vidcapper

It's not just the LD's... :rolleyes: Just having a last look at the election leaflets, and I noticed that the Green Party one quoted a Tewkesbury Borough Council result for *one* ward, with them winning on just 34% of the vote, using this to try and justify the claim 'we can win in Tewkesbury' despite getting just 2.7% in the GE last time. :rofl:

Just noticed how close this is to the last Yougov MRP one... :thinking:

I wonder if Reddit is less critical of dissenting opinion than Buzzjack? :thinking:

His opinion of what the Tory party was, would be like telling a kid that santa doesn't exist, at least to MM... :P It's also not something that can be resolved *before* the election. :mellow:

Perhaps we can all agree that at least *some* pollsters will have egg on their faces... :mellow: BTW, I can't remember an election where there was so little credence given to the polls. :o

The best poll for Labour just before the 2017 election showed them having a 2% *lead*... Just in case we didn't grasp that the million other times you told us? :rolleyes: Not according to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opinion_polli...eneral_election

Actually, I *can* see what they are, and what they are doing, but even then, still consider them the lesser of two evils. :mellow:

Not through want of trying. Don't worry though, your title of biggest Tory abuser is secure. :)

I thing Boris has got some new competition for 'biggest bullsh1tter'. :heehee:

What *possible* motive could the Russians have? But leaving that aside, surely the election should be about who has the policies that appeal to a greater number of people, rather than who the leaders are, or how the campaign is fought?

Sometimes I think you post so much, just to be the most frequent poster. :unsure:

BTW, what time do you prefer to vote? For me, it is normally as early as possible, but due to the time of year I will wait a little longer, since I don't fancy walking around rush-hour traffic in the dark!

Why am I not surprised that the infamous NHS video may not be what it seems?

You don't have a clue where Chris lives,do you? Clue, it's not in the leafy south!

Such as?

Judging by this thread's poll, Labour views are already more than adequately represented here. :mellow: Certain members of this forum are always complaining about lack of balance in the media, but I don't notice them complaining about the Labour dominance here...

Yougov election centre https://yougov.co.uk/uk-general-election-2019/

News flash, they do pay taxes. :rolleyes: And btw, despite my views, I always post politely (unless attacked), perhaps you could reciprocate?

If you think merely saying 'the end' automatically wins you the argument, you are very much mistaken.

I do not see a contradiction there, as I know there are people who still consider homosexuality a sin (mostly religious types), and clearly *they* would not be bothered by it. That is the *aim*, but no-one whose brain cells can be counted on more than one hand believes it will be a magic cure.

Than it's fortunate that that is not what I was doing. I am not claiming that it is not a homophobic slur, as to do so would be ridiculous - only that I can understand why others would not be so bothered by it. In any case, if everything else in the campaign has not changed people's voting intentions, I severely doubt this alleged comment will.

I notice you didn't dispute my comment about older people being less bothered by its use, though. :mellow:

Oh, very altruistic, planning to forcibly extract *other peoples* money to finance their unrealistic program...

It is *now*, but IMO older voters are less likely to be bothered by its use.

Whereas Labour are so altruistic?