Posted May 22, 200718 yr The little girls with their fingers in the pop dyke ALERT! ALERT! In the next few months the world's most amazing songwriters and producers will find out whether the best pop songs they've written in the last few years have made it onto the Britney or Kylie albums. Most of the rejected songs will have been knocked back because they are 'too pop', 'too commercial', 'too good', 'too likely to make people want to buy a record' and so on. Which means that in the next few months there could be a huge pop tidal wave as Literally The Most Amazing Music Of All Time is suddenly up for grabs. THIS IS WHAT EMI SHOULD DO NOW 1. Invent seven girlgroups, two solo singers, two Booty Luv-style dance outfits and one indie band who don't mind pretending they write their own material when really it's by Jewels & Stone or whoever. 2. Divvy up between the above-mentioned acts the - what, more than a thousand? - rejected Kylie songs of which we suspect more than 150 are of a standard that would make Lisa Scott-Lee weep. 3. Chuck in however many decent songs were also rejected by All Saints, Roisin Murphy and Jamelia, as well as the ones which they know full well will never make it onto the second Lily Allen album. 4. Launch one act a month for the whole of 2008 because everyone knows that it doesn't actually need to cost a million quid to launch a group if the songs are good enough which in this case they are. 5. Watch as SonyBMG do the same with all the Britney rejects which are probably even better than the Kylie rejects because people would rather have a song on the Britney album for reasons as diverse as cash and money. 5. JOB DONE. THIS IS WHAT EMI SHOULD NOT DO NOW 1. Leave the songs on 'the shelf' or in 'the drawer' to rot. Right? Right. http://www.popjustice.com/index.php?option...id=1127&Ite mid=206
May 23, 200718 yr Author They make it sound as if both of their record labels don't know what good pop music is... I mean they may be dense at times, but please!
May 23, 200718 yr :rofl: What a great article!!! :lol: But both Britney and Kylie were given great songs that weren't rejected. Anyways, if I remember right: "Toxic" was offered to Kylie, she rejected and then it was offered to Britney who accepted it :wacko: "Sweet Dreams My LA Ex" was offered to Britney, she rejected and then it was given to Rachel Stevens :( Britney also rejected "Graffiti My Soul" which was later given to Girls Aloud. Those three are amazing songs!
May 23, 200718 yr Author MATM did very well considering it was very dance oritentated... I love that song :angry:
May 24, 200718 yr Well, I said disaster meaning it never had lead single potential. I really like it too!
May 27, 200718 yr I think Toxic was only given to her since she rejected Sweet Dreams My LA Ex... otherwise If I remember right she was going to give Toxic to Rachel Stevens. So thank GOD for that! :) Edited May 27, 200718 yr by Music Maniac
May 28, 200718 yr I think Toxic was only given to her since she rejected Sweet Dreams My LA Ex... otherwise If I remember right she was going to give Toxic to Rachel Stevens. So thank GOD for that! :) Lol, thank the Lord she didn't gave "Toxic" to La Stevens :lol: She should've kept both songs, though :cry:
