June 25, 200619 yr good question... personally i dont think itll make 1 iota of difference wether or not we have a nuclear deterant. the argies back in '82 still invaded the malvinas...oops... falklands!...lol.. and anyone dumb enough to attack us would be prepared to die for their cause anyway... so if some tin pot dictator wanted to nuke us... they would regardless.
June 25, 200619 yr Nope Spend the money on NHS, more police, education and so on and keep maybe 3 or 4 nukes, whats the point in having thousands when one would wipe out a city
June 26, 200619 yr No, because no country after the fall of the Soviet Union, is really a credible threat to UK or the EU... The main threat is from individual terrorist cells, not from States as such, and a nuclear deterrent would be totally futile in preventing terrorism... In fact, having nuclear (whether for military or civilian purposes) makes it more dangerous, all some terrorist would have to do is target a Nuclear power plant or a transport carrying nuclear material and we would have an utter catastrophe on our hands that would make 11 September look like nothing....
June 26, 200619 yr Yes, yes we should..... Lets take over the world!!!!! MWHAHAHAHA!!!!! or not -_- we don't need them, we're friends with everybody :cheer:
June 26, 200619 yr we'll never get them as it will cost too much over budget and be years late in getting them,that they will be obsolete.
Create an account or sign in to comment