Yes you right Britney barely sing live when she performing, but that's coz she dancing her ass, check some of her live performances. Of course i'm talking about 1998-2005 (thought she had some live performances too).

 

Now is different story coz she's not that much interested in those stuff, that's why she barely doing promotion, she just wants to release music for the fans, which is not enough.

 

and again i really wanna see the best kylie's moment in dancing.

How can you say she is better than the likes of Kylie and "the best entertainer out there" if she doesn't even bother? Deluded much?

She is best performer out there, even if she didn't danced that much on the FFT, the show was spectacular. Why are u bother if u disagree? I just voted and gave my opinion and of course people need to make drama of that.

 

Gurl bye. Not here for that.

lol, you are so deluded. :lol:

http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lir2xh6XRI1qfxq87o1_500.gif

lol, you are so deluded. :lol:

http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lir2xh6XRI1qfxq87o1_500.gif

 

Please say *you* make these gifs :heart:

lolno, I google for them :lol:

She is best performer out there, even if she didn't danced that much on the FFT, the show was spectacular.

But you're contradicting yourself. She doesn't sing live and you say yourself she can't be bothered dancing so how is she 'performing'? She's basically standing on stage miming... badly. The show being spectacular has nothing to do with Britney herself. And you're comparing Britney (up to 2005) with other popstars (in 2012) which is an invalid comparison.

 

It's not like that she just standing and doing nothing. Check some youtube videos.. As I said in dancing way she is now basic as others pop stars who never really danced in their videos and tours.

 

And they did pre recorded vocals with some live singing, i'm sure that she's not the only one who's doing the same thing.

 

Why is that invalid?

I love both but I will always love Britney and she's my favourite female act ever, so I voted for her.

Britney is nothing but a robot who gets given catchy songs by top producers, she's probably the most talentless popstar I can think of.

 

Kylie easily.

 

This is such a bullshit statement. If she were the most talentless popstar she would not still be in this game. If that were the case and all you needed was a bit of good puppetry to be an icon and still be in this business for almost 14 years, there would be a lot more "talentless pop stars" selling over 100 million records and having one of the longest/successful careers since Madonna and Kylie. Talent in the pop world RARELY depends on the power of ones voice, rather it's commercial appeal and the art of using what you got to make your own "art".

 

Such ignorance.

 

With that being said, I love all three of them. But I think Buzzjack knows my vote.

 

It's ridiculous how you all result to offending each others taste in order to make a point on an online forum. Now I shall contradict myself and call you a group of queens.

Edited January 18, 201213 yr by Tyler

Sorry, I think I was having a bad day when I made that post. Regardless, I think what Britney does have is the best team in the business around her who have literally kept her propped up for the past 7 years, and kudos to them.

 

BTW, I consider 'I Wanna Go' one of the most criminal (UK) flops of last year, that was the one song of hers from the last few years I was desperate for it to do well. :(

Edited January 18, 201213 yr by Silver Rocket

Now, I do agree with you there. I think she is a shadow of her former self when it comes to what she has done with her past two eras. Atleast with 'Blackout' she had creative input with the album, then there was only a SLIGHT input with 'Circus'... then virtually NOTHING with 'Femme Fatale'.

 

But I think one thing people don't realize with Britney is that with the conservators she is basically used as a cash cow. Told when and where to be, when and what to do... and I don't think people realize the legal pull that has on her career. Hopefully that will be lifted soon and she can find the passion she once had for her career. The least you can say with Britney is that she knows what people want from her, and what people to work with. (Why do you think she has been paired back with all her old producers since all of the legal/custody problems she has). I have researched it thoroughly, and I would lose passion and drive for what I was doing too if everything I once had control over was no longer in my control at all. Britney used to be a risk taker and was maturing into a true artist with 'In The Zone' and 'Blackout', and that was taken away from her because of all the things that happened.

 

I'm sorry for ranting. But I feel the least I could do is explain why I stand by someone so strongly that MANY people on here refer to as talentless. Which she is far from, even if only basing that on her past achievements.

 

Also thank you for your last post, it is refreshing to see someone actually retract a statement and make a new one that is plausible.

 

http://i40.tinypic.com/2yzhgk2.jpg

I love them both, and they both have had some amazing pop moments in their careers, but i just prefer Kylie a bit more, but again both are great.

I like them both, both had made some great pop songs and some terrible ones too.

 

Kylie bores me with her tour set lists it's usually the same old songs with a mix of the newer ones and Britney bugs me because she mimes, I was really into her Circus era I wanted to go to the show in London but that put me off.

 

Overall I went for Kylie.

I wouldn't call myself a fan of either, but I would choose Kylie over Britney. I like I Believe in You a lot and also the duet with Nick Cave, Where The Wild Roses Grow. My favourite by Britney would probably have to be Everytime.