Reading the reaction to the murder of Eugene Terreblanche made me realise what a f***ed up country South Africa is now and how as bad or worse is happening to the whites than ever happened to the blacks under apartheid

 

When Mandela dies SA is going to turn into the new Zimbabwe, maybe even worse

 

The way things have developed since apartheid ended maybe apartheid was not such a bad thing after all, I remember the anti apartheid demos in Trafalgar Sq but where are the demos now protesting against reverse apartheid which means a white finds it almost impossible to get a job thanks to "affirmative action" ?? where are the trade embargos and the sanctions and the banning of south african sporting teams ?

 

Whites are getting ethnically cleansed with over 4000 farmers murdered in recent times, we have black apartheid out there now and with the rapist in charge things are going to get worse and worse.

 

Since white rule ended SA has become the murder and rape capital of the world, either the highest or second highest murder rate in the world, the lowest conviction rate in the world, the highest HIV/AIDS total in the world made worse by the rapist reckoning having a shower will prevent AIDS, life expectancy has gone down over 10 years since white rule ended, the economy has collapsed more so under the ANC, we have Malema inciting blacks to kill whites, totally f***ed up country thanks to giving the black population power.

 

The world sits around wringing its hands and turning a blind eye to ethnic cleansing and out and out discrimination against whites and somehow seems to try and even justify it.

 

So having seen the white minority being ethnically cleansed and discriminated against under black rule was giving power to the blacks such a good thing ?

I'm still trying to get over the title of this topic. Do you honestly believe apartheid doesnt play a HUGE factor in what's going on now? Fool.

You think the abuse being suffered by whites in South Africa is 'as bad or worse' as that of blacks back in the day?

 

 

ARE YOU INSANE?

 

 

Eugene Terreblanche was not infamous because he was WHITE. It was because he was a white supremecist. What on EARTH do you have in the way of evidence to support a claim about mass prejudice against and suffering by whites on a scale comparable with Apartheid? You need to start thinking before you type.

I really hope you've posted this merely for the reaction Craig...

if chris had of posted this i WOULD have closed it.... as its craig i believe he is posing a genuine if not somewhat odd question.

 

tbh craig, i dont think youve thought this through, seems like youve shot from the hip again..lol

I really hope you've posted this merely for the reaction Craig...

 

Not at all

 

4000 white farmers murdered so that their farms could be siezed, affirmative action in business where black candidates have to be put first for jobs leaving white professionals with virtually no chance of getting work and having to leave the country if they want to better themselves, murder (much of it black on black yes) is the highest in the world, more people died in Jo'burg last year than died in Baghdad, just a few examples of violence, murder, discrimination and ethnic cleansing done against WHITES.

 

Under De Klerk the economy was stronger, there was less crime, AIDS was a fraction of what it is now, the ANC are raping, pillaging and ethnically cleansing one of the most beautiful countries on the planet

 

The west got the ANC into power

 

Not trying to get a reaction at all Andre

I'm still trying to get over the title of this topic. Do you honestly believe apartheid doesnt play a HUGE factor in what's going on now? Fool.

 

Two wrongs don't make a right James, would it be alright for Indians to go murdering every Briton living in India out of revenge for colonial rule for example ?

if chris had of posted this i WOULD have closed it... .

 

 

And there my friends is a Moderator who lets his personal opinions of the thread starter determine whether he closes a thread or not. Unbelievable. :rolleyes: :rolleyes:

Edited April 10, 201015 yr by Victor Meldrew

Yeah I don't think admitting your double standards when it comes to the closure of threads was a particularly good idea.

You think the abuse being suffered by whites in South Africa is 'as bad or worse' as that of blacks back in the day?

ARE YOU INSANE?

Eugene Terreblanche was not infamous because he was WHITE. It was because he was a white supremecist. What on EARTH do you have in the way of evidence to support a claim about mass prejudice against and suffering by whites on a scale comparable with Apartheid? You need to start thinking before you type.

 

I wasn't saying apartheid was a good thing

 

I wasn't saying Terreblanche was a decent guy

 

Merely that because of the west meddling in another countries affairs the country is far more dangerous and unstable than prior to it happening

 

Ian Smith was not a nice guy but would anyone bar maybe Mugabe and his wife say that Zimbabwe is better off now than it was under Ian Smith ? and the same thing is happening in SA

 

The dramatic decline in the economy, the fact that the lifespan of the average South African has dropped by TEN years since De Klerk left power, the fact that South Africa leads the world for rape, murder and AIDS all of this since the ANC took office is proof of the fact SA was a safer healthier more stable and economically viable place under De Klerk than under Zuma and his cronies

And there my friends is a Moderator who lets his personal opinions of the thread starter determine whether he closes a thread or not. Unbelievable. :rolleyes: :rolleyes:

 

I agree with Rob tbh

 

The majority of your threads are total hypocricy usually about jobs or tax when you neither work or pay tax, you do have a history there Chris

I agree with Rob tbh

 

The majority of your threads are total hypocricy usually about jobs or tax when you neither work or pay tax, you do have a history there Chris

 

 

Yes but just because I'm disabled doesn't mean I can't have views on those two subjects does it? :rolleyes:

I wasn't saying apartheid was a good thing

 

I wasn't saying Terreblanche was a decent guy

 

Merely that because of the west meddling in another countries affairs the country is far more dangerous and unstable than prior to it happening

 

Ian Smith was not a nice guy but would anyone bar maybe Mugabe and his wife say that Zimbabwe is better off now than it was under Ian Smith ? and the same thing is happening in SA

 

The dramatic decline in the economy, the fact that the lifespan of the average South African has dropped by TEN years since De Klerk left power, the fact that South Africa leads the world for rape, murder and AIDS all of this since the ANC took office is proof of the fact SA was a safer healthier more stable and economically viable place under De Klerk than under Zuma and his cronies

Yes, but to say it's necessarily BECAUSE power was given to the blacks doesn't correlate. The whites still run South Africa economically, and an unspoken economic apartheid still exists. Had the ANC had free rein over South Africa, rather than be forced into renouncing the Freedom Charter they had held and being blackmailed by the IMF, World Bank and other market fundamentalists to enforce the Washington Consensus on South Africa, I somehow doubt it would face the problems that it faces today. Naked extreme inequality breeds violence...

And there my friends is a Moderator who lets his personal opinions of the thread starter determine whether he closes a thread or not. Unbelievable. :rolleyes: :rolleyes:

 

because you post inflamitory crap in order to get a reaction, based on what the sun says and most of it is a direct contradiction to your lifestyle. craig on the other hand is an intelligent poster who supports his views with reasoning and thought.

Yeah I don't think admitting your double standards when it comes to the closure of threads was a particularly good idea.

 

see the above response.