Posted May 21, 200916 yr Please use this thread to post any news about forthcoming films which are due 2010 and onwards. Of course if you feel a film may have a bigger discussion, then start a seperate topic. ;) Harry Potter And The Deathly Hallows I Part I is released 19th November 2010. They have already started filming for it. Spiderman 4 http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_n3eH1jI8AZ8/SiY0...600/spidey4.jpg Shrek Forever After http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_n3eH1jI8AZ8/SiY2...1600/Shrek4.jpg Iron Man 2 http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_n3eH1jI8AZ8/SiY2...U/s1600/im2.jpg
May 21, 200916 yr Hmm im in two minds about this thread... One cos the release date is SO far away and two, there is very little info around bar a few pics... Ill see how it gets on and then decide (or Grimly will)
May 26, 200916 yr A new film version of Buffy the Vampire Slayer could be set to hit the big screen, in a reboot of the franchise for a new generation. However chances are that character creator Joss Whedon won't be involved, with the new film having no connection to the 1992 film or 1997 TV show of the same name, aside from the fact that it revolves around a young vampire slayer. According to The Hollywood Reporter, that means there will be no place for popular characters Willow, Xander or Spike, with the re-launch having a darker vision with the potential to launch a franchise. Fran Rubel Kuzui, who directed the 1992 movie, is developing the project with her husband Kaz, together with Roy Lee and Doug Davidson of Vertigo Entertainment. They are currently meeting with writers and will soon start shopping the project around studios. Although the team hasn't entirely ruled out Whedon's involvement at this point, they are yet to reach out to him. So would you want to see a Whedon-less Buffy? Hmmm the '92 film pretty much sucked and Whedons writing is what pretty much made Buffy so i would like to see him return for this.
May 26, 200916 yr I'd only be interested in something like this if the Whedon-Buffyverse returned; I can't imagine Buffy being anything without Willow, Xander, Anya, Dawn, Faith, Giles etc all involved in it I'm afraid. If they do go ahead without Whedone, I can't see it doing too well IMO.
May 26, 200916 yr I'd only be interested in something like this if the Whedon-Buffyverse returned; I can't imagine Buffy being anything without Willow, Xander, Anya, Dawn, Faith, Giles etc all involved in it I'm afraid. If they do go ahead without Whedone, I can't see it doing too well IMO. Well....Anya is dead...so she won't be back! and how cud they do a movie without Willow, Xander and Giles especially?? :( i watched the ENTIRE series not too long ago.....what a great show! Made me laugh so hard sometimes haha! :lol:
May 27, 200916 yr So, they want to do a "darker" vision or whatever.... Then, basically it'll just be "Blade" with a chick or a bit of a rip-off of the Japanese Manga film "Blood - the last Vampire", which WAS basically a much darker versh of "Buffy" set in a post-WW2 school in Tokyo.... :rolleyes: Hmmmm, this change to a "darker vision" couldn't have anything to do with the fact that a live-action version of "Blood.." is due out in cinemas next month could it.....? :lol: Why dont they follow on the franchise and base it on Whedon's Buffy comic....?
June 2, 200916 yr Universal will turn the children's book series Where's Waldo? into a feature film, having now acquired the screen rights from Classic Media. Martin Handford created the franchse. Illumination Entertainment will produce the movie, according to The Hollywood Reporter. Waldo had recently been put into turnaround by Paramount and Nickelodeon. There's no word yet on who will write or direct the picture, but the plan is to make it a live-action family film. It's also not yet known whether this Waldo, like Paramount's scrapped version, will be a time-travel story, or whether supporting characters such as Odlaw, Wizard Whitebeard, Wilma, Wenda, Woof, and the Waldo Watchers will be in it. ONE BIG LOL AT THIS. :lol:
June 2, 200916 yr i prefer wally :) they should pause it at certain times and everyone has to find him in the shot
June 3, 200916 yr Merged this with the Forthcoming Movie News as not much has been coming out about the next HP film/topic didnt have a huge discussion. Also, edited first post to include the news i posted as well as edited Josh' post to let everyone know what film he was talking about.
June 8, 200916 yr Kirsten Dunst has reportedly been confirmed to star in the fourth instalment of the Spider-Man franchise. According to the New York Post, Sony producer Todd Black has said that Dunst is returning as Mary-Jane, laying speculation to rest that the actress had been debating signing on to the project. Black also confirmed that there are no plans to marry Peter and Mary Jane in the highly anticipated sequel. However, when asked about who the villain would be in Spider-Man 4, the producer kept tight-lipped. Black said: "We're just coming up with who the villain's going to be now. We'll be shooting in New York again. Trust me - people will appreciate who we pick, because it'll be a big part of New York."
June 8, 200916 yr Thor released: May 20th 2011 directed by: Kenneth Branagh starring: Chris Hemsworth as Thor The First Avenger: Captain America released: July 22nd 2011 directed by: Joe Johnson The Avengers released: May 4th 2012 directed by: Jon Favreau written by: Zak Penn
June 10, 200916 yr Mission Impossible 4 confirmed to be going ahead. J.J. Abrams is producing, no word on directing yet though.
June 12, 200916 yr Mission Impossible 4 confirmed to be going ahead. J.J. Abrams is producing, no word on directing yet though. JJ Abrams is on it, so it will be good basically, its just a fact for me now, if JJ has a part in the film, it will be good.
June 12, 200916 yr JJ Abrams is on it, so it will be good basically, its just a fact for me now, if JJ has a part in the film, it will be good. Well, he's not directing it, so I dunno.... MI3 was good because he was directing it, and I think he co-wrote it as well.... The start of the film was absolutely brilliant, a sequence which could've come straight out of "Alias", the simplest ideas are often the best.... And the choice of Phillip Seymour Hoffman as the main bad guy was just pretty inspired, he was fantastic and more than made up for Tom Cruise being a bit naff.... :lol:
June 12, 200916 yr Has Tobey MacGuire actually agreed to do Spiderman 4, in the last spidey movie he suffered a back injury, as he said in an interview he had no plans to appear in further spiderman movies.
June 12, 200916 yr ^Yep both Tobey and Kirsten are in for Spidey 4 ^_^ Both Sam Raimi and Tobey signed contracts for both Spidey 4 and 5
June 12, 200916 yr Well, he's not directing it, so I dunno.... MI3 was good because he was directing it, and I think he co-wrote it as well.... The start of the film was absolutely brilliant, a sequence which could've come straight out of "Alias", the simplest ideas are often the best.... And the choice of Phillip Seymour Hoffman as the main bad guy was just pretty inspired, he was fantastic and more than made up for Tom Cruise being a bit naff.... :lol: yeah but he produced Cloverfield which is amazing, and he had a lot to do with that, shouldnt really underestimate the job of the producer really, if it has his influence i trust it will be good.
Create an account or sign in to comment