December 4, 200618 yr Author sLvqcJHwKL0 think this films gonna be style over substance? ( :lol: hope you have seen this trailer at your local Lichtspielhaus, where they do this and start the trailer off again. dont you think the voice over make it sound like some dodgy 1980s horror on anchor bay???)
December 5, 200618 yr It's directed by Tony Scott, so that kinda answers the question really..... :lol: :lol: He doesn't really do 'deep and meaningful'....
December 5, 200618 yr Hahahaha, great post!!! I quite wanna see this...although it does my head in how you have to see the trailer twice before every film :lol: Maybe they've indoctrinated me to want to see it...
December 5, 200618 yr Hahahaha, great post!!! I quite wanna see this...although it does my head in how you have to see the trailer twice before every film :lol: Maybe they've indoctrinated me to want to see it... Yeah they did that at VUE. :lol: Whilst trying to incorporate this stupid competition by making the trailers slighty different. :lol: This looks quite good though. ^_^ Looks quite a good concept for a film.
December 5, 200618 yr This looks quite good though. ^_^ Looks quite a good concept for a film. It's not in the least bit original even though it appears to give that impression.. From what I've read of the plot, they just seem to have totally nicked the plot from the Jean Claude Van Damme action film "Timecop".... It's basically just a 'time travel' story with a few nobs added on.... It's nowt to do with actual 'deja vu' which is a feeling or a sense, nowt to do with time travel...
December 25, 200618 yr Author It's not in the least bit original even though it appears to give that impression.. From what I've read of the plot, they just seem to have totally nicked the plot from the Jean Claude Van Damme action film "Timecop".... It's basically just a 'time travel' story with a few nobs added on.... It's nowt to do with actual 'deja vu' which is a feeling or a sense, nowt to do with time travel... i thought it was alright (obv not as good as enemy of the state), even though the city of new orleans shouldnt have spent all that money on that expensive time machine that can only go back something like 4 days and a few hours when they could have gone on eBay and got a '83 DMC-12 with added flux capacitor and several decades on the clock for a % of the price :lol: :lol: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/6a/Back_left.JPG
December 25, 200618 yr It's a totally stupid film, but it just about manages to keep the attention, it's at least well-made and Denzel Washington lends it a certain credibility by his convincing acting job... I rather get the impression that really the ONLY reason the film is decent is because of Denzel's performance, anyone else in that role would've just made the film fall on its arse I reckon....
December 27, 200618 yr Author It's a totally stupid film, but it just about manages to keep the attention, it's at least well-made and Denzel Washington lends it a certain credibility by his convincing acting job... I rather get the impression that really the ONLY reason the film is decent is because of Denzel's performance, anyone else in that role would've just made the film fall on its arse I reckon.... yeah, well i suppose with any other actor it would have looked even more like a bad sf timetravel version of 24. could be a good tv pilot on the other hand. http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/7/7b/Runaway_jury.jpg btw when i was watching deja vu i actually had deja vu and thought i had seen this film before in one new orleans scene. but it was runnaway jury instead that i was thinking about :lol:
Create an account or sign in to comment