Jump to content

Should a 'recurrents' chart and rules be brought in? 30 members have voted

  1. 1. yes or no

    • yes
      6
    • no
      23

Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Featured Replies

Posted

Looking at the new chart it seems that while its good that record companies cant delete a record to get rid of their dingle so they can line up the nxt release (or put a sticker with a record that they no is not gonna do as good) the chart is just getting full up of the big big radio/tv/ad airplay releases.

 

So should a 'recurrents' chart and rules be brought in? like they do in the Hot 100 over in the states?

 

 

  • Replies 8
  • Views 1.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

If a song is popular then it's popular. No-one complained when Sinatra's 'My Way' stayed in the chart for over two years. His label didn't delete it, they didn't give away a free commemorative Frank cigarette card to make it ineligible (not that it would have anyway) etc.

 

We've just got rid of all the stupid rules that were created in the 90s and now you want to impose more?

 

The American charts count for absolutely nothing and never have done (Mariah Carey and Boyz II Men at number one for the whole of 1991 - 1995 anyone? Well, nearly.) - their example is not one to follow.

If a song is popular then it's popular.

 

We've just got rid of all the stupid rules that were created in the 90s and now you want to impose more?

I agree with this. I want the charts to record what people are buying.

I want the charts to record what people are buying.

Yep, i agree with that :D

NO

 

This new chart is now even more reflective of popular taste :winner:

As they say, "If it ain't broke, don't fix it"

A fairly big No from me.

 

If say Queen's Don't Stop Me Now or the Proclaimers - 500 Miles sells enough legal downloads to chart, then it should count.

Looking at the new chart it seems that while its good that record companies cant delete a record to get rid of their dingle so they can line up the nxt release (or put a sticker with a record that they no is not gonna do as good) the chart is just getting full up of the big big radio/tv/ad airplay releases.

 

So should a 'recurrents' chart and rules be brought in? like they do in the Hot 100 over in the states?

 

Absolutely NOT - that would defeat the whole purpose of the new chart rules!

 

If a song is popular then it's popular. No-one complained when Sinatra's 'My Way' stayed in the chart for over two years. His label didn't delete it, they didn't give away a free commemorative Frank cigarette card to make it ineligible (not that it would have anyway) etc.

 

I agree with you.

 

Actually My Way spent a total of 122 weeks on the singles chart (although not continuous) but was in & out of the chart for 3 years.

 

That was at the time when record companies only deleted singles when they didn't sell at all. As long as people kept ordering it, it was available. You could by some singles as much as 5 years after initial release.

 

The stupid rules brought in in the mid-90s ruined the chart making them so boring. Now 21 years later we may have interesting charts again.

Create an account or sign in to comment

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.