Posted June 4, 200619 yr Don't know if anyone here has seen this, but there is an article in today's Star saying that after last night's Wembley concert, Sarah has sensationally quit the band to go solo. The other girls have already been looking for a replacement in Aimee Kearsley from Clea, but she has apparently turned them down!! They have recorded three more songs for their 'Greatest Hits' album, but are worried that without a replacement for Sarah their time will soon be up!! What do you think? Julie
June 4, 200619 yr I don't think it's true, particularly because she's the worst singer - how could she make it solo? :rolleyes:
June 4, 200619 yr She is the least liked member of girls aloud and the worst singer so i doubt she would quit in this way, i also think if she had of quitted it would have made all of the uk papers and even on the news in some sort of way.... nadine and maybe cheryl will be the only ones to be able to make it as solo artists.
June 4, 200619 yr oh look sarah is the "next to go solo" to amount of times i've read about one of em going solo :P
June 4, 200619 yr Having watched the Girls Aloud fly on the wall documentary series I would imagine the remainder of Girls Aloud would be delighted (if this story is true, which I doubt) because she came across as a "mardy cow". And if true, surely they should bring in Javine as her replacement?
June 4, 200619 yr yawn! :rolleyes: If she did quit, the band would end, they would not bring in a replacement, they have said so many times!