Posted May 23, 201114 yr http://i1.cdnds.net/11/21/550w_movies_breaking_dawn_poster.jpg http://i2.cdnds.net/10/48/550w_movies_breaking_dawn.jpghttp://i1.cdnds.net/11/18/550w_movies_twilight_saga_breaking_dawn_10.jpghttp://i1.cdnds.net/11/18/550w_movies_twilight_saga_breaking_dawn_8.jpghttp://i1.cdnds.net/11/18/550w_movies_twilight_saga_breaking_dawn_1.jpg Just some of the pictures released so far. We're getting the first trailer on June 5th :w00t: Edited May 26, 201114 yr by Jaack Sykes
May 23, 201114 yr JUNE 5th? OMG! So excited now. In the 4th picture, they all look creepy with blonde hair! Is that Alice? :o
May 23, 201114 yr Author No, the three blondes are a coven that we haven't been introduced to before. But if you want a bit of Alice, one of the (13 or so) pictures that have been released does feature Alice with Bella.
May 23, 201114 yr Jack where are these pictures? Oh the coven that explains it, I haven't read the book for a while.
May 23, 201114 yr There's hardly a need for this to be a two parter :manson: Harry Potter, yes, because its such a massive conclusion and the detail in the last book is so big that they weren't going to cock it up but TWILIGHT :manson:
May 23, 201114 yr Have you read the book? Loads happens, fans would glady like the chnace for an extra two films ^_^ Edited May 23, 201114 yr by Jimmie
May 23, 201114 yr ^I bought the first book, couldn't get past the first chapter after the dribble I was seeing.
May 23, 201114 yr So you can't really say that this films doesn't need to be in two parts then! Breaking dawn is actually quite full. I'm kind of relieved they decided to split the film so it was done properly for the fans.
May 23, 201114 yr Author Here are the rest of the pictures for anyones interest http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/movies/at-the-...aking-dawn.html To say I'm a massive fan, I haven't actually read all of this book, so I can't say for certain whether it does need two parts. But I guess it makes fans happy because it'll all last an extra year, and knowing the details of what I haven't yet read, I'd say the point of split is pretty obvious.
May 23, 201114 yr So you can't really say that this films doesn't need to be in two parts then! Breaking dawn is actually quite full. I'm kind of relieved they decided to split the film so it was done properly for the fans. They only made Breaking Dawn into two films for the same reason why one of the Harry Potter films was pushed back a year and Twilight took the HP release date - profit.
May 23, 201114 yr There's hardly a need for this to be a two parter :manson: Harry Potter, yes, because its such a massive conclusion and the detail in the last book is so big that they weren't going to cock it up but TWILIGHT :manson: There was no need for there to be a first film, never mind a two part third one. :manson:
May 24, 201114 yr Breaking dawn isn't worthy of two films The majority of Breaking dawn is filler. I read all the books by the way (unfortunately)
June 5, 201114 yr Author sIpeBi6SG4A :w00t: Brilliant, although I'm not sure they should've given away the twist. Reminds me of when major plot points are shown or strongly hinted at in promos for TV shows in the US. Yes the big fans won't mind, it's in the book, but there could be people wanting to go who haven't read it. Edited June 6, 201114 yr by Jaack Sykes
June 8, 201114 yr Even though it's not the "right" thing for me to say, the first three books and two movies (haven't seen the third) are a guilty pleasure of mine. Maybe it's the tacky gay inside of me coming out. But I refuse to read the last book, even hearing about what happens is unbearable, so I'll probably give this a miss and pretend it's a trilogy. Edited June 8, 201114 yr by Daniel II
June 9, 201114 yr Does Kristen Stewart make anyone else want to slit their throats? Worst. Actress. Ever. and miserable cow to boot.
June 10, 201114 yr EK! The trailer is looking awesome, The wedding looks just how it's pictured in the book and I love how they teased Bellas situation. The bed scene :kink: Can't wait!
June 11, 201114 yr Even though it's not the "right" thing for me to say, the first three books and two movies (haven't seen the third) are a guilty pleasure of mine. Maybe it's the tacky gay inside of me coming out. But I refuse to read the last book, even hearing about what happens is unbearable, so I'll probably give this a miss and pretend it's a trilogy. The last book is possibly the best! It's just so ridiculous, I had an absolute whale of a time reading it. I don't think my jaw has ever hit the floor so much, for good or bad.
June 12, 201114 yr The last book is possibly the best! It's just so ridiculous, I had an absolute whale of a time reading it. I don't think my jaw has ever hit the floor so much, for good or bad. Just hearing about it was enough for me, although I'll probably end up reading it one day, and I hate leaving things unfinished. I can't imagine how they are going to translate soem of it onto the screen; I can see the endless facebook groups now.
June 12, 201114 yr Does Kristen Stewart make anyone else want to slit their throats? Worst. Actress. Ever. and miserable cow to boot. I'll give Misery guts a bit of credit, want an even worse actress. Try Jessica Alba's films. She is a regular nominee of the Razzie awards.
Create an account or sign in to comment