Jump to content

Featured Replies

Posted
tumblr_mk8h9jraum1s4yn6uo1_400.gif

Hello Sats Forum Members! It's been a minute since we've done any music related countdowns, so over the next week we will be counting down the Top Saturdays Tracks as determined by (you guessed it) your Song Sorter results!

http://www.buzzjack.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=176350

This countdown should be interesting and accurate as there is no strategy involved. You've already posted your Song Sorter results based strictly on which songs you like the most, not which ones you feel are most deserving, etc. The only downside is this excludes b-sides, but we all know Wildfire is their best anyway :kink:

If you never posted in the Song Sorter thread then that's too bad, because I'm not accepting late votes. That's what you get for not participating! Special thanks to Sean for posting the Song Sorter link to begin with :heart:

EDIT: This also excludes WAYWF, WTTD, and 808. Oops.

Edited by (Zach)

  • Replies 278
  • Views 12k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Well, was 'Wildfire' included or not, I can't remember, you know it being both a b-side and a bonustrack.

 

I think 'Not Giving Up' could chart really well.

  • Author
Wildfire and Move On U were both included!
Why is everyone claiming Move On U is a bonus track? It was on my regular album when I downloaded it?
  • Author
Why is everyone claiming Move On U is a bonus track? It was on my regular album when I downloaded it?

I believe it was iTunes only Tim.

Nope, y'all are liars. Amazon and Wiki have it listed as a regular track. Stop discrediting one of their best tracks :cry:
It was classed as a bonus track, but they never sold a version of the album without it.
  • Author
*Results Incoming*




























55. No One 45.81 Average
Highest Marks: #31 (Tim) #33 (Jonjo) #38 (Cameron)
Lowest Marks: #54 (Joe) #54 (Juliano) #54 (Zach)

Well, the dead last loser comes in the form of No One. I think it's safe to say that there are no surprises here. No One is very forgettable and has not aged well. It's highest mark was a #31 from Tim which is downright embarrassing. Out of 16 participants only 5 put it in their Top 40. FLOP

54. Vulnerable 43.38 Average
Highest Marks: #7 (Joe) #21 (Totto) #30 (Cameron)
Lowest Marks: #55 (Juliano) #55 (Tim) #55 (Jonjo) #55 (Calum Hood)

Up next is the underrated, overhated Vulnerable. While the vocal production is absolutely terrible (I think this is RoboMollie's first summoning), it's an unoffensive track with a good enough chorus. Vulnerable actually managed a few higher scores, getting a #7 from Joe and a #21 from Totto. Babes.

53. Why Me, Why Now 40.25 Average
Highest Marks: #26 (Will) #26 (Ultraviolence) #30 (Cameron)
Lowest Marks: #50 (Liam) #50 (Zach) #48 (Hurricane)

The first time I listened to this song in full was only a few months ago as I was never motivated by the snippets. It was what I expected. Highest marks come from Will and Ultraviolence, both of whom ranked it at #26.

Thank god for Why Me, Why Now, bye won't be missed.
  • Author



52. Not Good Enough 39.81 Average
Highest Marks: #17 (Totto) #22 (Sean) #23 (Ultraviolence)
Lowest Marks: #54 (Lee) #51 (Tim) #50 (Juliano)

Not Good Enough is the next to fall out at #52. Not Good Enough is a tad underrated but pales in comparison to the many other amazing Sats tracks. Totto is the biggest fan of this track, ranking it at #17. Lee, Tim, and Juliano are not having it. This is our first track to have a Top 40 average.

51. Problem With Love 39.56 Average
Highest Marks: #7 (Joe) #21 (Tim) #29 (Sean)
Lowest Marks: #55 (Lee) #55 (Martyn) #55 (April)

Thought it was over but it's only the beginning of heartbreak, break, break, break, break, break, break me. Una's flawless verse is the best part of this song. Problem With Love becomes the first track from Living For The Weekend to exit the countdown. While clearly one of their more loathed tracks with three members putting it in last, a few high marks helped it rise a bit. Problem With Love isn't nearly as bad as people act, although the dubstep middle-8 feels a bit out of place.

I can't believe how much Joe and Totto loves Vulnerable :o

 

Like Zach says, because we're babes :( To be honest I though I loved it more, it was one the songs that made me like them.

 

52. Not Good Enough 39.81 Average

Highest Marks: #17 (Totto) #22 (Sean) #23 (Ultraviolence)

Lowest Marks: #54 (Lee) #51 (Tim) #50 (Juliano)

Not Good Enough is the next to fall out at #52. Not Good Enough is a tad underrated but pales in comparison to the many other amazing Sats tracks. Totto is the biggest fan of this track, ranking it at #17. Lee, Tim, and Juliano are not having it. This is our first track to have a Top 40 average.

 

 

:drama: Rochelle's vocals :drama:

Edited by Totto

52. Not Good Enough 39.81 Average

Highest Marks: #17 (Totto) #22 (Sean) #23 (Ultraviolence)

Lowest Marks: #54 (Lee) #51 (Tim) #50 (Juliano)

 

51. Problem With Love 39.56 Average

Highest Marks: #7 (Joe) #21 (Tim) #29 (Sean)

Lowest Marks: #55 (Lee) #55 (Martyn) #55 (April)

 

As if the sorter put a Jam produced track so high!

 

853621.gif

Why is Problem With Love so high?

I actually listened to it the other day on massive speakers instead of on headphones and it's actually a massive track. In fact, had there been a tour for Living For The Weekend, I'm sure they would have chosen that track over a favorite of the fans, it just sounds huge.

 

The biggest problem with the track is obviously the lyrics. They are just awful, awful, awful. Such a shame.

 

Then there's the production. It does sound massive, but it still sound dater and cheap by moment.

 

And obviously ; the vocal production.

 

I think the position it's at right now is appropriate. It's hardly a 'No One' case, in my opinion.

 

I'm more shocked about 'Not Good Enough' being out already. It's nice, despite the clunky lyric in the chorus.

Create an account or sign in to comment

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.