Jump to content

Roguelt

Members
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Roguelt

  1. I strongly dislike the narrative of existing popularity will be determinent of success. As if that's not every artist at first. That will be positive fresh slate and having existing fanbase, industry experience and the like simultanesously. And any perception of will always be seen as missing something for the missing harmonies, but thats solely in view of existing fans who expect group formula in solo settings. We have nothing to base anticipated success off of.
  2. Wouldn't get hopes up. Between tour should have already happened prior to Between Us release (to not create this limbo before official hiatus) and treatment at last year's show suggests a big behind the scenes push to have big send off Last year was already the send off and wont do twice.
  3. Doubt it. Frankly think sole thing stopping it from being cancelled even under guise of virus, especially when happening long after when hiatus announced and BU release is contract with BBC for opener.
  4. The argument of ageism needs to stop. Beyond feeding it as okay, it's not true. Beyond Sia to prove not taking youth/sex appeal to sell... Debbie Harry, JLo, Fergie, Gwen, etc. If time changing this (when if anything opposite): Rina, Lizzo (that impossible to ignore having more prejudice that could be held against her but doesnt), etc. Then becomes argument of "unknown as individuals" as if not every artist at some point and if anything is a good thing as complete fresh start with benefits of 10 years in industry. We know nothing about what will or wont make them success. That outside of quality of team can get when however much repeat "mistreated XYZ" under label means nothing when existing career provides leverage for good deal, and an exit clause if mistreat that new signs comparing to dont.
  5. A day each. With admissions of being short days that Jade made up for. I'll leave it at that because (not remotely out of demanding more, rather fans being honest about it ) can go on and on about echo chamber of haven done so much (when tunnel visioning on "haven filmed five videos while pregnant") for working five days in eleven months. When in context of mat leave and prospects of group is supposed to be lead up to break not break itself (when fans simultanesouly whine about inactivity post Glory Days to then be constant seek for a break when already in one for haven done little in four years - and already in the "release 2-3 years" expected in break).
  6. It's based off one article that listed who would want to see on the show and based on is available while girls caring for babies and said was up for anything. And fans made that into a rumour. It's not one.
  7. Can someone who's on PJ ask the person who stated their friend worked on the shoot for her purple eyeshadow look a few weeks (months now?) back to see if it is an additional shoot for this deal or if there is an additional brand deal coming that that was for. Because that look isn't here despite the full campaign seemingly released.
  8. That should have happened a long time ago, especially once confirming solo activities, if truly on her or fans end that wants to be fully disassociated with group, not just reek the benefits without being a member in responsability. Solo act, treat her as such. And people are equally allowed to have dissenting opinions even regarding main topic of thread. That have more to support than supporters have to like music have nothing to base off of do outside of blind "support no matter what" (something that shouldn't be done).
  9. Radio 1 played a remix of HBA. OP said unsure if real and mistakenly played early, or a inhouse DJ edit, though. https:// mobile.twitter .com/jadememez/status/1413907899747811338 (Havent posted enough to be allowed to post links, so need to remove line breaks). Has more of a "climax" that many claimed original lacked. Anyone know if this is the remix David's been playing at events?
  10. There's a shot of a tablet and its brand logo in the HA vid that has to be a product placement.
  11. Absolutely not. It's always the show not artist that announces it. The fact that this speculaion gained so much traction makes no sense. Most viable thing for that to be true would be providing specifics of the performance (which in itself is not a big deal) after Brirs announce it, but they would already be teasing announement if coming Friday as usually a week in advance. And, I highly doubt it's a Confetti Deluxe as already have an Extended and vinyl release, and why wouldnt the vinyl be for the Deluxe edition if likely to be released around same time. And, despite leaking, LM has already officially announced the vinyl so not that either.
  12. "She enjoys her privacy" but she's the one doing this publicly as public figure in public situation. Everything she does on that account is an official PR statement or should be stated otherwise, and what she's doing speaks volumes especially considering the more obvious signs of who to unfollow and outright speak are likely legally prevented. She is accountable for what comes when throwing herself in the fire and those she's asking to consume it are doing so, even if negatively. There is too far, but no it does not ban negative reactions and frankly simply seeing it for what it is to save her from mental anguish for simply talking about what she's asking people to do because her mental health when she's proving bullshit and neglect to it herself.