Hilderic

Thank you!

Hello, does anybody have a list of the songs which spent most weeks in the UK top 40? I'm more interested in consecutive weeks, but total weeks would also be nice. Thank you in advance.

I can see Let It Go ultimately going top 10 thanks to X Factor. I would actually be surprised if they didn't sing it.

Go Idina. But For the First Time in Forever deserves to be higher than Do You Want to Build a Snowman?

Roughly 6 million, actually. Still huge, of course.

2009- Replay- Iyaz (#2) 2010- Solo - Iyaz (#32) 2011- Pretty Girls- Iyaz (#43) I suppose he counts, right?

Yes, that's what I meant. Thank you!

What happened to the OZ song? I cannot find it.

As I said before, people here are not condemning the idea of speaking one's mind, however negatively, about her. They are condemning the celebration of her death, from ethical and/or logical points of view.

I don't think this is the point. There has been a number of more or less official obituaries of a negative character. Her legacy has been democratically discussed in Parliament, with her opponents freely commenting on her. So people have spoken ill of her and this has not been condemned here. What is "bad" to many is for her death to be celebrated. Regardless of whether this is moral or immoral, it seems to be strongly illogical.

I genuinely do not understand this statement. There are scores of negative articles about her on the Guardian website and on plenty more newspapers. The opinions of Morrissey, Ken Loach and the likes have been amply reported. Several others newspapers have called her divisive, harsh and uncompromising. Clearly the right-wing press (especially tabloids) is painting her as a hero, because this is what she was for their readers. But that is just a portion of the media and we are far from North Korea-style mourning...

What is the reason for Clown's climb? Before Graham Norton, I mean.

Hello, do you know if Skyfall is now the Bond theme with the highest sales? Thank you.

I had read the rest of the thread and I already said that I accept what you said afterwards. But after explaining, you suggested that "so many" were wrong because of their inability to read between the lines. I know I am being irritating but this actually irritates me. Torresgirl commented on your post after you explained your point so her ability to infer from the original post is a pure hypothesis. But I do realise I am being irritating so I conclude this post with my apologies.

You suggested ignorance on the part of others here: When your original post means one thing and one thing only. I accept what you said afterwards (which is a different thing and cannot be inferred from the original post, no matter how much reading between the lines one does).