... well well well, this was posted on another site last night, its the first time ive seen it, but it is absolutely SPOT ON.

 

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

October 26, 2009

The conspiracy to transform Britain

Daily Mail, 26 October 2009

 

So now the cat is well and truly out of the bag. For years, as the number of immigrants to Britain shot up apparently uncontrollably, the question was how exactly this had happened.

 

Was it through a fit of absent-mindedness or gross incompetence? Or was it not inadvertent at all, but deliberate?

 

The latter explanation seemed just too outrageous. After all, a deliberate policy of mass immigration would have amounted to nothing less than an attempt to change the very make-up of this country without telling the electorate.

 

There could not have been a more grave abuse of the entire democratic process. Now, however, we learn that this is exactly what did happen. The Labour government has been engaged upon a deliberate and secret policy of national cultural sabotage.

 

This astonishing revelation surfaced quite casually last weekend in a newspaper article by one Andrew Neather. He turns out to have been a speech writer for Tony Blair, Jack Straw and David Blunkett.

 

And it was he who wrote a landmark speech in September 2000 by the then immigration minister, Barbara Roche, that called for a loosening of immigration controls. But the true scope and purpose of this new policy was actively concealed.

 

In its 1997 election manifesto, Labour promised ‘firm control over immigration’ and in 2005 it promised a ‘crackdown on abuse’. In 2001, its manifesto merely said that the immigration rules needed to reflect changes to the economy to meet skills shortages.

 

But all this concealed a monumental shift of policy. For Neather wrote that until ‘at least February last year’, when a new points-based system was introduced to limit foreign workers in response to increasing uproar, the purpose of the policy Roche ushered in was to open up the UK to mass immigration.

 

This has been achieved. Some 2.3million migrants have been added to the population since 2001. Since 1997, the number of work permits has quadrupled to 120,000 a year.

 

Unless policies change, over the next 25 years some seven million more will be added to Britain’s population, a rate of growth three times as fast as took place in the Eighties.

 

Such an increase is simply unsustainable. Britain is already one of the most overcrowded countries in Europe. But now look at the real reason why this policy was introduced, and in secret. The Government’s ‘driving political purpose’, wrote Neather, was ‘to make the UK truly multicultural’.

 

It was therefore a politically motivated attempt by ministers to transform the fundamental make-up and identity of this country. It was done to destroy the right of the British people to live in a society defined by a common history, religion, law, language and traditions.

 

It was done to destroy for ever what it means to be culturally British and to put another ‘multicultural’ identity in its place. And it was done without telling or asking the British people whether they wanted their country and their culture to be transformed in this way.

 

Spitefully, one motivation by Labour ministers was ‘to rub the Right’s nose in diversity and render their arguments out of date’.

 

Even Neather found that particular element of gratuitous Left-wing bullying to be ‘a manoeuvre too far’.

 

Yet apart from this, Neather sees nothing wrong in the policy he has described. Indeed, the reason for his astonishing candour is he thinks it’s something to boast about. Mass immigration, he wrote, had provided the ‘foreign nannies, cleaners and gardeners’ without whom London could hardly function.

 

What elitist arrogance! As if most people employ nannies, cleaners and gardeners. And what ignorance. The argument that Britain is better off with this level of immigration has been conclusively shown to be economically illiterate.

 

Neather gave the impression that most immigrants are Eastern Europeans. But these form fewer than a quarter of all immigrants.

 

And the fact is that, despite his blithe assertions to the contrary, schools in areas of very high immigration find it desperately difficult to cope with so many children who don’t even have basic English. Other services, such as health or housing, are similarly being overwhelmed by the sheer weight of numbers.

 

But the most shattering revelation was that this policy of mass immigration was not introduced to produce nannies or cleaners for the likes of Neather. It was to destroy Britain’s identity and transform it into a multicultural society where British attributes would have no greater status than any other country’s.

 

A measure of immigration is indeed good for a country. But this policy was not to enhance British culture and society by broadening the mix. It was to destroy its defining character altogether.

 

It also conveniently guaranteed an increasingly Labour-voting electorate since, as a recent survey by the Electoral Commission has revealed, some 90 per cent of black people and three-quarters of Asians vote Labour.

 

In Neather’s hermetically sealed bubble, the benefits of mass immigration were so overwhelming he couldn’t understand why ministers had been so nervous about it.

 

They were, he wrote, reluctant to discuss what increased immigration would mean, above all to Labour’s core white working class vote. So they deliberately kept it secret.

 

They knew that if they told the truth about what they were doing, voters would rise up in protest. So they kept it out of their election manifestos.

 

It was indeed a conspiracy to deceive the electorate into voting for them. And yet it is these very people who have the gall to puff themselves up in self-righteous astonishment at the rise of the BNP.

 

No wonder Jack Straw was so shifty on last week’s Question Time when he was asked whether it was the Government’s failure to halt immigration which lay behind increasing support for the BNP.

 

Now we know it was no such failure of policy. It was deliberate. For the government of which Straw is such a long- standing member had secretly plotted to flood the country with immigrants to change its very character and identity.

 

This more than any other reason is why Nick Griffin has gained so much support. According to a YouGov poll taken after Question Time, no fewer than 22 per cent of British voters would ’seriously consider’ voting for the BNP.

 

That nearly one quarter of British people might vote for a neo-Nazi party with views inimical to democracy, human rights and common decency is truly appalling.

 

The core reason is that for years they have watched as their country’s landscape has been transformed out of all recognition — and that politicians from all mainstream parties have told them first that it isn’t happening and second, that they are racist bigots to object even if it is.

 

Now the political picture has been transformed overnight by the unguarded candour of Andrew Neather’s eye-opening superciliousness. For now we know that Labour politicians actually caused this to happen - and did so out of total contempt for their own core voters.

 

As Neather sneered, the jobs filled by immigrant workers ‘certainly wouldn’t be taken by unemployed BNP voters from Barking or Burnley –fascist au pair, anyone?’

 

So that’s how New Labour views the white working class, supposedly the very people it is in politics to champion. Who can wonder that its core vote is now decamping in such large numbers to the BNP when Labour treats them like this?

 

Condemned out of its own mouth, it is New Labour that is responsible for the rise of the BNP — by an act of unalloyed treachery to the entire nation.

 

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

melenie philips the daily mail..

 

oh hold on, we arnt allowed to recognise anything the daily mail puts are we? <_< cos everything writen is right wing tory bollox... yeah right <_<

 

that article supports what ive been saying throughout this thread...

 

 

100% FULL TRUTH from her, nail on head, can't disagree with a single word she said there

 

Cameron when he comes in has to bring in drastic measures with regards immigration as another 7 million in an already severely overcrowded country will be very damaging

my god, if cameron does have a strong policy on immigration, as craig suggests... i might, just ,might for the first time EVER, consider voting tory!!! as i see it, the 'bnp protest votes' are up for grabs and if cameron is a shrewd politician he will recognise this and act on it.

but it is absolutely SPOT ON.

 

Source: Daily Mail, 26 October 2009

 

*dead*

 

*dead*

 

care to elaborate?

 

or shall i delete that nonsense post, and issue you with a warning? :lol:

As Neather sneered, the jobs filled by immigrant workers ‘certainly wouldn’t be taken by unemployed BNP voters from Barking or Burnley –fascist au pair, anyone?’

 

I'm sorry, but he's kind of right on this point..... If some of these lazy chav fukkers got up off their arses and did those jobs, there'd hardly be the necessity to draft in anyone from abroad.... Same for hotel, restaurant, much bar and retail work, etc..... This is the same people who barely even went to school and sneer at the thought of university... Well, if you dont educate yourselves for something a bit higher level or go out and learn a fukkin' trade, then what the fukk can you expect...? I know plenty of hard working students from EU countries and elsewhere who are doing jobs in bars, nanny work, supermarkets, shops, etc while doing their degrees... THEY dont have this ridiculous sense of arrogance that too many people who are just content to be lazy fukks have, like we owe THEM a living.....???? If anything is a drain on the country's resources, it's fukkin' layabout Chavs scrounging off the dole, not people who are working and contributing to the system via taxes and NI.....

 

And, by and large, it's those very same layabout chavs who moan and whinge about "bloody foreigners".... The Middle Class BNP voters should be objecting a LOT more to our homegrown Chav population who've never worked a bloody day in their lives and less about immigrants who are coming in to fill posts that these layabouts refuse to even apply for.... Last year, and this is a fact people, this country paid more out in benefits than it had coming in in Tax Revenue..... So, you tell me that this isn't a very BIG problem.....

I'm sorry, but he's kind of right on this point..... If some of these lazy chav fukkers got up off their arses and did those jobs, there'd hardly be the necessity to draft in anyone from abroad.... Same for hotel, restaurant, much bar and retail work, etc..... This is the same people who barely even went to school and sneer at the thought of university... Well, if you dont educate yourselves for something a bit higher level or go out and learn a fukkin' trade, then what the fukk can you expect...? I know plenty of hard working students from EU countries and elsewhere who are doing jobs in bars, nanny work, supermarkets, shops, etc while doing their degrees... THEY dont have this ridiculous sense of arrogance that too many people who are just content to be lazy fukks have, like we owe THEM a living.....???? If anything is a drain on the country's resources, it's fukkin' layabout Chavs scrounging off the dole, not people who are working and contributing to the system via taxes and NI.....

 

And, by and large, it's those very same layabout chavs who moan and whinge about "bloody foreigners".... The Middle Class BNP voters should be objecting a LOT more to our homegrown Chav population who've never worked a bloody day in their lives and less about immigrants who are coming in to fill posts that these layabouts refuse to even apply for.... Last year, and this is a fact people, this country paid more out in benefits than it had coming in in Tax Revenue..... So, you tell me that this isn't a very BIG problem.....

 

 

.... is that it? youve only found 1 line to disagree with?... well im happy to see that a well structured article which mixes fact with opinion and common sense is accepted even IF it was printed in the mail! :lol:

 

... is he right? after all his agenda has been outed, migration at all costs to import votes... 'yes prime minister' couldnt have written a better script. i just wonder IF these menial jobs are paying the legal minimum wage? or is it yet another case of shipping in cheap labour? and many are caught in the poverty trap and tbh i have some sympathy... after all if the state reckons that 'wayne and waynetta' needs £x to live in a week, why should they be expected to take a job that pays less? this is one thing that i cannot criticise the unemployed for because to be quite honest, I WOULDNT work for less then what i could get off the state. the systems wrong.

 

..... and just for the record.... benefits people come a very close second in the list of moans from the 'ordinary joe bloggs' people i know. and i know alot of people across a whole range of british society.

.... is that it? youve only found 1 line to disagree with?... well im happy to see that a well structured article which mixes fact with opinion and common sense is accepted even IF it was printed in the mail! :lol:

 

... is he right? after all his agenda has been outed, migration at all costs to import votes... 'yes prime minister' couldnt have written a better script. i just wonder IF these menial jobs are paying the legal minimum wage? or is it yet another case of shipping in cheap labour? and many are caught in the poverty trap and tbh i have some sympathy... after all if the state reckons that 'wayne and waynetta' needs £x to live in a week, why should they be expected to take a job that pays less? this is one thing that i cannot criticise the unemployed for because to be quite honest, I WOULDNT work for less then what i could get off the state. the systems wrong.

 

..... and just for the record.... benefits people come a very close second in the list of moans from the 'ordinary joe bloggs' people i know. and i know alot of people across a whole range of british society.

 

"Wayne and Waynetta" need x amount to live on because "Wayne and Waynetta" are totally selfishly breeding like rabbits and expecting US single, childless folks who work and, who actually do have a sense of responsibility to know that you dont have kids UNLESS YOU CAN ACTUALLY AFFORD THEM, to bloody well foot the bill for it.... The likes of Tesco or Morrisons cant realistically get out of paying less than minimum wage, neither can the chain pubs such as O'Neills, Yates, Nicholsons and Wetherspoons, etc.... At the end of the day, the STATE sets the Minimum Wage Rob... If "Wayne and Waynetta" need more than the minimum wage to live on, then clearly the STATE needs to step in and reset the rate.... And it ALSO needs to come down like a ton of bricks on those companies and employers who try to worm their way out of it.... THIS IS SIMPLY NOT HAPPENING!!!! Which should be a cause for you to be outraged.....

 

These companies who pay below the rate wouldn't be getting away with this in France, Scandinavia or Germany, where the Unions and Workers Councils are a LOT stronger and have much greater bargaining power, they actually DO have the power to bring the country to a standstill, and rightly so... Too many workers in this country, migrant AND indigenous, have absolutely no proper workers's representation to look out for their interests, which is what results in exploitation and slave wages which results in being caught in a "Poverty Trap".... And you certainly cannot blame immigrants for any of this frankly, it's a combination of unscrupulous employers (particularly in industries such as construction) and the Govt just turning a blind eye to it all because it suits their agenda....

 

"Wayne and Waynetta" need x amount to live on because "Wayne and Waynetta" are totally selfishly breeding like rabbits and expecting US single, childless folks who work and, who actually do have a sense of responsibility to know that you dont have kids UNLESS YOU CAN ACTUALLY AFFORD THEM, to bloody well foot the bill for it.... The likes of Tesco or Morrisons cant realistically get out of paying less than minimum wage, neither can the chain pubs such as O'Neills, Yates, Nicholsons and Wetherspoons, etc.... At the end of the day, the STATE sets the Minimum Wage Rob... If "Wayne and Waynetta" need more than the minimum wage to live on, then clearly the STATE needs to step in and reset the rate.... And it ALSO needs to come down like a ton of bricks on those companies and employers who try to worm their way out of it.... THIS IS SIMPLY NOT HAPPENING!!!! Which should be a cause for you to be outraged.....

 

These companies who pay below the rate wouldn't be getting away with this in France, Scandinavia or Germany, where the Unions and Workers Councils are a LOT stronger and have much greater bargaining power, they actually DO have the power to bring the country to a standstill, and rightly so... Too many workers in this country, migrant AND indigenous, have absolutely no proper workers's representation to look out for their interests, which is what results in exploitation and slave wages which results in being caught in a "Poverty Trap".... And you certainly cannot blame immigrants for any of this frankly, it's a combination of unscrupulous employers (particularly in industries such as construction) and the Govt just turning a blind eye to it all because it suits their agenda....

 

of course i broadly agree with this.. however, if the state sets the minimum wage as 'x' but says that wayne needs 'x + ' to live on, which is what they get through beneftis... there is a huge contradiction. i hate the benefits system, i have no time for benefits cheats and feckless single mums who use it as a career option, but its the system thats wrong.