Posted March 13, 200718 yr CULTURE BOX ECLECTIC ARTIST Jamie T's second single is getting a re-issure on May 7th :D Good idea I thought So Lonely Was The Ballad was going to be the next single but this re-issue should do better NlhCJaAU44U
March 13, 200718 yr It sames to change every other minute :o I prefer this to "Salvador" though I must confess...
March 13, 200718 yr Author Jo Whiley confirmed it was this one, with a b-side called Rawhide, a collaboration with Lily Allen
March 13, 200718 yr Jo Whiley confirmed it was this one, with a b-side called Rawhide, a collaboration with Lily Allen Oh I see. First it was So Lonely Was The Ballad, then Zane Lowe said it was Salvador and now it's Sheila. I still think both SLWTB and Salvador will be released as future singles. I like Sheila and it's definitley one of the most commercial on the album, but I mean it was only released something like 8 months ago. I know Salvador would be a re-release as well, but first time around that got minimal airplay and zero promotion.
March 13, 200718 yr Yeah "Sheila" wasn't released all that long ago, I don't see the benefit of re-releasing that EVER again tbh. It's had it times as a single, I mean it was hardly totally obscure.
March 13, 200718 yr Agreed. Record companies should be ashamed of themselves. Re-releases are such a quick fix...and it's getting more and more common. This means they can increase the 'shelf-life' of the album by releasing the 3rd, 4th, 5th and 6th singles later on (Christ! 'Indie' artists used to get a shed load of abuse for releasing more than two singles off an album) Boycott it...start as petition for one of the others or something.
March 15, 200718 yr Agreed. Record companies should be ashamed of themselves. Re-releases are such a quick fix...and it's getting more and more common. This means they can increase the 'shelf-life' of the album by releasing the 3rd, 4th, 5th and 6th singles later on (Christ! 'Indie' artists used to get a shed load of abuse for releasing more than two singles off an album) Boycott it...start as petition for one of the others or something. i suppose if they can run with an album campaign (and monopolize tescos away from the usual rubbish) they will do so until they feel that artist is truely establish as an a-lister. but only with a 'new signing', come the next album if this campaign is over and first single of the new one doesnt work thats it. however he ecclectic. so should be able to sustain intertest to fans over a few different genres
April 26, 200718 yr 2007 Video: xOpG86tTiyQ Really liking this video at the moment. Is a fun video but a well known actor (Bob Hoskins) in it, but it has a very powerful message in it, as shown by the ending.
April 27, 200718 yr Yeah, but Bob Hoskins looks ridiculous mouthing along :D :D :D He really does, but it's a good ridiculous rather than a bad ridiculous. If say Jamie T were playing the part of the part that Bob Hoskins play it really wouldn't have the same affect on the audience though.
May 2, 200718 yr Everything Jamie T does sounds so good to listen to, but I'd know why his voice is rather difficult to follow, but somehow his stuff just sounds great.
May 12, 200718 yr This should hopefully be charting within the Top20 this week! :D The b-side to this is also very good. ^_^ It's good enough to be on the album at least. :D
May 12, 200718 yr Everything Jamie T does sounds so good to listen to, but I'd know why his voice is rather difficult to follow he reminds me slightly of if Dizzee Rascal tried to do a mike skinner impression
May 14, 200718 yr I really like the song, and I'm glad the reissue has beaten the peak of it's original release, but I much prefer the 2006 video. Bob Hoskins and everyone else in that video are terrible at lip-syncing. I suppose the new video has more to do with the actual meaning of the song than the first video though.
May 15, 200718 yr Sometime totally infectious about this song. Justing loving it at the moment. Like the new video also, as it explains the song a little.
Create an account or sign in to comment