vidcapper

So the Mail never says anything bad about the Tories? :huh: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-76...e-comments.html

What - nationisation? :huh:

Updated

I did a bit of googling, but I cannot find anything which confirms those turnout weightings claimed of Kantar, and there is no source quoted in Dr Sleep's original posting of those figures... :thinking: One thing I hope we all share is a distrust of unsourced figures? :unsure:

Using the left's sacred PC against it! :lol:

I rather watch a test card than a political debate - the former would certainly be more interesting. :P On *current* polling. BTW, what's the betting that Michael gives polls more credibility, the higher % they give to Labour... :teresa: Vetting tends to be cursory for candidates in seats where a party has no chance of winning.

Presumably not MM, or Corbyn would have came out as 'popular' as Kim Jong-un claims to be in North Korea. :rolleyes:

Because some of us aren't as sceptical as you as to their value. ;) I'll be especially interested in the next MORI poll, as that's the one I took part in. :thinking:

Why should I, when he's one of very few here who is on my side?

Posting the same thing twice does not make your argument stronger. :P

How about Donald Trump?

The operative word here is *historical* - like all parties, they have had to evolve over time into a form more acceptable to a mass electorate. Your error is to believe that more than a tiny minority still follow their historical pattern.

If they are delaying the report's release, how on earth can *you* claim to know what is in it? :rolleyes:

Despite getting to the final, Ronnie still needs some more points to be certain of making the Coral series of tournaments. :o I believe he is now 20-something on the one year list. :unsure:

I can't speak for anyone else, but the question I was asked was simply 'Who do intend to vote for in the GE?'. Nothing ambiguous in that.

I wasn't actually requesting *another* example of your obsession. :teresa:

You do realise that this obsession you have about the Tories merely provides us with much amusement, and no-one takes your seriously any more? :rolleyes:

You beat me to that comment. :heehee:

What is the source for Kantar's claimed age weighting - as I simply don't believe they would use such flawed estimates? Also, even if that is the weighting they've been using, to assume other companies must be using similarly flawed assumptions is just... nuts!

Most *everyone* uses mobiles now - it's almost the 2020's. :rolleyes: I wasn't daft enough to give them either my mobile no. or my email address! Well, one out of 7 is pretty pathetic as a guess! :lol: You didn't pick Mariah, which I do like, and you got the name of the Boney M song wrong *again* - it's 'Mary's Boy Child'! I guess with that sort of success rate, you ought to work for a polling company! :rofl:

How is Fantasy Football fake? :huh:

You just f*cked yourself - it wasn't a phone call at all, it was a doorstep interview! :lol:

Are you for real? :wacko:

Err... how on earth could they know what someone's political affiliations were *before* interviewing them? :wacko:

I ask this, because I just have! Specifically, IPSOS/MORI