Hope it gets a good entry.......its a nice song.......

Anna.XXXXXXXXXX

I dont think it will make the top10...maybe struggle for a top40 new entry more like!

yes i think it will struggle

i think it will be lucky if it goes top 40, definatley not going to be any higher than top 30.

good song though think it deserves top 15 at least.

dont think its good enough for me to be buying it though

i can see it getting top 60 tbh :(

i hope it does wel :( it won't make top 20 tho :(

woolies won't be stocking it.. they never with shakira's illegal and look how it effected that :(

 

Its boring

course its gonna do sh!t

why didnt she release Loves me Not?

its a shame if it doesnt cos i think she sings it beautifully :)

Like Simon Webbe, I see a bomb coming...

The fact is, Beverley Knight's past 4 singles have all been far better than Emma's latest effort and they too can struggle for a top 40/20 placing. And i truly believe that this single does not deserve to rank highly in the chart - its effortless and boring.

Everyone.........................

 

 

GO OUT AND BUY IT NOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

 

Thank you pleaase!!!! :lol: :P

No sign of it in the midweeks. :(

does that mean it is not top 20 or not top 75?

56.

I think she's gonna get dropped, I don't often say that, but I think it's inevitable. :(

56.

 

it can still go up, but i think it will go down, i may buy this tomorow, actualy maybe i wont as that wollies only stocks a top 20, but i can get it on thursday when i go shopping!!

56 us actually better than i expected...its not commercial enough and hasnt had much promotion. but tbh i don't think she really cares she said shes just soo happy to be pregnant and can't wait to have the baby, i dont think the music is her main priority atm.

What a pity, poor Emma. :(

cannot believe her shockingly low entry into the chart! #60 is appauling, its notlike its a rubbish song or lacked promotion! shame on the people out there for not buying it! specially for Valentines! :unsure: