Welcome, guest! Log in or register. (click here for help) If you have forgotten your password and a recovery email has not arrived, please click here to send us an email.
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
Track this thread | Email this thread | Print this thread | Download this thread | Subscribe to this forum |
![]()
Post
#1
|
|
![]() ❤️❤️➕🟦
Joined: 3 June 2012
Posts: 22,246 User: 17,160 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
This would be an awful outcome if so. Channel 4’s not for profit setup has allowed it to take the lead in diverse programming and to take risks that other mainstream broadcasters may not be able to. I mean it takes that in some interesting directions sometimes but, as a whole, the channel regularly punches above its weight. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#2
|
|
![]() BuzzJack Legend
Joined: 13 April 2007
Posts: 37,572 User: 3,272 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Johnson is undoing more of Thatcher's policies than Blair managed.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#3
|
|
![]() Queen of Soon
Joined: 24 May 2007
Posts: 74,503 User: 3,474 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Absolutely not. Channel 4 is a remarkable success story that has produced some incredible British content. All at risk when the channel also has to take profit into account as it’s primary objective. C4 is essential for serving some key markets
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#4
|
|
![]() ❤️❤️➕🟦
Joined: 3 June 2012
Posts: 22,246 User: 17,160 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
The ironic thing is you can’t get TV that is anymore British than Channel 4, for better or worse! It’s the most representative of all areas of the country and the exact thing that the Gov should be promoting rather than allowing it to be watered down.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#5
|
|
![]() The owls are not what they seem
Pronouns: He/him
Joined: 11 July 2009 Posts: 38,232 User: 9,232 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
So this government really is just trying to neuter all the main channels huh? :/
Channel 4 has always produced much more left-field and daring content and while I don't watch them all the time, I'd be much more interested in a drama on here than an ITV one. It would be such a loss to see that change through this. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#6
|
|
![]() I'm a paragon so don't perceive me
Pronouns: he/they
Joined: 3 February 2011 Posts: 38,277 User: 12,929 ![]() ![]() |
Very worrying. Apparently it's profitable, apparently it's in good working order, apparently it's liked by the public, but what it isn't is supportive of the government.
same playbook as all the other conservative authoritarians from Orban to Putin, do not allow dissenting media and your government will survive. Labour should announce they'll protect it/reverse privatisation but I suspect committing to anything drastic and actually doable before it happens like that would take far too much moral courage. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#7
|
|
![]() BuzzJack Legend
Joined: 13 April 2007
Posts: 37,572 User: 3,272 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Ideally, Labour will say that they will bring it back into public ownership at the price paid for it or (if it has tradeable shares) its market value, whichever is the lower. That might help put off potential buyers and should also be a defence against any legal action as buyers will have known the risks involved.
A few Tory MPs have spoken out against this. Whether that translates into them voting against it is, of course, a totally different matter. |
|
|
![]()
Post
#8
|
|
![]() Break the tension
Joined: 7 March 2006
Posts: 92,870 User: 51 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
All because they won't bow down and kiss the feet of Boris and his gang of mendacious crooks. It reeks of fascism.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#9
|
|
![]() ❤️❤️➕🟦
Joined: 3 June 2012
Posts: 22,246 User: 17,160 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
It NeEdS tO cOmpEtE wItH nEtFlIx aNd AmAzOn ![]() |
|
|
![]()
Post
#10
|
|
![]() Buffy/Charmed
Joined: 18 April 2013
Posts: 46,064 User: 18,639 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#11
|
|
![]() Shakin Stevens
Joined: 29 December 2007
Posts: 48,785 User: 5,138 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Yup and Dorries proved on her comittee appearance about Ch4 she doesn’t actually know anything about the company hence this is clearly an ideological decision!
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#12
|
|
![]() BuzzJack Legend
Joined: 13 April 2007
Posts: 37,572 User: 3,272 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
On a phone-in this morning, Dorries claimed that Channel 5 was privatised a few years ago. As it has never been state-owned, it cannot possibly have been privatised. She was invited to defend her policy on Channel 4 News, not an unreasonable request. She refused. No other Tories were prepared to defend their policy either. I can't imagine why.
|
|
|
![]()
Post
#13
|
|
![]() ❤️❤️➕🟦
Joined: 3 June 2012
Posts: 22,246 User: 17,160 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]()
Post
#14
|
|
![]() ❤️❤️➕🟦
Joined: 3 June 2012
Posts: 22,246 User: 17,160 ![]() ![]() ![]() |
QUOTE In an interview on BBC Radio 4's Today programme, she revealed that the Truss government was "looking at the business case" for privatisation despite claims under Dorries that the broadcaster lacked the financial firepower to withstand the rise of American streaming giants like Netflix, Amazon Prime Video and Disney+. "We are looking especially at the business case for the sale of Channel 4 and making sure that we still agree with that decision, and that is what I am doing," she said. "I'm the type of politician that bases their decisions on evidence, that bases their decisions on listening and that's what I will be doing over the coming weeks. "I will take that approach when it comes to Channel 4 and every aspect of my brief." ![]() |
|
|
![]() ![]() |
Time is now: 17th February 2025, 08:00 AM |
Copyright © 2006 - 2025 BuzzJack.com