Should politicians have to live in the area they represent?

Latest Site News

Should politicians have to live in the area they represent?

vidcapper View member profile	6th June 2018, 06:24 AM Post #1
Paul Hyett Joined: 4 April 2006 Posts: 25,346 User: 364	IMO they should - that way they cannot shelter themselves from any negative consequences of the decisions they make. This applies particularly to local councillors, since MP's at least have the excuse that they have to have (second) homes in proximity to London to do their job.


diva thin muffin View member profile	6th June 2018, 08:51 AM Post #2
BuzzJack Platinum Member Pronouns: he/him Joined: 20 January 2011 Posts: 5,907 User: 12,837	Yes I definitely think they should. It's ridiculous to be a politician representing an area but not live there yourself. Especially due to what you said: then they cannot make decisions that affect (?) the area but don't have to deal with the consequences themselves.


Sophia View member profile	12th July 2018, 12:20 PM Post #3
New Entry Joined: 23 June 2018 Posts: 9 User: 73,239	After winning the title, mostly politicians move to big cities to live. It would be better if they live their own city which they belong.