http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3130/3174824788_48c5e7865b_b.jpg

 

She has a #1 album, recently entertained audiences on Good Morning America and shared the stage with Madonna. But with the March 3 launch of her concert tour in New Orleans, Britney Spears is hoping to regain much more: to fully reclaim the adulation and fame she had exactly 10 years ago, when her controversial single "Baby One More Time" shot to the top of the charts on Jan. 30, 1999.

 

But it's no secret that, as she starts to climb back to the top, there are sacrifices she's had to make along the way — specifically, spending less time with her two adorable sons, Sean Preston, 3, and Jayden James, 2.

 

Now, OK! has learned exclusivly the extraordinary price the singer is paying for her comeback, voluntarily giving up the fight to regain custody of her boys in exchange for fame.

 

Last fall, as her upcoming concert tour was being organized, Brit's camp discovered that because of the star's history, they could not purchase insurance to cover her tour unless she was still under the conservatorship of her father Jamie Spears. Until that point, the plan was for the conservatorship to be lifted on Dec. 31, followed by Britney, 27, heading to family court with a petition to regain custody of Preston and Jayden.

 

But an insider tells OK!, "The insurance situation changed everything."

 

And so, on Oct. 28, the singer agreed to indefinitely accept her father as her conservator – a decision which meant she would still legally be considered a child. No judge would give her custody of her kids, nor would her ex-husband, Kevin Federline, agree to it.

 

"Whether it was her decision or whether she was pressured into it, Britney's deal with the devil put the tour ahead of the kids," the insider tells OK!.

 

For more on OK!'s exclusive story, Pick up the new issue — on sale everywhere Thursday!

If thats true then thats really sad, but who knows what to believe with these stories.

The details are probably accurate, but not at all in the way that article is written. She was inevitably going to be kept under conservatorship, and thus wouldn't be able to have legal custody of the boys. So, what's the point in going round in circles, making everyones lives difficult, wasting everyones time and causing lots of unnecessary stress, fighting for something that just isn't possible? That's very different to, as they suggest, dumping her sons for fame.

There's the whole thing about the tour too. Supposedly she was supposed to be let out of the conservatorship last year sometime but with a tour planned she'd be less likely to get insurance for it. So then they decided to keep her under a permanent conservatorship for the time being? I don't know what's true or isn't. I'm sure she'd choose her boys over her career any day.