Jump to content

Featured Replies

Precisely why an emo board is needed - they really shouldn't be on this board at all. This is probably the last place, dance excepting, I would stick an MCR topic.

 

Emo is really an offshoot of "Alternative" though, so this kinda is the only place for it, it didn't always used to be this crappy though.... At one point (mainly mid-90s) there were some really good Emo bands....

 

  • Replies 26
  • Views 4.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Take it back - My Chemical Romance would put themselves in punk / metal rather than here.

 

Yeah man i think that they will do that too. However its the whole problem of the genre areas are you gonna think of genres and what people think of genres per urban tribes and styles, or are you just gonna try and get a forum area to one or two people's taste. theres not enough forum areas to fully map out all the different sub-genres and tribal interests.

 

anyway indie vs rock probably just boils down to the mods vs rockers thing from 40 years ago and one ended up inventing Oasis and dadrock the other MCR and emo. MCR look out of place next to very twee stuff (even if critics are saying the new single sounds like Bryan Adams worst).

 

it is laughable esp when left in the punk area you've got Fightstar, (previous pop-punkers) Sum 41 and Fightstar. Obv itsone rule for one and not for another.

 

i think this should go in the punk / metal and then let the vicious critism rage. it is an entertainment discusson area not just a fricking love in.

 

Once again we need a board for emo...

 

man i tried. man i tried, i've done rock in general, modern rock etc etc.

 

 

it is laughable esp when left in the punk area you've got Fightstar, (previous pop-punkers) Sum 41 and Fightstar. Obv itsone rule for one and not for another.

 

Personally, I dont really want Fightstar in there either.... Grunge-lite bollocks.... Almost as bad as Nickleback, Creed, Puddle of Mudd and all those other sh!tty North American bands who just watered down the likes of Tad, Nirvana, Alice In Chains, etc....

 

The particular tracks that were posted by Chapstik have a certain amount of Metally-ness to them, so they've more right to be there....

Personally, I dont really want Fightstar in there either.... Grunge-lite bollocks.... Almost as bad as Nickleback, Creed, Puddle of Mudd and all those other sh!tty North American bands who just watered down the likes of Tad, Nirvana, Alice In Chains, etc....

 

The particular tracks that were posted by Chapstik have a certain amount of Metally-ness to them, so they've more right to be there....

 

well in one respect its good that you want that area to be totally the more extreme ultra hardcore area of the metal spectrum, but metal on the whole can be seen as wider than that encompassing a much larger and perhaps $h!tter genre aspects.

 

however i suppose you cant have it both ways and have one ultra exclusive and here having anything. thats why i think that MCR should be moved to pop with bon jovi, linkin park and nickelback as obv they are not alternative. they are the mainstream

well in one respect its good that you want that area to be totally the more extreme ultra hardcore area of the metal spectrum, but metal on the whole can be seen as wider than that encompassing a much larger and perhaps $h!tter genre aspects.

 

I dont consider the likes of Iron Maiden, Metallica, Judas Priest, etc to be particularly "ultra hardcore".... They're just 'Metal' bands..... I cant stand Manowar or Dream Evil, but I certainly would never argue that a Manowar or Dream Evil thread shouldn't be in the Metal Forum, it would be a ludicrous thing to state in any case.... But it should be incredibly obvious to anyone that bands like My Chemical Romance are NOT Metal... Not even slightly.... And I dont give a sh!t how many cover stories rags like fukkin' Kerrang!! give them....

 

I would hardly call them 'emo', like Fall out boy(once my favourite band) they are complete sell outs,their previous album was far better before they changed their style to become popular and to be honest i cant really stand them or Fall Out Boy,even one of my friends who is really into 'pop' (he likes britney,xtina ect and doesnt like any indie,emo bands) bought their recent single. :puke2:
I dont consider the likes of Iron Maiden, Metallica, Judas Priest, etc to be particularly "ultra hardcore".... They're just 'Metal' bands.....

 

Neither would I. Actually I think Judas Priest to be quite funny when they come on the hits with Breaking the law, and actually I think Metallica were Q for Quiet in the hits Metal ABC. I was just trying to make a definition without naming bands of the kind of things you all may want in there towards the things (that are now in the pop area) that you do not the ultra mainstreem cheese. Just trying to get the vibe across without being pedantic about it. Argeeably genres are flexible things there is no right or wrong and in many cases one definition for another can be used and one definition gets superceeded when something else comes out or a definition dated from the 1970s to now etc etc whether you wanna use heavy blues, hard rock, metal, classic rock. the point is if the indie area is gonna be so totally wide and full of tricky, portishead, air, 1995 britpop, the thrills, twee stuff etc etc shouldnt the metal/punk area for the sake of two mcr threads and maybe one nickelback be as wide as well. you can always slag them off it is an entertainment discussion ffs site not a 'lets all worship the rock god and have Austin Winkler's babies site!!!!!

 

here's some info:

 

http://www.tbpcontrol.co.uk/TWS/CoverImages_1_9/184/353/1843534150.jpg

http://www.turntablelab.com/images/content/1/0/10845.jpg

 

The Rough Guide to Heavy Metal

 

The Rough Guide to Heavy Metal is the definitive guide to every dark star and bright supernova of the heavy metal universe, from death metal to classic rock. Features include:

• Career biographies of more than 300 bands and artists, from Black Sabbath and Led Zeppelin to The Darkness, Linkin Park and Kyuss, highlighting their highs and lows, their triumphs and disasters, the hair and the horrors.

• Coverage of every breed of leather-clad sub-genre, from thrash to southern rock and from Christian metal to hair metal and glam.

• Feature boxes on the best guitar solos, drum performances, metal movies, album artwork, ballads, bizarre cover versions, and much more.

• Critical discographies for every entry, reviewing the best of what's available on CD, with additional recommendations and reviews of the best of the rest.

• Copius illustrations including pictures from the finest metal photographers, concert shots and album covers.

 

What The Press Say

The ultimate triumph here is that Berelian has written a guide that novices can dip into and learn from and that even die-hard fans of metal will find worthwhile. - Classic Rock

 

The author’s done his homework and knows his stuff. . .Top stuff. - Rock Sound

Essi Berelian clearly knows his stuff. . . and the numerous boxouts are great. - Record Collector

 

Editorial Reviews

 

Book Description

With more than 300 artist biographies and band stories, this is the essential heavy metal companion. Additional features include dozens of boxouts and sidebars on topics as diverse and disturbing as Weird Hobbies, Christian Metal, the Japanese Scene, Weird Day Jobs, the Eastern European Scene, Hardcore Crossover and Drummer Jokes. From Alien Ant Farm to Biohazard – and yes, all the way to ZZ Top – the Rough Guide to Heavy Metal is the ultimate brain-warping A to Z. If you love metal, this is the book for you.

 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Product Details

 

Paperback: 410 pages

Publisher: Rough Guides (August 15, 2005)

Language: English

ISBN-10: 1843534150

ISBN-13: 978-1843534150

Product Dimensions: 9.1 x 6.7 x 0.9 inches

 

http://ec2.images-amazon.com/images/P/0385197977.01._SCTHUMBZZZ_.jpg

 

Heavy Metal Thunder: The Music, Its History, Its Heroes (Paperback)

 

Editorial Reviews

From Publishers Weekly

Writer-musician Bashe, managing editor of International Musician and Recording World and a contributor to The Rolling Stone Rock Almanac, dissects this anarchic musical style in a well-researched, authoritative study. He cites at least two sources for the origins of the "heavy metal" label (William Burroughs's Naked Lunch and Steppenwolf's 1968 song "Born to Be Wild") while tracing the sound from Link Wray's 1954 guitar distortions to "the first true heavy-metal single," the Kinks' 1964 "You Really Got Me." After more history, Bashe discusses 10 metallic groups (Black Sabbath, Judas Priest, Scorpions, Rush, AC/DC, Van Halen, Iron Maiden, Def Leppard, Quiet Riot and Motley Crue), concluding with a chronology and a discography for metalhead collectors.

 

Copyright 1985 Reed Business Information, Inc.

 

Product Details

 

Paperback: 213 pages

Publisher: Dolphin Books; 1st ed edition (September 1985)

Language: English

ISBN-10: 0385197977

ISBN-13: 978-0385197977

 

http://www.geocities.com/lord_of_ocelot/encyclopedia.jpg

The Encyclopedia of Heavy Metal (Paperback) by Daniel Bukszpan

 

Editorial Reviews

 

Book Description

 

Headbangers rejoice, because this fantastically illustrated encyclopedia includes all things Metal, from influential bands such as Led Zeppelin, Blue Cheer, Iron Butterfly, Kiss, and Queen, to Mötley Crue, Black Sabbath (before Ozzy became a family sitcom star), Deep Purple, Twisted Sister, and Aerosmith, right up to Jane's Addiction, Las Cruces, Limp Bizkit, and today's most extreme death metal bands. Not a single sub-genre or band goes uncovered. Well-researched and fact-filled, the witty text befits the raucous bands that push musical-and all other-boundaries. From obscure groups like Armored Saint and Norway's Mayhem to pioneers Grand Funk Railroad and Iron Maiden to megastars like Ozzy Osbourne, Alice Cooper, Lita Ford, Van Halen, Joan Jett, and Marilyn Manson, each entry contains vital statistics: a description of the band's history and sound; an essential discography; the most current, comprehensive, popular compilations; and much more. Special features cover such important details as "Metal Fashion" and the various metal genres. Def Leppard, Faith No More, Guns n' Roses, Judas Priest, Metallica, AC/DC, Nine-Inch Nails, Poison, Rage Against the Machine, and Japan's Loudness: all of the favorite (and not so favorite) adrenaline-pumped, bizarre bands that make heavy metal the unique form it is appear in all their glory.

 

Product Details

 

Paperback: 300 pages

Publisher: Sterling (October 1, 2003)

Language: English

ISBN-10: 0760742189

ISBN-13: 978-0760742181

Product Dimensions: 11.3 x 11.2 x 1.4 inches

 

btw have you seen the cd on the cover of classic rock magazine:

 

On this month’s FREE CD we deliver 14 cracking tracks from must-have albums by Whitesnake, Black Sabbath, Thunder, Courtney Love, He Is Legend and more…

 

yes, the word metal has been used by them, maybe you should sue :lol:

 

for fun try the hair metal quiz at ew.com

 

http://www.ew.com/ew/article/0,,20016362__20016359,00.html

 

 

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.