BuzzJack
Entertainment Discussion

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register | Help )

Latest Artist News
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Spice Girls & Award Ceremonies, Did the girls deserve more?
Track this topic - Email this topic - Print this topic - Download this topic - Subscribe to this forum
Spice Girls Net
post Sep 21 2019, 05:10 PM
Post #1
BuzzJack Regular
***
Group: Members
Posts: 323
Member No.: 64,815
Joined: 3-February 18
   No Gallery Pics
 


I was watching some old BRIT Awards videos from 1996-1998 and it got me thinking about how ceremonies are now in comparison.



Many of the artists in today's charts that have what we'd call 'a big year' usually sweep the board with 4-6 nominations for album, single, video, group/best solo artist etc whether it's
the year of Adele, Beyonce, Taylor Swift, there's always an artist that leads with the most nominations and wins.

I was thinking about how powerful the SG were in the UK and around the world during 1997 and 1998.

Despite being the UK's biggest group in the world and having the world's most successful album of 1997, as well as being the most successful UK chart act of that year it still shocks me
that the SG were never nominated for more awards at the 1998 ceremony (not even in the 'Best British Group' category)

In 1998, again, they were the biggest selling pop act in the UK and around the world, as well as having success on the singles chart, and yet after a successful 1998
the group did not receive a SINGLE nomination at the BRITs 1999 ceremony?

What do you guys think about this? I know the music industry was very different 20 years ago but when you actually think about it it's kinda crazy that they didn't receive more awards.

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Piers
post Sep 21 2019, 05:50 PM
Post #2
BuzzJack Climber
**
Group: Members
Posts: 63
Member No.: 69,521
Joined: 25-March 18
   No Gallery Pics
 


Yeah. They probably should have won more...though the truly glaring omission to me is the 1998 Grammys. After being the biggest thing in music in 1997, they were shut out entirely. Not a single nomination.

Looking back on that ceremony is a fairly odd thing now. The nominations are full of Bob Dylan, Paul McCartney, Fleetwood Mac and the like. I'm not diminishing those acts. But they weren't really indicative of the music scene in 1998.

The girls honestly should have *at least* been locks for noms in Best Short Music Video (most of the noms are obscurities) and Best Pop Performance by a Group. Wannabe, Say You'll Be There, and 2 Become 1 should have been strong contenders for that. Instead, the Rolling Stones made the cut with Anybody Seen My Baby? Not knocking the Stones (I'm a fan, and I've seen them in concert)...but it's a song that didn't make the main Billboard chart, and I doubt much of anyone would consider it among their best material.

So, what happened? In the US, I always thought there was a shift in attitude toward them when the Spice World movie trailers showed up. I kinda defend that movie now...for being so proudly weird, campy and culty. But when the trailers came out, I think the girls came off as...um..."less intelligent than they really are", shall we say. The movie ended up helping them with album sales, of course...but I don't think it helped them in terms of US music credibility.

But. Anyway. I guess the girls got the last laugh...sorta. Their music proved to have a longevity that most of the new acts that won that year don't.


This post has been edited by Piers: Sep 21 2019, 05:50 PM
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
sammy01
post Sep 21 2019, 06:05 PM
Post #3
BuzzJack Gold Member
*****
Group: Members
Posts: 3,648
Member No.: 9,988
Joined: 16-November 09
   No Gallery Pics
 


They just weren't seen as credible. I'd say the ROTSG tour, Olmpics and the Spiceworld 2019 tour have done wonders for their credibility as with most acts that put on great live shows.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
JaneJ
post Sep 21 2019, 06:40 PM
Post #4
New Entry
*
Group: Members
Posts: 12
Member No.: 88,953
Joined: 27-June 19
   No Gallery Pics
 


Make the new album and they'll get some more. Imagine all four or five on the stage of the big award ceremonies once more 20+ years later. Just the thought of it already gives me chills.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Spiceboy
post Sep 21 2019, 06:48 PM
Post #5
BuzzJack Enthusiast
****
Group: Members
Posts: 1,974
Member No.: 39,568
Joined: 6-September 17
   No Gallery Pics
 


The Brit Awards snubbed them quite a few times to be fair.
- Them not winning best newcomer in 1997 was quite frankly ridiculous, and they didn't win any awards given by the BRIT panel only ones voted by the public.
- They should have had nominations for best single and best group easily in 1998 but they only got a nomination for best music video (spice up your life) and then they were given a made up award because they wanted them to perform again. After the hype they created the previous year I thought it was a huge snub...
- They couldn't be nominated in 1999 because they didn't have an album out so they didn't qualify, and the Live Act one wasn't around yet.
- I thought they were snubbed in 2007/8 as well not getting a nomination for Best Live Act after the huge success for ROTSG

On the other hand I'm amazed they were given Lifetime achievement (although I believe it was renamed Outstanding Achievement that year???)

The Grammy's said they were not credible enough as they were too manufactured, yet they gave Britney and Christina best newcomer nominations just a few years later... rolleyes.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Spiceboy
post Sep 21 2019, 06:48 PM
Post #6
BuzzJack Enthusiast
****
Group: Members
Posts: 1,974
Member No.: 39,568
Joined: 6-September 17
   No Gallery Pics
 


The Brit Awards snubbed them quite a few times to be fair.
- Them not winning best newcomer in 1997 was quite frankly ridiculous, and they didn't win any awards given by the BRIT panel only ones voted by the public.
- They should have had nominations for best single and best group easily in 1998 but they only got a nomination for best music video (spice up your life) and then they were given a made up award because they wanted them to perform again. After the hype they created the previous year I thought it was a huge snub...
- They couldn't be nominated in 1999 because they didn't have an album out so they didn't qualify, and the Live Act one wasn't around yet.
- I thought they were snubbed in 2007/8 as well not getting a nomination for Best Live Act after the huge success for ROTSG

On the other hand I'm amazed they were given Lifetime achievement (although I believe it was renamed Outstanding Achievement that year???)

The Grammy's said they were not credible enough as they were too manufactured, yet they gave Britney and Christina best newcomer nominations just a few years later... rolleyes.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Mr.X
post Sep 22 2019, 01:05 AM
Post #7
BuzzJack Enthusiast
****
Group: Members
Posts: 755
Member No.: 39,587
Joined: 7-September 17
   No Gallery Pics
 


Yeah their history with the Brits is slightly complicated. Them being SNUBBED for nominations in 1998 and given a consolation prize was quite in bad taste, I feel. They deserved Best Single, Best Group and at least a nomination for Best Album for Spiceworld.

They also deserved to be nominated in 1999. They had huge success throughout 1998 and with Goodbye, and they had a HUGE tour. They totally deserved a couple of nominations at least.

The special award in 2000 was odd indeed, but I liked their performance and what it meant to them so I dont mind it tbh. They TOTALLY deserved a win for Best Live for the Return tour though!!

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Mr.X
post Sep 22 2019, 01:28 AM
Post #8
BuzzJack Enthusiast
****
Group: Members
Posts: 755
Member No.: 39,587
Joined: 7-September 17
   No Gallery Pics
 


The Grammy snub was just rude. They were told they were not credible enough - that must have hurt. And totally undeserved.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
SouthernStar88
post Sep 22 2019, 06:49 PM
Post #9
BuzzJack Regular
***
Group: Members
Posts: 205
Member No.: 41,834
Joined: 21-September 17
   No Gallery Pics
 


I hope for a new BRIT Award next year for the tour...they could become the only act to win it in four different decades:
1997-98, 2000, 2010 and (I hope) 2020.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
SouthernStar88
post Sep 22 2019, 06:50 PM
Post #10
BuzzJack Regular
***
Group: Members
Posts: 205
Member No.: 41,834
Joined: 21-September 17
   No Gallery Pics
 


I also hope for a Grammy Award for a new album...Ok! I dreamed enough for today tongue.gif

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Spiceboy
post Sep 23 2019, 01:46 AM
Post #11
BuzzJack Enthusiast
****
Group: Members
Posts: 1,974
Member No.: 39,568
Joined: 6-September 17
   No Gallery Pics
 


QUOTE(SouthernStar88 @ Sep 22 2019, 07:49 PM) *
I hope for a new BRIT Award next year for the tour...they could become the only act to win it in four different decades:
1997-98, 2000, 2010 and (I hope) 2020.


I don't think they have done the Live Act Brit for a few years. Would be fab if they brought it back. If Spice Girls were snubbed for it then that would be a HUGE snub as it has been the biggest tour by far in the UK this year.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Feel_The_Fever
post Sep 23 2019, 02:30 AM
Post #12
BuzzJack Idol
********
Group: Members
Posts: 101,992
Member No.: 845
Joined: 29-June 06
   No Gallery Pics
 


The Brits for years were anti pop and still are and they have snubbed so many great artists,/bands over the years. The spice girls are an example of it and ignoring the fact they were the biggest group in the world at that time says it all.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Jay ☆
post Sep 23 2019, 08:25 AM
Post #13
"Jayrusaleminians" - Umi.
*******
Group: Chart Mod
Posts: 23,024
Member No.: 3,217
Joined: 4-April 07
 


They certainly deserved more! The Brits really were pretty shady to them, particularly in 1999... at the very least Viva Forever and Goodbye deserved single/video nominations. Never being nominated for best group was ridiculous.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Mr.X
post Sep 23 2019, 09:28 AM
Post #14
BuzzJack Enthusiast
****
Group: Members
Posts: 755
Member No.: 39,587
Joined: 7-September 17
   No Gallery Pics
 


QUOTE(Feel_The_Fever @ Sep 23 2019, 03:30 AM) *
The Brits for years were anti pop and still are and they have snubbed so many great artists,/bands over the years. The spice girls are an example of it and ignoring the fact they were the biggest group in the world at that time says it all.


The problem is that the Brits DID recognise how successful they were, as they recognised the group BOTH in 1998 and 2000 with special awards related to the levels of success the group had. But they never recognised them for how good they were.

The fact they never even received nominations for best group or best album in 1998 or 1999 speaks volums about how the Brits saw them - essential for the industry but not good enough for artistic recognition.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Spice Girls Net
post Sep 23 2019, 11:11 AM
Post #15
BuzzJack Regular
***
Group: Members
Posts: 323
Member No.: 64,815
Joined: 3-February 18
   No Gallery Pics
 


One Direction received 4 Best British Group nominations and won ‘Global Success’ Awards too. So the BRITs have changed slightly but take into account they’re a male group and it was 15 years after the SG first success
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post


Reply to this topicStart new topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:


 

Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 22nd October 2019 - 03:47 AM