Jump to content

Featured Replies

Most of my "in real life" friends would probably give every track they'd ever created a -1 if they had the opportunity, lol, so the odd few 0s from fans expressing their particular dislike for certain songs isn't too bad. A few of their album tracks really are on the weak side.

 

 

Then I'm sure me expressing particular dislike at certain scores isn't too bad either ^_^

A weak song is a 1-4.. a zero is just mean :lol:

  • Replies 88
  • Views 3.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I'm sorry but those filler album tracks on Living For The Weekend are TORTURE, and 'Issues' for me is certainly -1 worthy if we're talking their overall catalogue. With LFTW you can tell those tracks were cheaply funded and used to pad out the album.

 

I don't know why it's such a big deal though, I own all their albums bar that one and they're overall very good. The majority of their tracks would get a high score from me.

I'm sorry but those filler album tracks on Living For The Weekend are TORTURE, and 'Issues' for me is certainly -1 worthy if we're talking their overall catalogue. With LFTW you can tell those tracks were cheaply funded and used to pad out the album.

 

I don't know why it's such a big deal though, I own all their albums bar that one and they're overall very good. The majority of their tracks would get a high score from me.

 

 

Agreed, Love The Saturdays but those Living For The Weekend tracks are pretty cringe. Tracks 9 - 12 are embarrassing.

Agreed, Love The Saturdays but those Living For The Weekend tracks are pretty cringe. Tracks 9 - 12 are embarrassing.

 

I wouldn't call You Don't Have The Right embarrassing. I think Chasing The Saturdays paid for that

Am I right in thinking they had to rely on sponsorship money from Chasing The Saturdays to fund the majority of that album because their label wouldn't pay for studio time? It certainly explains why that album is how it is, although I know that's not their fault.
I'm sorry but those filler album tracks on Living For The Weekend are TORTURE, and 'Issues' for me is certainly -1 worthy if we're talking their overall catalogue. With LFTW you can tell those tracks were cheaply funded and used to pad out the album.

 

I don't know why it's such a big deal though, I own all their albums bar that one and they're overall very good. The majority of their tracks would get a high score from me.

 

You dislike both Issues and LFTW!!!! :cheer:

 

Agreed, Love The Saturdays but those Living For The Weekend tracks are pretty cringe. Tracks 9 - 12 are embarrassing.

 

What about tracks four and eight as well? :o

 

I wouldn't call You Don't Have The Right embarrassing. I think Chasing The Saturdays paid for that

 

I love it! One of their best ballads! :wub:

 

Am I right in thinking they had to rely on sponsorship money from Chasing The Saturdays to fund the majority of that album because their label wouldn't pay for studio time? It certainly explains why that album is how it is, although I know that's not their fault.

 

I never thought of it like that! But surely the label would be obligated to fund it if they'd signed for the five album deal?

Edited by SB.

I wouldn't call You Don't Have The Right embarrassing. I think Chasing The Saturdays paid for that

 

 

I actually rather dislike it. Yeah it's a lovely piece of music but it's also VERY boring.

I actually rather dislike it. Yeah it's a lovely piece of music but it's also VERY boring.

 

I like the song, but if they were to re-record it:

 

1. Less Rochelle, more Frankie.

2. Giving Frollie the second verse that Una sounds flat in.

I'm sorry but those filler album tracks on Living For The Weekend are TORTURE, and 'Issues' for me is certainly -1 worthy if we're talking their overall catalogue. With LFTW you can tell those tracks were cheaply funded and used to pad out the album.

 

I don't know why it's such a big deal though, I own all their albums bar that one and they're overall very good. The majority of their tracks would get a high score from me.

 

http://38.media.tumblr.com/0fe2a2bb78e7a28d6f6f63219d5e221d/tumblr_n9l5gwx1Hk1qzbagvo3_500.gif

 

:lol:

 

Oh and yes.. OMG 'YDHTR' is terrible!

Edited by Scherz

All this Living For The Weekend shade

http://i.imgur.com/OG1jS6k.gif

I like the song, but if they were to re-record it:

 

1. Less Rochelle, more Frankie.

2. Giving Frollie the second verse that Una sounds flat in.

 

 

Uhm no.. Less Una more Frankie. Una is TERRIBLE on You Don't Have The Right.

Uhm no.. Less Una more Frankie. Una is TERRIBLE on You Don't Have The Right.

 

Yes but Rochelle has more than enough Solo's on the album :P

 

The next single should be like Up, very Vanessa heavy :heart:

Yes but Rochelle has more than enough Solo's on the album :P

 

The next single should be like Up, very Vanessa heavy :heart:

 

YES But Rochelle doesn't have enough solo's on other albums, so let her have her moment like Una on On Your Radar and Vanessa on Wordshaker.

 

Rochessa heavy is all I want :heart:

Edited by Totto

Rochessa heavy is all I want :heart:

 

http://livelikeavip.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/rochelle.jpg

 

There you go :lol:

:lol:

 

Is she carrying Vanessa like she always does? :kink:

:lol:

 

Is she carrying Vanessa like she always does? :kink:

 

Yeah :lol: :lol: :lol:

I'm sorry but none of their tracks are zeros. I don't even care about 'tastes'.. a zero is a joke :rolleyes:

 

You clearly haven't heard Not Good Enough.

You clearly haven't heard Not Good Enough.

 

You clearly are Not Good Enough for the song.

 

http://reactiongifs.me/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/sad-kid-reaction-gif.gif

Edited by Hurricane

http://livelikeavip.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/rochelle.jpg

 

There you go :lol:

 

She pulls of being pregnant so well ❤❤ She Looks sooooooooo amazing.

Create an account or sign in to comment

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.