vidcapper

Did he? He didn't say 17.4m... <_<

Clearly he could have done more though.

True! I think an 80 majority is a bit more than 'only just'. :mellow:

I and a lot of other people still want it to happen, according to the GE result.

That's OTT - Assange should be more than enough!

Lets do a deal - if the US doesn't extradite her, they don't get Assange! ;)

Didn't Corbyn also go to Private school... :rolleyes:

Just when I think you can't get any more :wacko: , you prove me wrong.

Do you seriously *want* Brexit to fail, and the country to suffer, just to say 'I told you so'??

DELETED

:rolleyes:

Michael, you can attack the Tories all you want, but please don't try to dress up your opinions as 'facts'. It does your credibility no good. :mellow:

Never mind all the non-political stuff the BBC does?

Thank you.

What should happen to it? https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-78...e-hearings.html

57k, 44k, 39k, 48k

Oh, FFS! :no:

So in other words, your definition of a one party state is infinitely flexible so that you can turn it back on the Tories? :rolleyes:

:huh: They told them it *hadn't* been doing the job they wanted it to do!

Nonsense - that would mean Labour in 1997 was also a one party state... :wacko:

And voters responded by holding the HOC to account. :mellow:

Then surely, by definition, it cannot be a 'one party state'...

Wasn't the power of veto a relic from when it had far fewer members?

But this time the Hoc hasn't blocked it...

IMO the whole concept of diplomatic immunity is decidedly iffy.