Entertainment Discussion

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register | Help )

Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Should politicians have to live in the area they represent?
Track this topic - Email this topic - Print this topic - Download this topic - Subscribe to this forum
post Jun 6 2018, 06:24 AM
Post #1
Paul Hyett
Group: Banned
Posts: 25,346
Member No.: 364
Joined: 4-April 06
   No Gallery Pics

IMO they should - that way they cannot shelter themselves from any negative consequences of the decisions they make.

This applies particularly to local councillors, since MP's at least have the excuse that they have to have (second) homes in proximity to London to do their job.
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
diva thin muffin
post Jun 6 2018, 08:51 AM
Post #2
BuzzJack Gold Member
Group: Members
Posts: 3,716
Member No.: 12,837
Joined: 20-January 11
   No Gallery Pics

Yes I definitely think they should. It's ridiculous to be a politician representing an area but not live there yourself. Especially due to what you said: then they cannot make decisions that affect (?) the area but don't have to deal with the consequences themselves.
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
post Jul 12 2018, 12:20 PM
Post #3
New Entry
Group: Members
Posts: 9
Member No.: 73,239
Joined: 23-June 18
   No Gallery Pics

After winning the title, mostly politicians move to big cities to live. It would be better if they live their own city which they belong.
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:


Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 27th September 2020 - 04:37 AM