Not at all, but like I said before, people are picking the wrong battle here. So a man who believes in debating if the Holocaust ever happened should be a member of the Labour Party? That is not a good look and no surprise people are blinkered by his associations of being a socialist (and not a very good one for the record) rather than his actual views.

 

Evidence? Sounds like more tall tales from Margaret Hodge, a Tory in disguise.

Evidence? Sounds like more tall tales from Margaret Hodge, a Tory in disguise.

 

What evidence do you need? He's part of a group with very dodgy views, he's made countless past comments about anti-semitism and has openly called for debates on the validity of the Holocaust. He is a champagne socialist, part of the "do as I say, not as I do" crew. He is no loss to the Labour Party and like I said before, I doubt he is even bothered and I can't even believe the likes of the "left" want to be associated with him.