Jump to content

Featured Replies

Posted

Net Set To Tighten On Downloaders

Downloading Video

The Secrets Of 7Digital 3:03 Choose Your News

Personalise your news

Help

Use the drop down menu below to filter stories and videos the way you want - when you want it!

 

 

 

Sky Unveils Music Service

6:42am UK, Thursday July 24, 2008

 

Britain's six biggest internet service providers are clamping down on people illegally downloading music and films.

 

Illegal file-sharing costs the industry millions

 

 

The ground-breaking fightback against online piracy will begin with service providers sending letters to thousands of the most prolific downloaders, telling them their activity has been detected and is being monitored.

 

It is thought that around 6.5 million Britons have downloaded files illegally over the past year.

 

Estimates suggest that the practice will cost the music industry up to £1bn over the next five years.

 

But the six biggest internet service providers - BT, Virgin Media, Orange, Tiscali, BSkyB and Carphone Warehouse - have signed up to a government drive addressing unlawful file-sharing.

 

It is understood that the ISPs have agreed to commit themselves to developing legal file-sharing services and to ensure their customers know that it is illegal to share copyright-protected music.

 

It has been reported that people who are downloading illegally and ignore warnings could be subject to online surveillance and have their internet speeds reduced - making it very difficult for them to download large files.

 

Fergal Sharkey, the former Undertones singer who is now chief executive of British Music Rights, the body which represents musicians, said: "This is something of a step into the unknown for the internet providers, music industries and ministers.

 

"But we can't go on without it - no business can survive after losing as much revenue as the music industry has."

 

ISPs and film and music companies are also expected to develop a new code of practice together on how they will deal with infringements - which could be backed up by new laws.

 

 

 

Courtesy...SKY NEWS.....

 

:huh:

 

  • Replies 3
  • Views 632
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Author
:cry:

 

online surveillance :blink:

 

:cry: ..I know...BB is watching you & knows where you live..... :P

  • Author

By Nigel Morris, Home Affairs Correspondent

Friday, 25 July 2008

 

The Big Question: What is being done to tackle illegal downloading, and will it succeed?

 

Independent.co.uk Web

 

Musicians have welcomed moves to combat the boom in illegal file-sharing by charging internet users an annual fee to download music. The plan – revealed by The Independent yesterday – is being championed by ministers as a way of tacking the boom in internet piracy.

 

 

Internet service providers (ISPs) and the music industry are to write to thousands of prolific downloaders warning them they are breaking the law. Andy Burnham, the Culture Secretary, wants them to follow the move by drawing up joint plans to make music fans pay for downloads. Sections of the music industry are suggesting the yearly levy would be between £20 and £30, with the cash raised channelled back to artists and composers.

 

British Music Rights, which represents musicians, said such a move would throw a lifeline to British songwriters, as 95 per cent of them receive less than £5,000 a year in royalties.

 

Feargal Sharkey, former lead singer of The Undertones, who is now chief executive of British Music Rights, said the music industry needed to find a way of providing "a huge range of services competitively priced to suit all the demands the customer possibly has".

 

He said: "I could envisage at one end of the scale, for nothing more than a couple of pounds a month, being allowed to download X amount of tracks. And possibly at the other end of the scale, for a slightly larger sum of money, there is the entire catalogue of the music industry and you can have of it as much as you want as frequently as you want, and any number of variations in between."

 

Mr Burnham said it was not the Government's job to negotiate deals over the prices internet users would pay to access music. But he added: "What we are saying is we do have to have a solution to this problem. And I don't think it's a controversial statement to say people should indeed pay for music. We've had a music industry that has led the world for decades – people feel very proud of that and if we are to carry on having that kind of industry we have to have a sustainable solution for them."

 

The Music Managers Forum gave a cautious welcome to the concept of an annual charge, calling for extra work on the idea with a view to presenting detailed proposals to the industry.

 

Tim Clark, who manages Robbie Williams, said: "We believe the idea needs to be evaluated. It needs the buy-in of the industry at large, but it's an idea worth exploring." He said the attraction of an annual charge was its simplicity, but difficult questions of how the cash would be shared out had to be addressed.

 

Mr Clark added: "The threat the industry faces from file-sharing is huge. Albums made three or four years ago which you might confidently think would sell seven or eight million now only sell three million. That is a massive drop and it's continuing to drop. Digital sales aren't going up nearly enough to be replacement revenue."

 

Source...The INDEPENDENT UK

Edited by Scorpio

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.