Barry George Not Guilty Of Dando Murder

taking this argument to its logical conclusion... then ALL evidence could be fabricated, or tampered with... therefore no one can ever be convicted!

 

you have to use common sense here, there has to be an acceptance level with ALL evidence. to ignore dna or forensics would be stupid as dispite there possible flaws, its still the most useful tool in capturing criminals and securing convictions.

I honestly dont know how you can make excuses for what is an outrageous miscarriage of justice based upon incredibly dubious forensic evidence which even your typical, ordianary Joe Public whose only knowledge of forensics comes from shows like CSI or Silent Witness could see was totally inconclusive..... If proper hard science had been applied here (as it certainly was NOT...), then that evidence should NEVER have been admitted into trial... You say it's an "administration" problem, like that fact is trivial.... It certainly is NOT a trivial point when you're dealing with the fact that this is the reason an innocent man was banged up for eight years, and for at least six of THOSE the fukkin' Home Office KNEW the evidence was dodgy but kept Barry George behind bars regardless because it was Jill Dando, MEEEEDJAAAAAHHHH celeb and not Jill Dando, check-out girl from Tesco or Asda.... <_< <_<

The "experts" need to be a hell of lot more honest about their science mate, simple as, they need to tell the absolute truth in a matter where a person is on trial for murder or rape, even if a guilty person may walk free, the science has to be absolute, it has to be 100% if this is the main method of securing a conviction.... Anything else is just not Empirical, and plain un-scientific.....