vidcapper

The Tories held Cheltenham despite the LD's best efforts Conservative Alex Chalk Votes: 28,486 Vote share %: 48.0 Vote share change: +1.3 Liberal Democrat Max Wilkinson Votes: 27,505 Vote share %: 46.3 Vote share change: +4.2 Labour George Penny Votes: 2,921 Vote share %: 4.9 Vote share change: -4.6 Monster Raving Loony Party George Ridgeon Votes: 445 Vote share %: 0.7 Vote share change: +0.7

Just noticed that Tony Blair's old seat of Sedgefield went to the Tories, too. :o

But you'd need to be careful with that - anyone could *claim* to be a party supporter, and make an unregistered donation, just to get the recipient in expenses trouble...

I missed John snow. :P

When was the first secret one? :rolleyes:

The only difference was that you & I were sceptical but wanted to believe them, others the same but *didn't * want to.

I never thought I'd hear you say that , especially as you were so insistent they were 'rigged' to favour the Tories.

Mariah, as my first choice isn't likely

What if it was done as a private citizen who just happened to be a Tory voter? :unsure:

Just noticed, turnout was *down* on 2017 - unexpected, given all the coverage of vast numbers of people signing up. Turnout change figures by age might be interesting though.

Thanks.

Will that show up as an election expense?

A definite 'cry wolf' factor iro the polls - people stopped trusting them, and it turns out they *should* have...

Was it even a tremor? You're going to leave this group to me & Chris, then? :teresa: The election's over, more scaremongering is redundant. +1 Surely having a lot of seats where everyone's vote can make a difference is a good thing? My thoughts too.

You just refused to believe the polls... Only surprise is Scotland - the SNP doing so well. :blink:

I'd search for you on FB if only I know your surname - if you're willing PM me it, or just look *me* up - you know my full name, right?

Fine, believe what you want - we'll know in less than 7 hours...

Yet again - you don't know anything about their methodologies. Also, have you considered the possibility that the narrower polls were the ones that *have* taken account higher youth turnout, thus already showing a best-case scenario for Labour? :unsure:

Not even to hope they could deprive the Tories of an overall majority? BTW, I find stories of long queues confusing - Cheltenham is always well up there in turnout, yet I've never had to queue to vote in my life. Maybe London seats have more voters per polling station? :unsure:

The average of the 7 polls dated 11/12 gives the Tories an 10.5% lead, and none less than 9 - I doubt increased turnout alone can overturn that, especially as your claim that polling companies have not taken that into account, remains unproven.

That you hate the Tories? Well, I can't argue with that! :P

She's sold 50k of her 140k since week 4. Too much! :teresa: It's sold 89.5k.

You posting every single day how you hate the Tories, is simply your opinion, *not* documented 'truth'. :rolleyes:

Does anyone have a hint of whether the suggested high turnout is universal, or just in selected areas?

You see conspiracies everywhere :P