were top X the year before, you're through', which of the Big 5 entries would've qualified and which wouldn't?

United Kingdom is an easy place to start the focus.

I literally can't think of any of ours that would've qualified other than:

2009 - Jade Ewen - It's My Time
2011 - Blue - I Can
2017 - Lucie Jones - Never Give Up On You
Go to the top of this page
 
+Quote this post
Iz 🌟
post May 19 2019, 03:41 AM
Post #2
Group icon
I'm a paragon so don't perceive me
Joined: 3 February 2011
Posts: 37,409
User: 12,929
I think we’d have long since given up before that but I think Children Of The Universe would have made it through also.

Italy would obviously have the best qualification record, with only La Mia Citta possibly missing. Germany would be similarly dismal to us, only getting through in their big hit years.

The problems we have are also prevalent in France and Germany when either of them aren’t on a good run, Germany especially but France had it too for a few years after the failure of Sognu. It’s clear that some of these entries wouldn’t have been picked or sent if there was a risk for the broadcaster that their entry would miss out on the final. Spain too to an extent but more of their bad results can be chalked up to only them and Portugal really appreciating Latin-style music.
Go to the top of this page
 
+Quote this post
Sour Candy
post May 19 2019, 07:17 AM
Post #3
Group icon
BuzzJack Legend
Joined: 22 December 2009
Posts: 30,289
User: 10,275
Germany came fourth last year, they have won once this decade as well (being only of the big 5 to do so), so they are more like hit or miss where UK is just "miss" basically.
Go to the top of this page
 
+Quote this post
Suedehead2
post May 19 2019, 08:23 AM
Post #4
Group icon
BuzzJack Legend
Joined: 13 April 2007
Posts: 36,652
User: 3,272
If we had to qualify for the final, maybe more effort would be put into producing a decent song. The BBC would not want to risk devoting four hours on a Saturday night to a contest with no British interest. They would have to accept that it might happen occasionally, but wouldn't want it to be the norm.
Go to the top of this page
 
+Quote this post
Popchartfreak
post May 19 2019, 08:58 AM
Post #5
Group icon
BuzzJack Legend
Joined: 18 July 2012
Posts: 22,812
User: 17,376
QUOTE(Suedehead2 @ May 19 2019, 09:23 AM) *
If we had to qualify for the final, maybe more effort would be put into producing a decent song. The BBC would not want to risk devoting four hours on a Saturday night to a contest with no British interest. They would have to accept that it might happen occasionally, but wouldn't want it to be the norm.


It would also shut up all the moaners who hate eurovision and resent us contributing towards one of the cheapest bits of 4 hours of high ratings of the BBC year. For those who whinge we never win: Netherlands have waited 44 years; Portugal had to wait 60 years or thereabouts to win. For those who insist it's because we are hated: it's not, it's our shit entries chosen by the BBC which is self-fulfilling as no-one wants to be associated with a shit brand. Sweden nearly won. Jon co-wrote ours, but it was clearly a cast-off and he kept the best stuff for himself. We need the best stuff, the best singer, not sloppy seconds sung by TV competition losers.
Go to the top of this page
 
+Quote this post


Post reply to this threadCreate a new thread

1 users are reading this thread (1 guests and 0 anonymous users)
0 members:


 

Time is now: 18th April 2024 - 11:03 PM