Sandro Raniere

The link was on Digital Spy sweetie So he is wrong then? :heehee: :heehee: Since you seem to love looking up facts to try make me look foolish by all means prove labour never said those things x

http://www.buzzfeed.com/martinshapland/lab...ax-bonanza-gimd

Labour are the party of the shirker not the worker

And wtf is it with that hair in that pic of her drinking the coke? Last time I saw that hairstyle was when Polly wore a wig like that in Fawlty Towers, in that episode where she had to lie in bed pretending to be Sybil when Sybil walked out in the Anniversary episode

Another X Factor flop jumping on the bandwagon, she came like 8th, the public made it clear they don't like her or she would have got to the final

Subject to certain criteria being the operative part though, i know an unemployed lad, nephew of a very good friend, he has this great idea for an app, he has done market research, has all the designs in place but what he lacks is the money to take it to market, needs about 2k to complete, he is the sort of person that could be helped in this sort of thing, if the government were to invest 2k in him and take a stake in the venture and it is a success then they would get their money back and more, not everyone is suitable for the world of enterprise but those that are and have a great idea shouldn't be left to rot on the dole

The article on the BBC site, an organisation that is far more left wing biased than right wing biased, reckons that we will overtake 2008 this year so it has been a great revival I would compare it more to the 1995 Indy 500, Jacques Villeneuve due to a problem lost 2 laps and was in last place, he overtook much of the field and with great strategy powered ahead of the other drivers and won comfortably The 2 laps down comparison being the UK under Gordon Brown's mismanagement, and the great strategy being Osborne's policies

Instead of creating non jobs with local authorities that Labour will do with other peoples money it is far better to encourage enterprise and encourage more people to start their own businesses, the successful start ups then create jobs The government instead of subsidising people to sweep floors and make tea for local authority workers, should be getting the unemployed to start their own businesses anyone who wants to start a business (subject to meeting certain criteria) a grant of a couple of thousand and the government take a 49.9% stake in these businesses so if they become a success the government has a stake and can get its money back and more

WTF? :rofl: :rofl:

This year the forecasted 2.7% has been revised up to 2.8%, that is strong growth, not as strong as China but still very robust and no Western European county is going to come close to matching that.

Which goes to show you don't need to be an expert to do a good job Osbourne is one of the best chancellors of the last 30 or 40 years, not the most likeable of people and is a very smug twat, but he has transformed our economy into a thriving powerhouse economy, the strongest in Europe this year according to predictions, goods are flying off the retail shelves, jobs are being created like not seen in years, the country has a feelgood factor, the only problem is the stubborn debt but the key to getting that down is increased tax receipts and strong growth so it is a project for the next parliament. But without being an economist Osbourne has turned us into a powerhouse that is the envy of Europe so it shows that you do not need to be a qualified economist to do a good job

There has been several policies such as the affordable house building (something that would cost imho billions) that Ed has said would be paid for out of bankers bonuses and a pensions raid, today he is saying that the jobs thing will be paid for out of it too, i am pretty sure i have missed out another policy too that bankers bonuses were going to fund, i just don't believe that the bankers bonuses and raid on pensions will raise that much money, banks will just pay higher basics and reduce the bonuses, then when Ed realises there is not enough in the pot from pensions to fund these grandiose schemes £150k pensions raid will soon become £100k and then £75k and soon non rich people will be well and truly dragged into it

I have the luxury of not standing for public office though, if i was i would fully expect my financial projections to be subjected to the maximum scrutiny, Ed Balls' figures just don't add up, he needs to be honest and explain where the extra money will come from, he cant keep saying bankers bonuses, he needs to be honest with the public

I do agree with the 'life on benefits will not be an option' bit in principle, welfare should be nothing more than a temporary short term safety net not a way of life, but labour will throw more people onto the dole queues with their anti business and anti enterprise policies if they get in The way to get people off the dole is to have a free market and pro business agenda that leads to employers creating jobs, that means entrepreneurs and would be entrepreneurs being allowed to keep more of their money, there needs to be a heavy cut in the 45p rate of tax, down to as low as 30 or max 35p, this encourages entrepreneurs to start a business Labour will just tax them into oblivion or cause a brain drain

Exactly, its absolutely bizarre, they reckon they are going to fund it out of bankers bonuses and entrepreneurs pensions, complete economic illiteracy, they have promised to fund god knows how many other crackpot ideas out of these same bonuses,they are either shit at finance or are under the assumption that the electorate have the mental age of 10 Plus these jobs don't even add up, they are creating 55,000 or something non jobs, whereas youth unemployment is about 900,000 and spinning it as 'a job for everyone' Bankers bonuses are already taxed at 45% plus NI, and there are only so many bankers in the UK Labour are unfit to govern